Rika

由最好排到最壞5 ]! a3 B! h- E+ \/ _4 X# X6 w
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
1 \& S* ~) k, _# u% W' V! @B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
9 I5 j4 S& f! g# Q5 iS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
/ \, {, N1 W! w1 _M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure$ B0 j4 Z' Y6 d, ^: f
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:- z6 X, P; @: D3 v

$ w4 j. Q/ k" Y; @( W: wM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人. a0 B. P9 _/ [; q
) y& W% a9 A& [  \& N
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)1 X; q3 \* i! r' X% R
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
$ A# @" W# ^) F
$ k( o+ m9 I4 iB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做& t' p; ]2 U  U0 G  E2 ~) @

6 Z' D9 _9 H- @4 qL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
  D! U, P% T6 A& ~7 L* ~3 ?- s3 H, g+ f! j5 ]/ n3 |. S
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
4 W8 G7 C7 A" I, B     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
3 e! `' X& d$ {) r5 U' T9 w/ [; T* E) F4 F# g2 Q) `! `' P
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案* [- K  t( m' n; i3 ^
而家答多次
- l2 P0 q% H* f, r3 P, qf: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽( ~9 [. e) d% ^: ]
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架4 P; @3 E6 M1 K1 a7 Z
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢4 ]" G. A0 |) N% B" N
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
! K4 n$ V9 Q* l# _1 V6 h& [: Cm: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
6 O/ v  G. z" `. ~8 ?
+ s! b. W2 Z, p- }5 CL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大+ i/ x5 Y+ u! R" B7 k
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
! s' @- n2 p9 H  c  `4 N) LM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
  \! k( {3 u) @) MS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
; f0 F/ ^+ E- y1 g) H# EB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞3 f6 t6 s* y; f; e% |
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
" I- h3 N6 s! Y6 ]) E/ u  Q3 h5 `5 zS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
( M" V9 d8 B& w( ]$ ]  E/ m7 qM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
# t. Y8 U3 ]% i$ RL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
1 ~& H, I; E4 W3 O" sB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情/ A1 z( k0 J3 }
% D1 t' [! j* c& ?0 x4 Q
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:& A+ A7 ]  z, s) w1 A5 q
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己+ Z) e* K! s1 Y" x2 }2 e
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
# ~7 a7 g# S, f1 w0 A; _' HS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件4 p  H  O* r/ c0 x
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
+ {0 A7 ~( ~8 H1 d  P( NM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

5 J* @- ^) ^, p
+ Y. j* ]: `* ~) B2 n' G& Q9 q
same choices with u , but want to add some comments
) x1 V% L' E3 z1 x
7 l- t* T* \' k  K- IB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
8 K6 b( S* C  N7 Z! e0 W
, O9 ?! D5 ~! `; {, \: iS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
3 ^8 T7 w# [2 P0 T" {) {9 M0 _* k9 o6 G5 D. r5 J
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome : ?8 Y( u+ C% z$ P0 h9 H$ s
4 i+ T6 \/ `7 c" \
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......4 M$ R( |) T5 W8 i0 U  v
: W& Z8 X( o" Y" l
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge% x4 s9 l' z3 y9 s
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
# q0 }. C) V$ x. G+ V8 UL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
) t- }3 r8 M+ `- F. D2 M4 p0 @; xF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma' A; R% j. N5 f
+ Z8 Y6 P3 w: ?
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽..../ n& R2 O; S" x9 y0 g+ d
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，2 \* I  v+ q1 Y. b, K
由最好開始排起既話，
0 l3 j1 x" D2 d( p5 W9 ?+ H( q  [L B M F S 啦，
: t( X0 X4 F! t5 C1 V" ^0 E" t9 s- ?& A+ {+ D& a  p6 e
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
) ~6 ^# X6 t, t' T% N+ ~但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
; D: V! Y: d6 z/ S1 n  y* v9 y如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？2 G1 i6 }" _  f5 Y
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
8 O; p  m  u6 W9 H- w3 h( U# ?8 ]/ q
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
9 y& G; d1 }$ c8 z% _所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
, k$ s& i3 I5 ^! K1 z  D; M明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。  C# N* b. y; C- E% v

/ B9 m$ D0 J) M) w4 S0 @而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，- [) ~1 d% _; y% [1 `
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
! f( m+ L* b- A; `亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
/ u( T6 n) z# M! t知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，4 m7 X* w( F/ q0 r3 ^9 |9 h
M 都可算壞了。
: A" [: [; l( Y2 U0 V6 p+ K  Q  @* n8 t! D
F 呢個人仲掂，
; f7 E: M( y2 F& l+ J% q知道既唔等於要講，
( K9 _/ h3 |0 F8 u: \; J* d如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
* Q+ q" v, c& i' z" ~9 K5 X我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。8 G- k8 w6 ]- c
% i& ?  g; R: v8 B9 `
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，0 i/ {# J& k1 i( k: w
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。' h! `) ~7 d/ ?" x5 z0 x/ f
, x; j2 Z8 H! e  }

& u2 ~7 E" I' x& T, i1 u! |1 C. \+ ?, d3 `( j
題外話：
. u$ s1 \3 z' |( M* ~3 I! {唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
& ^. b. ]  W  D9 R" l: A睇到 S 呢條友，
. l8 B$ T# _1 _3 T我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
- }" |! a) U/ ^' \) P" g5 ]+ t" g# B! `& [+ t
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!2 D0 p4 w0 p( k9 g9 Z
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
1 ^! M! C1 k, }/ S7 l  S9 q$ D3 m; ~M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她% t  `+ P4 W$ M% g* A: W) D
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
- T9 t: U* g; ~L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...