Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:+ v/ b# E$ e. b  T+ v: g; z- a& _8 A

) ?. I6 y' q" u1 \
& u: P8 S' z  R0 \# N1 Q, O8 M我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

( V8 \& {( P/ v0 D) x8 ^% X
2 [/ a/ ]+ h7 G8 j0 M
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
  F6 g5 z6 v" M* _& Z: {$ X5 X* c8 ?3 d  Q" x: }8 K
! |$ _4 t, i6 c& l
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

2 o9 k; S# ^% D
- f- f7 t' d* U1 V! doh really..., X1 F; |1 ^1 U0 j7 E& u/ R( |
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"  I+ u4 F7 I, B1 m7 b1 @
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題4 `5 g! D) P9 L4 N/ J: X/ z

1 ?- |4 [2 g; x( @8 d當然這是個假設性問題( l; J' l3 t/ n
但將人數倍大
9 N/ w4 {* e$ L. B4 R, m例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個9 h9 U" ]: C7 Z' N5 o
(情況可以換作其他)+ L7 C( U3 F; w
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
& f/ l  M6 \0 L  v如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
* U' T8 y$ \" Q4 L8 q如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:$ v6 }/ {9 a0 ^6 ^9 h' X3 R. k
絕情谷既問題...
# e9 d2 m1 c+ B如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
/ X2 G' w$ _3 X7 o5 E+ u9 q如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

7 c2 G/ P) F( b; h. O殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
+ k# L0 A  Q5 m9 z% W# o( p4 m& ?於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生% Z' ?2 _) _( ]$ M% `% Q! Y' `; g
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩) o4 G+ a  Q* A+ q7 T
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
% v4 G) F8 `0 \7 F5 \其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
: p' B/ [+ n) c# q. T5 z9 E9 M
1 a& l, j' |8 x8 _. E# P我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
, |, O8 U! P& h3 ?: P不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
2 Z5 Y# k8 ]3 G. |5 ?7 @其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

" f4 F$ Y9 o- C9 P' O7 g( a. o  K0 j6 E( ]- A
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣. J0 j+ Z+ Y" T9 {0 r
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....7 R7 v5 H2 Y. s3 c! b3 a. N0 C) B: m

& q0 b% O- R$ p+ P( x& }p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
( x( Y* K: \- {& i! y& @& y( L2 Wyes, my reason is helping more; F8 ^5 E, I6 s6 |
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
4 f% Z. O$ C% [8 \8 z) Sif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child5 L6 K, C3 |; I7 Y( X% G6 I
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?5 z  j% X) T) m( `
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
; J) S; P4 A( O: |: ?, S# f9 @may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!* @$ Q( ]5 P; |- Y9 M
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
2 l, n/ i& P: S; @當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
9 z. R, w$ `5 C- ~& k1 ~我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~# f2 a) U, q( q" A3 q
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
) _$ }* [# X" _1 [即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
  O1 z: M$ u) i我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~4 h2 p( S3 }/ Y; f0 {4 g3 j3 f, ~
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
5 ?5 {2 T) I% _我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）