Rika

由最好排到最壞
! _" Z/ x7 s3 Q0 N7 BF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong7 ], d, V! M6 G6 K+ Z6 ~2 M5 L
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount9 k3 W6 H# }6 K9 G6 I* t: h: r
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her+ X3 f6 }; S% K1 O* E9 m
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure/ m, ~! {% L& V& N$ }/ h' h5 w
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:. `  b- i9 K8 ^1 ~2 G' e

2 k0 z, j! U4 Y' D  MM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人' M: X2 }" `: l. s" C# ]) p5 b

( p! {2 ?/ m! b* }6 M" PS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)2 c  z0 H9 \/ C) ~  U7 s" z1 T6 \
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
. {0 {. `' B3 n3 K8 S" ?+ h+ o6 s- G2 g4 O
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
) c! E+ c4 H8 A8 W4 w+ [/ \
9 b8 q6 T  g3 |/ nL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志6 a4 s( `. K  K/ b) Y

8 Z! I2 H# ]; ]: G! U6 e0 j8 j" xF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
7 T# V$ |1 G  V  i1 T( N5 P" [     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好" Y: e- V! x% Q* X  b5 @
  ?% H; [+ g1 m/ S: T2 N4 C/ m
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
% |4 @( y' ?, {8 `: P6 f而家答多次
- J  [& n$ h/ [# }f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽- s( R! A4 Z$ O( I+ N
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
! g, C) [6 O( M( r, S! ?b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
$ |. y" S! X0 S% C3 U6 Ks: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.. B: f8 I7 ^1 V1 V; Z$ E6 r, ]8 ^
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S8 p3 Z. ^7 q+ C7 l8 ^0 \

* G( m8 J: |/ j4 mL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
5 |/ M* S' L# t7 EF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度8 K# f$ d" f! e1 l0 k( K) l) N, s
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
; i: \1 y. D3 @  tS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
: X) V2 `# z. R  i; B, {7 R6 lB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞( N1 b% {+ U' d9 a/ @' o# y
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
! L$ Y; J0 l7 b5 G/ Q! c7 y3 pS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取, }% Q7 H% Y5 \+ z7 S/ l5 |5 L; U
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法+ }: m# H+ s1 Z0 \6 u) @( [" E
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果7 ^# s& M* r- x
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情8 s8 k/ r1 L2 p) l& o

1 r$ W: x, R- G. o世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:" }% E9 f  X" m
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己$ ~* l( B# j! ^# q& m
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
% Y6 l2 N+ b, g5 s1 w8 zS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件) ~( ?. j# _& G9 I% v
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
" R' p" Y% @2 i* ]- hM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

7 L1 Z. z6 K& w8 e$ b
% R2 l2 `" ?8 f6 i same choices with u , but want to add some comments 4 g4 S( D( g1 L2 o4 }2 I0 f
7 ~' Y( W, X8 L' }
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
1 H+ O) E8 u9 `. Q- c  Q+ R( f  J0 @* U" @; [* E
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 ); N- I8 J; c3 @( f& b7 u; ]: x
" W" R0 L+ F0 S. S
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
5 B4 b0 M4 e! j( B5 \
" O' U0 c6 T* e* K6 FM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
, z$ ^- g0 G# l( Z4 @4 a6 u; s
* H. T( S" Y, u  x+ `- m[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
+ k' X2 k2 n( e1 M; `* lM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢7 d, m( @/ R5 F7 P$ j5 O
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點3 i6 Y2 M+ s: g5 E/ ^. H$ Q3 {
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
% ]) \! \2 \5 Z$ S6 E% g( P& R
3 r; F/ C$ V$ h) r* N2 f最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
' w: @4 C5 @( e# O6 r: K有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，5 M- A: g, f, V! Q5 p! j3 B$ O% k
由最好開始排起既話，  V5 i! B- ~- H( @5 X" U1 M
L B M F S 啦，
5 D! q5 S4 d2 _4 ?+ U# ~4 X! \+ R1 t8 M
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，" T5 |, X4 ^/ J
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
7 z  j# _) ?, A9 ~% M如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？! Y3 [) G1 h& `, \$ [
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。. n/ H7 c4 u4 `9 M

: }# ?) G2 E9 ]- J而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
6 D) o- k/ Y( j" v7 c所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
) C  ]1 T' L1 y9 R5 i. s: o' \4 v明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
2 l5 ~, G4 G+ S7 R' y
' u" L* P/ H8 M; y  o而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，* B/ M- L; v+ O& ~
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
) m! y; ~% m2 Y0 k亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，2 s, f( g5 J1 l3 J4 ~8 c- x% n# F
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，$ j! x) L( ~. q" F
M 都可算壞了。
% H4 h/ j; ?: j# O; f) Z2 d9 `0 v$ b( @" A$ S
F 呢個人仲掂，8 ?1 N1 \+ S5 T8 J0 q
知道既唔等於要講，0 g6 C6 a- h0 M3 T. l4 `
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，2 ^! j/ r: f4 ~4 E. F$ P
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。4 z/ K$ D6 L& n$ i3 {, d
- D: n3 ]5 Z3 t9 ~/ [  F$ |7 J* }
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，  Z. v5 B2 v7 D1 z$ P' {( |% M
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。/ l. q7 R& c" ^; ?% P( j" `/ c

" d1 y4 \& f! L) S8 b& H6 C) t7 k: S6 y' m

$ b+ ^3 G3 O/ e. N題外話：3 g  B& z$ p0 L6 e
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，7 j, Y; R4 S3 D0 z
睇到 S 呢條友，( O! U( ]: J4 l7 B8 X' z/ G4 _* I3 L
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L; X, k6 U$ _3 T& P7 L9 j

7 C/ ?5 x( K  K: {S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!" q! A5 H, Z7 E
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
- w6 q" g: Q9 V$ B& @M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
) g+ w0 \( ]9 D6 R. lB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害; y1 y3 L- g2 O% k
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...