Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
: g+ V# M. ~3 n" F5 m) [; k3 w* t& ^5 [( y% G" @: {
: i1 m/ Q( i0 Q5 l6 U
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

9 b% }6 i2 |5 H7 ?0 }# Y2 h+ \% _
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
7 {& b3 o0 o: h
3 Z) K8 `& m; c% i7 S
- E* |% O: {9 W/ b. c6 S6 DIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

2 T& y3 G  b7 x) R4 y6 N- A
6 L& [8 H% U# [/ [
oh really...
5 e' d$ c7 j" o# I4 y9 chahhaa, thx a lot^^"7 p- x4 o% ?3 V# w! {
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
4 V4 g7 G/ I! g$ T4 a
3 D' A2 Q6 c) s' E當然這是個假設性問題- p  N6 I9 @) W4 T% Q% y( [
但將人數倍大, E! N  Q  T. u6 ]% ^6 R
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個1 c. _* ^. `% T& Y2 ?
(情況可以換作其他)
% Z6 @+ N# O4 {) C2 V1 Q5 H- c始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題..." q. j8 ?$ y$ |  T
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...6 ~, {2 J% a( m5 J
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
% W* f5 \$ @! P4 r絕情谷既問題...$ S% e- r$ L  ]' O; W8 w# R' y
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
' O; v' K6 b  p) T/ H6 q4 k- g: b如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

/ t+ V. X4 V8 A& @4 y0 Z* |/ B殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好0 g& S" M( I# e9 P- V4 Z& P3 ^! c) `
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
' z' E# z- d6 S* b% l1 o1 I7 t但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩/ Z( t2 b8 N4 B6 ]& |
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
4 j4 x5 @  X* C4 E& ^% x6 |其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢7 j6 E1 e& H$ L# ~
2 X1 Q+ e8 ^8 Q: [* j
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命0 T' U  _$ @: w
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:+ I: Q( F, m! i9 V
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

  ]" l4 }+ c, d4 x  F  K- G
" \# }. z/ V' Y
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣# G- b- T8 j8 p0 L$ \4 J# |) v, X: Y
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....8 ]  p( P$ Y: @/ p9 ~
/ {5 L6 q3 {6 I
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
/ o: i" w3 E: t/ n/ I: Q4 T" iyes, my reason is helping more* M9 f% r5 u2 j
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!; \) Q: m5 g2 u& ?
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
$ ~1 e8 F$ m( ?; E& T; s. B% b9 T, lbecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
- Z$ [$ B3 O, R0 \& r7 palso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
8 Y& L: X' [0 Mmay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
- L& ~$ l3 p( J) Munder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
8 k' |, Y+ ^- _9 E+ t  W5 B當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~# J, @( H" `1 U/ V$ h% I& u
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~9 i; Z; b7 ~/ |1 ~: @; T# l
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
2 Y7 o" g2 T9 A( n即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
* X( f: m' ?4 `! a: R! i- m$ W我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~+ o1 O8 L# m. m
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
, s# A& [# r8 L, [+ x我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）