|
 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.- v1 w9 [+ a; w
1 K5 {: ~5 x6 f$ X! W8 saccording to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.
- g+ [6 C. H4 b7 _) k/ B5 e
( g7 u! N& k" F3 qIn the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,: Z) a! w7 z3 m. B+ r& P, f2 `
and that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.
0 y @8 t! C: m1 ^& I6 ]% |0 Z$ ~: l; N, Z# v8 ^; A
so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險" A$ S; [' f' I# M- q
* Z" |- [( g+ S( v+ b$ ~in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑,
! Y/ A6 d" H) Z; q, s# O4 Yat least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|