Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
0 W  f; T6 a! Q3 q0 C' _5 l: c5 P, ^9 k8 S: C
% `5 l9 j4 L5 v( j$ \
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

0 n/ J1 B8 @4 h) H# U
4 O4 G9 H# _- d5 m
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:) b0 T2 ]; S' r6 T
( K  K, ^5 u$ Q( r$ K

, `) B: X  h5 L9 g; t1 K5 dIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

/ G: m8 {. T7 Y3 v& u6 V6 ~7 {' c
* u( l; \! n' |3 r: y! m9 |
oh really...
# q4 a2 y$ }# S: ^& Rhahhaa, thx a lot^^"
- r) ^$ T+ X2 bi didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
4 S. Z' ]9 I/ G- A: r$ V( o+ c/ Y/ t* ?( y  S) T. d' {
當然這是個假設性問題
6 E1 {8 h# Q& m3 J但將人數倍大
, b% `& q% F3 a* m" }0 h1 G- H7 h例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個, W" x9 k! z5 ?6 J
(情況可以換作其他)
" \( U2 q  d3 o, a始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
2 f) n7 [. z, Z7 M: E6 }: q8 @如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...+ E2 e, t6 [( q! a- I/ n
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:! n: N* `& D1 N. @
絕情谷既問題...
1 g* K+ Y' |# [& l* R. M1 @如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...: F3 n( {& K$ W# K& E
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

, C5 O; \7 H# V) M/ c- Q殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
$ T7 M/ E7 C7 q* q$ T% j, C5 m於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
. R$ h/ T% U/ }# I% x2 g: z2 a但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩- p9 q+ z% Z  n' T
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢3 s" G+ a1 L/ @& }- E' K/ r8 Y: a4 U
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
' d7 ?- O! d, K4 F; u$ a5 v' y4 N$ }2 c( v! m
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
& r* H( k" y# g5 k9 y! {9 ]& r% m不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
# a7 B7 _3 T  L, l, Z0 O7 e' l其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

- W2 G) P5 A  Q: f; a
. e( G+ E+ x  @* z! B; Yhaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣1 c) p4 K* I; i9 e5 g
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....7 u# Z( I3 y- s- l; G
. ?' B; [- L: m+ v
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child  h/ L5 y( ]9 H: j  n% I
yes, my reason is helping more& r3 }$ c5 U; C& q+ C/ ]
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!: B; H  D" L9 ]- C
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child$ e. o& ~" f6 L+ {' V/ d( [* C
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?1 [. Z  Y3 w* f2 J
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
2 y. U6 U% }3 \3 Tmay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!% ^7 e$ S& Z4 T1 p9 F  P+ s
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~! w( Y5 n4 Z1 G
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
+ `- l, C7 J& O$ R( q3 a* S我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
& |7 h) Q, ]; {正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~9 J( b- G" i# J6 D* t
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
! X* T# p' W$ R我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
/ v. @! j4 n, d# X' F. ]但如果o係當時o既情況中~~4 {+ O  t, e7 j  E$ U5 c+ s3 K2 z
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）