- 帖子
- 6683
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 10274
- 魅力
- 5
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
11#
發表於 2005-4-23 03:42 PM
| 只看該作者
You guys are looking at very academic factors c2 X5 D5 w7 O5 L# t+ j2 c. p/ b
The ideal Hong Kong can be very simply.
/ R# a, o6 U) q; wJust think about the thing around you and you thing you are most interested
/ j, N/ ^' g; KWhat government, world city are too unreal to me
5 t0 c6 W3 ]4 A/ I9 T" d3 o$ LEveryone got a different ideal Hong Kong in mind
, Z# _- o) m: t+ ?3 ZI have stayed in Australia for many years and my girlfriend is Japanese! q, l0 B1 @2 Q. t4 e5 b3 R( m
So it's hardly to avoid comparing Hong Kong, Japan and Australia1 M) C* S* o$ `; ^+ _) l, v" U
. `6 K+ |/ h" |
First of all, Hong Kong is famous for shopping, becuase the selling is extremely low% g; O# }5 W* L$ c
However, the style and quality are must worse than Japan.
' a$ L2 y5 q7 L$ j& cMy ideal Hong Kong is keeping low selling price but improve quality and style of the goods and service. This is very very hard to achieve., q( d) W. o% A7 R
But that is ok, we are just talking ideal. Ideal doesn't have to be achievable% E) q4 h* ^7 V+ H
Secondly, the Salary are very high in Japan. High salary improve stardard of living( B4 @5 `6 h+ F2 S7 p4 N/ `1 C
So, people eat better, wear better, and even go for treavel& b' ~! _# @7 n
Thridly, Australia has huge area of land, hardly any to see buildings,4 ]4 b [; y6 E' C8 ?- _, N
People are living a house. A house is hardly any to see in HK. ( f ]8 H) J2 A
My ideal Hong Kong is more land, more house
) l1 @6 g1 {) ?0 [$ Y4 W
+ Y! w4 U- r, D2 I) S6 o# E* dAll other thing between people, I respect this is unique Hong Kong cultue/ }$ | [8 a* }/ N
In my ideal Hong Kong, the attitude are still the same, such as MK style.
1 V0 N6 F& d+ AI'm not laughing at MK. Sorry about that# |' s- a; D+ K$ v$ ^! s" ^
}7 U- M& r& `- y. YLastly, I don't wanna see too many Chinese in Hong Kong
2 M& _0 e5 P3 E* mI see all Chinese as foreigner. I know Hong Kong is a Chinese city4 ^7 V2 p4 j! J/ e8 U
But in my ideal Hong Kong, Hong Kong must be the most population
0 [4 N, [( f& b# z% d1 b. K* `/ x8 d
Isn't it very simply!? |
|