Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:  M6 P3 v' n: x

% M- N6 k' c; y3 b; F
( f5 s! H: F# Q5 Q+ p; _' J我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

) L/ m* N. F- p0 |1 }

) U9 H, h: V* C& O+ @9 N5 CIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:* |& u! O, Q5 z/ K- b# r

. J( i2 ^( L4 D, E9 z
$ i' ~8 G& A7 u, w& nIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

- ?4 g% T# b$ s/ l) D9 B
: a) N2 \. ?& d
oh really...0 X2 J- h* n7 Z4 X* o
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"4 W  Y- g$ d# |' \. j
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題1 K5 x% n* k6 J' N! v

) ~. e, J: z4 a2 v) T, W8 e當然這是個假設性問題
6 ]+ M; `! g9 B  X; l但將人數倍大- J( e& W* W' [8 G5 f
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
  ?% v& p! P1 ?. u8 J(情況可以換作其他)# K% C  i$ A$ f+ Y
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...; `! o4 y* F$ z  m; B' o) J
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
8 z6 A  r; K4 P如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
. m/ e& I: b' n/ v; n絕情谷既問題...
  i2 L; Y& c! b6 `如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢.... T. t( N/ |8 v" I7 H3 ~
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

, a( n! @6 n' O0 w, g殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
# T9 f+ M' H8 x) d7 p於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
6 c6 A  T$ a, k3 X. D1 c1 J( w% h但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
2 Y& w9 U; _& c5 c( q/ H2 j: [( R好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢* }$ k$ t: Z& b0 e
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢& \; n6 p, h% T
# ~% Y# X5 r( M
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命  ?1 x2 Y0 G9 K
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:1 c9 \1 J1 S3 @4 I( T0 K! z
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

3 i2 o/ v. |6 F- m9 ]: V# _8 `0 p

% j* |  H$ y, i' a/ k" H/ T3 n4 v, ^5 ahaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
: e; M& C0 F6 ?你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
- b9 \5 g0 w/ S) ^9 q4 ~2 q
) U' T- V7 x- bp.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
1 C& T6 t5 f- Xyes, my reason is helping more
0 Y) X: N, U2 i* bfor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!3 v/ @) E- M& i3 e& [
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
" O; ~2 {9 ~# I5 ^because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
. k9 I, ~6 Y4 V; }/ Ialso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
( |, X" [, b! ~$ b7 [may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!) N9 Z8 U* P, k" y% ]
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
) |/ h+ a- y/ T" V當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~* n- I- ?0 F3 N! S7 v
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~$ s% {- ^% n: J
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~4 E3 H! A+ m6 i; [
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~% O) B5 q' s: l! i! n
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
- O7 g; `9 G3 h/ M5 H0 L# y但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
0 M+ [: ]5 {! Y3 B& Z- p我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）