Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:9 E8 p, A) v" @9 C

. x# [3 {5 l" {2 m( [" S
. l8 R* [8 e. j+ v3 m我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

) T  O' c# `# v$ X' y6 T

. J4 q' @1 e* q6 c, K$ xIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
7 m4 O/ G, q' x5 E) _+ ?) C5 m4 d1 t5 M7 G6 }1 C( e% ~
) t5 @( z+ ~2 E! Y7 d0 l
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

6 x8 I' _. G8 \" H1 F+ _* T! M! |# }' ~( d6 e5 E
oh really...+ ~5 q3 I# w; N% Y
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"
9 c9 Z* E& _2 t! i5 h% g4 |" k9 T; ]i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題- ?3 s, P5 x, [; G2 K

7 X9 [! l$ L) I+ Z& u* z) B當然這是個假設性問題; T9 z" t: Y3 d- n
但將人數倍大
5 \  m; O: v9 {  n* F2 X8 T: ]# {例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個3 A3 P$ T$ M+ Z* e
(情況可以換作其他)  r" C! K3 j$ s$ n" W& F
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...9 \2 j5 u" \8 L7 o. `
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢.... g& J3 [7 O7 B( O' T& c
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
$ }* l* h, Z: k+ a! X( Q* y! ~絕情谷既問題...
$ D& D! o9 w- d如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢..." Q! W6 O* J: l
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

* e$ N+ K2 |0 _! G$ W7 U
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好* C+ b: e8 h/ q( J, t
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
' I9 ~0 r" W. }1 F但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩, Q( a. k- D( ^
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢' s( j1 t( U: E: \
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢' w  ]7 K  o! a: t5 N

- n- l" {  u6 n/ s4 R我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
9 _" \. l! N9 z8 E4 R+ t% M不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:$ D3 p0 v% |4 i
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

+ ]9 f& U8 ?% i5 k; i8 N
# B$ S  p! k0 r. Z" r7 t6 Chaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣* e6 S8 s0 H/ r0 f- g& I9 Z' ~8 T0 Z
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....6 |/ a" I5 J) d* U/ w. s$ M$ C: |# \

  h; E) g) f5 t; X  B6 ip.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
, ^, o& d& [1 n8 y: U9 M. ^yes, my reason is helping more4 _! z: F1 H6 P, `  `6 r+ M
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
8 [  S& I) `8 T! \( Tif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child/ g8 K. d' b! N3 ^
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?5 T* ]! A( E. w! l; i4 X
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
% p+ l% \7 E3 t- qmay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
  |9 J0 E9 U5 G$ y1 J- Bunder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
7 B1 s% u$ A9 {1 v- A/ h當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~) M7 H5 s$ A7 w
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
! o* p( k0 B7 t0 d正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
8 I) f0 [* m$ o4 y即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~: O9 A* S$ V2 I1 U# Z9 X
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~9 y8 ~2 k5 Z. R( E
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~* i' t$ ]2 B7 g2 t& e
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）