Rika

由最好排到最壞, d3 `8 p. j" {
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
- u8 M. [6 G3 W% @B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
! b' Z  k2 G( p  @7 x: bS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her5 i: A* @8 {  k+ p  P' ~% V
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
. M# \# b* X6 f& qL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
! A# |1 M; X: W
( C8 r# Q) S& r) W  L1 EM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
& \8 S% f* W& j6 G
( ~' h: b( X0 @3 ~8 LS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
. g; k7 W1 n+ h5 p7 n     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
) _# ]! w& U* _8 w+ f/ W3 I/ u; [0 F. m: |
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
! ?! l+ M% k1 H" q7 Q0 y0 j
+ {0 b! i, D( }8 ML - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
7 s9 }1 F5 l! V
) f8 c0 F' d+ N% d, M+ l% t; a3 pF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,% ?* G" u8 C. a7 J$ [% N3 x
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好' ?7 _) o; H0 T" F# c
( u1 w/ \, r3 l, L+ I4 T& b
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
+ y6 j3 ^; \: w0 [" C8 X而家答多次
7 H# U, `5 {9 x4 x  A1 b/ ef: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
8 ~- \6 d% L: \. V. O- dl: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架, U  a! {/ h( F' U9 n
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
5 S8 U/ P1 O: a6 p5 Ns: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
  a8 h* v& r/ c7 z. Q  U1 _8 hm: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
' l. Q4 {) N4 r; d5 b; p6 ?% S/ s  Y$ e1 x8 Z0 r) v
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大% P" U+ V8 z( u/ B% P+ O
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
& R' d! C$ c1 s" }M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒  e% m% w( w: w, w" C4 A* e7 a
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
! S+ u( [% A8 Q# HB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞& L  r- Z/ u' g5 h  W; ^
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"% G5 k' n& h  e
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取: o" t# n. c, L* s! F8 E
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
. u( v! v" t- T/ N- B5 SL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果1 e* Y2 d/ Y' S; s) j4 f) `$ |
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
% o5 P5 w6 R( l8 o% {" O( l1 z
1 q4 N7 h: t) G  r: x8 f4 p' u世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:7 i9 @4 Q1 A+ k/ S7 U0 g# ~
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己$ V& v) S9 x3 y9 _* P3 J
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
9 p) p9 l' L% b4 Y+ `/ H% }S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件/ E. }) C: z5 w9 i
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方3 ?/ S, l& V& @) }
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

2 o7 C8 R6 r% f( B0 Y9 r

! @- d( q4 K5 i  x6 ? same choices with u , but want to add some comments # U  s8 S/ s2 j9 `4 s4 s

8 C1 M' x  `4 o+ E' ?3 pB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
9 D; L/ d8 ~$ X) g( p
+ X6 _. \5 B6 z. c7 L& m' eS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )  C: i# I. e' Q( v; o

8 ?1 _: C3 {* {0 P  ~" }F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
+ F/ G. e3 h- N9 A! B; z0 t- q' Q6 ?; b6 J" |  d3 _! z6 Q; B
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
0 x6 n4 z9 A/ a7 i/ @; P1 [( D, Q0 r/ h5 u: S* z( P" A* k6 G) [
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge, L' ]' {- h. x* o( [, e! R+ u8 R
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
7 L% Z7 s' G( D4 h5 J3 Q2 SL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點, |! w4 E' V; [
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
' s1 L: {! A, I+ j& w/ j* P+ `8 r. }, u
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....* j" _7 Q9 B8 h: g- }
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，" M3 A, k  [) V8 x/ N. w
由最好開始排起既話，% o% _$ d* X* E; @3 z* F2 \/ h0 V
L B M F S 啦，
9 d" `0 c2 \! J( l2 w  z/ ~# k' I4 T, n* a0 ~
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
9 \3 R& M% {0 @# y1 }! x3 M) }但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
( t- t' u+ }1 \如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
; C: T: ]  e& `' q又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
% c: `$ o+ n1 Q$ S( l* Y0 H
, m. J4 f8 t- z) v而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，7 m9 @) P% g) m  e1 j9 ^
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，8 j' V) n) c4 W0 F
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
2 v) {' l) o" ^3 A! J. R" [' T% Q3 o3 X- [) \& j
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
  V* _4 Y* z* v# |  f9 M3 c M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
8 Z8 j* Z( H4 j8 Z" I- ~6 H亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
7 z" [, W7 a! _2 Q) ]知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，4 `. }3 P) G' H
M 都可算壞了。. @# B  Z& i" V9 H" u7 S9 L+ J; ^

' T* E. N; q+ H F 呢個人仲掂，
+ h' c) D+ l# ]  x/ Q+ t7 s3 x知道既唔等於要講，
3 x; s2 t- B+ R+ p* A0 [如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
( X& |2 h. k. J* L9 \/ _我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。/ g( A0 Z( |7 |0 i, b. ]' r5 Z
+ H4 D- V/ k; R  v; n
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，: o- ^4 z! e: h0 f5 c( H8 G+ Z5 g
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
/ p) x& h* r7 U$ e- ?9 |4 |2 x. y1 d% I3 I: r

" U4 P$ U+ k* j$ _: l( R# ~& Q
4 ~5 V+ J: A- w: z題外話：4 d* J6 M5 b% E4 R9 Q
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
+ h* [% D: X( {- p: }睇到 S 呢條友，
* z' T; T  {3 L0 D我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
" |$ |4 r3 ]" f/ u' O  k7 t+ R7 w( K2 C6 N% J
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
- D- l* E* u2 h1 ~: e6 N; NF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係) j, b0 A; g9 e4 ]5 c- m
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
) j) m: @, V; _3 }6 K$ i) u: |B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
2 d5 _# R# w- A4 s# [* B% WL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...