Originally posted by fung at 2006-5-9 12:24 AM:
原來係咁....第一頁就係...=0=
Originally posted by fung at 2006-5-8 11:57 PM:2 I( {+ n7 [! K1 c+ {' a; d4 |
各位brother
& W* q. e% y! q, ?
唔知係唔係我太廢......
Originally posted by Azuma at 2006-5-9 06:25 PM:4 R% k7 E$ }4 M0 f y' V `1 k( Z& B
一個市場有幾多個廁格?5 O: W( K2 ~- r
我諗你...
Originally posted by homan~ at 2006-5-9 06:38 PM:
1 n( ?& B" f, o& w9 E6 j/ S
好認同 !!!
good point !
- `! k+ E5 I3 m& T( k% g% c$ `
出得術既都有限料啦
Originally posted by Azuma at 2006-5-9 06:25 PM:
% W0 J! @( }* ^2 _" |4 {3 j( M
一個市場有幾多個廁格?
2 B$ ~; s7 E! i. O* a
我諗你...
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 12:59 AM:
其實我覺得真係會咁樣出貓既唔會好多, 甚至會係無
: [2 B% x, W9 O& R/ o4 N4 J
因為就算有網址比埋, 有無人會知道呢一遍essay會就嚮網頁既第一版?
又有無人會冒呢一個未知知數既險?
5 }4 A G2 z3 p5 H. w! l+ W4 O1 m
以一個正常既學生都唔會諗出貓呢一樣野, 明知係刑事- S1 U. Y& v$ O: e8 h3 _
就算真係有人咁樣而出貓, 佢又可以記得到幾多答案呢?/ Z. F- f# ~ s! G! }( K
4 l/ K" ?, d) a
所以, 雖然HKEA就絕對係有疏忽, 但係我唔覺得有d咩既大既影響, 只係CE考生嚮度小題大做, 因為如果真係取消果一part既分數, 通常黎講, 普遍大家既分數都會提升
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 01:23 AM:
出猫并唔係刑事的
所以警方冇...
Originally posted by gn00987333 at 2006-5-11 02:25 AM:6 G; \+ V( Y0 _/ K. t; |
講真
你自己考唔到就考唔到啦- F1 d( Z3 S9 r3 c% `( S; f
點解要出猫呢
出左,又唔一定會合格& l: x, _/ P1 ]1 @
有機會佢d答案錯既
你有可能會唔合格tim
而且係唔係應該嚴謹d呢' a2 M( g- x! [1 u) R1 L) G6 T7 Y
咁都會有個網有d會考資料
咁駛咩讀書啊,溫答案咪得囉=.=
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 02:36 AM:7 l3 V' a$ `! ~8 P" O; @+ K
9 a6 E7 w# F& U1 N
- ?+ S, i3 v5 r, K. r
考題係抄個網的
考評局懶Q到照出
班考生先咁興
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 02:32 AM:
出猫唔係刑事係無錯, 但係我記得佢地可以用其他刑事既例黎入你罪
正如偷窺一樣, 一樣唔係犯法, 不過警方可以用遊蕩罪黎入你罪' n) r4 @. @5 T: b. J0 D, I
# u& u8 ^, S. j; K0 }
另外, 通常會驚有d咩唔公平既人, 通常都係d邊沿人/低分既人, 佢地就係怕其他人拉高左分之後, 而令到佢地唔合格5 A" }* U# {5 d r/ V
如果係攞A,B,C既人, 怕咩你地出猫, 出猫既通常都係d唔識既人先會咁做, 高分極有限
所以當局為左避免出result之後有人嘈, 通常都會増加合格率, 變相等如加分
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 03:13 AM:
刑事係要舉證的% u, {. \& [3 L' n1 i5 n
仲要有相關的...
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 03:27 AM:- J, F, R/ |! t. z. |
9 } L" n5 @6 {$ `, F" F
" {9 ~# e+ _: [+ B1 V1 G
佢地可以用其他刑事既例黎入你罪,...
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 03:56 AM:1 ~# y O) \, L$ k3 D
! _5 m# j l6 Y; s1 U, }6 G
你當香港冇王管咩+ H4 k X! g# s
唔係刑事: h. L+ T. n8 [% s: f* q; m
你點申請法庭手令呀, D; x, s* A% f) O4 u9 K0 i$ `0 R
責任係考評局度
要查IP呢D野$ l0 L$ z* \3 V" I5 G% A
ISP要有當事人許可\手令先可以做野的
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 03:27 AM:
. Y; y2 y- z4 \, f
另外, 取消果一part唔等於直接加果一part既全部分數, 只會將其他既部份再拉curve, ) {4 D- E: z' ^. i% x: }7 @# m- G
所以, 高分既唔會受影響, 只有低分既著數左
6 `+ X# w: H* C4 n7 p: w7 R$ V+ l
所以, 取消果一part對於高分既絕對係唔會唔公平
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 04:06 AM:
/ y" c# \% N! j
4 {- w! q% s! H. H; X6 @
取消得一係就+曬3 Z8 r3 c( v6 N7 C) `0 M
一係就減曬...
