Rika

由最好排到最壞6 F" H8 j  S$ C; p: j! d. ]
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
8 u4 n3 `, ]; o/ O; c0 Z9 ZB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount  H, {2 \4 g- _: K/ D3 P3 ~& C6 |
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
- d' c9 \+ b0 t; }/ d. t0 iM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure0 |' @- |- O) h3 a0 P3 r  l! K
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
$ G9 T6 F+ O7 F1 G7 W% o) h
5 V  M! P! t+ d/ o7 q$ X: HM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
( P$ \# }/ b# j( Q* b  w5 P" r1 U( \. p) s$ T
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
% j5 w2 r( B9 L1 j7 b1 O     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!( f/ v5 R# I- b1 ]' ]
5 x8 Q$ u, r: s$ y5 ?7 {' Z
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
& j  i" C; Q3 B3 c  b9 O1 m- T- c; x% k- C' K. a0 `/ |0 h+ W
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
- h* y/ N- b5 E$ B+ o3 n- w
. o0 c3 W8 p8 r6 @* t& @F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
' K) |( ~' W% p- j  W% o) v     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
  H7 M9 }& p! A9 ?, L4 z5 C& }( M& h( N+ a
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案6 A4 m) c( \! E5 V
而家答多次
. U/ C8 N5 D6 t4 }+ d6 R2 Qf: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
4 B2 ~0 [# @6 p3 ^" U8 O# }% Ql: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
& G5 p' M2 E# \" Y& kb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢! M7 K4 d5 K6 p! I1 Q1 W
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
' w, a- X3 v5 q1 N1 v. k* C6 }m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
: F  i+ A" @2 j$ ^3 M# M0 D4 U, @& H( I' W3 o. _5 S$ e$ x
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
) E1 ], B. e# C6 z# MF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
& A$ W1 L: d+ V/ o! P3 VM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
% j3 K) r' T4 i( e0 YS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢5 b( Q: p" d6 z& \
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞3 @& N+ D& t9 v2 A; G* Z/ [
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
0 a1 J$ a) w+ W9 {* {. Q9 NS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取3 [" k( J3 r5 U( |  B! A
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法$ X9 a+ h% \4 U1 z( I+ j
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
5 U0 A- u5 U9 o* @* s# UB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情, M6 {7 u# c) r2 k/ d9 R
! J; k- X0 A6 t
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:, Q  n, e( Y  Q( q& B+ r
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己" J8 _7 U" g- h
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘! n9 m" b' q1 q- u
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
. @9 ~* m6 S$ aF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
% w+ f$ f5 z) p( r8 c: \$ p" |9 T- zM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

$ k1 \1 s# G  h  L% L( A: ^
9 E8 p* C# L4 p) W" T, i" B& d% @
same choices with u , but want to add some comments " z, y; z3 C' e5 O! E
# s4 y) h) L( l, S2 q2 m
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  ' K: E/ R: B- n# p$ B/ r
* S  p) N3 P  {1 H
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )& `& c$ b( m0 n+ |6 r7 t, \- q3 v) B

6 W7 R" a0 v  }  eF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
7 W# O# W) m, ]! `
( J# S+ h) C9 w# t* l% i, n% TM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
/ a4 F# i! P2 |3 Q' ^7 H
) R3 S! j5 [, o! W0 z[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
) f( W( Y8 E6 o3 l$ w3 MM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
4 ?4 A- B0 \- d9 o- u& UL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
1 \/ M! q/ ]" X3 W* \+ j: g/ cF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma/ y' b) i0 v0 d# E( _* o$ e

, v+ s$ D% A+ i6 X5 a3 r" ?最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....- b; b/ b8 g( i# ?: l
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，$ H* |7 f9 E4 u; R( x% T
由最好開始排起既話，1 a+ V: I) z4 f( b
L B M F S 啦，3 o/ o2 [% F: v4 ^7 F5 _! _
3 |, t2 @- F; z3 _' Z
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，: y% _+ |$ T+ I+ A' _
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
& x! h+ H# x6 Y如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
! T8 F. L8 w1 ^' U! ^$ y" G又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
* O6 j7 M' s( y4 W+ \
" x; j: W5 t+ G$ y而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
6 P+ b" f; x5 _" ^9 b/ e, e所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
3 p7 E  l. |# _$ T$ c, {9 M明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。9 X4 Q- [# f$ w& l+ v

  _' G  q( }5 ?5 I" n& ~8 H而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，& Y0 r6 f5 l1 e. {' b6 t  Q
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
  K. X8 I- d1 \亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，" K# ?1 U; D3 H+ o, z$ k
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，) C% X) A5 `$ L/ P0 O
M 都可算壞了。' _; c# ~- D5 Z7 F
8 w# z4 C. v& F, x" i1 u& O
F 呢個人仲掂，
, o# H1 R6 [- p知道既唔等於要講，7 W' e6 [# {, @, f, L
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，$ r0 a) z9 R" I' k1 N4 `) z  \. t
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。, _2 b# N% b: N! ]8 Z

# F3 u  \8 r4 o; J5 D8 e- k3 i最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
6 M4 Q. F+ O/ Z& f" c2 W始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。) l0 t) ]9 X1 N( r  U
$ t: _! L: J/ B' C& i( R9 w

" k! c; H( p3 ~: L' u( l$ z' I" m/ d% {! Y& P" }/ N0 z% Z
題外話：
: L5 L3 b: {& u& @唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，* t. n/ \6 K5 [, v) ~: u
睇到 S 呢條友，7 T4 I# s# |5 I1 G7 G6 ^
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
: G; |# ?! V5 P) m4 z3 X) Z# s2 u- z$ X
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
7 |; r( @# R% W9 I+ RF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
2 A! Y& C4 B! H- c7 d( yM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她0 }9 a* u  G& v
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害0 I' }$ O0 g5 K: i
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...