Rika

由最好排到最壞
/ @; t; n8 G" p' P4 {1 xF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong' W# o# I" I& H; K3 v9 A* j
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount1 W, L/ v* p9 b" f6 K! H7 i7 a
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her: X4 I7 ~( \; \# O! K
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure' ?( L. B) U) `3 h& f8 ~
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:3 B9 N. c  z; p" O9 ?- a

" u, O( |' [  mM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
! ^1 L' Z+ T/ t9 k" z/ u; R% {- O+ U7 ?6 O% W2 N
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)$ p0 `' y3 ]: P& o0 S$ x" W
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
7 I1 k* n  z+ J" Q) Y" x  l
1 h9 u4 z. E2 {3 E$ a. Q* TB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做& m- F9 h' _4 E0 k& D$ p9 `& T
1 t7 s: v$ R0 S+ U& {5 g
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志6 [% u( T2 \% q# v' p" g( f0 E

& ^8 [6 G$ L' VF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,, p+ }" l) T9 a# f4 q2 D! [6 E
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
' J/ {9 x2 R  g4 H6 m6 [
* `2 v% u' A, F4 r* Q( `, }[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案" P+ X$ b' i- g  A
而家答多次  o! s2 H$ B6 E6 K$ \( t% x
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽3 D' c) ]6 S  P% ?
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
& }# B8 W% B* P6 v  E0 hb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢0 [+ T* l( @& ^
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
1 a, `. D& @7 z) @& A4 B& |4 }m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S% n$ W7 @5 I5 y6 j
+ O& p0 E/ _6 b1 s$ i" j# q+ n- c
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大3 N, ]% G  ^4 F* T& k
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
  W/ ?, P( z6 Q4 {, l0 b4 Z* SM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒$ r2 M* T: L5 {& w+ |5 S
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢, v& f, j6 D* M  {7 Z7 T
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
8 e' M) ?" R1 V! f2 E( q1 p2 p2 sF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
. z; {6 Y5 L& ^3 C# o. m6 `S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
# s% p$ O2 J- m) T0 HM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法+ G( t& q& n9 O' B- T1 g
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
. ?% C/ g5 [" l9 MB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
- @$ Z, h3 `; m! }% n  J& K: i" J+ U9 J9 Y: V8 f
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
. _6 w, Y9 n0 Q, D8 ~# Y/ ?L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
7 t: h( p9 ~1 |+ r4 O8 SB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
+ f1 G# }! ~2 n/ f# A2 l6 a, ~S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
# W) `) J) s( {2 f6 sF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方! U+ Q% R1 `: q  G7 m( m
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

, ?: O$ \2 h) T( ]* P9 `: b
% n2 B8 b# s$ |2 w9 @8 L; p/ y  D
same choices with u , but want to add some comments
1 J# m8 D* k" }! Q4 a: C3 n! E
* ~- `. s# s7 LB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
! ~# H, M/ P! [: [( f0 L, S( v) W& r/ H! G5 v: H! ?
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )' w  K( j2 t' t: h/ @" X) z" ~0 o
5 K" H2 x! a7 W2 ?0 I, t3 r+ Y
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome 1 W: |  [. J6 u* Q9 R( h
$ j; u' i  ^2 L+ m
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......5 L, v& m! s) n: N, b

6 ^4 F3 t, K- x% I, f7 C- f8 N- ~[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge, U; {9 W4 q" w9 z2 I
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢9 x9 z3 Q  x- v3 v6 z. A
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點% N+ H( {4 d" M. X
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma5 P" s7 g! o' C( j7 H7 v
5 |% a: Q8 D- T& ?) i1 b
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
/ v1 C8 e. W  \! B有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，: e; {0 l6 r" `5 N8 q
由最好開始排起既話，. v6 q$ Z! [( v
L B M F S 啦，& l4 ^5 q3 o: t% J* n6 |. y7 d* L

. f$ R: f" V/ K) y9 ?其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，* U) _- n5 y9 ^0 j' O* N
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
. L0 {6 V; a& b7 I+ x' T: M3 I如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？& e  g! N, d0 d
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
0 M: }: D4 i# t* R# x6 R; F" j% \  H! x
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，  |8 }" U4 M9 r4 Z* w' [! c4 l. F/ J
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，8 E, s' @7 Z) ^$ f0 y' k
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
3 I, H$ i7 L# ]* }" l0 j2 m
" o6 G$ Y7 C0 l" l: u2 Z4 N而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，- y; B' p- h7 ~4 |, Z
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，+ ^9 n' L) @2 Y1 U2 p$ Y
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，; a1 |* t" N7 d* \' f
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
! u" `8 h/ \: U3 j M 都可算壞了。5 j: m+ F# c" P; r( j& ?( x' u
3 q/ H( J8 i  s
F 呢個人仲掂，
) q' ]" [1 [, M. p; E知道既唔等於要講，
  [3 C) w' H& Y7 E7 g! |* I如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
/ o4 W2 t* m6 q& M+ n  a% k1 o我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。0 A% ~/ \/ t7 |! Y2 Q- L; j

# W; U" \+ }' F  f* P  a+ w最衰個個緊係 S 啦，0 }! e7 U7 V2 y& O3 M
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
2 S. y2 e8 j# j2 z% h) |1 K6 z! H; |" D$ J

+ a5 C- _% J, q  }2 @' M$ B- H
/ j8 v3 r1 t+ Q題外話：
7 P6 ~% |" D( J3 R1 @唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
; |& L4 @5 _% r睇到 S 呢條友，# ?6 }& w1 m; ~* n3 i$ ~
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
% i2 S- i. M7 [+ `; H2 P! p
" y" O% m3 Q# a* \S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
# \, Q5 h! B: }0 I$ c. n/ `F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係' d: h/ l( l9 P% l
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
2 s' F: m$ n  K: e% ~5 N. sB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害: l4 P+ c, p: d1 m4 t& G
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...