Rika

由最好排到最壞3 y) \1 g; L. A/ p
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
' y& Q$ w( S) Q) yB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
9 L- U$ N  f. b0 b* \S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her: y4 i' _  P. S, r. [$ F) H
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
2 s! a5 |1 J8 ~! HL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
9 z5 M7 j2 b6 _& W# Z) k
/ s5 `& Y: w  U' D. x6 u" m4 CM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人1 {- o, K( A* L: m! a2 H2 g- w

) f% P7 C# l  ZS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)' |% y5 D( G9 a, z5 a
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!/ ?: y  o" U0 S8 n

5 q0 w3 E3 j' C! fB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做- S3 X1 w0 G- ^3 W
& p- w, Q0 {' Y& v7 j6 K
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
# S. q: `( z( |# y8 n* p; N2 \$ Q7 j
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,0 y6 H5 ?. S  O$ m4 M
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好: e; r$ q4 [; d$ M- J7 a4 T

- V' _. c2 w) k6 ~6 m[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案. ^) B! a/ y$ c  Z6 h' g: g
而家答多次
2 c" w' O4 `8 ?, D& ^f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
$ }& w& _6 `5 sl: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
: `1 P5 T! K+ I& Jb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢) X& F( C7 V" v
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.8 j1 X0 n( `# J, Q6 F
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S% u$ W! z9 y. f$ Q
1 b7 t8 I, J, d+ i6 t# C
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大- d, l/ D& M! n8 p! K$ M
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
4 x- L# T; ?* A- NM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒8 {2 w7 v4 E9 g) @9 N- l
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢  E# `- U7 K" L- D- L
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
# s8 C3 p8 W1 ~F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"/ b! t, e/ I* R
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取% E7 j: l8 ?6 g
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法9 I" K: X  k  v, G0 p2 B
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果- @0 H2 \# Y5 w% k0 t' H
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情0 [& T+ o- n% E% W# l% B, V" ]: y: W
8 T9 y6 ]: n1 P+ T' n2 ?4 l
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
  J$ a: N6 t; [, l2 YL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
$ p5 N) D2 l2 [B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
' e' T# ?0 H: j+ FS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
: E/ }) h+ |* v6 IF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
9 _1 }0 P& v  ?- q8 J7 h( nM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

" g6 k' P9 _: y8 N9 b* m6 E3 y8 X0 {

0 t7 ^7 z8 Q. ]: q same choices with u , but want to add some comments / Y1 R& ]2 t; A1 J' y& D  k9 N

  _# N, J7 V7 C& g  @6 q# QB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  : M9 [1 R2 W! H1 P8 q4 S
% e5 @7 M+ S, W! z) W! O+ Y1 v7 f
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )* C6 d9 ^, J& h! ~- P+ ]( J

( R! X3 k# r# R: K: b3 oF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome $ e0 I4 R. [. E. I' g2 F2 b4 A0 z
9 v5 i( L  s. _( r5 e
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
3 C# A0 F5 F1 B9 D" K6 u$ u, n
' z) _! f2 d. m4 J. L8 a" Y5 A8 n# V[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge7 A, }1 G& S1 f5 Z* Y0 v8 d7 U
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢8 i- R0 {. _6 ?/ M5 `
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
, U& `1 n; l9 q7 \1 c0 |F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
& Q; m/ c9 O% O! W/ L3 t* f+ M6 f
/ {1 `) h, q4 C* S, N( ]' E9 y最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....7 U: T# z4 E9 d* a. x
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
+ @8 M% N4 z1 s0 v' L% M; Y8 v由最好開始排起既話，
  u: T. v7 J4 u* ^2 ^L B M F S 啦，/ L; Z3 B3 h! ~6 Z; V
5 q0 r! D$ T* w0 F* C
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，- A; o. |% r" w( k2 \- I
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？# I/ n4 H& ]* }1 ]0 ~7 B
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？3 d! A5 L6 z- W
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
3 Z: |" g& f- |- e3 q  ^3 T$ ~
$ @8 q3 ]* t! N$ L8 I  a而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，) [# s6 g! B8 n0 y( a
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，' R6 |5 x9 F: p9 A) i5 ~5 o# b# U( q
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。; u: j) v  V, G3 m: R+ i9 X, J% h0 d
2 T. x3 v; k& Y1 E7 ?
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，* U( q( |, z( C, P5 o
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，! Q9 n. E% S$ c& i/ T
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，5 N; o3 Y; r8 C" J2 @
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
% h9 h/ r0 q, G( o4 s M 都可算壞了。9 C8 s6 X  I' y

" q0 r* u+ Q6 x/ e- \ F 呢個人仲掂，
: Q4 [4 p, k5 W& {知道既唔等於要講，% F- a! j; p6 e: o- O
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，- u9 ]7 E- V' R# D' Z$ i/ P
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
% q( S4 M$ @; o: X3 U* W) X: ]* E8 y4 q
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，) G: |, h  @6 w0 T+ z" q5 E3 A
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。% b' P4 L9 V+ ]

" `4 I$ W. o9 j4 ^, n9 ?1 z
8 k9 D9 p3 }6 b: s3 r* i) L5 e
1 |# ?. Q3 V& J; k  e3 m& E: w題外話：
: x! R& J# H4 c1 G7 y- y6 w唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，- a# M  W( c4 e' D1 A
睇到 S 呢條友，
$ B1 {2 d, G. U/ I! s/ t& I2 Q5 S我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
' l9 S! ^* }# C. ?- M! C7 ]+ ^. X0 U+ w- x$ ^
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
+ |$ N1 N, W! x) H  HF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
1 T+ T1 I! A3 u4 LM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
+ M* v' I7 ?; C2 x. IB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
2 j8 Q; l2 H9 ]5 ]7 _( i  eL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...