 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.. N: h$ R- D/ T. _- @
8 m1 j+ u z' K+ l7 Q" y) daccording to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.
$ d: p0 T: z9 F' h/ m3 f y O/ z0 ~9 B# G
In the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
8 `3 n2 G% w- ?/ Sand that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.
# c, u0 w' v5 K& B! G/ Q( B
% j1 q3 W# D8 \% x6 d% G( \! Lso, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險
2 U- q6 g( B4 }
" H. a- Q. \% Y: K3 c! [4 Ein 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑,
8 h- h4 `2 F- u' y; wat least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|