data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/542f4/542f47c4550d4010d126cb026f7a55ee01137643" alt="Rank: 6" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/542f4/542f47c4550d4010d126cb026f7a55ee01137643" alt="Rank: 6" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/542f4/542f47c4550d4010d126cb026f7a55ee01137643" alt="Rank: 6" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/542f4/542f47c4550d4010d126cb026f7a55ee01137643" alt="Rank: 6" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/542f4/542f47c4550d4010d126cb026f7a55ee01137643" alt="Rank: 6" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/542f4/542f47c4550d4010d126cb026f7a55ee01137643" alt="Rank: 6"
- 帖子
- 24451
- 精華
- 93
- 威望
- 10195
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
15#
發表於 2006-7-7 06:44 AM
| 只看該作者
Originally posted by 奇 at 2006-7-7 05:10 AM:
02細哨得22歲,佢對英格蘭已經有場經典作!!!!
況且98法國有主場之利,就好似今屆德國
你好似覺得98奪冠完全係靠施丹,對克羅地亞最後無杜林救命法國一定入決賽?
如果球王定義係要決賽先有好表現,咁告魯夫&90年既馬勒當拿已經稱唔上球王
或者要挑剔既只係細哨狀態唔穩定,唔可以keep住data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5c3eb/5c3eb8e8254ccc10f52a4821eb763de97adceef4" alt=""
兩個都有神來之筆,只係施丹係決賽出現,細哨對車仔﹑ac先黎料 我唔係覺得98奪冠係完全靠施丹, 我係想講佢係果時已經好勁,
細哨今時今日都好勁, 細哨既腳法好好, 技術好全面, 其實都幾乎係球王了,
細哨上屆世盃對英格蘭果球雖然都算係經典, 但我就覺得經典程度不及施丹果d囉
睇返施丹今屆世盃既表現, 施丹係歐聯決賽致勝既一腳, 似乎比細哨既更重要喎
如果球王定義係要決賽先有好表現,咁告魯夫&90年既馬勒當拿已經稱唔上球王<~每個人對球王既定義總會有d唔同, 我就覺得細哨暫時仲未係球王, 經典之作唔夠說服力, 狀態又唔可以長期keep住data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5c3eb/5c3eb8e8254ccc10f52a4821eb763de97adceef4" alt=""
我自己就覺得細哨仲未有球王果種風範.........data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5c3eb/5c3eb8e8254ccc10f52a4821eb763de97adceef4" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33e10/33e105714e6b81f3391f6b0277f3cebd770034fd" alt="" |
摺吧啦data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/baa7b/baa7b13508cd2f265972396777a67717a7be367e" alt="" |
|