|
 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.
- i. _& L* ?+ A7 |% ^$ s' G) M1 {2 R" C
according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.
3 t9 Y+ }" e" b- B- `/ U5 v6 S+ d U8 u; e+ K
In the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,! n" f5 G P5 O7 {# s
and that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.
H Z2 g: C4 q3 M8 W/ o d- w# g8 U* ]9 ^
so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險
: `- ^& R0 k4 P U2 {+ R
7 M/ B( @0 T" }% S8 ain 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑,
% l7 }* o! Y2 E7 x" ]. gat least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|