Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
$ w' \* J/ ^5 z9 \: c' J2 n; b3 {3 f  |

3 h$ B0 w) a( E' j" _! \6 T我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

4 Z. k; t) k9 C" P6 }
. F' N/ C( E, j- K* [! H- y, V
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
8 w  Y# E/ E- R( v& k
7 u6 h. l+ T0 m- Z' \4 h2 Q* g" ?* M4 Z
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

1 X- |3 |" q8 s1 V, S) }+ F8 H) h. ~& z: }9 V2 q' X
oh really...
) U8 b2 u! y% Chahhaa, thx a lot^^"
5 J+ a0 m  C3 ]7 r6 U% H& W' ~- Ai didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題8 y: t2 A1 X7 D# p9 ]/ t  S

7 ^+ y4 o8 F* A3 D% w  C當然這是個假設性問題
! E: S& `2 @( x0 \* _3 o# h9 q但將人數倍大' [+ l- @# S. R1 @6 {$ U' N1 ~
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個) s* w+ b0 j, \9 \; V
(情況可以換作其他)
3 Q3 C! ]  e# v0 X) d4 n始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...  x* [8 z* b6 H; x' Q
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...7 I3 c7 M# v: [6 }6 _
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:0 d$ c, E6 f  c$ |2 C9 a5 x6 t
絕情谷既問題...
5 L5 D7 _0 I9 ^& j如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...& h0 X+ Q% `4 e
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

1 f" R) S9 n# Q, u, U0 K) o+ {/ X
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好* J+ ~3 m2 D, M7 w; {
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生( U% v. k0 u5 I7 V6 ^& ?" H
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
8 X* N, V- _9 i) m9 `: ~. n好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢5 ~. A# S- j( G# Q* v$ }. a4 R
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
8 u4 X/ V: }$ K8 ?6 v, p( K$ W/ O. a9 v$ d* a. ]4 I( Q
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
2 W  N; U' Y7 H7 Y# G: K不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:3 S8 [# u. R7 g! V
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

4 E8 y9 R  Z% b6 h" X+ U% k  Q* u% d8 N& X) c
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
' R  O$ Z. z- B4 N: V7 g你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了...., O, O9 v, R. u& P$ G! L# B3 T
1 J8 I! {( I% l0 s7 x
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child$ N2 U2 O9 G, ~& H) r0 n$ ~
yes, my reason is helping more
% f0 x+ z6 X6 c2 ^( |for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
# E6 a/ ~0 c+ E4 A4 ?6 {if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
" p1 t) U8 F& @$ Xbecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?; r8 P: ?/ W( z: ^) F
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!- \+ Y  R9 D6 a& |8 P6 [
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
( J3 `$ s2 H) ~+ k+ Cunder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
, c4 I+ G: I$ E8 j5 D當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~8 Q& i# I* z7 d) r
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~: R2 P, h! E3 K
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~9 u) Z$ o: K0 O
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
% x! k! u6 f; E我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
' i3 W! I! S* P1 t4 k) o但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
! Y3 h- M8 \) n- o我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）