Rika

由最好排到最壞3 M$ o, n0 M5 w. s+ L
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
# C6 v3 _# M+ v: |  T, @B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount7 V" V( I& L4 y8 }: o3 v
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her/ @2 e' ~+ C+ H/ r
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure8 ~) \8 _. L5 [# p
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
0 K3 d% [; h2 w4 Q: b" D7 A$ x  b$ l0 c( v* U& t7 G3 |, q
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
$ D8 d3 |# p* f6 J. y* o& I
( g: `$ }! }7 Y4 K$ tS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)9 R/ o+ x: n) G3 A  a# x2 D
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
' Q3 x* p; f$ U2 L  a8 ?3 Y" |& I
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
- m: a* w5 ?' S& d/ H( t
0 L- P6 H# x- zL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
1 q: A' w+ q: ?4 O- G% h
: ]. z3 C; P+ f$ @9 A/ u" e. zF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
8 p& ]/ s7 u8 s+ w4 `$ X0 r     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
4 [6 ]  V+ q  `8 B& {+ I' i. B* r4 b4 ?
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
" N$ u7 w0 M; d- M: V& C而家答多次" w# X. I  Y. ^7 z
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽' E5 E' G2 M/ i1 t1 F+ j
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架: r5 P( n' ]/ g" l" s2 W
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢" X6 ^. {  k8 T+ U; R4 ]
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.  B# H: W! e/ D/ \7 B. I9 m
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
% M7 g6 H7 f7 ?: X3 O; H# G# `" v  g7 U6 C3 P2 U- T
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
$ m3 \- q0 T( g& [F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度4 \* a+ }2 R- N+ e  x3 |/ y. x
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
7 `: k% T; [! V  Y; j: rS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢# P: `0 d: J& `+ w5 V
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
! I2 ]1 S$ W+ J7 _1 b5 {F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"( F, N% [* y5 j: W8 m. x
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取/ ]; y/ U: _4 \9 ~9 k
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
- N8 Z4 x( }  X5 k! \L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果- n! R# D" j+ a" R6 o. }: w# n0 C3 N
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
5 E9 \- J) h- |- M, U
3 ?4 J, x0 ^5 Y9 N/ m' ]世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:( G! N# X: `) E( N8 y0 i
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
* R# K" F: u. y! y. C& _, a: S( OB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
. @6 b- `1 d, ]# ?S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
$ @! }# E. H7 z# sF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方) r7 m! e$ \' s
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

$ b; _9 e" i$ O, c5 o. X

# A# z7 n6 v. V+ P7 f" i0 z same choices with u , but want to add some comments
! X: J1 o* D. c/ `+ H
3 w' F2 }, x/ F) O4 G3 V8 _. [$ [B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
) p6 \1 N8 V9 _" B0 }
# e% z9 z* m0 @9 B' FS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
+ W1 S4 _' }: t8 \1 K9 P* t5 e: s
9 Q$ X( z: @8 V, aF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
4 s/ b, _! b# q2 i! s$ T$ p  n" \# h' ?( t  k+ Y1 z# M) g  d% Y
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......  G3 T0 u" G) P' u. ~

: r- h' Q/ K% i, V- t[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
, B  r6 b9 x( L- b9 Z! S7 ^M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢7 n& y5 P7 G: m4 v4 x
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點! r$ n( h( L  q& f
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
6 _/ _, ]+ J! |
  v1 f# G' \# r8 q; z+ S5 R最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....- [- _" Y+ F% H9 }/ J- t
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
! o0 c& l+ |' _1 j由最好開始排起既話，
: C# n4 Y' X+ N) X9 |6 dL B M F S 啦，8 w  b/ z. b( W8 s  T; D

/ D5 f( o. p, d9 h/ O8 F其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，: j" T4 M5 V0 i0 a7 [! w
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？) b+ k( q& v4 B, [% d) W  p& ?$ |& D
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
. B3 D8 l: W7 ]6 k5 y# G又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。  P' k9 D# D: K

$ B7 {/ _. F2 ]而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
, B/ s0 L. ]4 R8 i; A+ w- r7 Q3 ~所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，* l! K* Y% T5 G: a* m; \
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。; J( U9 J, S) T( ^
6 T. L2 M1 U+ f, m; M$ L
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，3 I2 |: S' [3 W6 W4 O) k5 y
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
" U- {9 }1 O8 B亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，, r2 U* X( Y7 e4 h, D* d
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
0 q5 ]7 L: \. p, @  J4 [, B% Y M 都可算壞了。
. c  O8 m( ]0 c' r) a% |
* M9 r/ E1 h- Z. J! v+ `4 ` F 呢個人仲掂，( ?- a9 k- H" f# L' V
知道既唔等於要講，
/ T; ~5 y5 n* K+ c# k如果呢件事發生係自己身上，- q. v; F8 g# i0 Y* N2 W
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
! Y- S5 ~. u2 _% J8 z7 v
/ D+ M3 h. I% g5 r2 W最衰個個緊係 S 啦，! E. V* \1 R/ W# Y$ |
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
7 p9 U+ a9 j, \% V; y0 ]$ ]  y. I. v$ F4 o4 a' s# J

: B0 h' T7 {3 H! m+ B( f
, y# l# [) i& g9 r5 g6 t題外話：
4 @6 U, d! k" _0 f% e# n$ @唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，$ V! @+ ~$ p! `( N- V1 \& F
睇到 S 呢條友，
0 f1 L& i, |6 [( P5 K我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L3 T" B3 p" |3 L7 ?; D

$ G1 e- j: d0 F6 U0 IS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!7 V5 T# {/ \7 @$ U, h/ Y! c: _
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
: D2 J% N) t$ @M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
1 n! ^% L+ t1 R. m  uB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害) l7 c' c, R; h* X/ \- O0 i+ }
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...