westsider

And what does "挪亞方舟" tell you about "先知既能力" in ALL context?

"先知" said ONE thing right, it doesn't mean that "先知" is right on ALL things.

[ Last edited by westsider on 2005-8-17 at 01:43 PM ]

westsider

Also, "先知" only appeared in the Old Testament. "先知" did not write the New Testament. So the ability of "先知" is not even sufficient to justify the WHOLE Bible.

imaimashi

你又知一樣野岩,其他唔岩?
呢d就係Prove
佢有能力去寫一樣神既idea
佢就有能力去寫第樣
都冇必要昆我地
你當然可以唔信...
你可以唔信好多野tim...

westsider

Originally posted by imaimashi at 2005-8-17 03:20 PM:
你又知一樣野岩,其他唔岩?
呢d就係Prove

It is not a prove. It is a verification of ONE thing. It didn't verify ALL of the Bible.

佢有能力去寫一樣神既idea
佢就有能力去寫第樣

No. Raining is "神既idea". Weather forcast can predit that, but not other things. Same for "佢".

都冇必要昆我地

Looking at how much wealth and political power religions have cummulated over the years.

你當然可以唔信...
你可以唔信好多野tim...

It is your duty, as a Christian, to convice the non-believers.

[ Last edited by westsider on 2005-8-17 at 03:40 PM ]

imaimashi

No. Raining is "神既idea". And weather forcast can predit that.
仲係唔明?神既idea,比佢地寫出神既idea,就係大洪水等等...
同Raining 有咩relation?weather forecast係人去predict既...唔係無神神有條友話比佢地知

Looking at how much wealth and political power religions have cummulated over the years.
大佬,,,你知唔知先知寫既年期?

It is your duty, as a Christian, to convice the non-believers.
咩叫convice呀
我話可以信可以唔信
睇你自己點諗
有咩問題呀

westsider

Originally posted by imaimashi at 2005-8-17 03:42 PM:

仲係唔明?神既idea,比佢地寫出神既idea,就係大洪水等等...
同Raining 有咩relation?weather forecast係人去predict既...唔係無神神有條友話比佢地知

I know. "先知" wrote something down.

First, it is a historical event, and there is no reason of linking God into it.
Second, even if God is involved, the event was written in the Old Testaments, which is also used by Judaism and Islam. No as far as I know they believe in different Gods.

Looking at how much wealth and political power religions have cummulated over the years.
大佬,,,你知唔知先知寫既年期?

Third, the Protestant Reformation happened in the 16th century, and Christians' impact on economics and politics are huge.

[ Last edited by westsider on 2005-8-17 at 04:00 PM ]

mememe

Siverxing 兄﹐你真係極品。

你批評一編唔係attn你既帖﹐話我講錯嘢。我解釋完我個帖既內容之後﹐你冇嘢好講就話我唔應該點樣點樣寫﹐應該點樣點樣寫﹐雖然除0左你之外其他人都1) 明我講乜﹐或者2)至少唔會乜都唔明就聲大夾狼0甘話我錯。

大放完一論自暴其短既厥詞之後唔道歉仲係0甘吠。

你要明白﹐如果大部份人唔使我親自解剖我篇帖同explain都明我講乜而唯獨得你一個唔明﹐我係冇義務一定要解釋清楚0西俾你聽先至唔使聽你吠0架。下次請喺你話人錯之前睇清楚﹐問清楚﹐同諗清楚係人哋講錯定係你理解能力差。

奇

Originally posted by silverxing at 2005-8-17 04:27 AM:
甘你就唔好将阿bobbywu同阿justin_lun...

唔係呀!我明wo

silverxing

你唔种意绝对可以唔复我，唔该你睇清楚版规，E度绝对欢迎任何人发表自己既意见，明又好唔明又好，只要唔系人身攻击同谩骂就唔会有问题。反而你老兄一睇人唔过眼就话人乱吠，犯规既系你唔系我。你自己收敛下就真。

mememe

silverxing兄,

喺睇完你既回覆之後﹐我決定涉取你既意見去睇睇版規。我諗你所講既版規應該係呢0的吧:

規則:
1)        本版歡迎所有具備任何關於靈幻神秘的事件(色情除外)
2)        真人真事請註明[真事] ,轉貼請註明[轉貼],有圖片的請註名[圖片]
3)        回覆是發題者的動力, 希望各版友多加鼓勵, 利已利人
4)        每人每日最多發出四個主題, 以免版友負荷過重
5)        請不要無理批評他人之文章

本版賞罰分明, 加分寬鬆, 扣分亦嚴謹

[取自http://www.26fun.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=38061&fpage=1]

我點睇都睇唔出究竟我犯0左邊條﹐要麻煩你自出0添。

如果你對"吠"呢個字眼心存介蒂﹐我道歉又何妨呢? 我喺呢度鄭重0甘向silverxing兄道歉﹐並更正我之前既帖中所有"吠"字而用"無理取鬧"代替。0甘樣寫我諗會文雅0的﹐希望你接納。

我驚你睇唔到上邊版規既第五條﹐我特別為你highlight0左in bold。當然﹐我唔會奢望你會為你既言行道歉﹐我亦都唔犧罕。如果你睇完之後可以反省而有所得著﹐繼而唔再無理取鬧﹐我諗你認唔認錯以經唔再重要。