- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.8 \. ^. G3 K* Q/ ~6 K
% K* V, j# n, Q" _, _* h
according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.
8 N/ `; g7 M7 ~0 L2 j
& f, y+ J) T2 y; KIn the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
e! `* V) {2 R Dand that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.
* F2 Z1 s! g8 y1 c! N* [9 d
( Z" ~8 t& z- d2 G1 U2 [! Dso, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險
: u! f9 e! t& V1 g( ]
" {' ~$ C% b8 I Ain 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑,
& I: E9 }+ d# q5 l/ B5 I$ Cat least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|