harvey22

Originally posted by toro at 2007-5-7 07:16 AM:
今朝太陽對馬刺，未睇場波但知道賽果，太陽先失一局。
其實呢個對賽係兩種唔同打法?一場對抗：Run & Gun對陣地戰
陣地戰控制全盤比賽節奏無疑係好過Run & Gun
究竟將Run & Gun發揮到呢個地步?太陽能唔能夠戰勝馬刺？
大家有咩睇法？
有睇場波?兄弟可否分析下點解太陽會輸呢一場？

I am not sure how Run & Gun 對 陣地戰 goes, but the fact that suns playmaker was out of the game for the last few mins, the spurs dun have to defend that pick & roll and can easily focus and double AMAR when he got the ball~

On defense suns close down the lane to prevent TP diving to the hoop but he was able to knock down most mid range jumpers!

And btw no teams run & gun in the 4th Q, most plays are half court sets in the 4th~

我愛章小慧

Originally posted by toro at 2007-5-8 01:45 AM:

做低nash一個，贏左一半，化算化算

傻拉 , 其實太陽根本輸硬 , 唸下 , 柏車仔身嬌肉貴 , 家有嬌妻 , 比你搏唔搏???

toro

Originally posted by 我愛章小慧 at 2007-5-8 01:52 AM:

傻拉 , 其實太陽根本輸硬 , 唸下 , 柏車仔身嬌肉貴 , 家有嬌妻 , 比你搏唔搏???

難道我nash就唔身嬌肉貴咯噃？！（）

atimsi

想问下各位，世界锦标赛果阵美国队输给什么队？
太阳对住马刺，就好像梦七对住希腊甘！
马刺最犀利同人斗防守，打阵地，拖慢晒D节奏!
太阳的速度上不去，点样Run and Gun?
相反，马刺专门打内外结合~
太阳衰硬！

alhambra

打波有時係格食格嘅, 加上spurs d 球員嘅playoff經驗太好啦

atimsi

Originally posted by alhambra at 2007-5-9 12:15 AM:
打波有時係格食格嘅, 加上spurs d 球員嘅playoff經驗太好啦

同意！！！

Shaqleung

suns呢兩年常規賽成績好,都已經惹左好多人討論究竟run and gun可唔可以係季後賽大發光芒.....

如果要將太陽同馬刺比,顯得有點比下去...馬刺真係好犀利,快慢皆宜....講隊型,我覺得聯盟得活塞同小馬有得同佢地比....

太陽既內線強,係呢方面絕對著數好多.只不過a米進攻板斧唔多夠...無背籃攻,加埋shawn marion又係,感覺上差左少少.

run and gun既戰術點解難係季後賽出位係因為,戰術中心係要快,變左相對上防守要減少犯規,令到個tempo唔好停咁去.但係季後賽既主題就係防守.近廿年只靠進攻而贏冠軍既球隊...湖人係最接近果隊. 當球隊加強防守,自然無咁易俾你地打快攻,變相太陽要靠好既防守去換快攻機會....但係並唔係佢地強項........

而且唔願去犯規,等於放生馬刺.td,bowen仲有parker既罰球命中率七成左右.犯佢地都係好既方法去追分.

今年太陽已經刻意係常規賽嘗試用呢d方法去抗衡馬刺.結果係......a米犯規纏身, 陣地戰射手射唔出手感,防守內外都有漏洞.

尋日第二場,終於嘗試搵kurt thomas正選落場mark td,俾a米專注進攻,事實證明都有一d效用.至少隊波係每方面平衡些少.即管睇下d'antoni點樣係快攻同陣地戰取得平衡.