Originally posted by fung at 2006-5-9 12:24 AM:4 b# K, E6 D$ ]6 _ t
原來係咁....第一頁就係...=0=
Originally posted by fung at 2006-5-8 11:57 PM:* n q2 A) S0 w% G& A, G7 ~! C1 J6 b
各位brother# R$ W& F; @# F( B# I: E
唔知係唔係我太廢......
Originally posted by Azuma at 2006-5-9 06:25 PM:
5 N- c( k; k! X6 k
一個市場有幾多個廁格?( B9 b8 Q, ^8 x0 G5 X2 ]0 P
- m+ A% r' A, B" s
我諗你...
Originally posted by homan~ at 2006-5-9 06:38 PM:
# V: j+ d; l9 m6 s
好認同 !!!5 n2 u" U2 z) j7 H; Y4 {6 e4 ]
good point !
出得術既都有限料啦![]()
Originally posted by Azuma at 2006-5-9 06:25 PM:
一個市場有幾多個廁格?
0 Z2 [- ], d4 x2 Q
我諗你...
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 12:59 AM:7 ?3 h* B5 I2 H* K
其實我覺得真係會咁樣出貓既唔會好多, 甚至會係無
因為就算有網址比埋, 有無人會知道呢一遍essay會就嚮網頁既第一版?
又有無人會冒呢一個未知知數既險?
以一個正常既學生都唔會諗出貓呢一樣野, 明知係刑事- g3 v X) n- _, d
就算真係有人咁樣而出貓, 佢又可以記得到幾多答案呢?( y5 @( |% b# D, c3 q
所以, 雖然HKEA就絕對係有疏忽, 但係我唔覺得有d咩既大既影響, 只係CE考生嚮度小題大做, 因為如果真係取消果一part既分數, 通常黎講, 普遍大家既分數都會提升
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 01:23 AM:' I) x5 d4 k$ \* ?7 [$ h7 b
7 d3 I* m; f. h2 M2 s* K1 V. c( V
0 E/ t7 b" o+ O) s9 ^
出猫并唔係刑事的% v' N% o: J h% K+ b
所以警方冇...
Originally posted by gn00987333 at 2006-5-11 02:25 AM:
講真+ H5 y3 T; A8 [+ O4 n3 v4 m
你自己考唔到就考唔到啦# \: R& \+ j+ O7 `( _1 }
點解要出猫呢
出左,又唔一定會合格( c( K$ s' s+ B9 ^, M
有機會佢d答案錯既) p% V# u ]3 N8 s* p
你有可能會唔合格tim1 W0 C9 V$ z: M$ C
而且係唔係應該嚴謹d呢
咁都會有個網有d會考資料9 E# \ ~1 {7 b# G6 r, t
咁駛咩讀書啊,溫答案咪得囉=.=
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 02:36 AM:- \ C" A" n& w: b/ [
7 e! A% A( v D# D
`" s5 m; f* I* q" R0 p
4 K# p6 `. i# {0 G7 D
考題係抄個網的& Z! i$ g" L3 Y) ?! J0 ^
考評局懶Q到照出
班考生先咁興![]()
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 02:32 AM:. G3 i ]) n1 @
, P8 v9 H( |9 K2 b4 D% }! }
, Z% o! s: c+ E/ ]( O
出猫唔係刑事係無錯, 但係我記得佢地可以用其他刑事既例黎入你罪; f$ A7 |5 {7 p" W; N' ~
正如偷窺一樣, 一樣唔係犯法, 不過警方可以用遊蕩罪黎入你罪& t+ _6 c! h( y' y
另外, 通常會驚有d咩唔公平既人, 通常都係d邊沿人/低分既人, 佢地就係怕其他人拉高左分之後, 而令到佢地唔合格
如果係攞A,B,C既人, 怕咩你地出猫, 出猫既通常都係d唔識既人先會咁做, 高分極有限$ _, U0 M- Y T) t `5 J7 k
所以當局為左避免出result之後有人嘈, 通常都會増加合格率, 變相等如加分
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 03:13 AM:. p' i# V0 I6 q) _
6 I4 o5 [5 ^! i' e8 {- z% `+ F8 N
刑事係要舉證的* ~! R; u9 {" o( [# R1 j
仲要有相關的...
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 03:27 AM:
佢地可以用其他刑事既例黎入你罪,...
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 03:56 AM:% F) H8 G5 s; i2 [% s
% `2 h! ^% l X' s. ~0 D4 Z* y
你當香港冇王管咩
唔係刑事9 G7 C9 h2 z; G2 D
你點申請法庭手令呀" A1 X8 S$ L( @! T
責任係考評局度
要查IP呢D野0 S+ P9 S, f- E: n
ISP要有當事人許可\手令先可以做野的
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 03:27 AM:
另外, 取消果一part唔等於直接加果一part既全部分數, 只會將其他既部份再拉curve, * I0 g2 a& N" Z- N. f4 F& P$ m" Q
所以, 高分既唔會受影響, 只有低分既著數左
5 b; h/ @0 D! z5 Z! P1 o" R* w
所以, 取消果一part對於高分既絕對係唔會唔公平' U& r* C1 Z: U: ?! p
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 04:06 AM:
1 v1 I' |% v4 R3 w
3 s$ g0 b. K; T$ g4 o; M
取消得一係就+曬& t; e9 B* d3 O3 m
一係就減曬...
