|
 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct." x- T- ^4 `' c7 z
0 h( s) K& k" [3 N! F6 M
according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.
# B. h- ^: I8 ?/ U. X# F+ S: c3 `: [1 z" Z O; _5 B
In the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
' H. ^5 }( D0 L# F0 qand that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him./ [5 R0 _& p' g4 a2 l; J
" m0 c- U5 q+ k
so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險
" p! A' ^, V2 r- l. h6 @
/ ]7 c3 w! M i. |in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑,
+ M3 u1 I, e0 K6 n* i% ~. Yat least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|