|
 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.
8 @7 o" R" e3 v+ a
% _3 W8 b& }7 ^5 ~according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.6 O w3 c0 N" [# u! w
5 ~5 Y: ~! q) t, d1 h( _In the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
6 I; r+ L3 O4 p3 l8 x8 w4 tand that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.
* i8 f# v7 V+ \1 A+ f0 W' X) F: f0 _2 `+ H
so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險& z; h5 U1 `; f
: s" U0 C I( [0 z8 G2 oin 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑,
, [0 z3 q. P' F4 W8 cat least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|