痛快!進攻足球的勝利!

AshleyCole

荷蘭今日表現堪稱完美!
強勢的中前場!
賞心悅目的比賽!
本以為今場有意大利，又會變成一場死龜、鐵桶戰!
估唔到賽前俾人睇低ge荷蘭會俾人咁大驚喜!
好耐冇睇過咁暢快ge進攻足球!
荷蘭抵讚!

奇

荷蘭進攻一向有計,不過意大利第一球唔抵,明明越位...

donald15

Originally posted by 奇 at 2008-6-10 04:54 AM:
荷蘭進攻一向有計,不過意大利第一球唔抵,明明越位...

可以話係離譜
呢組球證之後應該唔會見到啦

pc20001103b

聽講扑左出底線外既球員都算包左越位

arthur8088

Originally posted by pc20001103b at 2008-6-10 09:41:
聽講扑左出底線外既球員都算包左越位

this would only happen if the player has intention to walk off the pitch or not coming back
but Panuuci was lying outside because of injury~~

Edgar_Davids

Originally posted by arthur8088 at 10-6-2008 09:52:

this would only happen if the player has intention to walk off the pitch or not coming back
but Panuuci was lying outside because of injury~~

The problem is Panucci was punched by his teammate Buffon...
It must be no fouls, it mustn't be any permissions from the referees and linesmans to leave the field either...

PS: I've PM Bright for professional reply....

[ Last edited by Edgar_Davids on 2008-6-10 at 10:19 AM ]

brightlee

i will answer this question tonight..... after I watch the video....

woooot

I thought it was offside at 1st, but maybe not later.

someone was mentioning about the Fifa rule book or law 11.11 DEFENDER LEGALLY OFF THE FIELD OF PLAY A defender who leaves the field during the course of play and does not immediately return must still be considered in determining where the second to last defender is for the purpose of judging which attackers are in an offside position. Such a defender is considered to be on the touchline or goal line closest to his off-field position. A defender who leaves the field with the referee's permission (and who thus requires the referee's permission to return) is not included in determining offside position.

I think the Itailian defender was actually pushed off the pitch by his own keeper too and (maybe injured in the process a little), but I guess it's still not under the permission of the referee and so counted still as the last man.

[ Last edited by Edgar_Davids on 2008-6-10 at 10:34 AM ]

Edgar_Davids

各大體育新聞網站對雲尼斯達萊入球的意見


[quote]

Skysports:

"There were substantial protests as Italy believed the striker was offside, but the goal was allowed to stand - seemingly because of the presence of Christian Panucci, who was lying behind the goal line throughout."


Satanta:

"The Real Madrid striker was at least two yards offside when he tapped home inside the six-yard box. The linesman may have believed Christian Panucci played him onside but the felled Roma defender was clearly off the field of play when Sneijder struck the ball back into the danger area."


BBC:

"Van Nistelrooy had better luck when he gave the Dutch the lead in hugely questionable circumstances after 26 minutes, standing in what looked like an offside position when he steered Sneijder's shot past Buffon."


ESPN:

"Striker Van Nistelrooy was clearly in an offside position when he turned in a shot from Sneijder, who was celebrating his 24th birthday, after 26 minutes.
Despite vehement Italian protests to the linesman, Swedish referee Peter Frojdfeldt ignored their calls to the delight of the vast swathes of orange-clad Dutch fans in the stadium."


Daily Mail:

"Former Manchester United striker Ruud van Nistelrooy gave the Dutch the lead in controversial circumstances after 26 minutes when he scored from close range - but also from an offside position."

[/quote]

[ Last edited by Edgar_Davids on 2008-6-10 at 10:40 AM ]

woooot

Originally posted by Edgar_Davids at 2008-6-10 10:33 AM:


I finally understand what you're doing....

[ Last edited by Edgar_Davids on 2008-6-10 at 10:35 AM ]

lol, you said reply and I did it 'literally' but wanted to edit but the browser hanged at that time, so you edited first