Rika

由最好排到最壞! n, ]( s+ \9 o: \  P
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong- s& Q+ r' i/ u& q& F4 c) u
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount) ]! y" F% D# w! T* e) F" ~# {
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her8 p& Z0 P7 ]) L2 {( n8 \7 Z% \
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
; ^" W/ f& O5 ?5 @: F% Z$ N+ X- pL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
; A# D) l8 J8 |" ?
( f; ~, o9 V7 h: m+ CM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人, l8 B& @( G/ z& a: m( h: a9 R# j
8 `- f, _/ O" ]0 q; D0 U
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)' ]0 [  b1 S) d  u! j
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!0 u3 L5 H2 T6 o2 P. ^
' p! ]1 N- J1 q; k
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做" a8 J6 ~+ c8 }5 W8 M' p' D
# y* V# j: V+ q/ u, d6 w
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志' p" N3 E; F$ A) ?4 {2 s8 e
" R) M# Q& ?. r8 {4 v) |* r$ P
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
  y! A& p( N7 M; ^, f     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好9 {# \$ V' d# U9 P1 {! X& Y# l+ C, p

. B& @- _' \5 J, p7 Y+ v[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案7 l2 E! a0 I- _6 Y$ B6 m: @
而家答多次
  Y# z7 Y; U6 V; n. F1 E1 Df: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
: W& {" z1 N3 Ql: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架$ H' U& g! O5 l
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
, k# G4 M' O; K# {: i2 ms: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.& v' u4 u+ {9 A( o/ ]
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S  `4 Q6 P$ g1 \% n' s

+ H  l  p% F( k; U7 ]5 a2 eL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
5 S* S% k7 M* |$ G+ F9 o1 ZF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度; j) V( M- f# N4 e+ g0 X- @
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
$ e+ Q: E9 b  c+ t  P4 y0 _) O% M( HS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢7 W0 _2 @1 R3 s+ |% \
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞1 r$ h' r  B3 Q4 E' }  p7 b0 H# V, N. }$ }
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"4 c  R/ i# b0 {4 x: p: f
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取. a5 s5 |. h+ x  D  L
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法1 ^% n! Q, }  N4 G
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
. u' T3 y1 A+ X6 A8 _B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情# d- |( ?* @" ]- e) X  b/ {8 N
* U! g3 D& C, I( o6 P1 q6 x
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:' e/ @8 A6 M8 k& k  c
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
# b5 u7 P5 g0 M+ D) PB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
7 N9 F4 u; ?  z. [" b2 D: r+ {S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
$ P! @# G0 M. @$ CF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
+ y8 o% \, y2 k6 A0 ~1 XM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

7 g% G+ t/ u/ O9 N  L: X
- Z2 [$ a$ E: @8 g* S* W
same choices with u , but want to add some comments
  h5 C. i' d5 v3 x4 T! l$ q) Q! R, J9 I$ A+ A4 u/ f. b
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  , y" }" g# o$ I9 Z6 z3 m8 P2 B6 w
) Z# g3 w9 X; z9 K
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )% _. Y5 q# @2 t1 W+ s! N
- e$ ~9 N. k) R9 _* \" f' a2 y1 q
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
: @7 R7 L  L1 F/ R5 I9 b8 r# F; w4 x' f" {1 S8 V" h
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......& \0 ~& b9 q- ~) K. y: L# L
9 b0 i" o* ~2 o( v6 H7 n* x3 [
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
' s6 p1 i) }9 G! l+ J4 mM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
2 r, h2 \9 p8 A( |L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
% c- h! ~1 N1 S5 {" x0 vF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma  y! M* q8 m4 y) T, u, A( x8 U
+ X: ?7 Z. l/ {
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
6 [% t1 k; N' @有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
; u. n- O* I4 s" S由最好開始排起既話，
9 F( i8 J" s% o( CL B M F S 啦，
) l/ b" }0 [' }" f& r. N, \3 b) a& m; e: e
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，4 O& n' v: x% v+ U1 H. ^
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
$ f" a: A, x' ~  x$ |) [0 |如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？% ^% g# o3 x2 S& t
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
. n8 P5 u3 a' w; g) Q6 a9 A' }8 X2 Q0 e
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，# y" L5 ~( _+ m+ `/ @* m& X0 A7 v
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，0 {8 |% `6 l4 |: H& S
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
! |0 J: s& A- V+ u: o+ H* M
7 R" I9 z9 o" E. h而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，& B% W' f* V( T
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，3 @# w# G. \3 k% e9 h8 G, p
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，, B9 W3 R' z( D+ \% P' D3 p, r* z7 A
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，' V0 F  x+ ], K0 J; x
M 都可算壞了。+ _1 D! P% B4 N, Y  `2 u/ D- e

- n6 O  G: ]/ M: [* ?/ b F 呢個人仲掂，# d( F" D4 g( r- B
知道既唔等於要講，; J1 D' W* n0 F0 A
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，( S4 ~& |# K  C9 ?
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
8 M1 Q4 B5 ^5 B7 Y
: I+ q( m: ~+ c3 {" P最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
/ y/ @8 K; R+ H+ I6 J: c' Y始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
1 X0 R) M( c3 s+ T. L) K- r$ F
) Q  F! n" s, {3 s5 ]( s
# F* x* r' l  o9 m! x/ o) X& o+ b
" s4 X; T- s' d( h+ h$ j題外話：
: [( w: Q* d5 O1 E唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，+ {* M% Q% Y6 j) \+ ~: u
睇到 S 呢條友，+ P" ]  v! C: z8 u/ H. d- Y
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L7 A  f8 |: ]8 F& y% }" Q" p1 a

7 X" `. S1 I, R8 K% U/ \, A$ z# ES: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!( X5 [* G% K! p& ?
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
, `' S. C% q' A4 p  \8 JM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
4 m3 I+ a! {; J! Y- G1 B9 _B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害9 {  ~2 N+ t. y0 L
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...