艾力克

Originally posted by fantesticming05 at 2006-2-3 01:07 PM:


howard 換既話又唔會影響你 ~
如果唔肯放我唔再計啦...................

如果我換倒兩個 sg 返黎就有得諗
1st: bell v howard

但你唔會放 t-mac, paul, 就淨番 wells, 咁我唔會要3個帝王, 所以...
2nd: wells v rahim

2換2... 你嬴 fg%, ft%, 3pt; 我嬴 reb, stl

但我會冇左個 pf, 咁你就要放 jamison 或 martin 其中一人

3換3 o既話, 我想 bell + rahim + sbk v howard + wells + jamison
條數係 你嬴 fg%, ft%, 3pt; 我嬴 reb, stl

fantesticming05

Originally posted by 艾力克 at 2006-2-3 01:14 PM:

如果我換倒兩個 sg 返黎就有得諗
1...

咁我咩 reb 都比曬你啦............仲洗玩咩 ~
howard 換 bell 我都係 攞你 3 pt, 你攞 reb..........各取所需 ~
你仲講位置..........SG,SF trade SG 都唔係唔合理姐 ~
你講到我攞多個SG咁.....

fantesticming05

Originally posted by 艾力克 at 2006-2-3 01:14 PM:

如果我換倒兩個 sg 返黎就有得諗
1...

尋日又係你話1換1..........我先諗咁耐...........
點知今日你又話要拉埋d人..........
比 reb 你都無理由攪到我冇曬掛 ~

艾力克

Originally posted by fantesticming05 at 2006-2-3 01:18 PM:


咁我咩 reb 都比曬你啦.............

看來你計數仲差少少
唔緊要

fg%, ft%, 3pt 都係你隊波所需, 相反 martin o既加盟已經大大提高你o既 reb 力量
不過既然你再三強調此 point, just let it be~

[ Last edited by 艾力克 on 2006-2-3 at 01:23 PM ]

fantesticming05

Originally posted by 艾力克 at 2006-2-3 01:20 PM:

看來你計數仲差少少
唔緊要

...

fg%, ft% 馬田都有啦....................
bell fg%, ft% 雖然唔係屎, 但唔係你講得咁高姐 ~

艾力克

Originally posted by fantesticming05 at 2006-2-3 01:27 PM:


fg%, ft% 馬田都有啦....................
bell fg%, ft% 雖然唔係屎, 但唔係你講得咁高姐 ~

我係講緊 rahim 同 wally
算啦, 唔換就唔駛傾啦

fantesticming05

Originally posted by 艾力克 at 2006-2-3 01:30 PM:

我係講緊 rahim 同 wally
算啦, 唔換就唔駛傾啦

ic...........唔係唔換得 ~
但係 rahim 我一定唔要 ~

清揚

Originally posted by Xtravagant at 2006-1-31 13:17:


清楊成日將自己而家隊波同他另外個LE比較﹐其實甘又點得既呢。大家環境﹐對手都吾同。 我覺得就算艾兄你而家隊波跟清楊調換你都會繼續玩落去﹐因為大家追求既係樂趣而吾係勝利﹐至少我自己係抱著呢個心態去玩。

我系為左win先玩ar,唔得ar???
唔想win仲玩黎仲乜???:cool:

清揚

Originally posted by Xtravagant at 2006-1-31 13:17:



清楊成日將自己而家隊波同他另外個LE比較﹐其實甘又點得既呢。大家環境﹐對手都吾同。 我覺得就算艾兄你而家隊波跟清楊調換你都會繼續玩落去﹐因為大家追求既係樂趣而吾係勝利﹐至少我自己係抱著呢個心態去玩。

我放Duncan比人系自殺ar,吹ar???

清揚

睇下我個陣
唔好諗住叫ming同我轉人,你地冇機會喇
因我轉了PW