|
 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.
$ \6 Q- y4 j8 k0 y+ ?. X: h& [
. i& N! o" N. Q% q& r* R) q+ `2 paccording to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.7 c) W" g# w: {+ F# z+ h( U
; V `; ]6 @( z/ n0 ~$ y; O0 V6 QIn the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
# C9 [9 ^* s" D& g0 s3 vand that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.' O5 `" d/ V# N7 f4 w2 n
7 ]2 U3 I4 t. [8 c) J0 C% h( Z
so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險% u; B2 l& m& l' Z5 @6 a) b
$ l! Q9 |3 O' c( }1 u" Pin 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑, ' Y0 |* j" }8 O Q- ]5 t+ P- a: O
at least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|