|
  
- 帖子
- 706
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 316
- 魅力
- 150
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
12#
發表於 2008-10-8 07:03 PM
| 只看該作者
i thought it is the reason of rate of return.
3 o0 p9 |7 d+ V9 g c( x1 ?CDs could have different ratings, AAA -> F,5 w2 F6 M9 Q+ J" @) L. b0 x- j1 T
more risky ones would have higher premium (interest rate) as a compensation for an investment.3 A' `& E3 N5 f* R/ R+ m- a
main reason why ppl buy those risky CDs is because the rate of return exceeds their internal rate of return,; M5 D9 B ~3 r. L' _$ c W# X( j
in other words, the interest rate of that investment > their required interest rate, therefore they invest in those securities.8 {' _. F% k4 ~/ T
Also, fund managers would include risky assets in their portfolio for different purposes, eg efficiency.
: c- V* N9 a, _7 nsimilar to bonds, CDs trading in the secondary market have different value at different times,* \: G! \+ N# y( r
normally the value is calculated by adding it's principle and interest. * @4 G, O% [# o8 A7 U, ]
eg. the value of the mortgage+the interests to be recieved in the future.
+ v; V; N3 s, d7 z5 y# s Obanks who sell the CDs, could enjoy a few benefits like, the present value of cash and passing the risk of holding a debt to another party./ u6 n% r) G0 Z F: F
5 A! g$ d" o! k1 h! s/ t$ }
im not quite sure if the multiplier effect does really matter in this case.% S1 b9 B3 C- w3 u2 A' C- a7 }0 D
in stock market, it's the demand and supply pushing the price up/downwards.
, j, z8 ^8 ?! x/ bFor eg, A bought 10000 shares @10$ ; B sells 20000 shares to C @ $12,2 F! _" _6 \' Z9 x/ Y p
A's shares would suddenly increase to $120000 from $100000 which does not invlove any $ transaction.
5 t% P: \! C# o& P( x( pThe capital loss that ppl suffer nowadays, i believe, most of them does not really suffer a real $ lost yet as long as they dont sell their securities. # h( R5 d5 o5 M* q9 C0 @4 E
but the value of their assets did really drop significantly.# l. m' a, Q& f* i1 \8 z
# F7 x3 O- r+ h
[ 本帖最後由 Kev 於 2008-10-8 07:26 PM 編輯 ] |
|