Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
5 @+ [( x  L) Q) @! B0 f- M# G' [

8 b1 p  w$ r) w# C我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

( |1 P9 C% I0 W6 H
0 K2 p9 j7 Y! \4 d! C+ o1 L; C7 ]In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
# l$ G, a; i  L) `& u. ^1 X) H: F7 r3 U5 _% s
  N2 ~7 h+ c) Y0 h
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

3 ?3 r) y1 d2 R" x
$ G" {  |) R, W3 f. zoh really...% g; u: Y5 D4 p0 I, D& ~8 `
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"
( ]- c  y) ]3 B* D9 O5 Ui didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題* j( [( _7 N! V, o% H

7 ~& V# ~2 B- |: b當然這是個假設性問題8 ]2 y  h. Z  Q/ G9 k' i- {3 T
但將人數倍大2 k5 ^. b! @( V- v7 m
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
3 M  Z3 z: R+ p0 ?5 ~1 a/ q(情況可以換作其他)8 c! X5 J* Y  y( n( e4 j, f+ _: j
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...# m% M: Q6 E3 ]) A1 Z2 v
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
! }/ P; |3 s2 W( `& b9 V/ J如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:2 n% y6 P( f) o. j0 C1 L
絕情谷既問題...
9 C: |) n! W% s: Q* u如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢..." b1 ?6 M5 T9 n: O* T
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

) V% F' I/ m2 l7 O9 r# _1 j# y$ v
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好8 H/ h& i) K5 U) A; A
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
. i3 Z' s: k  C但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩& V7 s# b; Q# j! u# `) a0 D
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢% ], ]7 ]4 W8 h( J5 ^& ]
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢! W3 i& r" d& G) t/ N6 ~! K

8 R& j& ?# a- ], f9 e/ H. Z我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命1 s6 }. l7 t. m  @
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
3 n, V! x# R! U; f9 Y- E其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

( X; j/ m- Q3 b2 L9 m
. ]$ t( `: l6 V( t
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
# M' T5 O& z8 {你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
0 V1 N4 h. H/ |8 W, M1 s  v1 o- y5 U) W- y" X6 F2 s
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
# ~6 D( }& g4 Hyes, my reason is helping more% {; y" Y  V6 ^6 ]+ Q5 v
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
. r1 {& r3 z" p6 j8 M3 G# W& Kif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
- q  Q* }5 s- X0 g7 E& L; Wbecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?! H! x. Y+ k3 a( N
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
8 y7 t  Y0 S% w7 fmay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!' H, f# f" a+ f; B8 T& t
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
- {% r* D6 r, S! }7 I& ^: f7 H, Y當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~: W4 ~. u) r9 r: D1 x8 b% \" {3 j
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
5 v2 @5 x9 V. P8 P5 [6 U5 o+ Q# R正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
8 M/ y- f0 x3 y7 v即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~; P5 |0 O/ a- P' Z& ^
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~6 r, h/ J5 [9 W: A2 o. @
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
7 o% `. w& L0 p% T5 ?0 n# p我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）