Rika

由最好排到最壞
+ G& `3 A. ]2 Z5 SF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
; g) \; d) r, b: |B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount- U9 ]% A& @+ X1 Z
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her; [; \( o2 T9 t/ p2 Z% H
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
# x7 _- N& E+ K. S5 F: o; G* M+ QL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
, q& F2 @  L" a- y/ X5 Q4 C% ?' S) K7 \/ y
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人+ M  N2 L0 n% g) a8 M5 Q+ T( M
8 O. {( S" N: x/ c, J4 g- `' e
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
- @4 R- i5 R! X/ n     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
9 A8 H9 P1 L9 y# @; ?% o
0 A+ V" G6 X( t2 B2 u: d' L: {B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做% p: D, [: V4 n* X  c

. o3 M5 t% E4 m9 t9 ]  |L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
% `1 K7 i5 k/ y+ W2 m* U3 P5 m! I! P6 U% M/ E# P
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
- \2 `: V/ b! T2 y8 g" m: {+ a     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
8 o: m& c! u3 }+ c8 I) B: I
" @  r2 O- H) M. P[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
. t; r) E) q0 }# C" U, I1 C而家答多次3 R/ O0 n; b5 g7 |1 h
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
8 R. n' g/ \9 c1 l* Y1 ]l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架' }. T% F' U* G5 D) E; F3 M1 A
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
8 y% r& A* R' W. b, ms: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
! H0 p: Q+ j) P  V0 N& ^- Mm: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
7 f% l9 ?) ?6 k2 _( G; f% \
& M; C3 y- V# AL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大& w9 j6 y! ?+ `" ^
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度, U  C, I" M6 J- s$ U
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
* R( e5 |5 I3 K0 B; uS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
4 m7 ^- }7 E- x* B* H  eB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
5 z! J& _& n* r& x' B/ RF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"+ a3 D5 ^: [+ G" t. d
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
  @& A$ c: T3 U6 lM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法' |' S/ M: z5 v% r* j$ N) z  L
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
# g& R: N& m" h  C& ^4 uB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情# Y* H9 o$ _- ]$ Y" @) O

! b/ P! v6 G( H世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:5 {0 L  I! t) ?" Q
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
8 p) r1 _; a5 E# U/ kB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
# o9 r! @' c# k3 ~  ^8 ^7 w) V5 GS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件" u5 X) N& P! e& K1 }
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
* A1 J' X) I/ P+ L& U6 J2 aM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

4 ^2 e$ U. l. A% j  p
$ O  x1 G' f, }$ Y1 F5 N* f
same choices with u , but want to add some comments
, Q- H: q: f4 [+ z$ v) P, t' i4 ~: g6 L# a2 B" P7 a
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  : V& B/ C9 B) f5 e( v' T
" u6 X. t  A1 o! z! G; y; ?/ H
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )! u5 _8 H- o8 q

: t- l, A1 v2 C3 a: v8 SF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
9 I( U2 ?% Z- F: t' F) q5 F7 n- ]% U0 x
# L' Q! w* _# U& B( u) vM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......5 R2 r9 i% X. a% N" g4 D
1 a8 h! D- v3 |0 h# {: C) w
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge% h- ^6 j# L' V3 }* Q( ^
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢5 E7 e* |( r$ @1 h; }7 b: U: \4 y
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
+ @, w) b; j( {( LF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
  ~" S. `" T! f1 d- j* A, `! q& F  W! l6 g
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
& K* K' o) Z- t有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
, W( [: f3 A- W7 o4 e, f* t由最好開始排起既話，2 {4 n" o% {+ N
L B M F S 啦，
: ^1 Q4 }5 ], J! P* u; P# y9 [, p
! P6 I( H" X* C4 ~其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，% g, M2 m6 ~( R. F1 P
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
6 I5 }$ E9 v2 I如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
2 e" A# w9 M  ~8 N又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
5 n# `; J# F5 o
* i7 @" i$ m  t/ p而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，6 m" \8 r7 K6 m, q8 T
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，, F- h! y1 o0 x7 |) h+ [9 M+ P! _2 l
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
3 ~) g  l/ K* \2 _! w8 }: @7 b) d  G# y+ c" q( k2 a: W/ E
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
9 [; Y' e% d1 x7 D: G M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，+ I, q/ g5 ^! C9 [# U0 d0 x& Y
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，/ r9 T  i5 x- y  Q
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
. z: s3 f" t$ P M 都可算壞了。
8 L- L; c3 N6 A( T( y
. d1 F. E/ s9 d" q8 R" L) I F 呢個人仲掂，
- J; A- W4 z$ r  a$ k' s. N2 {知道既唔等於要講，
8 K/ j: p/ d- Z9 c如果呢件事發生係自己身上，) ^3 {' M* [5 d* J6 J/ z
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
% q- M( w! x. Z! ~+ }
# Q  f: ?* ^: S% C1 f# G( H最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
' u, ^! x% ^4 n# p" A) ~1 @2 A始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。0 d) s6 P2 q" q
4 [; d  ~; c- {9 h
' U$ C( E! b. ?

" o0 Q! L; E/ k/ Q: ^8 k題外話：
) \2 U: o, f/ b5 @5 ]: c唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
. e0 Q( Y9 M6 ^% u! _! p睇到 S 呢條友，  |: n  P3 [9 g3 p. Q7 P
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
& Q. Q' `  `/ V: D7 F  H* `0 h+ q( d9 Q5 w' {8 d
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!4 B+ I# `$ K, J1 g0 [; ~+ V" t! p
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
$ i8 `) a& e( h# vM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她/ R2 o! |& |/ K/ F
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
6 m' l4 q% k  f3 H! C# B, f, hL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...