Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
. R. v+ c& @* d; n6 v( Z: i  c: n; A) _; |' D3 J$ s

2 ]2 |$ ]6 z( r我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

1 O; e7 \+ @4 V1 y
3 X4 `! C# ]' y+ V) z2 p
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
& w* K0 \' x0 l" |( g% t
6 m: h% \3 B6 e* M( Q* }/ x; q
% ^# w# J* x' g- v% G! kIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

8 j% h; i! i; X
. t2 i" H" H4 u1 g  {( Z+ e0 zoh really...* H- K: J+ }8 o; q" |, G! y3 a
hahhaa, thx a lot^^". l4 h. k4 o. R* ~# H, ?
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
8 D* V! s' [5 Y2 N; X, @1 K
8 b' u2 J: v; k. ~  _當然這是個假設性問題
; j% }- J, D+ R" l但將人數倍大
9 h! u/ Q8 l# U' n* c例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
- Y$ x$ k" ?# k: j(情況可以換作其他)
6 B" s* e& S0 c始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...5 d& G) n' Y, U
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...+ v0 V# A- {9 O2 {) p2 s* i8 E
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
) p* o8 s/ E9 H+ H. |; t; L絕情谷既問題...6 P, b% ]) t  G& z
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
1 J* h# ]% D8 v/ r8 W& n$ W$ L如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

( C+ P! b, G# c( A% \0 P4 d
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好4 N1 S' O* ]# J  g4 U( D- O' x( J* l
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
" P5 D/ g3 @" h; w9 O0 W6 }! ^0 k但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
4 e9 i0 Q, {2 [- z3 M5 i) w好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢. q, Q* Y" R$ z6 O
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢, U0 w, O3 P5 ^# i2 s2 P3 i

, j" P: a' N/ G我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
$ M% O# m( ?# _( K) D# k不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:# h: x9 |2 e( [( ^' Z. S/ e
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

9 k* l! q* p/ D5 t0 c0 w

/ @( ?/ N2 |% u- Bhaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣# e. Q# R' y) |9 W9 F
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
# n5 ~; e( w: b6 w' v6 n3 @
1 F/ o% R! u9 ^1 z4 ]p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
3 O6 j+ y- q5 F' `2 g4 wyes, my reason is helping more
! h0 l* x9 n  n# |for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!' @: k  A" Q5 |1 m
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child6 {' D& b/ O( E/ X
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
& Y5 b+ |9 h6 _- {also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
( |5 Z& {( q9 q' `) u4 }( mmay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!5 F# F1 e' _9 o8 x- I# }7 m' ?7 e
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~4 b% c4 v, }) C& \0 a
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
; N7 P& W% Z* r. {5 U2 {我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
$ s& x3 f4 |( R/ C9 J+ O正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
" s5 c0 V1 Y* Q- Q2 g* G即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
  d& C% q% E9 S8 H我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
; x3 t9 V" j  Y: l& ?" h但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
: U) [4 v+ A- V: R0 {; o我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）