|
  
- 帖子
- 706
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 316
- 魅力
- 150
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
12#
發表於 2008-10-8 07:03 PM
| 只看該作者
i thought it is the reason of rate of return.1 P8 Q2 x1 J y5 O" {0 M- f; r& ~
CDs could have different ratings, AAA -> F,/ U" z% l- d% s& F+ `
more risky ones would have higher premium (interest rate) as a compensation for an investment.
; B& q9 H0 z# I3 amain reason why ppl buy those risky CDs is because the rate of return exceeds their internal rate of return,, A0 q f0 M7 y3 w6 g# l
in other words, the interest rate of that investment > their required interest rate, therefore they invest in those securities.
. M) Z5 u3 x; @$ B3 uAlso, fund managers would include risky assets in their portfolio for different purposes, eg efficiency.2 Q( U& l' `7 t( j9 b7 u
similar to bonds, CDs trading in the secondary market have different value at different times,9 f1 m$ Q6 k$ n& ~
normally the value is calculated by adding it's principle and interest.
, I. X7 s' e' i! [$ J- geg. the value of the mortgage+the interests to be recieved in the future. ! x+ N- M$ v0 i9 d, p# k
banks who sell the CDs, could enjoy a few benefits like, the present value of cash and passing the risk of holding a debt to another party.+ a' o: ]% |# N! Q1 v$ C; v& j G$ x
8 Z9 u6 J& ?; l# N$ kim not quite sure if the multiplier effect does really matter in this case.
1 v* N; P* z% V9 b. din stock market, it's the demand and supply pushing the price up/downwards.
( x0 z. s3 |- H, H4 D) uFor eg, A bought 10000 shares @10$ ; B sells 20000 shares to C @ $12,
- M- e: q& z2 M OA's shares would suddenly increase to $120000 from $100000 which does not invlove any $ transaction.5 Q+ k- A: v4 A3 O0 S. {
The capital loss that ppl suffer nowadays, i believe, most of them does not really suffer a real $ lost yet as long as they dont sell their securities. 6 V$ g. w! H4 A+ t& k0 \
but the value of their assets did really drop significantly.
?+ T* X3 o5 h4 U8 e
" q0 n8 C* D) ]6 S, @; m. i[ 本帖最後由 Kev 於 2008-10-8 07:26 PM 編輯 ] |
|