Rika

由最好排到最壞" a) `# h: V7 g' H3 ?# S1 E9 O* T
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
! A/ @. t2 p8 m4 w: l4 A" ?8 x+ hB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
& C" ~1 ]1 E+ e% bS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
6 a3 ?' J. x9 ?) E4 uM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure1 i$ ^/ X7 _# i$ C) \% V. k9 O
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
+ E; }/ Z" K; [3 }. r" j8 B
4 l& {0 \9 J5 g/ \2 _, XM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人4 s* i6 d& g2 U, L+ ]0 d# O
9 ~; C+ d# n3 ]
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)/ B; E7 Y) w, D3 l4 j
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
/ B8 ^7 ~' x4 s, V0 \. S" T9 o% f; B6 `- P
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做+ ]  p- {* J# {( N

" Y/ W% ]( L! N4 c  i) ML - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志- O; `9 H" z) _9 s& ^* g# `

3 A/ v4 W' L* n  x" Q* pF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
% d) `9 j4 s! @* X& p     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好/ J: P1 l( X5 |, i
# Z3 g* u) c9 W
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
5 q7 \. C9 I$ F7 |4 j: Z而家答多次
$ ?8 x; B5 r, E# V% b& c) b1 ~" bf: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
" s7 {1 o% b( Q- d( J% cl: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
; \3 p9 ?  h" b/ U6 r& M1 y' Gb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
. m1 D3 A& H$ i# U$ t. ls: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.2 t& ^1 e/ O! R# b8 o+ G3 A
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S- p! h7 E/ q4 O7 [; o) k2 ]

. k3 {; A8 J- cL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大/ z( ?/ @" @' O- p4 N
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
' `9 {. L+ y, M5 M) s4 AM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒0 _1 h, l3 t. Q" y
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
! g" h% {$ g* y7 wB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
5 z9 l$ f4 @! j; i8 cF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
# I: R8 S' G9 X" b4 }S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
9 V$ T& @: y* ]# Q5 c+ V. ZM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法0 U" C: E$ v: t6 V2 r  V0 ?, `4 P4 F
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
% J9 V2 d% D$ xB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
$ `! q$ y# P3 I* F- k
( p( s6 y# |8 N世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:8 M( |' y$ {( s  D1 t& s
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己+ v/ m5 u* ?' @. N8 X! K
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
1 a  U, Z7 s0 i' }. i7 W3 r+ MS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
' F2 R" [6 G: Y' k5 oF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方, W  J" q6 |5 |
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

3 X" s; X/ ]) r6 o) H

+ R1 P- H5 y1 e1 r same choices with u , but want to add some comments 3 h; K$ C$ l9 K: t7 J, j& D
7 e! x5 _( a3 O9 }
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  $ q" \- s  k( Q8 X
/ X8 }" o# a0 `0 H
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )& b: l) n: ^. s& k: e8 |) ~& n
" q2 \% M* Y4 n1 c
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome ) u) o: A/ p7 _$ ^5 ?
0 M2 W4 \3 p5 |% Y
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......; l7 N8 Y0 I- Q

, {" l3 W3 {. F8 Y[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge* B3 ^7 D2 P9 |1 }% s; L) X: R
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
2 W3 }0 V/ y- P; ]% Z, h5 ~/ h, \  |5 FL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
7 F5 h0 a0 `$ vF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma/ f1 j$ Y+ L+ h7 q' T$ I4 ~

4 P6 p" w- n# D& K0 s  ^最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....& r) \' H9 w! ~/ o8 s: L4 I
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，& t- M! G0 \3 B4 v
由最好開始排起既話，( `( T. K! I2 a' k
L B M F S 啦，
1 W! \3 ^- Y, l$ G" b% E- [9 h3 }: F& l; L: N  N) u& G
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
9 k5 W$ O$ f' q3 c6 k" j但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？8 n7 G+ L+ X( T! j8 X, k# H6 A
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
, {0 n* f$ O0 ?5 _" u2 B# e又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
/ F4 }7 D9 O" w9 ~" Q/ h, R# H  r  U# _( v- C1 J# y' p3 z2 A- s
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
' b& y$ d1 e3 V# e0 J2 \- a/ m所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
! r$ A" f; q" B2 w! N$ y6 D2 [/ d明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。% e' Z0 |, K% X! t' u- g& w+ R

6 }$ J! r8 s! O3 j! Y. D" n而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
$ u4 ]2 t  T% ? M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
8 [+ v0 \$ f; W( [3 ^  f8 l亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，9 T; \0 X) T, I
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，1 \  }. p( w8 n' P- e$ `+ q# x
M 都可算壞了。
  H0 a% r$ X& Y" G" A" A
) ^- T7 P: x# R4 b; | F 呢個人仲掂，
9 L% t! l( R" r: d! l知道既唔等於要講，
6 m. c! {: G7 U7 F9 F! \( K如果呢件事發生係自己身上，9 l2 |2 W  C4 E" y2 N) @% Z' p) [
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。/ d! w* W  F8 i- I

( y3 [& g9 d) A  g1 _' ?' e* E最衰個個緊係 S 啦，$ n" E  d) n( L. C0 _/ @+ k
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。& C- M6 }# `% n/ ^$ q: \4 ^+ U; U
4 a& Z' X- B' I  z9 J
7 Z0 K3 G' {8 g) _
4 j7 T9 A0 }2 N$ B0 |5 F
題外話：
* p6 C/ u# h; D1 Y6 W2 t" t) g唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
& Q2 v; l. z8 _4 w5 j睇到 S 呢條友，
$ D$ |# n4 I) j我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L  _6 Q! h2 M1 G5 P/ U
# g9 A7 Y; i7 S+ k+ |! z+ S5 |+ r0 [
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!, o. M# ^& X2 |6 i& n' b0 O
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
) v; Q2 @4 J  [4 ]6 P, IM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她0 {/ B- t: Q  T* H; p0 j- \! }
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害$ h# W- ]9 Y+ C. l5 n
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...