Rika

由最好排到最壞
9 w) z" z! g) j% f! V6 J7 E7 p% ?F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong8 ~" |) h8 C1 ]7 r* n( T
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
  ~' x# _% {" fS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her2 v: m+ E: }. [- W$ G, e# `
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
( t+ G2 E0 `: M+ o- l* s1 `3 |; R# Z  VL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
- W- @5 `4 e% V5 k
" d3 t9 Q! {! g- b/ p) e: AM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
0 \7 W* T1 p: r- _3 l+ _$ T1 j, G4 K6 }
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
0 s  ?: Z+ `! [6 u( o8 N% @3 c6 d     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!% s0 a$ P# `4 a" d! E1 @# a
7 M* z1 Q& {! R; \7 P
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做$ W$ ?/ ^. a+ H

/ {7 I) M" `& SL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志! q, j* x8 }7 [- S

3 {& _* U2 m1 L& ]% @F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,! f2 c1 C/ Z# O1 p
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好' I* `. s' \" L7 x" x0 ]

/ o2 O1 R/ g+ S[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
! O) C* k3 j: s8 F9 _9 i% d4 O而家答多次
+ s3 n0 y% t, \0 _9 k" w# F5 \; @f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
  r) ]0 x) G9 f* L5 p2 [l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
. y1 {; x# @  @. B! @7 Kb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢( J( g9 K3 ^, W4 t- V0 e
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.; K# Q  H2 }: c% ?3 L% q) l
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
# O7 Z6 ^7 r3 R' a- o& Z' W* e( q" f' O& V$ G: J# e# y
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大* B. @" t: c- h( p! z3 x
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度) ~6 D) |6 |' }3 Y2 K, P
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒+ ^2 j6 `1 A$ e- t) Z
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢* l# G% u. \' O: T& a4 _
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
2 K3 k  J+ t9 E* L# X$ oF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
( K, [7 m$ {! H+ l8 TS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取8 {% {' E. L* Z& S
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法7 g4 a4 ?  ~" C! u0 o
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
5 c: H8 K3 Z3 D4 h2 Y& PB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情! s% z" M$ ?, D+ G$ L& ]3 t2 X
1 d; U4 U' H' U, E* c) N
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:+ f- {) E7 ]0 p
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
4 G1 n& L2 |" {5 j) J& KB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘% m; W. T' ^/ _1 P9 E9 ~
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件' W/ ]3 E3 r) ?) I5 |
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
5 s5 g$ ?* w' c- J1 `/ o! aM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

1 K7 Z% ~% J6 n" R0 }- P  Z- \! Y" d# d/ s# n  s# q: @
same choices with u , but want to add some comments $ I4 U$ H) o1 F+ j3 @3 }2 T, Y) ^

8 q1 s9 u  z" `% {! WB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  9 S6 }4 Z0 E2 H) t% P, X

( h# e- N# ?3 {8 h6 \9 ES : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )! k0 ]- O/ v* x$ e' z  r

' H. C9 k9 b" g3 u5 B% AF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
( p, S3 v9 o3 N8 y$ Q8 u; T2 f/ A% t0 o6 @1 Y  `: F/ k+ \" W  z
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......7 N+ ?) \  `0 B0 T- ]6 W+ b

8 i# v0 v1 i/ ]7 k3 X% r[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge6 @% b- z7 Y0 m  Y  N% M2 t
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
0 R$ A6 x8 H: o: K3 GL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
" r8 @. r% Y5 r# IF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma9 Y" a# k: J: o1 U6 p7 [; M1 e. w
3 m/ B/ L  i( N+ n" I* s
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....0 T6 ^, b2 F9 F2 p7 n% r) z- d/ L
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，; S0 P9 M- T! j6 \
由最好開始排起既話，* g( r: H( @$ Z5 W2 L- v
L B M F S 啦，+ b7 A( i2 D9 m. G6 l5 K2 y
9 b+ Y( o6 f8 l& z' O
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，9 Q% X7 ?" A+ G, |
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
' U+ X6 z2 w+ G) j: {如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
( L9 Y, e( K5 O8 y又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。  X5 W3 v9 w7 x$ p1 m
! ~. E5 q3 ]% l6 W3 A% L  B
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，: f1 B8 L6 x" X0 e9 v0 a: ]9 @
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
5 v, W5 O  }; Q, r# S明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
: Y# L/ ^  f2 \, m+ u+ F
3 Q/ W$ P: Z) u5 [, Q而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，7 S/ y" H  T; Y
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，5 \8 |1 g0 n! X' ]8 q
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
/ R) _+ `" F8 M6 a$ L' D知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
" `: m7 @# M3 T3 Y- a9 K M 都可算壞了。! v- A/ _$ F0 P, f: w2 a9 C

1 D7 f/ v$ ]; Q: T F 呢個人仲掂，& @" V9 V8 P) i' e8 J* N
知道既唔等於要講，" O1 Q0 W/ E# p/ [# R; ~  `) H& k. q
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，8 ], p' ~  U1 @% @/ y5 g
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
$ H7 F9 t, V; |/ G( S- E$ c2 S8 A
7 ^* z- w+ d' K" Z1 x5 j- o& H最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
3 r! S7 [9 [) F- f始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。9 U& E1 J3 r6 a8 D+ l
# c7 |4 }# }, V$ o
( `1 \5 ^( k$ J/ Q2 s- Z

, e3 G  k- a* U7 e題外話：1 u/ @  T8 ~: G0 z' Q
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
9 O9 B# F4 g$ S8 }2 r睇到 S 呢條友，7 v7 Q# ^. O$ ^" G
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L5 D6 ^% A  ?, I* o
/ W0 N1 O: H! o1 c+ _$ u5 N% l
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
4 L! [* |& o2 f$ ~9 R. A. WF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
. K0 N1 l  v, w. Z$ ?M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她0 D/ {3 F; C6 u$ t
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
; \2 N) O+ f' r# X4 D1 N5 o/ j2 r9 RL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...