Rika

由最好排到最壞5 E8 N" {+ o# g, D5 w$ c" ~
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong4 G7 a4 O7 }. n* a
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount$ A; F/ v! l3 Y
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her) z# v1 s9 D4 n) B5 h& C! e
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
& p, {7 S, M  B$ i6 K- D) hL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:5 |! F, W; i( r9 n& P, M' f3 j  C

1 x5 d4 a/ W- O+ q! r! tM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人) \7 c. c6 E* E! {6 A0 M
0 E4 X" p! F+ B
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
: r7 r' x# Y) H' ], ]     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
+ ]) `* E" O% {/ u% `! h' G
) G# W% k  j% t! I" D4 AB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
: C; r! Z$ H$ z! u  |  }
9 L0 t' ?% W  ~L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志( Z, [5 R9 d0 t$ T4 T  x
- N% u4 L) S0 `# {5 ]3 ]
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,+ _0 [4 P6 |- |# P$ x4 {
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好' f4 G  W; \/ C& y6 b

4 j* A5 Q7 }, s[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案1 w, a/ g7 g6 n9 I$ Z% o1 t" m
而家答多次" m. M. L) j3 I- h; p1 o
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽7 o0 `) f: n# K; N
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架  {+ ~8 ?' |9 j6 E( C3 j3 \
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
& x0 }4 e: y1 S! }: ?0 @s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
& l2 y7 O! t" }: o1 l3 um: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S" [( {3 D5 M; B% j4 l) Q% f

2 p3 o+ i! K- N, z3 t0 L3 yL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
) j  j# _5 ?/ g; p3 [! A' hF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
/ x' t: N5 m' W, @3 FM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒7 ]' a- Q0 \1 \7 o
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢) b* |8 Y3 [  y7 t( ?- N+ S, T
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞: D! c) x7 b) i' s4 G" L
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
. B! \$ {; F/ b  r9 e# m( JS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取2 H# W! i. d' r  y0 {& f6 Y# g& H8 Y1 _8 r
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
, }, Q# A% I6 a) ]L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果" T; u& H, r: B' l
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情; d" ~( b0 z  e* J4 n

, S9 r9 @+ C9 r$ g% O世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
: ~9 v) n% v. [* I) ]; y: t5 k# RL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
4 ^; h9 p# }, ]2 @5 f& r/ gB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘" s. W1 l% [' P! t; k5 X
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件/ p5 {* ^$ g4 I+ h6 @+ o' ^
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
- @2 }8 G* H" K( jM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

* r+ k$ ]- z0 }( ]
- G  N- {( C* x7 O3 h same choices with u , but want to add some comments
0 J: _$ Q/ b/ _, R# W* u- o4 @5 A, f$ _3 ]" Q8 w
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
/ [, G! a4 L& H2 x2 J) z. Y. O- m7 Y
; n% D7 m8 j  y. ~2 Y  u: IS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )( R  r' h: y' @) |. l" R
9 @1 Y: a8 h- Q  j5 ^
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome 9 N( R$ s7 g* D& T( y+ K( P

' {4 v" V$ |  rM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......; O5 K5 s: |6 f" G( j8 f, A; T
- [5 B4 X' P. {
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
4 X% I' j  ~! CM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
  D' Q2 b$ T- y7 `1 g! YL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點( Q2 K3 M8 o: b0 S+ a
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma$ J0 s* O  D* @: n
: E9 t$ Q2 b- I& v4 n/ u! a
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
( n6 U+ i. {& x$ }7 l$ {有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
3 X: c+ A3 w% o4 d& [; N/ g, b由最好開始排起既話，
6 M3 b8 V$ o$ K9 J# ^L B M F S 啦，
2 O! {  y! t4 V" I( g
) E9 }, {' O0 Z* G2 R其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，5 w! R5 B# H- q* c" v& x' C+ b) }
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
- t' Q& L8 \& ~- O5 o8 p6 {. |如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
9 V0 w7 _$ j/ T6 r% T又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
4 m1 [+ M% X! m7 ?8 m" T% K" a8 f- @+ z3 x7 X
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
' H2 n8 g  J8 |( P所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，* V- C- o. Z2 N+ @4 ?: r- B) H
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
: U& T# r$ j$ Q1 b5 e8 U8 ]& o% B8 Y3 [' ^  i5 y2 r
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，7 }5 r6 [8 Q' j- v/ u' d6 U. R
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，0 B0 I7 n: j$ U
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
2 V( b: _  O/ u0 s) Z  M: I7 d知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，/ U+ ^: |, d0 i6 M0 n. n' Q1 V
M 都可算壞了。
- m- L, `$ h# U4 ?5 u# L/ C
" Z( \* x! Y- |/ C- A; X( m9 c6 v% O4 t F 呢個人仲掂，% ~/ e: ~5 v6 ]% H% N, G0 E% n
知道既唔等於要講，
0 Q/ o- e1 R) i/ F7 @如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
! [0 z) t: }2 L& |" `我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
( w% K3 _2 f9 ]8 D/ ~( g9 P; r, V( G5 P2 u! F
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，/ @. q2 p* Q- E/ r* L+ d) b  M
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。$ I4 s* H- I& P( \* C

! y2 j9 T) }' c8 A( l
" e! Z# q! M& P" {0 V, T, f
, Q6 C7 J) x* Q; y' }/ W- Z題外話：: }$ S. x& q& {# C1 F' M3 [' ?
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
! n0 E5 C# s3 X  N+ b' I1 G7 @睇到 S 呢條友，: a* N! X6 s$ C8 i
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
% p0 v; B) I1 A# A, b% N" b% b. l' g3 i& ^
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
' u  y4 }# l% B1 gF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
4 g8 [- Q1 h* T5 `M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
2 K6 j/ h6 a$ Z; Q$ J) ~B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害% c5 |3 s9 s8 d0 w6 D- q) h
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...