 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.
, H4 h% i0 @- x9 h( ?: {4 j' m1 z* U% k; E: C" Y) v
according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.8 G! z+ M' L1 p3 P
, H5 v- j; y* y% z: x. a1 T) V. r& P: s
In the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,( h' u3 H; P2 H( z9 P9 q
and that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.- z) q! q) w$ v: b2 r! O9 Q8 S
: r# R" t+ ?: d) i# i3 J, a4 ~% _: p
so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險$ {# z: @' d( U) X. b+ L6 x
% U# C2 n- x9 w- R# c
in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑, : [0 X2 w: ^7 ?/ K4 H& p8 G
at least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|