|
  
- 帖子
- 706
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 316
- 魅力
- 150
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
12#
發表於 2008-10-8 07:03 PM
| 只看該作者
i thought it is the reason of rate of return.; B. f. H( {, ?3 V) r& V; N* ~' J
CDs could have different ratings, AAA -> F," @ q% g0 ~' A4 J- b! T
more risky ones would have higher premium (interest rate) as a compensation for an investment.
x2 b9 i, X9 }# k( Lmain reason why ppl buy those risky CDs is because the rate of return exceeds their internal rate of return,
. Y' @7 e! W ]in other words, the interest rate of that investment > their required interest rate, therefore they invest in those securities.
. P+ B1 g& F: ~& G9 [7 AAlso, fund managers would include risky assets in their portfolio for different purposes, eg efficiency.
+ M! o: @; e, M2 P6 c8 P/ @similar to bonds, CDs trading in the secondary market have different value at different times,
* E) h1 k1 W; r# dnormally the value is calculated by adding it's principle and interest.
1 _( d3 e; T, J8 k+ m* Ceg. the value of the mortgage+the interests to be recieved in the future.
; \+ A5 M: ^0 @3 V* `( U* wbanks who sell the CDs, could enjoy a few benefits like, the present value of cash and passing the risk of holding a debt to another party.' Q% A* k2 z8 d1 y& k
) C9 L8 h: K+ j
im not quite sure if the multiplier effect does really matter in this case.
* Z! J" P! q6 n7 `1 x+ ?in stock market, it's the demand and supply pushing the price up/downwards." Q9 A; e. y: N# i9 o5 m
For eg, A bought 10000 shares @10$ ; B sells 20000 shares to C @ $12,
3 o. w" u( D* [- X% U$ N% {A's shares would suddenly increase to $120000 from $100000 which does not invlove any $ transaction.. p% X3 p# B4 G' N' n# Z
The capital loss that ppl suffer nowadays, i believe, most of them does not really suffer a real $ lost yet as long as they dont sell their securities.
: D0 D4 D+ J, \5 Lbut the value of their assets did really drop significantly.7 S, o1 R( t- v! q, U
( A1 Y( m* e% j( O) z4 [
[ 本帖最後由 Kev 於 2008-10-8 07:26 PM 編輯 ] |
|