data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/542f4/542f47c4550d4010d126cb026f7a55ee01137643" alt="Rank: 5" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/542f4/542f47c4550d4010d126cb026f7a55ee01137643" alt="Rank: 5" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/542f4/542f47c4550d4010d126cb026f7a55ee01137643" alt="Rank: 5" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/542f4/542f47c4550d4010d126cb026f7a55ee01137643" alt="Rank: 5" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/542f4/542f47c4550d4010d126cb026f7a55ee01137643" alt="Rank: 5"
- 帖子
- 2960
- 精華
- 4
- 威望
- 1369
- 魅力
- 844
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
8#
發表於 2007-11-8 12:44 AM
| 只看該作者
Originally posted by foto188 at 2007-11-8 12:08 AM:& w: d. O2 I1 p. P" @ Y
7 ?7 Z" f5 O" i+ R, b
, e3 P/ _& j1 q4 D% k: ~; O"如果"
2 |; D( y, ^5 M3 C
" ~1 R& Z, C) `! k: D |" ethey way you comment is no different from those irresponsible weekly magazines. you cannot make your assumption becomes the fact. that is not a fair statement. 2 @* w' g2 S" r; V3 r2 G
想不到一個吹水區變了時事評論區,還要一定100%正確的言論才能發言
4 @5 H: H6 y- q, x7 q本人英文欠佳,只能用中文回覆,請閣下見諒。
$ X' y' b" _1 s. P
% Z+ y! f: B, k: S2 B豈不聞[空穴來風,未必無因],之前[頭條新聞]事件徐四民已點名說此節目不當了,曾特首也評論過[十大中文金曲]是否繼續,而且政府在查核港台時也發現財政賬目有問題,加上近日港台員工貪污醜聞不斷,令人們會想政府會否要再次評審港台牌照問題呢?7 z1 E; \: Y. d; ?! [
( u" y2 z5 {, r% I X當然,以上只是個人的想法意見,並不代表任何人立場。
4 U8 N3 P6 I! Q# H( \$ M" I" g
# ?2 R- q" u9 q6 D: |* C[ Last edited by oz2 on 2007-11-8 at 12:46 AM ] |
|