唔知梁奕侖還可以留在港台工作嗎?

rayyipas

唔知梁奕侖還可以留在港台工作嗎?

oz2

港台ｅ排發生咩事呀?0 X- {6 L6 N, A9 Y) n4 @4 g
之前嗱嗱林貪污,而家又到梁奕侖, W) c, \" {7 h7 U, M1 ?9 @( I
難怪曾特首話要封港台啦!

foto188

Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-7 11:17 PM:
7 p8 j' o) l2 Y' N" V港台ｅ排發生咩事呀?4 I% D! f' ]0 }7 }' W
之前嗱嗱林貪污,而家又到梁奕侖
3 W7 H' @! y, {' N& k/ X: d難怪曾特首話要封港台啦!

8 z! `+ M( X1 m2 h% h

& V2 ?* q: |& U& y特首有講過要封港台嗎？

oz2

Originally posted by foto188 at 2007-11-7 11:25 PM:& z- @  k" }* c: j4 g, n/ L* S

/ L9 [# h3 r: W; R# r+ E( g6 }
7 J, H- t6 n1 V: h) I: S2 w5 ?7 Q. N特首有講過要封港台嗎？

6 e# h8 a% K3 ~- B3 {1 h3 ^
& g0 A$ V( O1 r之前特首講過考慮港台續牌問題

foto188

Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-7 11:36 PM:
: C7 q! g6 r2 I' k4 q, {' T) b/ G* Q) f3 i
! G" F( d, `3 V# W0 g/ ?2 b
之前特首講過考慮港台續牌問題

: o/ B& H1 o+ B8 u- o
! \, J* K- o3 C. B=封港台?

oz2

Originally posted by foto188 at 2007-11-7 11:56 PM:
  W% A; b0 c4 a' E+ k8 S. O/ h% T$ V

1 {, H7 q! W( [& B9 H2 V- D. `=封港台?

3 J" Q+ l7 M" R如他唔續牌給港台,咪變相式封了港台囉(不過唔係直接封姐)

foto188

Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-8 12:06 AM:& X2 _4 ^. K9 T4 C8 F5 P3 I( r

9 @0 [' C( ]7 Q, |& {! Z5 P- c如他唔續牌給港台,咪變相式封了港台囉(不過唔係直接封姐)

% v2 x" J# D; ]8 W  G: c3 |6 `
' \; y2 P+ T2 ?* A: S
"如果"( _, K& G/ s0 _  y

) E! T& e/ d% ~2 [they way you comment is no different from those irresponsible weekly magazines. you cannot make your assumption becomes the fact. that is not a fair statement.

oz2

Originally posted by foto188 at 2007-11-8 12:08 AM:4 c5 {; g( O9 T; l; m! n0 m9 w
5 H0 i0 p6 h$ L# L* r+ G. {) n

; \) z# o) P& x"如果"
7 a3 e, E, [, s" C; {6 ]& j
; `7 }3 I! A" }' ^they way you comment is no different from those irresponsible weekly magazines. you cannot make your assumption becomes the fact. that is not a fair statement.

+ y: }+ n. i8 p想不到一個吹水區變了時事評論區,還要一定100%正確的言論才能發言/ J2 P+ y0 M' M  J# ?% R' b) L+ a
本人英文欠佳,只能用中文回覆,請閣下見諒。, @( H; _+ B3 a
7 ~- N/ X; Y; i7 L. f4 Q* ^$ P3 F
豈不聞[空穴來風,未必無因],之前[頭條新聞]事件徐四民已點名說此節目不當了,曾特首也評論過[十大中文金曲]是否繼續,而且政府在查核港台時也發現財政賬目有問題,加上近日港台員工貪污醜聞不斷,令人們會想政府會否要再次評審港台牌照問題呢?9 X: |9 i) Q! w# s& ]
' W. \3 T/ J7 Z* W$ g3 U( x
當然,以上只是個人的想法意見,並不代表任何人立場。
3 N' t0 b6 R1 ~. b. E0 j3 L. x4 a0 p2 H3 a& s$ Q  I
[ Last edited by oz2 on 2007-11-8 at 12:46 AM ]