 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.
0 X' A1 Z; x X# A- h% m
2 q: K% R, p) m! ]5 X" D3 baccording to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.
4 U7 j. u; p$ T0 b: |2 \3 }% v8 A% G; z' {/ ^
In the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,4 v, y5 j- w5 d" X, @0 @
and that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.
0 y, W. `6 {; X+ N0 v7 }% B4 G0 T; ~1 m* i8 ~6 e* @
so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險" f2 q$ _6 w4 B: R% P4 g
" P8 L% J4 R4 @# e9 K8 l
in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑,
) _2 _8 t7 w. mat least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|