Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:+ w3 C  _# K) m

& v( J# H& v% q* K5 x6 T! Y  t7 ~, }3 R3 E4 h) ^& F
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

7 ], j' b3 Z. u( H( ]- k9 V( O

' u5 H, e( f  L, u. x3 XIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
0 T( Y* h$ i/ L3 B& v3 `) A
9 S1 u$ S  |  Y) g  s) J: p2 R: a% Q' f2 y9 `, k
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

1 d: v/ W8 `$ _# F8 ]( B. p: a

0 W- Q: K1 C# i; `  t" uoh really...
! R, d) _0 E) e, G) bhahhaa, thx a lot^^"
: ?, a/ `6 {/ Gi didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題) R" k. D  L3 I* m9 n* Q

  H% N, v) ?! P) Y! {( j當然這是個假設性問題( v* i0 v4 s4 Y: b/ V9 k& B
但將人數倍大" e. L) k6 M/ l- o
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
: h7 Z7 x7 |0 V6 J6 I6 V( j5 Y(情況可以換作其他)
7 W6 \$ @8 V' e8 F& n始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
- @2 [6 C( c6 R0 I& h* M如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...8 i1 ]1 m# K; D3 a$ T- m
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
8 f# ~4 B9 n- ]8 A/ [) N* d絕情谷既問題...
/ O) S6 O3 r9 e' B, T7 I如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...0 G2 `0 Y$ P0 M3 ~- {
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

* ~8 n( a' ^# V7 F) X殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
, s) z* y( Y5 D& S% d於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
& x5 b- C2 Z8 E8 r, F但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩4 D' A6 _4 L) z$ _- U1 \( j
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
3 g! O- p9 R* j; F! z# A3 _其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
4 h) O( s( {& Z# A6 ?
5 {* M3 O: v  ]% a我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命7 ~9 J$ N6 S& T0 @
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
1 H8 P& D9 q, ?# y6 L其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

/ i7 }6 M4 L( F6 e* _5 y7 T& E3 i% u! x! Y
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
; F+ }/ y1 {% j7 e1 e0 m你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了...., C( C# V1 k3 f, P4 S
) f1 G& ~+ j  N$ s7 Y4 k
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child" y3 w9 o% F' l: k
yes, my reason is helping more
2 |; g1 M9 w9 l" n: Afor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!7 Z3 T- R6 T8 o. y5 ]
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child. u/ Y0 G; E; f4 `5 K: X+ W  i
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
, L" u" O* s, _8 a- M' ialso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
: y& |7 o) `% Z* H. s! A# omay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!5 Z  H) ~+ S9 B- h3 a! q7 Y
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
. }6 a6 Y0 \! B; J+ i當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
; c$ d- V8 N2 i  m我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
  V2 K( p" v' P* f' s+ B7 K+ v! @正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~, {" d  O1 W# }5 @
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~  ?; Z$ d& y  U' {/ I
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
' @/ F9 p/ q( H3 S但如果o係當時o既情況中~~! `0 m4 S0 o) @
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）