Originally posted by fung at 2006-5-9 12:24 AM:
原來係咁....第一頁就係...=0=
Originally posted by fung at 2006-5-8 11:57 PM:
各位brother
% t( `3 W7 c1 Y: l6 c' q
唔知係唔係我太廢......
Originally posted by Azuma at 2006-5-9 06:25 PM:
6 Q3 u1 G5 q+ d7 j3 I: a8 ~
一個市場有幾多個廁格?
我諗你...
Originally posted by homan~ at 2006-5-9 06:38 PM:4 W; w3 e' ~, n7 x% K
2 P, P+ G X: k. O+ D; C
好認同 !!!' g3 r8 X* [+ f' V
good point !
出得術既都有限料啦![]()
Originally posted by Azuma at 2006-5-9 06:25 PM:
3 z' f6 O6 j# s. C y1 D& X
* S1 b. s! u0 Y. X. @! V
一個市場有幾多個廁格?
3 q# g1 Q- o6 F8 x% N' f
我諗你...
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 12:59 AM:
其實我覺得真係會咁樣出貓既唔會好多, 甚至會係無9 ^; O1 k5 N7 L8 A4 I- }! z7 F! _
因為就算有網址比埋, 有無人會知道呢一遍essay會就嚮網頁既第一版?4 N% u N3 C% V
又有無人會冒呢一個未知知數既險?2 e8 e. L2 _0 F
, T1 s) _5 A$ l
以一個正常既學生都唔會諗出貓呢一樣野, 明知係刑事, u2 z. P0 b& h' A4 w* y
就算真係有人咁樣而出貓, 佢又可以記得到幾多答案呢?* e8 L/ m9 Z9 T: K- q$ {
& u6 W, j+ i |
所以, 雖然HKEA就絕對係有疏忽, 但係我唔覺得有d咩既大既影響, 只係CE考生嚮度小題大做, 因為如果真係取消果一part既分數, 通常黎講, 普遍大家既分數都會提升
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 01:23 AM:* S8 { E6 D( F* |! _* z
9 |, X I- i# P8 p% p0 M
/ A2 y2 M5 g. O
3 S J5 n" }# M3 a* i
出猫并唔係刑事的$ g$ E! R( L9 b) \
所以警方冇...
Originally posted by gn00987333 at 2006-5-11 02:25 AM:' j: |" X. _, z% I
講真! r' c- ]5 a7 S
你自己考唔到就考唔到啦
點解要出猫呢
出左,又唔一定會合格
有機會佢d答案錯既0 Q5 Y9 B: ~. n% ]9 v9 z
你有可能會唔合格tim
而且係唔係應該嚴謹d呢+ P- O$ C9 c/ ~5 V+ ^
咁都會有個網有d會考資料
咁駛咩讀書啊,溫答案咪得囉=.=
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 02:36 AM:
! T' P; ?9 S3 t! ~! d; R
2 Y- `. t" r# F
g) [! P# l- l, Q$ M
考題係抄個網的$ b% R D0 x+ Y: v k9 N
考評局懶Q到照出
班考生先咁興![]()
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 02:32 AM:; z6 G- e' {) g; ^7 R5 G: |
1 t, b( y8 z: O1 w: T2 k# T
出猫唔係刑事係無錯, 但係我記得佢地可以用其他刑事既例黎入你罪
正如偷窺一樣, 一樣唔係犯法, 不過警方可以用遊蕩罪黎入你罪
另外, 通常會驚有d咩唔公平既人, 通常都係d邊沿人/低分既人, 佢地就係怕其他人拉高左分之後, 而令到佢地唔合格5 O# Y$ g+ I7 S& T4 d
如果係攞A,B,C既人, 怕咩你地出猫, 出猫既通常都係d唔識既人先會咁做, 高分極有限0 T3 `7 o9 r5 ^; N9 i A
% C! ]1 `$ a% Q( s* U
所以當局為左避免出result之後有人嘈, 通常都會増加合格率, 變相等如加分
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 03:13 AM:- K/ z6 X: h, @1 \
刑事係要舉證的% S3 \. N& y' W1 N! N7 T
仲要有相關的...
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 03:27 AM:
7 f6 }: P/ Y- O V5 G
佢地可以用其他刑事既例黎入你罪,...
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 03:56 AM:6 W* N8 ^# q; _9 U
6 h$ r5 ~1 l4 e# v4 C
4 N3 ]9 }% E7 L0 Y
3 {) \8 q0 q4 {5 [5 D$ X4 n
你當香港冇王管咩
唔係刑事
你點申請法庭手令呀
責任係考評局度$ w% Z. {6 X j8 n
要查IP呢D野0 h% S Q& B g6 `7 X; t! I
ISP要有當事人許可\手令先可以做野的
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 03:27 AM:- a. f5 G4 b* l3 o' p
) d0 Y- m/ x& I9 B" G. v
: B8 I# A+ ]5 n$ D7 ?( F8 H# o
另外, 取消果一part唔等於直接加果一part既全部分數, 只會將其他既部份再拉curve,
所以, 高分既唔會受影響, 只有低分既著數左
所以, 取消果一part對於高分既絕對係唔會唔公平! r3 F5 O* Z# i9 m2 s8 z
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 04:06 AM:
( u* _4 @5 }8 y& K, g& q) e4 [
4 v2 t0 T) }7 @7 b& w4 S" S
取消得一係就+曬1 o( d8 w0 F' E5 Z8 V! Y
一係就減曬...
