Rika

由最好排到最壞5 t. `! G; R( C9 r/ e$ D
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
* j# w* `: F9 |5 M8 x; w$ wB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount- U; P1 i- |7 w( l9 A% u& Z6 P
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her  u& |5 A1 f& _* \  f, }0 t8 s
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
: G+ z! C) P8 ~& g& b, s/ ML, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
# |  B) S) H- B( ]" d" T
: |2 D; L5 a9 `- X+ f4 LM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人# Y$ J( O' {! a  r" s- K
' b* v0 b  i8 K! }; U
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)1 g$ ]: k6 \& \( `4 o: K
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!; j! {9 u' A: R; r
* C) l0 W: y+ l- Y
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做! {% n3 L& T5 Y* N/ f% L% R

; v9 Z$ @3 r/ b+ F4 E9 WL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
+ I/ U. L/ a7 O* [% A! u. |( X5 D- h5 P4 t$ O  W
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
; h- z4 F# A% r: X, \     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
# E4 W/ h: \) p8 B& R6 v
( f1 ?8 E, f6 H  M8 ]5 U. d[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案6 z5 @1 S1 h. g1 f" n+ f# n8 @& X( f
而家答多次$ P6 L/ R7 j! D( N% T* G$ j
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽; k) }) o* b! L* n$ k! A- \
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架0 g0 V2 i8 u7 Q( Z: ~2 Y
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢, v' t4 G3 ]% U5 y1 @- X
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
" G7 D+ Y2 l8 Q, C2 Em: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
! G! n8 e( {% D. A3 X
6 M7 I% O. s3 }8 Z+ O( `7 q2 DL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
4 |7 k- ~! t. z* e6 KF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
. f+ K# h" e3 @4 P5 e+ |$ R1 TM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
" U* C" F6 R% _. W/ kS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢6 N5 N* b8 O" G; w& \
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
; Q" V$ m) D% ]8 \& k! H: H' S' SF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
2 |: V4 J# e8 d/ eS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
+ V! h# E* c8 o, ~  l& G( y3 q' }M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
5 h4 z1 g1 X/ V2 ?1 @& h; HL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
' v: Q  u$ O4 ]: k0 c8 kB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情' m; E3 w# T& ^  V$ w2 h
" Y0 R% m* g5 i1 i7 i/ K; F& T
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
9 S: [, @9 c3 r- g. }% ^/ KL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
  Y" d2 o% t) Q; F4 EB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
) W3 r! a9 V  |& \: U# DS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
6 {* u9 {2 D) t5 Z$ QF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方. P4 y- N( E# o
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

' Y  B9 {: L3 c( {* }- L: g% j- {" R) G! C/ B6 O$ H- j" ?
same choices with u , but want to add some comments 5 q8 V/ V( h1 s  `2 Y$ I  |, Q

' p7 r' u$ r8 F6 C# f  IB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
( ?1 [* x% y4 B1 n" ~0 R9 z* F+ j/ G' a
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )4 ]* C' n/ |  W6 w: @+ ~

% _/ `+ Z, W/ H; v$ VF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome % O! m5 t( ~% Y5 U1 O
; a9 P; [  S* ^+ q1 b5 s
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
, j, }- ^4 z& J; a4 @+ ?
6 ]; n% q) \4 m9 T9 M+ Y  c[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge3 F- W, h5 }! x+ f7 i1 s' {2 ^0 I" I6 M
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
$ H; P7 i; ^/ m* K5 L# T3 S( e! OL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
& ?; U; `" i: P+ h. UF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma& {% d2 g% i/ z1 c8 g" e

: o9 p4 {2 p: A) [/ W+ q! ?2 p1 W- F最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....1 K3 G! ~3 A! e6 K' }" `/ \
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，* u8 |" y* k, Y( L* G$ K: _
由最好開始排起既話，
5 J' `& \) V  I1 h8 Y; N5 g$ ~/ L% i- DL B M F S 啦，
; b$ I4 n/ z3 u, S9 ~7 I2 ^1 a/ G9 D' P  j' V
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，8 W, _- ~$ B' S0 b$ {8 j
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？* N) J- Z" K, ~- N; W
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
  \5 d) B4 O- [  C, `又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。' C) D+ X& F6 v

4 K2 Z- Z7 d  A! K7 Z  m- f1 |而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
% o' l9 x5 Y& |4 o. D8 z所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，6 }" ?% h+ L. M3 Y+ ?
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。" X/ B4 d6 W3 ~4 a# `, h8 V1 ]
, ~6 L- m  i# H) U; v* K) w1 Q
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
  Z: V& E! Z( S  F7 U5 r( o M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，& U1 \3 ^% e, k" {
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
$ c' j" o9 C# Q( }6 K% y知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，! h; B8 X6 L! i; W# ^; B
M 都可算壞了。
8 b& \& {1 k7 O* p5 V3 D  E6 h" h0 w/ y% m' g, q. y( Q6 _
F 呢個人仲掂，
( H5 Y% |! P9 |" f* B' s" K, B1 b知道既唔等於要講，4 L# W% _2 {; j- P+ v) x
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
  d- A  ^, ^# ]! n( O. u我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
/ u) }5 Y7 y; U2 G: s0 C( v& }0 h9 D- H+ ~
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
. o7 u% m/ ]$ t8 ^* V, s始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。7 f* X* a4 J( M- e- o

  B# v, G4 M* z6 h: h
% i2 J: L" c4 J( w; I# K0 o( x6 ?' S7 U" t0 s
題外話：$ a( ?! j6 o" t! C& c1 m! Y" n
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，# ~8 N5 }0 Q& s- o! }1 E
睇到 S 呢條友，) Q3 n! f7 l7 ?9 `
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
0 a* B; u' {5 M7 i+ V* o& n7 T! s, i: T* h# y) N9 g1 w
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!, h9 Z% m* @' U" S
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係1 y$ F/ E7 i: U7 A+ }+ C7 a+ B
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她; q: f2 r+ A: o3 p% Z# b
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害/ [% I; S7 Q7 s6 i5 r
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...