|
- 帖子
- 110
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 16
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
|
14#
發表於 2005-10-23 07:48 PM
| 只看該作者
Justin_lun兄﹐
我唔會再同冇科學班底就學人拋書包既人討論。對進化論一竅不通仲講乜嘢進化論說甚麼你知道嗎? 簡直不知所謂。
*********************************************************************************
Primordial organic soup 係 Abiogenesis 既論點﹐而abiogenesis所用既係chemical evolution,即係化學原素點樣經過多個化學作用後變成有生命既物體,唔係biological evolution。進化論冇包括到解釋生命既開端。你真係好似咩都唔知就亂講噃。
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AbiogenesisAbiogenesis (Greek a-bio-genesis, "non biological origins") is, in its most general sense, the hypothetical generation of life from non-living matter. Today the term is primarily used to refer to hypotheses of the origin of life from a primordial soup. Chemical evolution is a hypothesis which tries to explain how life might possibly develop from non-life (see abiogenesis). Various experiments have been made to show certain aspects of this process, the first ones were done by Stanley L. Miller in the 1950s. For that they are now called Miller experiments. However only very basic organic building blocks were obtained. The challenge is getting complex molecules organized consistently.
The hypothesis is that simple chemical compounds could catalyze the creation of copies of themselves (somewhat similar to the formation of a crystal or polymer) in an environment rich with the necessary building block compounds or elements. The theory of evolution applies as long as life exists. How that life came to exist is not relevant to evolution.
Missing ring?
http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CC/CC200.html
http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CC/CC212.html
http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CB/CB910.htmlRing species show the process of speciation in action. In ring species, the species is distributed more or less in a line, such as around the base of a mountain range. Each population is able to breed with its neighboring population, but the populations at the two ends are not able to interbreed. (In a true ring species, those two end populations are adjacent to each other, completing the ring.)
进化停止?
http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CC/CC050.htmlThere is a fine transition between modern humans and australopithecines and other hominids. The transition is gradual enough that it is not clear where to draw the line between human and not. There is evidence that humans have evolved in the last several thousand years and continue to evolve.
乜都唔知就妄下定斷﹐大言不慚。你錯到離普﹐但係又沾沾自喜﹐以為拋得成書包﹐點知搞到怡笑大方。唔該你下次要放謬論前做做功課﹐唔好亂點人。
你同全世界既科學家講話進化論被推翻係事實﹐睇0下邊個俾人鬧白痴。 |
|