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 04:01 AM:0 Q( g& g; ~7 w
) f& j C# S3 _
, U7 _0 N6 t- G' S8 o
出猫唔係刑事係無錯, 但係我記得佢地可以用其他刑事既例等同出猫既例黎入你罪2 G2 G4 ?" J$ G) G ?
正如偷窺一樣, 一樣唔係犯法, 不過警方可以用遊蕩罪黎入你罪
7 z( H0 g% N* p; }8 p. u
只不過係無直接既例, 而用第二d相關既例, 唔代表無例可管
唔通你話偷窺入唔到佢罪??
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 04:11 AM:
( l0 Y+ L! a( F! P1 l8 T- B
8 G# o0 _- ^9 u1 t5 n
語文考試唔同其他科目, 你話讀佢果d就只係識果d, 語文科正常係唔會突然之間有一part半part特別高分
% t( Z; q3 z* F- Z1 q2 k% N' C
所以減晒果一part既分, 嚮語文科係唔會唔公平
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 04:13 AM:
! D3 v) Z: [3 C" y% T+ L* G
用其他刑事既例等同出猫既例黎入你罪
G! b* t: t* W0 C
如果有使乜仲要提議要求立法, B5 z. ^1 Y) @
就係冇相關的7 X0 `3 ^# D6 t1 C5 N" t; q
佢地乜都做唔到先要提案
偷窺同呢單野有咩關係?
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 04:15 AM:
考過會考未?
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 04:16 AM:5 h( Q7 ?( k% a. Q0 }* s
2 G9 c. W* m0 y# w: s
8 D" x. |% m1 {4 |
偷窺只係作為例
偷窺一樣係無直接既例, 而只係用第二d相關既例
所以, 亦都曾經要提議要求立法' R" ~# s9 M7 r
$ w0 Y. B8 ^3 O' z @) F
出猫亦都一樣
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 04:18 AM:
) i4 p5 J: z: ~0 x& a: J7 k5 g
我反而問下你考過會考未?
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 04:21 AM:
我反反問
我(上)面唔係講左咩![]()
Originally posted by pangpang2066 at 2006-5-11 04:36 PM:
其實都難唔難捉到人? 就算捉到,佢死口...
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 05:57 PM:0 ^$ x$ K1 g6 M; s4 ^" y8 q" B1 g/ c
重唔重考唔重要
7 W' [, s4 q- W8 _) J. A0 ^9 I
最緊要收到成績單之後- _# k) \- G2 `. [7 N) T# o
唔好又走出黎話- p/ ]7 g) w/ j& o2 Q; s% z
唔公平要重考, T; a- B: q+ T" q2 J
呢d就最無謂
Originally posted by wangjacky at 2006-5-11 06:47 PM:
不過而家佢地好似有辦法喇
有左對策 v+ x4 g( S2 A( _
各位brother睇睇6 e( ^- R. k1 ]1 P; P
http://www.hkeaa.edu.hk/doc/isd/LetterToCandidates.pdf
Originally posted by wangjacky at 2006-5-11 06:47 PM:
不過而家佢地好似有辦法喇
有左對策
各位brother睇睇
http://www.hkeaa.edu.hk/doc/isd/LetterToCandidates.pdf
Originally posted by s20021601 at 2006-5-12 01:31 AM:
普通苛尿先係~1min....但係爆石的話可...
Originally posted by s20021601 at 2006-5-12 01:31:/ _$ x) P( m' Q/ V# Z0 h- H
普通苛尿先係~1min....但係爆石的話可...
Originally posted by 155220 at 12-5-2006 09:18 PM:( L9 T2 ^* b8 F& q5 j) G9 C
( \7 \* |! X) H V
入場前先搜身,然後再令他們將手提放進locker,唔知得唔得呢...........
Originally posted by xylitol25 at 2006-5-14 12:28 AM:
咁煩,不如學外國同大陸啦,裝個手機干擾器仲好啦,包唔怕有人上網or講電話問答案![]()
Originally posted by xylitol25 at 2006-5-14 12:28 AM:7 v" @% H0 Y; B8 R4 D: g4 C5 Z
咁煩,不如學外國同大陸啦,裝個手機干擾器仲好啦,包唔怕有人上網or講電話問答案![]()
Originally posted by 155220 at 2006-5-12 09:18 PM:
7 V3 \" w! S' Z0 y* t9 F
, Y. Q$ q: v3 V
入場前先搜身,然後再令他們將手提放進locker,唔知得唔得呢...........
Originally posted by zz1988 at 2006-5-16 09:06 PM:- s" Y7 x5 K; w n- J! g
i retake this year & |% s. R, ]2 A/ r/ S
i really dun...
歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0 |