Rika

由最好排到最壞
  g: d& F1 B! x8 rF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
0 e& b$ a0 _) N. v3 _# K& xB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
# \/ V: `) x7 CS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
) v4 t: z  v+ `, m: [; u, a) ?M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure" W. |, @9 F( J* a+ S! a
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:4 M: ?* _) }; [0 g& I6 b# @3 p3 q

1 h0 `- h" M" A! U, t% mM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
5 ?2 }* X- O' x# Y3 ~! h# L: j) Y9 Y& A$ z" g3 L3 c( r5 w# ^
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
: k: T  C1 e8 g. n5 r6 I8 ?     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
* i( e& a! r4 U- F% q6 ?2 E5 p& }9 ?/ }4 h$ {. Z+ |7 V
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做: g% D4 Y' m8 A4 t, N

) t: B* g7 z4 P2 u2 FL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志3 T0 H% w0 v9 ^& j! Q& C% Y7 i

6 `3 k5 I, j" Y! d5 U  T/ m7 ^: b# `F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
  @, K2 i" l! l     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
* Q7 Y+ Q5 T/ `0 t( Z. {# [5 I1 D; E: K5 j4 y
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
% z( @( f/ Q  d" h3 W8 \" R而家答多次# S* I- p9 d' ]- p% |( U/ i- i
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
$ C6 @" o% p* g3 t4 fl: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
+ g3 H! l6 I2 d# c* Xb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢) o. j" O% K. z8 k: D* Y3 e
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
7 J2 |9 o# m* Tm: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S6 R' Y! q% i6 _- p/ A7 ]

. N* z" t0 n% F: B0 UL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
) x1 Q' g3 U& e7 OF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度1 ^* B, G* g7 R. \1 y" G' j2 l
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒+ J0 q9 T1 u6 Y. [2 e/ h
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢+ H0 e$ d+ K! P; H: a" G/ z/ Z; J
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
0 t* v$ s, b3 E9 h  x2 ~2 \9 ?& sF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"6 Y% Q) |+ J; d; ]
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
6 _& q5 k5 g. N$ }M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
% k6 K- l$ I; vL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
+ L4 s8 f+ v) u& }& SB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情; W+ J0 k# X  c1 ^0 D. k
2 _5 a7 p3 w1 W  _! O7 J
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
: d" ^9 R1 u$ R7 K1 @& A3 B  QL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
, [/ }3 M3 H, _0 x3 ^) T- eB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘4 x3 V* q& x$ H# ~
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
, ^# d3 [' H- M# ^2 B' ^9 aF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
3 Z, }& a# ~) E+ C/ ~! `- aM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

- U" Y! b5 `' t
4 V* }/ O9 ?$ p# ]
same choices with u , but want to add some comments
4 R6 V' m! H1 }# ^% y' o( t. s5 D# ^9 ~" u% A3 a3 ]
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  2 v1 F) C( e9 _9 m: K: {) v7 {
5 h" v; H# \" \* ^) Y% ~
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )' @5 K8 B9 @6 R4 p( V4 w' k# W$ t4 _
. s6 X2 J! @/ ?1 [: x! ?' |
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome " f, C/ p( e" v6 H& }* `. b
! v* _' i+ d$ W, K# X3 y2 B; w
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
) f& s1 p+ N( d* S  D, z
9 Y# }* r" \9 Y$ b3 E% n. J* s[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
% s9 t! u+ ]  kM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢4 S# V3 \; T/ t2 [1 ]
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
2 n" y9 |6 y$ x; E- _F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
* Y! _$ @5 B5 G  G) f2 \) l; S; a0 J
; C# c! n3 k* }) ^( s: N最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
0 g  j/ _9 J0 `  R" b4 R有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，6 {, d% l4 P- x6 H7 t
由最好開始排起既話，
; H# J5 s- Q( m( z8 x2 e2 sL B M F S 啦，
) i0 u0 p4 M3 o# d: ^1 Z% m
# [6 e" ?8 b/ B# C8 w) @其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
. U2 X0 Z+ b6 b+ w6 ]9 p+ N+ N但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
# A3 u& S5 s' b" u5 G如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？* k- m  g2 C, r0 C0 d
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
. B. v& G+ [' T4 j8 K, x
& T% d6 U. `5 {0 G而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，; M5 r+ l" Z" D, G
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
- u% ^2 l; ~( d8 _8 R  [, V: ?+ }% g/ Y明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
( W' L9 O6 m0 q9 Y( O9 r
$ u5 b8 @) h2 J5 e而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
, e( h' E. o7 d  a9 V, `% i, D2 Q; ]( H M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，& X2 ]2 J# e+ ~+ V- G$ w
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，8 C# Z1 `3 h7 [- Y  S5 A% V9 Z
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
: w# l; ?! N. M! X' U, e* K+ V M 都可算壞了。( F4 o* H+ F1 @$ h

  g( x7 d) Y* p- M F 呢個人仲掂，
! z% K5 g9 M- ?知道既唔等於要講，2 U- s# s0 _  U' Y0 ~
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
6 L" G3 h" S8 E6 A4 _0 ]# Q我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。; \3 W7 G0 w7 ]: q) s
7 O0 I1 U5 L5 L( J: Y# |
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
( ~( H1 t- _: K始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。4 e9 r$ d' V- U3 ~' g
, X+ t! `( M! w5 [+ g0 f

% ]- @! [9 I  E+ i# |! H9 _1 y+ s: T, T  r
題外話：
% a% a7 R4 p% E, _唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，& F+ K0 g- z- C4 N3 F2 k# v
睇到 S 呢條友，0 O, J& p% h5 i* c% Z2 `
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L5 O$ R  x5 [; y
: X2 T! @" g; R. V2 ~
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
  X$ O. E+ u* M5 _) a! TF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係* I' a3 ?1 g: ]0 X: E
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
. Z" c! w3 o) w# L* ~3 x- y- iB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害& g% A8 N/ N0 n/ g
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...