Rika

由最好排到最壞0 b4 ]4 {: N# h, C" o4 s% j8 |
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
3 \, [8 e' \! Z8 V4 O; ?: BB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
' K! X9 S) P4 f# T6 N1 |9 `S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her# J# A) Z" A; M: k) Z& H
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
1 `/ p/ P4 `" f( O! p& DL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
% j% J% I8 v. P* n9 O, o$ a; i6 S8 P. j4 X! V
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人2 n' G# j( ^* C/ K  H
- U( O# q7 w+ ~1 F* }
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
6 N1 Q4 w. o, T: z! {5 _: z$ M7 K+ W- b5 I     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!6 I, {# f, r3 ?" i8 p3 s
7 S( o% ]7 C% V' S
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
) h0 k0 Q8 D0 v& S1 c$ ]
6 [: S6 ~+ J. d4 V6 X4 _% H8 Q4 b2 [L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
; A' y5 D- p( F
$ N/ T. {3 i/ h' @% A  zF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,7 C( [. B1 i( a
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
. w6 \  V6 ^- A) j9 j$ x. k9 s
9 ~. o4 O2 p9 w$ n" k[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
; n: V7 p9 O( m3 Q: Y而家答多次  s. R% Q3 V# o. ?
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽) W4 F9 C* Z) Z1 ~% M
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架. m5 E5 W) l0 Q/ i7 B; O0 p
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢! x, r+ @5 A$ B/ H- ?* X. R
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.+ A/ `* V# @) a2 k
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
, D/ l: r. M/ S" {  `& E; Z
8 r8 t. c7 c0 w% dL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
& V) g$ M8 s2 M( X+ K( SF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
: p8 `) E$ X) zM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒" q% M1 {% K& r3 [9 M. _! b
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
" C7 `# b3 M1 J; R; Q7 XB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞/ n9 l1 ]# j4 C1 `( M- V5 H
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"8 V: A8 H3 R) \6 R
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
- C1 i2 U2 |& G* b+ f6 O& L% PM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法7 _2 v: {) ]) k( X- i
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
7 X4 W( Z; v: R9 f& [B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
; L& N$ u, n4 M. z: z& L! X% ?1 r: R
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
1 ^0 i6 j* p5 J4 {L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己6 f) {8 ]: q$ e/ h/ K7 m2 Z
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘; A' w# S; k$ q4 U8 e& Q. U
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件! n+ g. F! @( ^& `
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
& W  Y/ z1 G7 z( u- f' }0 X1 {0 l6 bM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

; i$ Z5 I- W! e( {4 m( a7 v

: j* W+ T+ X' o2 k( ^* r+ b6 e same choices with u , but want to add some comments
9 Q& {& Q. S+ U  z& y2 J2 U
" u8 v( T% B: d) lB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  . i/ y8 @& y+ ~9 H
- s& @& i+ _7 _/ F+ C9 Y
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
7 }& F0 E5 m- @" J4 W; D9 u" \% i: k9 o, i, a" Y$ L
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
7 G, q0 ^9 T; R1 F7 U
' \; h8 A# x* p' U. v- K; A6 KM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......& u6 s8 p9 P0 @; M( a! e
, i. n' `/ N% y2 [* ^4 A2 q4 f
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge) C# d9 }0 v+ D1 X% U4 n6 N
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
4 I6 m6 ?! I- V$ H" WL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點- z8 W# L! t5 e; w9 \/ L
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
% n) a9 Z& V" G0 @" W) [, Y9 ^2 S$ |+ `9 S+ o2 n
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....' c& u! s+ n7 ~) S4 [8 q8 ~
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，1 I+ N, X) C% h5 D0 D; @" w: H8 _
由最好開始排起既話，
4 D- F& r; c0 o! lL B M F S 啦，* X+ K& E3 F. K% Z+ }2 |4 o

0 A- Y+ M0 Q& _( n; G. m3 `" v其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
4 M* @5 [; f, A* v9 i: j* \7 C但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
# f& h4 t, B- j5 i如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？  A9 M) q4 `/ X, L
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
, P- z- ~$ T6 e# \* ^/ Y
* V7 I9 o0 i7 c+ h8 Y而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
/ M4 V/ P. F/ G$ x( {+ N2 b: r所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
0 Z9 j8 s$ \; L" L$ a1 m; t2 X明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。% @, S0 m/ X. I, \5 O. J, s3 `

' f8 U5 z( Q' q- D1 n4 |! f而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
5 P' N: C( A8 D' \ M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
% ]; f$ N: Z$ j' ^7 I亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，# N' z5 J0 t& Q4 O' c. o7 Y* e
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
0 z1 N9 N# X, ]1 Z% d# I' ?% u3 T M 都可算壞了。% `' D8 r* c- w& Y1 Q( E

$ g/ @$ O( C- b8 v F 呢個人仲掂，
3 O% ]+ a7 L+ ?" F$ e, o知道既唔等於要講，
9 G  @8 ~1 I% d* X$ h! Q4 K如果呢件事發生係自己身上，7 G& s$ g( ~% G. F: i) @* W' y3 X( w
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。# R2 k0 Y+ c7 i$ [4 t) N

0 G  Z* y* D% H% K; O! R2 Z最衰個個緊係 S 啦，2 v2 g1 p% M! ?. N) p6 W
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
% q9 P1 q0 Q1 r( ]
; V" f5 x5 A, f
6 B  Y' ^# X" g" m6 h0 o3 s" X0 c. Y9 L: B; ?
題外話：! C- s0 P; O4 B% W5 K
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
4 h; Q$ X" g) W: Y8 [: Q: S8 ~( I睇到 S 呢條友，0 b8 |4 L( w& A4 e# X
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
: M* y, B% _) q* g* a) N
8 k& o9 ]4 H4 hS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!+ w1 q. e) T' v
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係8 v- o+ X6 Q5 z
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她& ^1 l2 {2 x& G, a. Q
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
- M7 ]# x3 E- ^L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...