Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
. j9 Q) d% [  y9 g
+ W$ d0 s. f& j' R0 M5 y; p
* I2 e9 z8 r2 o) S! g8 J. p我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

/ H' }; u- r% {/ o: T5 j; D% V4 Q% u# U3 r  l
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:0 q5 A" f* R: `7 |5 J
8 g. s) B4 x" s; |& z, \$ D
/ s# R" y' u& t( }
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

& e) w: X9 U# A% \0 y* U" G- A$ j' F
oh really.../ r% ^  d) t+ B7 k) s8 K4 }
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"
) m* b6 [8 w! v: {, r0 ai didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
& {5 I4 Z- L5 J1 ?) P6 m+ D$ I0 x& c% I7 {. n1 [
當然這是個假設性問題
. B7 A( A# _4 Q, X, q/ u8 U% ]( Z但將人數倍大
, O, L; C# U- A例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
+ z; m8 b+ S: @( B(情況可以換作其他)6 y2 k+ K2 m/ A) d) D
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
7 A7 Q9 F7 J& ~9 w如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...+ B' N  K, [* d2 r
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
0 }  b- I, U( e# v# P絕情谷既問題...: F# p8 x' x8 d% a6 T$ ], y
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
# J  Y( N" |- z如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

( P. r" E, t( W, a) H
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
8 |- N( w# u& J0 @4 V- Z於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
0 ~" ^* T$ |- ^% I# ^6 @7 |2 Y1 y  @但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
3 J, n3 }) ?4 ?6 C: B4 d, M好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
- K6 r- [: E  d其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
2 D" @" E- O8 D
. H" H7 Y7 R4 G2 X( c% n* J6 Y) ]我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命+ U& M$ x0 S; H& l6 o' z
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:1 R  Y9 O4 F/ Q3 {8 Z7 L* T9 J3 _+ \
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

- I8 ?/ o) `: V
2 y8 I  d1 Q3 H, B% ]) |8 ^) ahaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣& |7 \( [) ^" U) l) h
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....! z3 R& q6 \/ z) U9 c4 T/ ?, f
% l& y, f4 o( n$ e2 H
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child0 r; p2 m7 t- C% ~. z
yes, my reason is helping more0 P) y8 G6 y. t1 Z
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!; f8 T, Q. _" A9 t
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
+ R6 d8 `9 R4 |% P# Zbecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?+ ^( L; q2 V+ a2 L5 k( v  x
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
9 ?% ]9 V* o' X; c. Hmay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
- [3 R3 J' Y9 W0 t9 munder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
" `( A" a, v) Z+ Z* n0 h" v8 B8 ?當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~# h; z5 i6 r1 ]( e- N# G, i2 v) B
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
1 [' C  b; W9 e& u  `正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~. h3 c# _1 o  E
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~. \: U: E* u% ?
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
+ m( s* w( a0 @但如果o係當時o既情況中~~8 x, a) `1 w  F" o: _
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）