Rika

由最好排到最壞' a) I  f0 Y7 N$ ^+ S$ l9 ?
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong8 S) e  ]/ i  H8 H( n0 o% [
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
* t0 J9 S$ E4 e, ?0 _+ d$ O! IS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
- U( j' m1 r0 E! Z- K* M& OM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
0 j1 c8 ?1 }: s6 wL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:4 l7 m& n1 L, ]& S+ g

; {. Q  _4 e& _$ B% C6 ~3 pM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
) K% u& t: }" X1 H5 J2 a% T7 n2 ^# Q
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事): ?: T' m# W! _
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
# h& L7 f: \. O# V8 X7 y1 P2 h( j# m* X: ^4 e! e
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做' y9 ]) W' \4 E8 K0 Q
6 L; E5 o3 O2 a1 ~* u* g
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
! A' |. q. M; Y) E" h: r- u. z; S
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
# c2 D* q1 O! O, f8 \* ?( L     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好2 G3 t* s  J: w* }& e  ^+ W  r" }

( Y: F( X9 S% E. ~( @$ b1 e[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案6 Q2 C- x/ a$ n' F; S% F  I
而家答多次
$ T! P: ]/ w9 ^2 x  i, C# Z0 ~f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽0 s3 D: V2 J: k  D0 |1 |+ n1 f
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
9 h* u, [9 e! V9 O/ m- P* {+ \b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢+ X! R+ Q& w4 P# m) P1 H
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.4 [6 s! E; e& J8 L: _
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S( f' p% v$ ]( x1 Z

7 E# U4 k8 L5 X/ X% c1 c/ [L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
$ q  X" L" s! W2 |F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
" A- W- F# |% {1 o* uM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
# e9 M6 Z8 a1 x; O# fS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
1 S+ T' R* s5 ?6 O" T" dB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
5 x0 h' E6 X; mF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"8 O* X: j  j7 L$ W* \
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
  I+ W& u8 h. `( VM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
9 V$ M" Y5 g5 q4 lL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
2 r( q. l# d" ]7 D7 V+ [) NB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情7 @$ _/ v: e" ~0 _/ @

; s0 f" \. C) ^+ C世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:3 {3 A$ y1 t1 P$ l1 z
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己. U. J5 W: w' g4 g; a0 ?
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
1 _& i2 N: I1 D9 H% mS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
9 Q/ G1 @& P9 B$ ~6 E* M9 XF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
4 X& ^' }" u) M7 xM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

; ~6 c0 h( ?# G8 x1 Q  `

2 v5 `9 b* _( W. h+ j7 O4 l% p- K! k same choices with u , but want to add some comments . j* ]$ l3 f! s4 }; A

) s2 F: @! M9 m" T3 ?0 h$ y# \* \B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  2 e* \" j9 Q7 R& k! A

- i" p3 d8 @" J: t  W' e: eS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 ). J" V) `1 T) B/ ?- l# V3 t

, C9 p) W7 k( E) X7 I7 hF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome 2 A+ H, r' ~" t( g# B+ x
6 ?1 `9 Z0 k" o, u
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......# k8 `0 N0 V+ Q, G4 q* c& i

$ v; j: b6 z5 O. @. S% X[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
' w3 Z, F" U/ ]! ZM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
7 f4 A* R9 N4 kL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
/ i- n: M# O! h- mF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma% F- s+ P! I6 f( z+ m

  r; n( Q$ g5 w& e4 U" p" x+ `7 K最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....& ^- Z. F; f% e: B1 X" ]+ H
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，! L5 Q8 n' D# I3 i) f$ K7 O$ {
由最好開始排起既話，
& ^$ {* w" }5 }9 w" RL B M F S 啦，" ]7 e0 W0 z: }. T% @3 S) K/ `

9 d2 p/ Q7 |4 y其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，% u' O9 ?9 G' q
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？. I' ^3 i, W0 F+ b9 x* f' n- B
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
9 h9 T* U0 ^- c. q' V4 M6 l又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
0 X% t+ T$ Y1 d
6 U* @( J  d+ j; s而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，6 X* v/ l) l, @& f8 x* ~& M
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
/ p& g! g( W6 t+ g1 |明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
, Y% c& _6 K' v
3 H! z5 P9 u7 D" X; z而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
6 v0 k1 ]8 {7 g3 E- Y M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
4 Y& {1 _* P7 j0 ^% f/ F: F9 v* x: b亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
6 F) G/ {3 d" k知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，3 H' W2 N5 U  X# N6 s2 a/ K" g
M 都可算壞了。9 e1 A( G/ j3 }% ?% ?
+ g  p8 p# m' N3 z
F 呢個人仲掂，, g6 i& }3 x) G# r$ m3 @% Q9 O
知道既唔等於要講，" t. c0 V) g( C) G" H3 J
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
. r. t( I6 D2 q7 N6 v我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
& K% F* B1 N! b; p; Z, S0 h/ H: @  Z0 B$ {1 L6 v: j# I5 ^" \, }3 X
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
; J* ~, U% C- N8 z' N始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。& G% m- `' n- i7 G6 u# n% ?

* N4 ?! e7 V& Y; e7 ^, Y0 n/ P
0 t1 h% ?- O5 a( g; j- ?, [# v
題外話：
5 z( J3 y9 @) z4 D唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
' ^' ]. |! @6 q0 H9 m5 P睇到 S 呢條友，
! {% X4 B9 M  o7 |; S4 E" y我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
, ]3 `4 k  d( {. E4 ?7 O+ w  g0 l6 x6 Q, n
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
( J( J# m1 R# B* ~( \2 y6 b2 uF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
5 B& T9 ^' T" D; V- P! AM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
" Z2 d9 H. D0 q) d; sB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
5 b, ~* z" P5 z$ v, wL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...