 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.- @ e) Q' f& `' o8 y8 ~
7 I3 O( k$ `( ~
according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.
$ m% e' ?2 z' j: [) @, T3 K) H5 g1 R1 w/ C, J' Q
In the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
- ~2 e, s# u) [0 \4 mand that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.
7 q/ r5 V! [2 ?" H8 i! u y
i, Z" C: o) [0 S8 v0 W/ }so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險, y0 E& b+ G5 Q' p, H! o I
0 O" W$ i( y- U5 p! f3 J% C& Iin 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑, ! ~. f# j- h$ \% ]' W5 Q; S0 o1 d
at least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|