Rika

由最好排到最壞  W, w: a9 Q- B! G
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong5 J  H) J6 E  C9 {
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount% {# w$ Y: Q# O& F% |9 ?
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
& o4 V) b8 A8 Z2 h0 K* j, [; gM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure" N- m% G2 l2 ^
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:6 G" B- H. M* `" }  ?" H3 O

9 R, X& d% \0 M! m7 U8 B- nM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
8 J3 ^: ~9 |3 P
6 h4 s( g1 @) S& ~% US - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
- K3 C9 R; {/ w/ h3 x5 ^     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
+ _2 Q- h; E* Q9 B0 ~* |
' i4 j% [- S4 O* U4 m  @B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做6 }( e7 x4 v; L5 ]+ m
/ W7 e& Y7 a* R- d4 v# E/ |) U& w
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
% \3 V- I% g) e: L  B) a2 g* C& [6 p9 U7 H6 Q7 L
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
3 I4 i  I3 v4 b. K     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
, p5 u5 P" D& p; B8 w: J0 g4 ?2 V7 v7 p- F, ]6 k3 c" m
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案) e) x: g/ b" K. O7 c
而家答多次
6 U$ Z7 i7 j, d+ G1 a. ff: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽5 o4 b" u3 J3 T8 c
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架; [8 }0 k* y8 C8 u% P
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢- B8 z" i3 _# T8 G$ \/ `* K+ a5 x
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
' ]8 i5 X- Z9 D0 s2 hm: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S, |& P; q4 {) ^+ ]+ F

8 J5 e, r) U: r# R, X6 dL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
+ ]* p; N2 X, v& h/ \' XF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度4 ~/ e- j& u' c7 D# l
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒) o( [# r0 y; ]- H9 `
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
( J. S- C% Q4 i0 P; V( A4 B) RB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
1 R2 m4 A8 J7 b; Z; ?. `3 bF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
6 \8 k9 u  ^" A' {, Y; [S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取* L: L/ F0 V. f% B+ B% t6 S. r  C+ K
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
# q2 y2 w: G6 }) t$ M( HL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果0 M5 `4 u4 b! V+ R
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情6 j5 m% f( W2 j* ~0 X# V
5 x5 w7 v' A- m
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
' Q& ~* O' D8 C! X: {1 f* Q) g+ EL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
7 w8 q2 x, ?: D+ Y$ ^6 AB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
) M8 F  Q) y- B# pS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
, T' q* m+ J& ?7 b, x/ gF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方! d" X! U: c" r4 C$ v" t
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

' ^8 A8 P, M4 l% {3 n0 q, T
: B' a) U  f- c$ G+ s( c same choices with u , but want to add some comments
1 `2 |  e5 j! R
: B% B3 U: o0 H7 r2 A- CB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  , H6 c2 \: I$ u4 R2 V( P
  L1 G$ ]* b2 {8 C; s2 }
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )7 r0 L! i5 R/ x, M  V' c5 z/ O
" H2 r/ u" x+ K* A5 R. m
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
" D) P! |4 s  P
2 h+ H% g; X* Y: ]9 MM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......: p; @2 ~3 `5 O. A$ K
7 v/ @; N" ~! E1 K7 j1 _# Z1 p" p
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge; o* x/ ~5 v8 z6 c0 i! a! Y# J
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
2 ~' E! s& j. U) wL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點* Y- |. o8 e' y4 P. G5 `4 A
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
3 T/ n9 f% r9 [) I$ }
% }6 _7 C3 Q4 @$ v) p, W最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....% |% B7 _% r- J9 s8 U
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
. e7 d* L1 f3 E2 A9 q1 H由最好開始排起既話，
7 S7 n1 p& Z- @7 E/ ?L B M F S 啦，
7 v; U. n% C7 p* I' l' X+ |$ ?- z/ `0 |* s0 o  J; O8 j
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，9 ~; n  b! Y, W+ Q" P
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
5 K) J1 i) x. ?+ k如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
# F! S& o' Z3 G又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。/ S9 a/ M6 ]# Y3 A( z" D
, w% ~: g7 s- m7 C; r+ T$ \
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
2 p/ ?, }& _+ J所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
* P# I' z- X/ U5 T% R明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。' j- `$ l& Z1 j3 Q( L/ o4 C- k! K
7 R9 V! O2 E" a* Z1 L; K; Y
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，: k3 p- \" D, f8 S4 S
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
, S) s6 E7 f9 N! j亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，2 ]  u4 R. C/ A& W) f" Q
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
3 E) W$ n3 C% B* c. p; h4 | M 都可算壞了。3 b) O+ G: u1 t

/ y7 w1 ]' O) l" I8 _8 A F 呢個人仲掂，! P% j5 A' v7 e4 X; h
知道既唔等於要講，1 O4 A1 j) b0 x4 ]( X: l
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
/ w% ]9 |2 W! |我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
/ W8 Z( K0 W3 i5 E+ O5 H+ f/ }" l0 R$ a0 D  i# K- C% W
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，4 w7 p/ n$ B5 g; v8 g, E
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。9 W9 c6 r6 G5 P3 \

" P' W" [: N9 l. K2 C
/ C& ?7 P/ D+ {/ H+ Q. S
8 n: d' A- C6 F; y題外話：
( u- d# @) r2 H8 a! ?3 i唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，: }- N. ]& Q3 L$ y' O1 k* t
睇到 S 呢條友，, }4 P7 B+ J9 m+ f
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
) T) m2 K3 d9 S- }& i1 E; {/ I7 |& Z# j
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!. X8 ?5 J5 D( B
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
- m# G9 B5 ]5 q3 X4 K% @M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她' P, G+ e- k8 `0 }1 p
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害- U* P) p. ~' `* B& S
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...