Rika

由最好排到最壞; v' O) g! [. {7 V- D  G9 ]7 E
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong' S2 R/ \, K; I: b2 A$ y
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
8 C* M. r3 h) e, b& W6 IS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
# n9 d' a8 |; ~2 mM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
  _, c0 g3 H% c/ y! h2 C: \/ n/ zL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
" I7 c, x( S9 ~/ Z+ N. C4 y. T  g9 z9 v" q! }/ E- U
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
# U, {! Z, Y. o3 R: Z9 b2 L1 X
4 e+ x! o$ d0 q8 w/ E% FS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
7 L1 `8 t, G/ B  h3 ]     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
9 ?! T. A+ L' ~& ?
# H. D  J, `# v+ }4 U$ i5 rB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做8 R5 P8 Z( V6 k( s

# `9 Z) m) p0 r; L- p2 TL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志* ^! U: G$ X& o% @3 K" L  _

' H+ G* t$ y+ N% ?F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
( O: S3 X6 z1 b9 d$ O9 @/ R     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
- N4 |0 ^) [3 t( T
/ b( F. ]# Q7 _) i3 L+ o[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案$ r2 R6 m- c3 O$ P- S6 x% n
而家答多次3 M+ ~+ D/ B4 S. Z
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽$ _) q% R/ \4 I0 E2 Y- j
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架0 u: _$ m( I8 a  d  U
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
* z) D2 f/ p7 Y0 Is: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
7 r/ a4 k6 _, _  O) R: Tm: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
8 Z$ S. w$ \4 P
+ q) U" K; U: n3 HL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
- ~8 U+ f2 |* r& B# \F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
/ t, }& s* z8 o0 RM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
8 z  O  K2 A. ]$ |: R+ }S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢* T6 I0 g0 p2 E3 d0 W
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
4 T" Z# t7 k- |" X- ]. }F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
3 T' z  K/ H8 [1 m' \- K3 eS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
) A' Y0 I& ~( a, G+ c$ o& J2 G: ^4 eM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
7 [2 {( @/ i8 F  m- I- O% ]L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果& N4 N/ R. e* P! G4 ?# v: p
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情3 z$ [# Z$ ~0 Q& p- s- w7 t5 u

: P& z, a: R+ N* P世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:! p  Q0 A& Z( s3 H2 l
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
4 L+ b+ m7 ]0 d( v7 [4 u" K9 b# q+ ?* z  YB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
" O) Q/ z- Z0 |% [+ hS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件: Y2 w: m( b, [
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
3 t$ z4 K8 V, Q: S( xM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

! W6 J. |7 F/ J/ W' c. f0 l" _
7 B' v0 x& N( k9 { same choices with u , but want to add some comments 2 B  K% }) ?+ ?( @1 g
1 f( v% a  B! D4 J7 _
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  3 l- w" }  P! Y  h& |$ [2 Q. E9 u
( p; z6 R6 S% A& L( R
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 ): o* M  X5 {9 n
- K' `3 K) o  u( `. x: J; ?  R9 [) f
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
) \2 H7 d5 w% N  {' ]% [! F# h+ E' n: W
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
2 W$ c% X4 m) S, k' h2 ~  E" F% ?( L
9 W# u) U$ B  \9 D' |) O[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
/ |. q' L0 A, X7 `M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢9 c/ g! y6 t% b# ?* Y
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
& p* p7 y3 o) v) W+ E3 A3 ZF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma6 c4 d$ e) b" K: o) v' |, o
; p$ g3 v# M0 b3 r4 d5 \
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
. q5 \# E. g, z8 J有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
$ O: A9 J% @* p8 _" z9 p0 P由最好開始排起既話，
8 r. C  b* }( L/ zL B M F S 啦，* Z; I: z2 n; F/ m% M. G4 h: n. Q
2 ^$ F- s- T$ a/ L3 u$ q8 c
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
/ ^: ^3 m9 l4 R但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
6 M0 t) q! ~2 s如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
' T; l$ v$ L& x" a! `" Z4 q# c又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
" {/ ^0 S3 O+ g$ {5 e
) w) [) ^2 [' n$ o0 t而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
# q2 a$ S' R; J2 a7 y$ j所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，& O  u, y% P3 q% K' k" X1 [
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
  o6 i7 r3 U1 u% Z- D: B3 E
; u# W/ d% k7 K, Q8 @而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
( U! D/ F* `6 ^( r$ S M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，4 m, K) x, y2 _4 |
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，3 _6 a6 H; J5 r+ z
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，' W/ k  z; B. _9 o+ U
M 都可算壞了。  Q* q0 @$ M+ O7 h
6 ^  e* s9 M/ B7 N! ~
F 呢個人仲掂，
: O+ ]) q5 |1 m知道既唔等於要講，2 e4 v2 C; m4 d9 y  V" t
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，' w% v' v6 L6 Z8 d- n6 q5 U. E
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
9 Y& F8 i- r' o) _' f6 ^- T6 ?# H9 K1 `: R9 M
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，, W8 V* f2 X2 E
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
& S  a; u; l, F
2 t' [+ x; m; C! W, Z2 Y: A+ X6 c5 {9 y& k. D. z
; W  O/ Q6 h+ G3 r. L: I
題外話：, ]1 Y/ a/ P, v& x0 D' K
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，0 ^, I& M( N2 _
睇到 S 呢條友，
9 I- e3 [% Y* _1 K1 m( Z# \我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
  p1 H+ o+ Y/ i3 [$ M" x9 j6 Q& P3 y, b
; ?3 V2 l, B5 ~0 _: r9 ]4 RS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!9 u; g& B! h/ c/ `  J
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
" I; g; W- S2 `- e3 u9 D7 {: {. LM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
; R: a! d3 y9 W$ K: p& JB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
, Q. @! S5 I' A$ P% c$ BL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...