YUEN_LOUIS

Originally posted by singleung1956 at 2006-7-12 10:02 PM:
咁我依家  除哂你地老婆D衫得唔得

chicken

No reverse.
It is because defender mind is different than attacker mind.
Defender sent off is mostly caused by professional defensive foul or direct violent challenge.
Attacker sent off is mostly caused by violent revenge like Rooney, Zidane, Beckham...

[ Last edited by chicken on 2006-7-12 at 10:15 PM ]

getpaidz

Originally posted by MaxFigo at 2006-7-12 09:31 PM:



咁咪係唔夠客觀lo....
難道你認為咁樣去維護一個人係岩？？

當然不夠客觀,所以沒有錯, 這叫做先入為主。

[ Last edited by getpaidz on 2006-7-12 at 11:13 PM ]

getpaidz

Originally posted by Kian76 at 2006-7-12 09:49 PM:


佢殺左人我驚你都會支持佢。

你會首先去嘗試相信這個人, 所以沒有錯, 這叫做先入為主。

MaxFigo

Originally posted by getpaidz at 2006-7-12 11:07 PM:


當然不夠客觀,所以沒有錯, 這叫做先入為主。

[ Last edited by getpaidz on 2006-7-12 at 11:13 PM ]

問題係...先入為主已經係錯

Horowitz

Originally posted by getpaidz at 2006-7-12 11:07 PM:


當然不夠客觀,所以沒有錯, 這叫做先入為主。

[ Last edited by getpaidz on 2006-7-12 at 11:13 PM ]

"當然不夠客觀,所以沒有錯"

簡直係強詞奪理

Horowitz

Originally posted by getpaidz at 2006-7-12 11:10 PM:


你會首先去嘗試相信這個人, 所以沒有錯, 這叫做先入為主。

嘗試相信?
若果有片段証明呢?

iknow

點都係打人先果個差D GALA,冇話分邊個邊個

austin666

其實大家都係馬後炮
場波直播時只影到
馬仔ＵＰ左Ｄ野
之後Ｃ丹頂佢

根本冇人清楚成件事
唔講Ｃ丹之前點對馬仔
大家連馬仔講乜都未清楚
更何況之前Ｃ丹做過乜
好似連片都冇
咁都好難怪任何一方面的人

始終成件事只有佢２人最清楚
其實大家都係估估吓
就算Ｃ丹陣間０２：００ＡＭ講果Ｄ野
都唔可以盡信
咁當然馬仔講果Ｄ都只有Ｃ丹先知真假啦

[ Last edited by austin666 on 2006-7-12 at 11:59 PM ]

Kian76

Originally posted by Horowitz at 2006-7-12 11:23 PM:



嘗試相信?
若果有片段証明呢?

若你認為出手打人先既人係冇錯，俾人打既人係有錯，可能你真係冇錯，但我諗你唔適合呢個世界生存，呢個世界都錯，得你正確。