Rika

由最好排到最壞7 z& |6 D; F$ E/ o# J
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong, X' T! O3 B2 b4 ]; s
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
* a' k3 f0 L. M# K/ kS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her$ J$ f' @% \# G! {, O, x
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure3 c, x/ ~* o' O, l& `1 [: [
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:* X7 a1 T. f, S2 |& a% b0 X; b' S
1 ~* Q% |: M: a5 Z
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人( U! {3 C5 e1 a0 T8 d- ]

% V' D, D+ O/ B: b) J1 PS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)' @. m! I9 D' H+ F) I
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
: z* Y; {2 t) t# L" [7 s
, e0 Z: ]6 y: D# A# NB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做( W5 I  D. a/ W! k& J; u& S
7 Q  R- m- {- J! R4 K7 J
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志4 B2 |' \6 C% A4 {0 u  Q3 d5 L( f

% m+ P8 R4 @8 B4 t' sF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
; z  `2 e% z% y     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好+ ?2 b4 d! V6 _% l
. P& {, d; j1 f
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案; X( X+ K5 ]  D% A6 ]  ^, R$ o
而家答多次3 ]: h3 t$ |( {
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
# ]8 [8 s/ I$ K( v8 P/ |0 a0 hl: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
4 U3 O9 N& w* X& z3 M9 P' W" Ub: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢$ I. ]6 G4 ~( \8 t% ^, L
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
2 Y1 {; [* Y# g/ g  n. xm: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S# s* T: a* G4 @; Q2 B6 m3 J( x

' s! \9 I: S2 Y9 y% k! ?L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
: _( K8 k! E' V/ }) j6 RF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度) ?, L% P1 J( V) S* q% I, ]& B
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒7 n' V6 t( [$ I: x+ Y: o  [
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
3 Y4 g: Y: b/ J" zB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞" d( }3 n8 E- e+ e
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"3 }7 X! G* o* m- i' A3 R) w9 C4 |
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
% |5 r( l3 }$ n" c+ r4 @3 oM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法6 }/ ^5 F8 H7 ?$ I
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
) ~( P) c# n' |2 `5 x. W, [+ Z3 X) _0 D5 aB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
' j- O! |" d7 R* Q* w* i0 X! j  a" F( e" ~) [$ s
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:0 o& }# ?. M, \) v2 A: A
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
" A% d3 ^; S$ f% R! l4 {0 _* SB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
6 v0 ~8 _- a1 I) w) eS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件  C4 d- G8 X% X+ Q
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
- m: m* H0 i2 g$ u% j+ ^M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

2 t# Z0 u6 F2 E9 Q- d% o

/ Q) R8 W& Z3 G& l7 k same choices with u , but want to add some comments 2 l7 B' T- ?2 ]  }4 b, g- X9 }4 v

7 T$ C1 `1 T5 d: o8 ^9 VB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  3 l, Z% K, Z  y% \( a4 j1 c

) _6 M+ U2 |( B- s! tS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 ): v# h% y& C" O5 y" d# S5 I

. t) n3 Z, X3 }5 s' CF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
' m% ]: w' W8 S- ~5 Y  U. ]! n! o; l- |& p+ d& l- a3 O
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......  Q& U2 k% Z) H0 W: }/ i/ w
9 b/ n) ]8 v8 [
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
- Q) |9 d# A+ e( V  c! x1 XM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
- g, L3 S( S9 N2 W1 cL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
4 J! _9 K3 v- t0 _/ W4 R( X  XF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
& t0 _' ^3 [' `0 N2 t, G1 [; I$ t2 B/ ^5 S3 {7 H/ s4 N) z/ s  I0 J
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
% D4 L4 e4 D! G7 w有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，: i1 m) G0 x. a9 d4 K1 p5 Y" V
由最好開始排起既話，7 @2 W' E8 c) b+ W
L B M F S 啦，! p) f$ W% @. Y4 `% `

! W" [( g) u0 {! w其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
; [; m$ A1 \% B  v  z但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
  \; M3 n# w% F1 r/ _/ Q如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
7 i, J. f% K, L又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
* S, W; X, P4 i7 o# s& r: C* `+ \8 f8 P
* F8 s! _  ~  u5 j& C而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，) J4 k* I0 K' [, v2 w5 m* i
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，7 i$ e) s, z) j( w  z: U: w
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
* b& Q- \( s. @- W, h# l5 o: j) U3 Y
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
6 Y  A% _, C% H M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
9 `* i' \5 ]- B1 D亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，/ X$ F# b: e8 ~- o( u
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
* [" b4 Q# o0 Y& m1 P+ M2 N3 @& y" G M 都可算壞了。. l1 c+ n% S$ K/ w7 ]
- o+ [2 R2 C+ G9 W4 f& T- x
F 呢個人仲掂，4 u2 ^# Q7 M6 W0 @# w$ i# l
知道既唔等於要講，; O1 r8 V1 c2 }. L4 k
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
; b& G6 B0 L+ \7 u3 _7 U0 N5 b0 U我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
& L( y' Z/ X) [# A: u- Y4 p
; L4 k# h3 c+ J& \) Z& S+ @) @  I9 J最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
( s2 y% y( Q8 q4 @$ K) N% c$ `始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
% L" ?' A0 k- M; V; I2 e% u. E& U" R' A8 Q8 K- _; `1 Z! @

( m5 H0 F0 T4 k' h3 w: C! V* b7 ?/ N% O
題外話：" ?; f2 y4 c) [* @4 K
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
" e' u& @7 v! v, q$ }0 R6 I睇到 S 呢條友，  }, q2 B0 _* k. K+ t
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
. ~! M5 |% v* k' M( u, Y0 M( ^; F5 @' {' A' K8 ?6 P
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
$ B* R6 v4 X; }9 kF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係7 X, N# ?% y( N
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她  t& i4 _: P, e2 C% s% e
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害! p5 [) }/ c7 E+ c! T
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...