Rika

由最好排到最壞4 W4 j8 x7 o! V" y8 w3 Q$ e
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong" Y* Y# i0 m  h+ w$ n* b/ b
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
: x1 ^( O: K1 u: `& d( B( s: O0 J1 C% QS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
* H8 [; d& V3 }3 g5 \9 M* |M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure: e) Y+ }, c6 s# t
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:8 F0 s: T6 x1 E2 \7 I' J

! L+ x- \- \/ e4 h0 T2 m0 M  ZM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人* A; h( s. G% R4 O7 _8 g2 C) ]
: P6 j* P6 I$ i1 p3 f2 j$ h
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)6 A* m& A: c. ]1 J0 {2 {, _& U
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
2 {( A  j7 s' O. j! v% G' o4 H& s8 M2 R/ H& C  w) E' E6 P, R
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
" r* w7 v6 S; q' X; H4 ]2 l
+ F" ~" J1 m/ S/ H& C1 s8 RL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志' {" k( Y0 a& j" {, g( ]

: ^" x# J. P# F, y8 H6 P/ oF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,: x( S5 [  g+ Y6 P) [, s" d
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
6 g7 Q$ u! I0 _4 t# v" P+ S; _2 O" n( g: {7 b& f2 M
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
* q# f2 c1 H  T- A, t( u( f而家答多次
! \" ?% }8 ^; z1 z4 If: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
1 N3 u  q% Y- F0 S/ h  m+ P1 Gl: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架  v/ q5 R9 i7 i. \
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
0 W6 p: {3 t/ g7 _# f& [s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
4 A) p; J/ w# R8 R! Sm: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
' C  M2 O/ M+ k% `+ j& d& L9 [9 y0 c% ?7 [& ~  d
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
; f, R1 l% k# P) tF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
! P% Z$ J# Y  W% J* m! [2 NM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒$ v7 c/ q" O: d" P* ?6 M
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢' M1 D4 G9 b$ L% a" C& t+ i$ \
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞' K. k! W3 h  m) K+ t
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
; C0 e& C5 N1 j: C* ]8 E" _S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
$ C. P+ A6 {/ W! b4 T% J7 PM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法+ `4 T: H  t& E5 `& n/ F# f( q
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果$ {! j0 Y! l; @4 h$ ?- u
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情$ b( R# F. \# Y6 t' X# ]7 U  a! T

4 K$ l9 F$ P7 h4 e3 z0 M  l世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:+ B% `) K4 O* [& |
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己. \- l/ P  I3 D& W; l5 d
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘6 F* r9 q7 P2 E7 D
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
$ ?% o- D" W/ }: l$ P  B9 u' J- cF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
  V. L* h- P, q) I: d& D" B8 \M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

: s$ u: Z& }' ]0 a9 E1 W5 F; m3 k
same choices with u , but want to add some comments
3 R( L. G1 W3 g8 ?4 u
, J% i3 L. d$ S" m7 h3 s9 P. eB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  ' r- p. |( t0 ?+ F+ A4 K

1 |2 I  y$ ^& \# zS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
6 f# m- p! a8 K8 f5 k; u7 u5 v* x2 F5 w! ~! o+ b. j9 E( e2 t
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
) L1 W5 Q8 D+ F) z0 C# y4 Z/ }
- b* d3 R# u" D7 N) w9 M5 h) U. O+ yM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......2 q: v% C# H( h# T; l) Z2 l7 W% v) a

7 ^! O$ C& V/ F$ y) K[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge, @8 B% I) C3 z& K1 e8 q& u
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢  n5 h7 B! p5 v8 @: \6 C5 [
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
8 o+ Y$ t$ }* O7 h* j# A: Y6 jF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
7 w2 E1 [6 G& K- F' O( [- ?3 S- C9 P5 K5 k6 m8 g
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....2 F( ^7 Z' P2 y( u5 E$ V5 C* T
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，; M- B2 |/ t0 d# S+ a% F  K" ]: R
由最好開始排起既話，
: ~% D" F! D4 d- RL B M F S 啦，) d! C6 s7 M" X6 k: ]3 `$ d
" w. z4 M( s" o( V2 p- L8 H
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，" K1 a% T7 e$ ^8 x/ j
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
$ }. }8 ?# @% s5 B, D2 j如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？7 o( V  r6 u9 k' |2 m
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。, E, k7 o2 a" A5 Y$ [( d/ Q/ U

6 s/ I) ^: j5 W而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，2 P0 O% W6 S* n
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，! J; D. j/ U2 }; U& ?* o
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
% ]9 B9 n% \5 [# e! r
. }8 y8 R1 y6 _; w4 \" S8 C, L而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，/ x0 O- N/ @0 L1 E
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
0 y4 R& f# |% J; p6 T1 z2 n亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，1 P+ ^. `3 M9 V5 P& V. m# w
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，: _, ]. H* {* [
M 都可算壞了。4 ]) W& n* a0 y0 R0 M3 ^) B

$ G3 f* V2 A1 Q* b F 呢個人仲掂，; O3 @5 M4 A8 S+ h
知道既唔等於要講，
5 Q) x4 z3 }4 M; }4 l( ]如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
( i3 J( R/ s$ _+ d; F) _1 m2 z我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
( E- \' Q/ p6 x4 z/ ~2 Q4 ~# ~/ e
( V; b! a% c$ J+ F1 C最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
% D" n4 T4 T' N始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。+ a+ D' U8 Q1 V  T' _  f4 k) R' M
  @) x/ ]/ l; q8 Q( R# E

& x9 X: h+ {( x, A: b" q* y% n1 K7 r8 Z0 R' i5 U
題外話：
+ e  x% l  @. q' d* A% E' D& X; ^唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
& K& k4 u- o) r% M3 H" U  u睇到 S 呢條友，
. N7 k, @; G1 v6 P6 Z我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
/ i( w0 ]( {+ l# @/ j) V* ~3 Q! K* c5 Y
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
) T- n1 M4 }" p/ C9 FF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
$ g% \4 Q4 m" g, ]# |0 `5 pM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她2 p9 V! j) |/ J( \2 a% n' [
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
" T" R0 S; ~* D' {/ B6 l, i8 jL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...