|
 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.2 c6 g, D5 f( k M+ n& I5 Y& s
( z5 V& a" r1 y3 c
according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.+ x5 j$ s/ y1 Y1 Q) c% C5 s
" f/ m% s; ^1 r/ W! K) B7 p& p4 f
In the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,, K6 g" v4 n6 A6 i' [+ p( f y# L& U; S
and that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.4 p5 [0 z- x8 T" H9 F( U, P- w3 Z
2 T9 @8 n: r# ~, z/ w% j2 iso, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險
/ ~9 @4 C0 M1 {$ A' ?0 o3 d9 U! _0 o
in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑, ! x2 q+ Z* w! v. I# r$ B2 d1 q) J
at least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|