|
  
- 帖子
- 706
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 316
- 魅力
- 150
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
12#
發表於 2008-10-8 07:03 PM
| 只看該作者
i thought it is the reason of rate of return.6 w) C% k4 b$ f! n1 b. N" v7 G
CDs could have different ratings, AAA -> F,+ F! @, x. T6 c
more risky ones would have higher premium (interest rate) as a compensation for an investment.
' \( [ g" I2 d- lmain reason why ppl buy those risky CDs is because the rate of return exceeds their internal rate of return,9 {* v3 ^6 p) ]: k: n
in other words, the interest rate of that investment > their required interest rate, therefore they invest in those securities.
. K. d# I, b, E5 nAlso, fund managers would include risky assets in their portfolio for different purposes, eg efficiency.* O$ p/ k( I( {+ r
similar to bonds, CDs trading in the secondary market have different value at different times,
4 w# |5 |5 F6 W1 L0 Cnormally the value is calculated by adding it's principle and interest. 0 X, q4 w _; l% p8 ^ u/ t
eg. the value of the mortgage+the interests to be recieved in the future. 3 B& W2 ]) i6 \9 P7 d
banks who sell the CDs, could enjoy a few benefits like, the present value of cash and passing the risk of holding a debt to another party.
7 L5 h' w, ~/ P0 B; U! T, t; K( f. F. j% N8 ] d0 e+ g5 j# {
im not quite sure if the multiplier effect does really matter in this case.
7 _. d6 V- Z6 s* P7 D M8 H8 T& Xin stock market, it's the demand and supply pushing the price up/downwards.
5 A" d6 K( g- W) B. {. E( CFor eg, A bought 10000 shares @10$ ; B sells 20000 shares to C @ $12,* [6 |9 o2 U* T4 R8 e: z C
A's shares would suddenly increase to $120000 from $100000 which does not invlove any $ transaction.
. S1 T8 J. H a9 [The capital loss that ppl suffer nowadays, i believe, most of them does not really suffer a real $ lost yet as long as they dont sell their securities. 7 c g& @$ J7 l" l3 @" ~* ^
but the value of their assets did really drop significantly.0 u3 S# U4 S0 i8 A1 Z* I
1 Q; S# O+ D# \& b[ 本帖最後由 Kev 於 2008-10-8 07:26 PM 編輯 ] |
|