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 04:01 AM:& `7 L' j, b# m5 g1 U
5 _+ o1 x; o( U! I, ?
出猫唔係刑事係無錯, 但係我記得佢地可以用其他刑事既例等同出猫既例黎入你罪
正如偷窺一樣, 一樣唔係犯法, 不過警方可以用遊蕩罪黎入你罪
只不過係無直接既例, 而用第二d相關既例, 唔代表無例可管" w5 K1 H5 [% |/ e) D
唔通你話偷窺入唔到佢罪??: n- k, I% x4 g: r/ j
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 04:11 AM:6 X3 z9 n7 g- j* h; r1 Z' {
! R: u# t/ U9 M* Y3 s; Q
語文考試唔同其他科目, 你話讀佢果d就只係識果d, 語文科正常係唔會突然之間有一part半part特別高分: \' n# o6 v! O- V$ \: O
所以減晒果一part既分, 嚮語文科係唔會唔公平
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 04:13 AM:3 t9 Q& e/ M" _6 H7 f
( G: S1 p, A; ~; z; X/ D7 {
* _: W; S4 _* [1 X
用其他刑事既例等同出猫既例黎入你罪& C* X2 `$ t0 ]: u4 r! ^1 w
如果有使乜仲要提議要求立法
就係冇相關的7 m2 c k p1 D) b
佢地乜都做唔到先要提案
偷窺同呢單野有咩關係?
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 04:15 AM:
. r) \( E* Z; K" `6 j. N3 O+ c' Q& S
考過會考未?
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 04:16 AM:- Y6 x+ J& E9 b& R4 |' G& p1 s
& a9 |# R: \0 A) b) ?6 U, n
偷窺只係作為例
偷窺一樣係無直接既例, 而只係用第二d相關既例
所以, 亦都曾經要提議要求立法
% Q5 r+ D5 h) s) U0 ?6 m- c, f
出猫亦都一樣
Originally posted by clkgtr at 2006-5-11 04:18 AM:
( P- u7 S+ `+ x
我反而問下你考過會考未?
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 04:21 AM:
7 _: ^: O' i- \/ v( O8 q0 L
# y+ k7 N" E2 G) X& o# ~
我反反問
我(上)面唔係講左咩![]()
Originally posted by pangpang2066 at 2006-5-11 04:36 PM:
其實都難唔難捉到人? 就算捉到,佢死口...
Originally posted by austin666 at 2006-5-11 05:57 PM:0 Y" t6 V w7 S+ E+ {9 j% C
重唔重考唔重要
% W \6 O r8 ^+ _. p5 f
最緊要收到成績單之後+ ^. C; t0 t- `' I7 b) s
唔好又走出黎話0 M: m; ~ b) p, W
唔公平要重考& K2 W3 N: P s" ], w5 N" I
呢d就最無謂
Originally posted by wangjacky at 2006-5-11 06:47 PM:1 A3 ?& |5 e0 }: ^
不過而家佢地好似有辦法喇
有左對策
各位brother睇睇: h. ], W [, H- _# b$ A2 d+ P
http://www.hkeaa.edu.hk/doc/isd/LetterToCandidates.pdf
Originally posted by wangjacky at 2006-5-11 06:47 PM:
不過而家佢地好似有辦法喇
有左對策: k% M; v. t% [2 r% s9 n
各位brother睇睇
http://www.hkeaa.edu.hk/doc/isd/LetterToCandidates.pdf
Originally posted by s20021601 at 2006-5-12 01:31 AM:3 }5 K* i, @* Q# {5 t
普通苛尿先係~1min....但係爆石的話可...
Originally posted by s20021601 at 2006-5-12 01:31:
普通苛尿先係~1min....但係爆石的話可...
Originally posted by 155220 at 12-5-2006 09:18 PM:, r9 f/ b& j- i. b
% P u1 l% y) Y2 `, B1 V. m& Z6 b
1 i( I4 y" q* ]: @
入場前先搜身,然後再令他們將手提放進locker,唔知得唔得呢...........
Originally posted by xylitol25 at 2006-5-14 12:28 AM:" y2 G$ z, s7 D6 p# K; d1 r
咁煩,不如學外國同大陸啦,裝個手機干擾器仲好啦,包唔怕有人上網or講電話問答案![]()
Originally posted by xylitol25 at 2006-5-14 12:28 AM:
咁煩,不如學外國同大陸啦,裝個手機干擾器仲好啦,包唔怕有人上網or講電話問答案![]()
Originally posted by 155220 at 2006-5-12 09:18 PM:9 T; x& K5 b( V
- @" g* f- ?7 _: R! J% B8 U. E
入場前先搜身,然後再令他們將手提放進locker,唔知得唔得呢...........
Originally posted by zz1988 at 2006-5-16 09:06 PM:+ p+ R9 I6 Z1 N$ M# |; S
i retake this year
* K+ ?2 W! x+ x5 c N
i really dun...
歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0 |