|
  
- 帖子
- 706
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 316
- 魅力
- 150
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
12#
發表於 2008-10-8 07:03 PM
| 只看該作者
i thought it is the reason of rate of return.
, \. r+ _8 Y; u. z% eCDs could have different ratings, AAA -> F,) X) T2 l2 s- U% [6 H- y9 A
more risky ones would have higher premium (interest rate) as a compensation for an investment.6 e; Q+ M$ v8 o0 V/ T) H
main reason why ppl buy those risky CDs is because the rate of return exceeds their internal rate of return,7 C4 t5 ~* p- x; {; L
in other words, the interest rate of that investment > their required interest rate, therefore they invest in those securities.
: g1 p' @" x: p2 r# `; C9 JAlso, fund managers would include risky assets in their portfolio for different purposes, eg efficiency.5 O- |& V2 a2 V3 z7 r
similar to bonds, CDs trading in the secondary market have different value at different times,+ t6 H' S1 P, I/ H
normally the value is calculated by adding it's principle and interest.
1 } M4 y# n2 `: veg. the value of the mortgage+the interests to be recieved in the future.
; L( I6 @& a! g0 Ebanks who sell the CDs, could enjoy a few benefits like, the present value of cash and passing the risk of holding a debt to another party.3 A4 A, D t; m% s4 c
' b. ^& z0 ]# v% A5 Yim not quite sure if the multiplier effect does really matter in this case.# L# {0 m$ L9 ~! [! `
in stock market, it's the demand and supply pushing the price up/downwards.. [* s, _% { U0 A
For eg, A bought 10000 shares @10$ ; B sells 20000 shares to C @ $12,
& U9 Z3 c3 a4 ]3 xA's shares would suddenly increase to $120000 from $100000 which does not invlove any $ transaction.
3 A8 H( {/ Y q3 f/ G+ f- TThe capital loss that ppl suffer nowadays, i believe, most of them does not really suffer a real $ lost yet as long as they dont sell their securities. ' M; |" Y2 v: ~3 q
but the value of their assets did really drop significantly.
! ~7 \( W* P% K0 _! ~" \# T% L j, ]: ^
[ 本帖最後由 Kev 於 2008-10-8 07:26 PM 編輯 ] |
|