Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:9 `9 a" H* O- e+ t' H" Q$ I. U

1 r2 P8 G: ^% p6 i* m6 C) t3 _8 J- s+ s  _* m8 O" c" x" Z
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

  v& w  L/ t9 o

  u9 a& ?1 q' W: SIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:. y2 y) [- H. J  D. ?$ S- g* X
' F* F4 U$ C) M) I4 B; [- f
' V, ?% Y/ p# ~0 G9 B% \1 W
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

- e5 J% X/ T, g6 U, G; q: V* T
3 r2 I$ }+ q4 ]% s( J8 }
oh really...* b  \5 U( H" t% E- r9 G  v
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"
' w$ @- m& O2 L, B. b, F( Z4 g3 ni didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
  \: |4 p8 y, f' F( {5 k  Z; T5 V; d  G7 h) i7 K
當然這是個假設性問題5 d$ w! p' X3 n/ @  n6 F/ \. A2 S+ v
但將人數倍大' y/ u6 C4 c3 c' \& I7 _
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個9 [$ v+ S  @( x; K1 M( x; L  [
(情況可以換作其他)
! P6 L4 _. c8 L: w始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...! i, e$ q' E+ j) L
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
+ B/ U& J# t1 v# {7 n( y- q% y如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
9 T, C( \: K8 k; Y( _3 F  y) n( o絕情谷既問題...+ x- [+ A! W+ V3 y: Q6 N# s- g. C
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
* W2 H" E/ y4 H" ?如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

1 E+ b5 n# z3 ]/ A" c2 y
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好9 \: ]) m$ s4 g' y
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生" h; G# D2 {0 \; k0 N/ {' @
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
/ O$ m* g0 s/ `; x4 H  S; X0 ?好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
& a7 @& a& [" w  B0 ^$ Q9 S1 n其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
$ ^# `& F# e1 ^1 l: a" T& ^+ }& l( T! E) u3 @  E
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
8 k& e. U: ^! y; b不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
2 x+ n* E; H5 d, Q5 \其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

6 T+ x- ~4 ?4 a" y9 M/ }, Y0 g

4 o, C" }$ T- W& Mhaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣' N' J; @5 R" K$ I* |
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
/ P" x& r6 Q5 ]" C
( N8 ^& Z1 I, h  p& m: fp.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
' _) l5 H5 ]0 ryes, my reason is helping more
4 O2 }, I/ T9 bfor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
" k0 c) Y% D5 \! c% I& oif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child2 s- z3 l' C; o1 C- b
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
2 |4 \" N, G) i( a0 Galso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
; d: i% K8 G% b2 Y5 }& hmay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
' s# t( ?4 a6 A, B% Q4 f9 Wunder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
2 t% D8 o8 _/ r, m; l# w% v當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
5 X0 D2 [9 I8 ]- k6 t9 T# R1 ]我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
  b% R* [3 h9 m- ^) c正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~6 x7 e: H- E2 b6 x7 |. @, B  n
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
$ v% @, ^8 X3 B# p' U  n我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~) I  M. g7 U9 X
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~: L8 `7 {% R2 q6 z1 D
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）