Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:/ t; k& X' M' Z0 y0 w& o; u
) {6 C4 j2 `6 x
9 Y7 k; k) z& i2 d
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

( t% f* T7 B- O( i" v$ H0 e) W- Z! u+ u% w
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
! p* X' X2 Y* v, y; v- Z
* Y  J8 A8 z4 Z$ S/ U. _
- i9 q' {. I% k* y3 {7 [1 A. `' h. rIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

/ p6 a+ \  v; X4 b) A# U* |! }& b7 |/ z- m( V. r
oh really...
2 k. E2 s/ u) e" [hahhaa, thx a lot^^"% c. y- L$ ^5 k) E9 `' }
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題! C  q5 E. V% c- R- e. O

. L$ B9 P1 z) Y當然這是個假設性問題
' P; C+ m, r8 W" F% t( C# Q但將人數倍大
% {( U9 w/ j% h- p+ i0 B" l  y例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個. n' q1 @, ?: l( K" p  H9 {
(情況可以換作其他)
: B# ?; B) F" i6 g" S9 ?( B5 }7 ?始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
9 Z, a* }. [. k4 ^, |4 W+ R1 q2 t: C如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...# j4 Z/ X& Z* H) B( x
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:+ S* @7 W/ j8 T! a+ z7 f+ g9 j
絕情谷既問題...- R- M& ~* W6 q. O
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...  R  ~% k+ y, O% F6 X* L
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

* [) V2 b" i6 ~. s
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好& b9 x" {7 {* a  D& Y
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生, G# W# H( }4 s+ w6 }4 `
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
$ W7 y! E$ V; D& g) Q好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢6 z4 Q; _/ Q6 r1 _6 R! z9 A2 _
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
- z$ |; C5 d* }  _- S
- l0 B5 l; s& e% l9 y我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命+ D; A2 c% R5 K+ {
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
& p4 L+ c; a9 [0 o  [+ z其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

: z4 A+ _" D; B; K8 f

# e7 G) C2 v, ?7 v8 l' F, P+ khaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
. a9 `$ @5 b9 D- T; b( ?% D+ m; r你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....7 y; z+ ~4 K% V& y1 g
: j; t0 H; ?3 F9 v- C' Z5 s. J
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child' l8 r7 p# ~, p& W; a2 S
yes, my reason is helping more: c" S6 a+ g6 U9 e
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!8 M* k% A8 m$ h5 h; D% J: y
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
9 @* _/ X# ?/ p' m! S5 `because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?1 Q0 w1 n: Q, {& }6 j7 y- a
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!* D6 O7 r" z8 Q
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
; ^7 ~( l4 Y  ^3 [' }- R5 Hunder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~4 @9 Q( q0 n; f/ _4 y5 \
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
! G; K2 l5 q( v0 s" ]$ C: {' ^0 H我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
# ]3 ^9 G3 Q; Q) P; x$ A' A正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
+ o% b& E9 p, d' e- H+ I即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~0 |4 ~8 S' y$ [: B
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
- s2 I$ X# t5 ?/ S) x$ e但如果o係當時o既情況中~~* o: ?; b$ ~, g
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）