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 04:01 AM:" c7 C4 _, D3 Y0 t/ i
4 x1 ]# Q+ S) ]; x R+ k6 o
出猫唔係刑事係無錯, 但係我記得佢地可以用其他刑事既例等同出猫既例黎入你罪
正如偷窺一樣, 一樣唔係犯法, 不過警方可以用遊蕩罪黎入你罪
) p: v5 O2 b' y+ M& w( ]# W
只不過係無直接既例, 而用第二d相關既例, 唔代表無例可管
唔通你話偷窺入唔到佢罪??- C0 X- ? S! B& }9 B
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 04:11 AM:
+ I# L5 P$ C4 G- v1 \# `
語文考試唔同其他科目, 你話讀佢果d就只係識果d, 語文科正常係唔會突然之間有一part半part特別高分9 K5 f! P& L5 |7 p
所以減晒果一part既分, 嚮語文科係唔會唔公平
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 04:13 AM:
; J2 F6 Q; N4 m3 @1 y& L. D0 l8 M/ |) A, Y
用其他刑事既例等同出猫既例黎入你罪
如果有使乜仲要提議要求立法2 q7 q U7 r/ i) c0 p8 O, [0 }/ I0 b
就係冇相關的& n3 f- M4 e+ b/ E9 `$ t2 ^) g- _
佢地乜都做唔到先要提案9 E" Q5 n2 M" N7 K0 B) [
) v0 O. i o# e8 g8 b/ b
偷窺同呢單野有咩關係?
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 04:15 AM:* f2 [8 V' F; c* v) [
考過會考未?
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 04:16 AM:7 R" L+ p7 D1 J' x& X7 C, N! K1 r
% m3 X1 M+ D3 W: b! |0 M9 O
偷窺只係作為例
偷窺一樣係無直接既例, 而只係用第二d相關既例
所以, 亦都曾經要提議要求立法3 m6 A+ {6 S% `$ e7 L3 F& |
出猫亦都一樣
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 04:18 AM:
$ O- k/ U0 |/ P# L, N5 _ D* J
我反而問下你考過會考未?
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 04:21 AM:
2 r# p/ W6 K2 n1 C/ S$ Y% [
我反反問0 B1 L% r5 S8 h* M Z: {
我(上)面唔係講左咩
Originally posted by pangpang2066 at 2006-5-11 04:36 PM:
其實都難唔難捉到人? 就算捉到,佢死口...
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 05:57 PM:" R( i8 |. h0 ^, F
重唔重考唔重要
3 K! t2 O# d/ I2 o% q/ U1 O% C+ {+ u
最緊要收到成績單之後! U2 {2 ?0 O7 l) O
唔好又走出黎話
唔公平要重考; ?/ T* D) T1 z4 w, i0 z
呢d就最無謂
Originally posted by wangjacky at 2006-5-11 06:47 PM:
不過而家佢地好似有辦法喇$ I# ]1 C6 ~; {( `& ?; s/ Q: D3 E
有左對策# L0 u: I, G; i1 ~5 k3 G
各位brother睇睇4 [3 [" Z3 z' d& H0 c$ M
http://www.hkeaa.edu.hk/doc/isd/LetterToCandidates.pdf
Originally posted by wangjacky at 2006-5-11 06:47 PM:1 M: J+ Q7 |6 y+ B
不過而家佢地好似有辦法喇' M C3 p, U% g( L" [
有左對策
各位brother睇睇7 G& j0 p8 r& _) C( R" k: V: Y8 i
http://www.hkeaa.edu.hk/doc/isd/LetterToCandidates.pdf
Originally posted by s20021601 at 2006-5-12 01:31 AM:
普通苛尿先係~1min....但係爆石的話可...
Originally posted by s20021601 at 2006-5-12 01:31:, C5 x7 x, w8 y% M* o! V1 `1 {
普通苛尿先係~1min....但係爆石的話可...
Originally posted by 155220 at 12-5-2006 09:18 PM:
1 V: m7 v; t% u( v4 p, r1 a( @/ E
, O& j, A. @8 O8 Y. X9 ?
入場前先搜身,然後再令他們將手提放進locker,唔知得唔得呢...........
Originally posted by xylitol25 at 2006-5-14 12:28 AM:
咁煩,不如學外國同大陸啦,裝個手機干擾器仲好啦,包唔怕有人上網or講電話問答案
Originally posted by xylitol25 at 2006-5-14 12:28 AM:; |3 `! i! T: e, ]& @* d/ S* _
咁煩,不如學外國同大陸啦,裝個手機干擾器仲好啦,包唔怕有人上網or講電話問答案
Originally posted by 155220 at 2006-5-12 09:18 PM:
7 }0 d: x) z1 L- }
) i$ ^! C c8 h9 W3 {
入場前先搜身,然後再令他們將手提放進locker,唔知得唔得呢...........
Originally posted by zz1988 at 2006-5-16 09:06 PM:$ L, H- o: ?# O/ ~' n9 I1 ]
i retake this year
i really dun...
歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0 |