Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:. j5 ~1 y# ~$ j5 ]2 T

7 M5 q, Q, D7 I: m' ], \& R: ~  \
" {( V6 h1 Z8 u2 R8 }2 L我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

5 x$ }5 u2 r& u  G
7 n7 o% h7 m) V& o* EIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:+ D4 C# V% E8 |; r1 g) P: k
0 O# j7 `7 h. r# c5 B2 X
1 O6 n( A2 ~; u
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

& ]/ y& p, g9 l. F/ a
  j# `* V+ o* K3 Y3 Y3 b
oh really...
# S: j$ w$ {) Khahhaa, thx a lot^^"
, w$ R) N& Q5 y# i; N9 Q2 Hi didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題9 V* |& E6 T' M* Q/ F8 m
; U! |; W' R3 T, g1 ^9 A
當然這是個假設性問題
& O1 K4 a- ~2 o  i6 I6 N但將人數倍大: G% i) A6 u8 F5 D
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
, k* W& _3 `! G0 Z/ q(情況可以換作其他)
4 x5 k$ Y, L/ }! R! [: G始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
0 S" S  t! |3 ]- C如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
+ m, P" m* ~& {; |# I$ Y8 A如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:) B6 A2 a& ~: u. i( n5 H2 R) {- y& i
絕情谷既問題...
7 h# V& E$ ]3 v6 N/ _' Y& X如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...1 U/ r. z/ J1 b5 t8 ~
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

% B9 ^8 M0 z: i殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
, m6 C# W. j9 {' `於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
) q* a0 Z: X$ i6 B% u& \但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩, f: C: O1 y5 Y# t1 u
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢' {' V( \' t5 Q" }" x# O2 B
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
3 q9 k; S8 z4 n
' \" H  [; w# ?# v7 I6 T我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
& e, Q+ Y+ Q9 q# W/ J4 R0 ?+ W不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
  x1 G: l* \3 i% j1 M6 t其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

8 U+ g: g  {7 G* N; ~7 K# M* s- O

& f  h# M, ?5 }8 f1 w' mhaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣5 H# C7 M6 O0 T
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....' Y2 W# m. P# n& j  r& S& P

- m# M8 g2 a8 t' F0 Bp.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
5 H( t. g. s! N3 vyes, my reason is helping more
9 V8 p9 m3 p1 u  f: Afor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
2 q6 N6 o  a, v+ i3 `if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
6 W  H$ `% G! T( lbecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
7 j* H8 @, `) ?8 j2 Y( Z+ F( @also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!5 ^$ s# F; J& I: e
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!! ]2 |8 x# I% x! i- D
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
0 H) ]7 ?+ ~3 i/ ~, Z當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
6 j0 t- K% f& b. z0 G1 U* t我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~, A$ ?) _: V6 }
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
% p4 d# L& e' o& b3 L$ c即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
9 I- x) s8 Q) ~, {, x8 H7 T我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
  U: A& ^( c) m1 |; y4 g但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
& e7 b' J* t3 K3 G  H我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）