|
 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.
& \7 P( l U$ I% ?8 b. I6 i1 J1 y* e- h2 z& X
according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.
/ r5 B; N9 S* e& ^" x3 F8 ]& R
2 j- ]# \: M9 p d# A+ jIn the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
3 x5 U! U0 F3 J8 I; aand that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.; i8 o# o; b9 e) N* M
% B ~* c3 Z/ F& k9 n1 Eso, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險
7 {$ ~+ E: u+ z* b( X" D8 w
6 P& ^/ c0 K9 B4 ~/ Ain 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑,
0 |! Z8 |6 c( r( h- Cat least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|