Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:  q4 H, p/ q! F2 P7 e8 z7 d- H
  ]2 N( T) n+ \6 B7 G, i

# i# W- g" f& M* B9 _我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

' K# g0 y3 L- W2 p2 f; ~) s* f1 ~2 G9 B! T1 ^" f3 H  |" F* F
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
4 L; K% U* @, m. T9 `+ W) O
6 F, E5 K/ N: G- @$ \  F
! i: r& N) i; d$ f) i* L5 t2 WIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

" G+ n1 W6 l) x) |. P9 o/ b  u/ v' H$ ~, |
oh really...
  h' [/ D, B  |6 R' Lhahhaa, thx a lot^^"
+ _* c9 C0 T# @; p: o# H, L( I! S" `i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題) r* N" K; D  d5 O3 c
+ g1 x4 k& N* Q+ H- Q& ?9 f7 D
當然這是個假設性問題
1 Q3 j$ l$ ]  n0 C/ O9 U( S但將人數倍大. [0 v1 q. x& `  L
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
. Q. G  ~3 {4 D! G& F; g, [3 d(情況可以換作其他)' @4 a( c4 K' c9 s' W
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...; s, o+ M& v0 i( J
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...3 S# j' N' U6 c. t  q' s
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:- M6 S7 [% T$ ^  D( v
絕情谷既問題...
6 ?: j" o/ W& t9 _( o0 n: b, t/ m$ R如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
5 p( {9 q* \- f: @如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

# W, E1 E/ p9 s/ D7 j
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
7 J. D# \. e( w6 {: D' v0 Q於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生1 M5 `- n5 b( W- o+ B$ B& g5 D& W
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩7 H- F- v- ?$ i) |5 z, E0 q
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢$ y+ a* F/ ^. p* l& f
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
+ l1 I, s- W$ \$ ]: _# s- b- A
- u1 }5 m8 v2 P  t! d我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命7 O5 i7 `- B- ?6 \. w7 ^
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:2 H- h& H/ i0 x+ u* k! s) B& e
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

: x8 _. I5 _6 i) J( @- J
. X6 T: v. A; O$ t% K
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣  c7 b7 ]8 z; J9 u3 P- Y, n
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....1 A, j* b  l+ E1 c1 m+ _

9 c' l0 z: I2 f( _4 R/ yp.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
! l) s# P* }& `7 e% }yes, my reason is helping more
2 T7 G, w# D0 `/ q: T0 e/ Sfor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
8 Z3 J* L( s' K) c1 b! W/ V$ vif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child' `. H" f8 m0 P) O) }
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?" u8 d/ [% _) X; v: ~
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
1 u: C/ s/ z0 A9 Ymay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!& s' q; Q% Q6 m
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
6 e- I4 t! y8 i6 i- t: B; n當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~- t* e( ~  g6 h
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~( O! f/ y- {1 _# z* U  R: N: ^5 P! p
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
" O3 N, W  r, M% t& ?2 Y% u, K5 z即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
" P6 [& Y5 ]& K* q8 f我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
. d, k( I% u, v. ?6 ]( c但如果o係當時o既情況中~~7 d7 C; Q6 g/ G! R2 I. `, h
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）