Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:1 ]; \! F5 U" J" ]( W

5 O7 b" I- N# T# b. ^/ H! N% @, @( ]* s" |8 n7 j$ ^. d- e1 ~
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

0 ^: R* y; P9 c
# S( t$ b  C0 T, h* v( @In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
9 @, P+ U/ ]+ X& \0 y* s5 u' K0 e& i5 B
: i. k6 k2 [+ @8 t0 H
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

" C- D- v2 w7 g7 }8 t

  q3 U; [4 X9 toh really...
& j, T$ Z3 R, u' m; rhahhaa, thx a lot^^"
" a* X( E1 d5 R) J  Fi didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題* G8 K0 O3 O/ `* m

0 n: x) t9 d# d) ]; A當然這是個假設性問題* W; S2 G! E+ U2 o2 Y9 w
但將人數倍大1 C& e7 w: J3 X% A+ M; E
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個* E0 u' E! |! @3 x- F6 \
(情況可以換作其他), Y/ H4 S* c( `* C7 V/ I: t3 n1 G# Q: N
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...8 C% \, t0 e# ?  R0 A
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...: |+ B0 m/ v- v) N! m: t9 G$ A
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
; j# \2 ]" G( B8 S0 R絕情谷既問題...: y' l6 j7 _$ K3 S, b) X
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...% q6 D' v, T. \- ]- E
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

3 Q# s, O7 P4 ]7 @- Y8 s6 c6 [殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
/ m4 `" W6 C9 E7 y1 y3 M於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生5 ]! \0 T! t- h7 c# `9 _4 i
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
3 f6 i1 I% w' j, c, I; @0 U- l8 v好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢+ s2 u1 e$ g6 R4 R8 ?
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢' ^. b: u2 m0 S; {1 T
" e5 ?6 e0 t/ f) C
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
0 Z- v* |" b' e9 ]% w6 Z; H+ ]不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
: b- j3 I8 a( }& N其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

6 D# t* w' y0 H) \* Y
$ t, s  ?0 H( o% `haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣- W" j5 U) c  W' g
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....0 _& Q" R  {4 ~' {5 ]& n" k

5 s0 B0 \* X* N! N- d5 ]5 Zp.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child# I9 m" p9 Y* ?
yes, my reason is helping more4 U, d1 Z# D+ V: R) H
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!, k, V# |+ ?. k/ W
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child" _2 o6 _$ k: I. Y
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?) V) g( U  {5 N0 r& u$ m$ U
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!4 G: a' h' R" I5 s' H. x2 D
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
: i* x4 n$ z  t$ g3 Bunder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
2 F. l/ G# a+ t" `: i- k: h$ e1 ?當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~/ Z. j7 }% \# v! L8 ]& b9 h6 ?
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~# i: l. C+ z# _- p2 D: c4 D
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
# z. Q( }+ T/ S9 D* M即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
  D& q+ {$ \2 B4 A/ j4 U. V' _我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~, c0 ]- v' v3 d, c: |2 L  |
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
1 {7 I/ M# d: y$ A' h& t& n我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）