
Originally posted by CHECSS at 2006-1-30 12:38 PM:
ME
Originally posted by nashisthebestpg at 2006-1-30 13:22:
姜維真係咁勁?4 Y7 w- M8 X4 |+ v5 `& |- u
佢輸俾鄧艾鍾會幾次ga bo...........
Originally posted by 托迪仔T at 2006-1-30 06:01 PM:0 Y+ P( l6 H3 i* u
羊祜![]()
Originally posted by hung414 at 2006-1-30 21:08:
# P3 ]& s, D4 y" W3 l7 b8 B3 k; H0 `
yes...he was the great one to unified Chinese
Originally posted by 機密 at 2006-1-30 21:22:
司馬懿
Originally posted by 151515 at 2006-1-30 21:24:
% t! i: i9 V1 ?2 P7 Q
唔計司馬懿呢?
Originally posted by 機密 at 2006-1-30 21:25:$ X$ x: o/ o( P8 I. j
; Z0 ^- Q- ?$ S+ @( y
姜維
Originally posted by 151515 at 2006-1-30 21:25:
why?
Originally posted by 機密 at 2006-1-30 21:28:
. ]/ x- Y1 S7 h. S- p2 O+ ]0 W
4 t2 g* Q: {# d2 R" i* O6 b* d
智慧高之餘﹐又打得+ H9 r0 O6 v) M8 w) m- T! P
智慧: 諸葛亮-->司馬懿--->姜維
Originally posted by 151515 at 2006-1-30 21:32:
$ V* g! U: r% q; P/ e% m5 T, u
but i think智慧: 諸葛亮-->司...
Originally posted by 151515 at 2006-1-30 21:39:, z0 ~( h$ a6 n% F: E; f" K
Just I think
第一五分,第五一分1 x# N: p! Z+ H0 q$ S$ N! ~
4 M/ I$ @& c& r" m- @( ^9 x
諸葛亮:5+5+4+1=152 ^) s8 ?# `) p1 W) h% u) [
司馬懿:4+4+5+3=16* `. |* \" z3 q# m' {
鄧艾:1+2+3+4=10, \% i# r4 \5 T u1 I# K
姜維:2+1+1+5=9) ~* S7 Y. x8 B: f. d
陸遜:3+3+2+2=10
Originally posted by 機密 at 2006-1-30 21:41:
* f' j" L* H1 }7 C3 b- q4 D" E
智慧: 諸葛亮-->司馬懿--->...
Originally posted by 151515 at 2006-1-30 21:42:
! ?7 {& n5 I1 M' a
but 鄧艾and陸遜have 10 pts,姜維only9
Originally posted by 機密 at 2006-1-30 21:44:
% d4 {1 `$ s$ b
But I don't think鄧艾and陸遜 is really better than 姜維.

Originally posted by 151515 at 2006-1-30 21:45:
why?
其實他們實力差不多,很難比較![]()
Originally posted by 機密 at 2006-1-30 21:50:
In addition, a merit for 姜維 you haven't consider for him. 姜維's fascination is better the others because he was the only student of 諸葛亮.
Originally posted by 151515 at 2006-1-30 21:51:
他比孔明更偉大
Originally posted by 機密 at 2006-1-30 21:55:
% k7 p8 o8 N* D
Agree. Both of them were extremely loyalty. However, he was more great because he was in more poor situation. He could maintain a same loyality to his boss.
Originally posted by 151515 at 2006-1-30 21:58:
* t Q3 V7 Y& k& I/ M8 x; h: }
他支撐了蜀國三十年,雖然孔明也有27年(207-234),但那時的人材比姜維時期的好很多,五虎已屈機

Originally posted by 機密 at 2006-1-30 22:03:" }4 K G8 r* z; ]* _
yes, that's the point.![]()
Originally posted by 151515 at 2006-1-30 22:20:: `6 u* i7 h$ B. O
陸遜也偉大,但不得善終......
Originally posted by 機密 at 2006-1-30 22:29:
% k2 R8 y2 H7 c1 y3 }* W
Many '3 countries' peoples 不得善終 too![]()
Originally posted by 151515 at 2006/1/30 21:32:
6 F/ q: x. T% _5 a% I% n( W8 G
but i think智慧: 諸葛亮-->司...
Originally posted by nashisthebestpg at 2006-1-31 01:07 AM:( j: Q8 Y, S+ A2 b5 c
聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........
佢勁係勁在治國能力............
係咪如此?
Originally posted by benny0105 at 2006-1-31 01:46 AM:
# {7 }3 j% j$ E' p* {
其實又有幾多人真係睇過三國志丫...
好多人只不過睇完神化既「三國演義」就信以為真
Originally posted by nashisthebestpg at 2006-1-31 01:07 AM:# k& Y9 `6 @ D
聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........) C( K( D9 f) n% i( T# T
佢勁係勁在治國能力............
" Y/ u$ x* O" B4 N
係咪如此?

Originally posted by nashisthebestpg at 2006-1-31 02:01 AM:! V" R) `: \1 N' x1 Z
呢個網係講有關三國正史~
不過我諗好多人都有睇過~
http://k-fung.net/han/real.htm
$ m* z2 }1 }2 @Originally posted by step025 at 2006-1-31 07:13:
你睇演義定火鳳? 你又點知佢地打得?
...



Originally posted by 155220 at 2006-1-31 12:56 PM:& M- _/ N/ c* y
P.S 曹魏後期頂住蜀漢姜維主要係teamw...
Originally posted by abcde1918 at 2006-1-31 12:58:
0 @% M+ m! G$ q7 \
我打機,姜維係最勁
Originally posted by 155220 at 2006-1-31 01:02 PM:. s5 r. Q+ H6 K/ U5 h
' `0 f- n, h! ?- j+ H& c: ^% K
打機鄧艾都唔錯,但正史中,我認為鄧艾勁d
Originally posted by abcde1918 at 2006-1-31 13:05:
點解咁講 {3 I) j: \& q, E0 [# l3 e
7 l, m' z0 Y7 n3 u
[ Last edited by abcde1918 on 2006-1-31 at 01:06 PM ]
Originally posted by 奇 at 2006-1-31 02:05:% `7 o9 w9 ^! }7 ` e# g+ e
* `( a8 V, H1 o, H; n% X
歷史中諸葛亮的軍事能力的確沒演義中那麼屈機,但也算不俗,始終對司馬懿也 N% |: \) m6 @) G; V& p
沒有佔下風![]()
Originally posted by 下......... at 2006-2-13 05:36 PM:" X# j( q1 _! W9 [7 y
姜維智力夠高, 諸葛亮又將兵法傳左比佢,最勁當然係姜維啦!
| 歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0 |