Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:0 G) _, z5 U: Q' ]% O2 n0 U2 Y

+ U) d" P0 \& V$ K& B% _0 l7 U% g3 Q+ z' o6 C
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

* k; a; g( g9 |; l5 f4 e1 ^& Z! Z# r$ d7 T
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
7 h8 a; g& Q- t2 @( Y( G! O* f1 l2 Z5 H/ [4 B& ]5 V
# o9 w$ v0 F% D6 i3 p
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

; H' `" k! `) V, T1 `
9 d# U- U/ K, ^
oh really...% u/ x7 h  q, J4 J! G7 T
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"3 ?* _6 S  Q- r; O7 O9 ^
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
5 y! u+ x9 J8 }( n9 n4 I! E4 J/ Z. e
當然這是個假設性問題
. g% L1 e( w4 Q- h8 F但將人數倍大
9 r/ [6 X- x* q& J, ]9 ?例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
6 \) @& H5 ]' x' r6 A3 e  ^; `(情況可以換作其他)
& j; Z* I$ E, x2 j; |7 d/ c始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...8 a/ h  J; Q3 O+ m# |: V# _' C
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...' A- A$ k) P( s
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
) [+ \, X2 W5 ]: y$ u3 o絕情谷既問題...9 I; U, k6 e6 }7 s7 a
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...  {: h% m! L2 M( E3 K. b
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

9 l, l9 J4 s+ y. Q" E6 V
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
4 X5 D9 d2 ^* c1 X, g, R  d2 y3 O4 B/ e於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生. E1 [$ C9 y% ?4 p0 }3 G2 J5 U
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩' {7 H" y4 j8 z" o4 E' j3 A2 ]
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢: j$ N$ C# |/ D, q/ Y
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢: o+ ]# L7 m8 g& n  J

" |" Y7 N7 U  f我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
" A9 f% e6 S# L! L# ?9 X不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:: s# Q( ?! ^  R, [# N
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

( n9 K1 q8 D( ^1 F1 @6 ?
8 J- [1 T  {0 d  L
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣) L- R7 M" J8 Z# \8 a8 }4 j# z" b
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
& M3 J/ [4 L/ @
1 h- e; p; I! Z- F" J, Mp.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
" U/ u; R# }, k  N7 m/ m, }% Fyes, my reason is helping more9 |3 S8 J( |7 x& ]$ G4 h9 w$ E
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
  \: K1 ^: I; Eif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child5 v' A+ i; M7 }' Y1 F) g
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
, v4 ]. y0 h# Z% valso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
3 J5 P8 X# u' ~8 R- Amay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!/ _- f$ L3 }2 I9 a
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~. S9 v6 ~! l: z# Z9 g2 I
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~) a( e/ B" {8 I! H
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
' @3 w2 S- ]9 Q5 }% ~* E5 Z6 K正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
7 H5 |* v* p) W3 E9 D即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~7 g3 G6 D' i- T% s
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~- Y* q* f( _& w5 W7 E' Y! D
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
! ?' J6 {/ t/ `) [7 U. E我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）