Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:) f! ?- [- S0 A9 m
. b/ H  v  T# Z8 h4 a; S
. A& C2 M9 ?! N" S7 G3 Y
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

" H" O- L7 i- r4 A

$ ?0 ?, B0 }, F- }7 \6 ]In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:- [. V- v" m1 Q  f+ |6 ]+ A

$ j7 A  T, [: j4 n. E! o: [
- w3 f+ f" R3 M+ a* i( FIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

, O0 o) G7 a6 m' c! H- q' _
2 J- i8 \: x+ Foh really...
* b1 P8 f* h- ]4 ~hahhaa, thx a lot^^"
& v' c3 z2 N! a3 |1 \: {$ yi didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
# O0 t! Z0 W# }5 F6 ?: u6 W2 m# r
2 g8 T9 J7 v$ Z. x! c4 o當然這是個假設性問題
7 l( a* M8 o" E& B# H" ~- t* S但將人數倍大6 e; {& f1 ?8 b3 C+ ]& k" t' p8 G
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個. L6 g7 Z- t% j) h9 x0 [9 k1 W" k8 F# b
(情況可以換作其他)
" m6 R8 s6 c6 U始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
1 E5 Q  D5 n% S1 H* p* D3 ?如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢..., I# n9 w* @% r: V  f
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
6 X! |' W$ i; |絕情谷既問題...: G2 K+ R2 v1 L7 y6 U, `( ?) J
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
/ `7 ?1 N3 H; K" S7 C! J如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

7 @* \, I; N# b% g% R
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好0 Q  z6 X* P0 p4 S/ f- E1 t
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
/ f( d! G( h8 \2 |' t但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
0 G4 ]. C# t% v; A好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢- I* o* Q9 F% U5 ^+ `
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
0 t! _; r: e; e, j) u% c8 ^, Z8 W  M: q
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
( b: C. @2 w; B( h# K9 H! o不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:8 ^' b0 O8 h+ y. |$ \" c% @5 r
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

' N" A1 D( H' u) E; j

8 [/ P1 `& A2 y$ p. p" P! F4 A5 d  ohaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣2 l! b7 t* x. N
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
! J3 L6 J5 H% o4 ]# l) n
7 U) k& ]# G6 p' R% Ip.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
  w) m, c- W) i" }  E" kyes, my reason is helping more
& I" P& K1 j( Q: P2 v% R) Vfor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!. n, X9 \1 F4 z6 V! {0 p! {
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child4 W/ i1 ?2 A* U' Z; A
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
9 j+ @$ j' U5 _0 }# j* ialso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!/ v( h1 O3 V4 h
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!3 F" J$ H  s, f
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~3 u, {( s4 T4 l+ d' O# N. ]# {$ H$ Y
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~4 D& t) j0 U- M, p# u$ x: c4 c1 s/ Y
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
' m" }+ J  M( d3 A* X& J正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~) d! h# R4 w9 d0 t1 w9 N  w
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~# B" |, W: Z4 h' N# F5 t" v9 m
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
$ b! B' V6 m, Z9 I但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
* |4 O8 g+ {# T! l& f3 y+ _( k, K我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）