Rika

由最好排到最壞
2 n) S/ s% P% T5 }) A6 X6 z7 b& RF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
% r$ a1 Z, b# h( z4 UB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
# A! ]* b. |0 x; Q4 \4 I) m: k7 u6 _9 FS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
) p, g  A& t) \: C& EM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
8 Y' s* i1 R8 o1 U" CL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:7 c  D+ ^; g. R. O! `

. x6 C5 s& v4 Y. dM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人3 R4 o  u+ P1 s+ f2 L4 ]4 D5 C

. r/ C4 T1 H' [* ^3 eS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事); g) H5 K/ E$ i
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!0 [% o1 F4 T; |5 [# B

$ B* B% I- a. Q( _B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做5 g; X$ ?* x0 Y7 T% F" M6 d
& v) u6 L' p9 t" V3 B/ A. r
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志, i% ^$ m; b9 [2 {" U+ ^! j" y
$ F% O9 Y' o8 f
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
; R$ X* y4 ^0 B# e     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
! X2 M7 k3 L2 D% a  t" _* V' G- E" a
& F5 _& B) Z' u/ z[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
" ]4 o& {8 j5 S: P而家答多次! |: K2 p  {- W0 [5 O& i' r
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
) M! P3 h4 `# c5 x" G! @l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架) _1 |9 Q1 m8 V# K) i
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
9 _+ D6 r3 Q" S- m- w' h  b2 ws: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.! {1 g9 T8 B. g9 n) v( D! J
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
# ?4 ?6 q) R, C( ^
1 P5 m# a# h6 q9 A  G2 RL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
$ n8 \  Y+ Q+ W) k! zF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度& O  c0 p0 Y2 m  B1 L) R
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒' u& O1 Z& H1 Y' A1 {4 d' \% o
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
, \  i9 a0 y& L$ X7 F. ZB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
% C4 j' u. S) D/ AF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
  [6 M4 A. h0 n" L+ D  P1 |$ rS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取! B4 y& Q3 d- S( G: [" e
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法' W) z8 H& J. E; M; V
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
: L% D, O* B1 k9 ^) B$ C: HB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
4 a8 L1 f2 ?: u2 v. K6 b/ k1 ?7 {. _- d1 M# J  F; S. k
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
; {0 B$ i* }7 z" T2 x. ^L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
3 q7 x% @8 p) d' u' v( U/ oB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
, I( H# A; z6 \+ HS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件8 C- u# A% i/ Q5 |/ j0 H0 R* s: b
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方% X2 n" D6 ~) W- p0 o- {
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

6 N1 |6 X. E1 p/ |) u+ H/ d" H) b1 n* z4 p
same choices with u , but want to add some comments , l1 i5 l: W. a0 ?2 `

9 |& a3 y: R* B* Q' {! AB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
2 ?* V# N7 j# G7 f" O6 J6 y5 B. K/ ?: e; R% u
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )) V( H/ g: C% i# N4 |: E9 Y

$ c+ V" G& b) z% z) [7 P  M4 EF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome $ r# H9 g% d# L8 ]6 D

" Q- ?. L$ O1 S8 R- U$ w4 lM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......- d9 H, D" i( K9 i; X
. N- ]" b* t/ o0 h* P7 v
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge- Q, Z. S! v3 I. J
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
: L9 ]3 Q" ?  G$ P0 p2 VL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點' L  @' y; s0 G% h- l$ w) Y
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma) I" h/ U4 E9 \! n: X
" s  a8 \4 v$ E" z0 l0 ?
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
4 ^9 h5 l4 h' p) s! [* t, c有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，! o, L! U; K1 R2 F3 F
由最好開始排起既話，
/ G0 Y  |! y) S' O4 GL B M F S 啦，
) H9 L4 T3 V, ?
! c9 Y3 ?- I  F+ u# x9 s  Z其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，6 q) `& B* ?& {+ w# [! C
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？0 [1 u3 d7 B/ q# D
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
# c7 H2 }0 D6 `) o# j又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。4 z+ M1 Y/ j9 O
: _& Z8 T6 W+ L# m! q% ^
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，2 g( O8 A6 P* P8 @1 x$ K' E' V
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，$ A* O  ~( f. [8 G
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
( W- u9 }. W4 D) X0 n9 X5 U: H' p/ z
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，9 l) b5 C& ^$ G4 _# |+ _# D
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
, n7 A# D. a8 n) R0 n/ Y9 Z6 R# A0 j亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，  V% Z  U9 G4 L6 W; n4 i2 \9 ~
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，- h1 r% |: Q4 i4 L3 y
M 都可算壞了。
- T. b  ]3 q9 l* t. J" y
! u8 @  ]5 V- d) u8 D8 ]0 c8 G& E F 呢個人仲掂，7 S$ K1 l( f  t
知道既唔等於要講，
, C' q* b+ D: q" v如果呢件事發生係自己身上，% q7 O% {! O# G7 V* S  k
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。5 G% U2 S, v$ |8 O9 `
' w4 S9 l/ K7 F
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，3 d  _- k* P7 H8 K% `$ a: {
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。- T( D. |" R$ }

+ ]# |" d3 i: g0 ]- h) H8 q' ]9 K" d) I- d8 T8 C4 l
) _0 p) L( }( G, \6 M
題外話：8 Z' R# d( o; r/ B
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
$ [* Y0 Z+ B8 [8 G睇到 S 呢條友，0 M' N5 Y6 @  l( e+ y3 b* p
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
, q  A% G- X9 f7 E6 r% x; t) C
- ~: E4 G% E; J6 B* ]" XS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!$ v  `& l2 b1 g2 w2 d" G
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係. k2 t  z8 p  o/ h
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她8 U/ I' I0 P# ~, w# _
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
& a4 N# p  P( b5 L- Y( Z/ I2 KL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...