- 帖子
- 6683
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 10274
- 魅力
- 5
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
11#
發表於 2005-4-23 03:42 PM
| 只看該作者
You guys are looking at very academic factors
0 Y; C9 s, |: L3 Y1 T/ IThe ideal Hong Kong can be very simply. / f7 F- {( [/ f
Just think about the thing around you and you thing you are most interested
0 ~ c% ^. V1 c! G4 XWhat government, world city are too unreal to me, ~! g+ F/ `; |( C* ?
Everyone got a different ideal Hong Kong in mind
! f) h. _4 ?; E' AI have stayed in Australia for many years and my girlfriend is Japanese q6 z3 h* W v; h
So it's hardly to avoid comparing Hong Kong, Japan and Australia
4 X3 B# A4 v4 z% T* W& t; g
! D- D! i& u/ |% Y6 RFirst of all, Hong Kong is famous for shopping, becuase the selling is extremely low" U( t# I8 f: O: I
However, the style and quality are must worse than Japan." d4 g+ z2 d5 K
My ideal Hong Kong is keeping low selling price but improve quality and style of the goods and service. This is very very hard to achieve.
" _/ n& s' b0 x' ]But that is ok, we are just talking ideal. Ideal doesn't have to be achievable
& ], g8 p6 D- kSecondly, the Salary are very high in Japan. High salary improve stardard of living# X# b; I O! _% ~ J4 p6 Y" Q) `
So, people eat better, wear better, and even go for treavel! D; N: D+ ^% X+ s; @
Thridly, Australia has huge area of land, hardly any to see buildings,$ o8 Y) ?: }7 [8 M K5 `
People are living a house. A house is hardly any to see in HK.
2 A; y. K+ p9 h! _+ uMy ideal Hong Kong is more land, more house
* m9 B0 I" z/ ?$ B
$ \2 k, h& {( ^3 _0 ~5 MAll other thing between people, I respect this is unique Hong Kong cultue
" b1 r! x; ]# g6 @In my ideal Hong Kong, the attitude are still the same, such as MK style.' {8 p* U1 w- }+ |7 ^
I'm not laughing at MK. Sorry about that
$ y1 V% }& ]* e; U( L
7 Y7 u% L( L+ j Q7 XLastly, I don't wanna see too many Chinese in Hong Kong
7 \( J. |1 K O" i: g9 j5 LI see all Chinese as foreigner. I know Hong Kong is a Chinese city/ Q* ` m7 w1 l, W; `
But in my ideal Hong Kong, Hong Kong must be the most population( U! p# u- W1 Y8 ^$ N; @2 |8 d
6 t- N2 e S: N) f. v+ A
Isn't it very simply!? |
|