Rika

由最好排到最壞
* X0 o- \6 Y! h3 U% ~; T3 ]: }. ^# YF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
$ U2 k% \( @0 ]4 b+ ?B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
$ F7 z6 T1 k" U& s/ y( t4 TS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
8 r4 v4 P7 E+ U2 U1 OM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure- U$ V% X% K$ q
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
. ?" r. n! {! W- V
* h- M- ?4 Q% [% Q& _M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
+ b5 E" o( M  s6 s. [! P/ G
6 z/ J" U; L% [+ s6 F' K8 Z% JS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
/ U' W, }) C) q, D. s     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!7 p# p( F. {& _1 S% w1 H% ]
; G# f2 R0 Q! H7 g# L# K
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做! g3 O  D9 ^! m/ }& H: t4 {) y

% X( g. u1 e) {* eL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志3 H- N  E6 H; f: L& A7 F7 _' y
# p# W/ x" s+ g8 d; {7 p( o: l
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,; \6 c8 e9 i5 F# U
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好; c% o0 p2 g* ^/ a

( @) |8 ]$ n5 f2 `0 ^[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
% R: J3 B! a% N而家答多次
; g/ g" ^* {4 `f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽) s" \. G. q  U  z
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
& x! p) S  d; ]. k, {* E$ db: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
# f' G  o" z( K; zs: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.% A& u5 z/ }# ?
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
" a/ v# d9 t7 ?( m2 ^4 _6 ]" Y: o% u( _
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
$ q6 g( M: Y; p, {9 }  ]' ]' pF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
  z- B0 w$ L" HM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
+ C7 A: e$ D6 \3 R" |; `S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢* m4 H9 R5 _$ j
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
7 }& a& _, X8 X5 u: [F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
$ ~; x/ T7 Y' _) k2 S7 }, gS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取, ^  g# E4 l$ a7 r$ u+ _
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法# G  r+ v1 p# K, n
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
" X' `6 l1 @4 d6 y% tB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
9 A$ S8 c: [4 `# C+ ?9 E3 {
7 o1 @6 r* X: |: I. Q世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:7 D8 S- p# F- j7 g# ~* P
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
# ~6 B8 w4 c# S- i- HB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘7 R4 W1 P# {+ t
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件4 y& J5 O# b% a! a8 o% d
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
$ H1 c! m  A4 O, DM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

8 E, J( `4 O" [0 D+ T* _& x8 ~3 b+ ]6 ?

! \4 B% i$ u. u% t* n/ {5 M same choices with u , but want to add some comments , H  F& m0 H3 c) M* }" s2 C4 {
: l" X" ]$ }( o% e) G
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  7 E0 F. [4 H2 a/ {6 v  ~0 g

+ F1 M* d/ }) I: O. rS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
- a# H  e" B4 ]+ z" H, H' }
( a5 s, y/ y! VF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
- M3 t& d& k$ }; i( \* D9 U7 \4 C( r# b" p: \- Z% P/ n
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
8 ~7 W& F$ N/ J# f( a: C0 \) }: K) T. p  d% B! O; i) j. q
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge2 I1 Q+ X: m) r) E
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢  }/ c+ }/ w( A7 Y( T2 I
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點3 K0 O9 g6 y0 \5 j: |, X
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma) L6 E8 _/ A# `/ @7 p6 |

9 M; p! b9 R5 }最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
! S. v  {7 ]. c; d; |有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，4 \( w4 I' k& {& R3 E" k
由最好開始排起既話，
1 z' C$ a/ j" O& ]: N; E1 L  |L B M F S 啦，
5 T/ f3 \# [# c  y
; b5 T! L7 V3 r( B$ W) r' W' ^其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
1 H4 m+ u( z& x& d# b4 x但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
9 O7 J/ c' Z* M' c如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
4 ?8 k" A# J6 L! s又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。; A& ?  D! I: }) [
2 q+ [, G! g( t- e7 u, A; v9 t
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，2 m6 G, U+ V1 [/ h$ ]
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，2 F2 L! X' \  |3 r5 q
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。: _) _+ T+ y9 C9 {/ d9 A
* W6 H# `+ K  }2 }- u0 C0 p
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，' D0 H% B. ^+ d  V- U
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，! u+ y3 e# Y  f
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，: o6 q7 ^' |: g: r* X. j
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，  w- n- X" `' Q8 J
M 都可算壞了。1 q% l5 U0 m3 {" s5 |: S. ]
$ w  ]- U( j( G4 R
F 呢個人仲掂，
0 `' X/ `; E1 a9 C5 t8 t$ M知道既唔等於要講，2 Q9 N% k! _2 C' W1 }
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，* G* Z. A7 F1 A
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
9 C4 b+ v2 U; N% }, G7 f1 D) R/ T+ M; u/ Z4 n  @2 G* h
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，& N* t* X2 T4 E9 n# H* b
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。/ e4 c% @; h& {+ p7 Y  f! J' y8 r
, V+ z# W" F% |9 m1 D; p) F
2 V9 u6 `! m6 p+ }. m
  T4 _1 ?" K* f3 _+ H+ W9 e
題外話：" j  G( c2 p# p6 {9 {$ V! o
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
$ N# g7 A, ^& Z+ ]% B睇到 S 呢條友，
$ |$ T, S+ R, D* S我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L: p$ t' |! g1 l( s  j

$ m; H& O3 H6 p1 \. v; }" SS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
2 F" @+ @& P7 z% O3 l/ ~1 uF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係3 r* C4 F& ~- m3 O) P; }
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她, V) F( c1 T1 n; f) g
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害9 Z8 K+ {9 q" k
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...