Rika

由最好排到最壞( P+ a6 o' C' @
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong, `9 Z% l8 \5 b, f- @) l9 ]# F
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
+ e1 A$ ~) H3 F& _S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her4 B  _- P4 ]8 B1 V, @6 }- p- R5 p
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
- c, j3 w* Q; z9 _! {' k0 LL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:' M! Q* W* n. y) @# {& W

0 K3 e- U2 D" _( n" `  {M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人! u4 ?( E: |/ H" |

! o8 E, h, d* a8 `1 a! X4 ~S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)# G7 I- n8 f( q
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!! Q, a8 |. Y0 B. h) ]) \/ ~7 n1 K

; B+ k. _5 l8 u8 `1 bB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
8 n$ s" s" R2 e/ k3 B: ^" V# b8 F
6 e" [: {, ]' Z1 h2 Q  D, _L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
# t: X9 F4 n* I$ r
, _5 b( Q. P1 @% F3 c0 ?F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,4 E# {9 f2 K: L! i9 ?% H
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
6 y- y/ H+ e1 c9 g9 W* Z  S
1 |- _. w8 _+ t[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
, s" T8 o4 b# P& V- F而家答多次+ c$ g* Z4 C' j; y- o. |' z
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
& t4 B0 Q1 u* |7 Jl: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
) s! R: ?% P8 z! v1 Yb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢( E' h- A/ x  N0 G  I# E: y) w
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願., Y$ s+ z0 Y& |  @
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
- u4 Y- J3 C; f5 `$ ~6 W
2 d* O" U0 c  w$ D+ IL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大) Y9 w6 @0 w  i
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
5 W, Y/ o( @7 |, [2 m; \% KM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒' A% U2 R" H" e4 t" C9 Q
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢( |  K% J  {, d6 t
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
) k1 f5 M+ ~# k% rF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默") ?, [. D* G: V0 m1 ]8 e
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取7 K, O8 ^. v: |$ e& p
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
" I* g2 t( f3 A$ DL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
3 W; a0 r. S3 |/ W+ `3 G: h# ~B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
# Z2 F4 X5 m0 B6 ]
; C* Q+ h6 B# o  B; A世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
. T8 G' C& I% J1 B& [/ o. P  l& gL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己" {$ m- k0 `2 R2 x  i
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘' e, ?" N' j# G# h+ J: B
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
  y! L8 t$ Y8 X1 l. fF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方1 T* q5 c0 U+ }% x! U2 f
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

. p/ f# u3 o# I0 a9 ~
' t, L/ F. r( x& O; Z0 a same choices with u , but want to add some comments 3 x) w# F/ L0 L# M7 ?
4 u/ ^* ^/ P2 g
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
  H8 V7 i  Y0 S! }: m/ A- Y: z: l# }
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )+ P8 M* a* t- w
' I% J: E, ?1 [# I; z
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome   z7 ^/ O! N* m4 n  [: \& i
1 Q5 X; x6 F5 _- |$ w
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
* H/ D/ a- P" r7 c% Z% T/ z- K
) x( i3 [( R4 p- S+ Y4 |4 ][ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
' f3 \8 W8 P/ K2 |$ VM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
! v$ {1 b/ @8 S  [' y+ NL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
! ^9 d/ ~8 D5 _+ [. B2 U! q& zF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
) _% C7 d2 B# r; Q8 P; m: U; v" \
, K) _$ D+ l. v8 i$ D5 q6 ~最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....: I# A3 m- m% w
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，2 W+ V' }$ B6 x; {5 U1 O# _# @
由最好開始排起既話，
$ [  I( I9 T- t" ~; _L B M F S 啦，2 k3 P. c- S) d$ d
* K: y' [7 V  y0 K; i3 S1 N5 T) Q
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
% n( z. i$ m! K6 G# B但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
* t$ x! V6 I8 G  c4 u如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？3 ~  {) M/ b0 ?5 o. _0 [1 F
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
6 Z  t& [& V4 c, a4 l( }+ b  _+ R2 _+ j4 M4 W% ?
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
+ A: Y9 J4 Y6 D5 l9 L2 n所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
* P& r, ~1 q! ~9 l( t) B; D明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
  M) P, h$ p7 {: h$ x, Y- Y! y# E$ N% S, p1 j+ [
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
# T$ v& p3 d: ?* O, }3 L M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，; H) B- W# }7 w7 G
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
9 c4 d3 y- g' X* P知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
: y. O- |( ~8 }$ X2 o7 \& f M 都可算壞了。, Y$ c, T9 k5 T: H( G
3 S$ C# h4 K4 Q6 {( w
F 呢個人仲掂，+ z/ p9 l  W6 r/ u2 E
知道既唔等於要講，; F4 ]3 `% _0 u) Y8 E) p0 d
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，+ Z; \& k5 M. a4 K7 {; N
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。: ~8 e# e5 `( m3 S6 _, y! Q1 ]

5 n. C! _' z* U; s9 g最衰個個緊係 S 啦，2 W/ U& q: J# X8 Q3 K6 I
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
% S0 k& _/ G3 C3 X' z9 d* B. ?
1 g8 J; c- F' r- U$ \' E! P$ ?; D0 ]5 E: l( L% k' r# u

5 z0 s0 h+ A+ k* x" \( A* n' w題外話：. f  k7 s+ C+ V& R$ E! |- e% o
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，2 u% H6 e/ v, D' ]2 V
睇到 S 呢條友，/ ~/ }$ g. L- I0 S
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
; F% ^6 y% P9 P4 Y% ~: I2 I4 `, S/ q1 `4 B2 @4 s/ n% C" H0 b% H
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
/ ^( H8 F# B  x" z6 Q" j. k8 ~F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
$ K& s  v% \( o- M2 A$ p! @1 A3 x7 _M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
+ S! \8 j/ u+ {6 c+ ~4 rB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
' k, c. X/ V" P6 X  C1 `L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...