Board logo

標題: 朗尼可能要停賽3場 [打印本頁]

作者: 瑞比    時間: 2006-8-5 11:13 AM     標題: 朗尼可能要停賽3場

Sir Alex Ferguson is hoping Wayne Rooney will not be handed a suspension after his sending off in the pre-season friendly against FC Porto.
The 20-year-old frontman scored in the 3-1 win but was dismissed four minutes before half time after an aerial challenge with Porto's Pepe. It appeared a harsh decision by referee Ruud Bossen to give a straight red card for an incident Sir Alex described as "innocuous".

The referee can report the incident to the Dutch Football Association, who can in turn can pass it on to the English FA and they could punish Rooney if they feel it necessary to do so. He could miss three matches at the start of the season, which would include Fulham, Charlton and Watford.

"I've seen the incident with Wayne and it was innocuous," Sir Alex told Sky Sports. "You would think common sense and fairness would prevail. It's a ridiculous decision, but we will have to wait and see what happens."

The United boss was disappointed with the reaction of some of Porto's players, adding: "We talk about players diving and play-acting so often that it has become the norm and people accept it now. Of course, we can't allow that. [Pepe] made a meal of it. And I thought the referee should have done better than he did. Ole was elbowed, but the ref warned the player and got on with it."

張紅已經俾得唔合理
停賽埋真係.........-.-
作者: brightlee    時間: 2006-8-5 11:20 AM

Well, that's the rules
Red card
3 matches banned...
That's no excuse.
作者: penp0319    時間: 2006-8-5 11:54 AM

相信最後當足總方面研究過錄影片段之後 - 會無需停賽
作者: michael86    時間: 2006-8-5 12:57 PM

Originally posted by brightlee at 2006-8-5 11:20 AM:
Well, that's the rules
Red card
3 matches banned...
That's no excuse.
老豆對朗尼睇黎好似有d偏見
o個球波根本就唔應該紅牌
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2006-8-5 02:30 PM

Originally posted by michael86 at 2006-8-5 12:57 PM:


老豆對朗尼睇黎好似有d偏見
o個球波根本就唔應該紅牌
果球波如果要紅的話大把人紅=3="
作者: MaxFigo    時間: 2006-8-5 03:08 PM

施丹都係3場啦,迪羅斯停4場tim....朗尼3場都合理
作者: fung0109    時間: 2006-8-5 04:30 PM

迪羅斯係世杯果下都係冇心嫁la,,,,睇得出佢係向波定向人既,,,但係始終係危險既動作,,,3場都合理,,,但係只係熱身賽都要停就有點兒那個囉~要停賽佢我覺得唔關係到朗尼比人既印象好唔好囉,,!!就算哩下唔係朗尼,,而係第2個,,都可能會被停賽!
作者: brightlee    時間: 2006-8-5 04:36 PM

Originally posted by michael86 at 2006-8-5 14:57:


老豆對朗尼睇黎好似有d偏見
o個球波根本就唔應該紅牌
I didn't watch the match
I am not bias
But I am saying, if that's a straight red
i.e. you need to be suspended in the next 3 matches.

Please understand what I am talking about
作者: cfccfcc    時間: 2006-8-5 04:40 PM

Rooney個臭馬朵晌
加上係有意伸手
同埋球証好嚴
變成一個紅牌
不過好似友誼波係唔會停落聯賽的
作者: brightlee    時間: 2006-8-5 04:46 PM

Originally posted by cfccfcc at 2006-8-5 18:40:
Rooney個臭馬朵晌
加上係有意伸手
同埋球証好嚴
變成一個紅牌
不過好似友誼波係唔會停落聯賽的
The English FA changes their rules in last year...

He will be suspended.
作者: harvey22    時間: 2006-8-5 04:48 PM

i think rooney won't get ban if the dutch fa dun report it to eng fa, so is up to the dutch fa, but even so he can appeal right?

[ Last edited by harvey22 on 2006-8-5 at 04:55 PM ]
作者: brightlee    時間: 2006-8-5 04:54 PM

Originally posted by harvey22 at 2006-8-5 18:48:
i think rooney won't get ban if the dutch fa dun report it to enf fa, so is up to the dutch fa, but even so he can appeal right?
yes


作者: harvey22    時間: 2006-8-5 04:54 PM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZVcnBY0j8xs
check out the replay, dis cuss.

Thanks for your video so we can filter-004 about this incident
+4

[ Last edited by brightlee on 2006-8-5 at 06:59 PM ]
作者: brightlee    時間: 2006-8-5 04:56 PM

Originally posted by harvey22 at 2006-8-5 18:54:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZVcnBY0j8xs
check out the replay, dis cuss.
I watched the replay

Yes, definity red card!

No doubt about it.
作者: harvey22    時間: 2006-8-5 04:57 PM

Originally posted by brightlee at 2006-8-5 04:56 PM:


I watched the replay

Yes, definity red card!

No doubt about it.
no way!!!! tell me why?
作者: brightlee    時間: 2006-8-5 05:03 PM

Originally posted by harvey22 at 2006-8-5 18:57:


no way!!!! tell me why?
look at his ARM!

also I heard that the referee was really straight in that match

If he's keeping that straight, I am not surprised he would send his off in this case.

That's between a "deep" Yellow and a straight red

I would choose red if I am straight

also, remember the position of the referee, he was just standing 3 yards of this incident


i.e. he's clear what he was doing.
作者: brightlee    時間: 2006-8-5 05:03 PM

p.s. I am not bias in any side......
作者: harvey22    時間: 2006-8-5 05:10 PM

I wanna raise a few questions:

1) Is a friendly, is it a bit harsh to dish out a straight red for this incident?
2) Is rooneys arm intentional? coz i think the ref thinks it is, thats why red.
3) The players reaction leading to rooneys red?? coz he was clearly acting, look at the replay, right after rooney got a red he got straight back up!
作者: harvey22    時間: 2006-8-5 05:12 PM

thx for the points dude lol~ i guess i finally reply something with quality lol~
作者: brightlee    時間: 2006-8-5 05:14 PM

1) even if that's friendly, that's no different as the standard of individual referee, sometimes you may see some referees that he may "invite" some coaches to sweep one player who had a terrible incident. THIS IS NOT HIS JOB, this is his sympathy inside his heart. That's NOT GRANTED!
2) Yes, I think his left arm was intention
3) The red card was not due to the acting from the defender, it's depended from the action of Wayne Rooney

Harvey, thanks for your points, I am appreciated about your work in these posts.
作者: brightlee    時間: 2006-8-5 05:16 PM

Originally posted by harvey22 at 2006-8-5 19:12:
thx for the points dude lol~ i guess i finally reply something with quality lol~

keep on going man!!!
作者: 瑞比    時間: 2006-8-5 05:31 PM

Originally posted by brightlee at 2006-8-5 05:14 PM:
1) even if that's friendly, that's ...
個爭打到人,,球證都唔理佢有意定無意??
一下straight red??

[ Last edited by 瑞比 on 2006-8-5 at 06:49 PM ]
作者: brightlee    時間: 2006-8-5 05:36 PM

Yes, from the rules
See you later... cos he's punching others.
作者: 奇    時間: 2006-8-5 06:38 PM

尺度問題,英超球證多數唔會咁嚴
仲要熱身賽....
作者: Man12161    時間: 2006-8-5 08:41 PM

你識咩呀
個個又係到係咁吠
作者: Kian76    時間: 2006-8-5 11:54 PM

Originally posted by at 2006-8-5 06:38 PM:
尺度問題,英超球證多數唔會咁嚴
仲要熱身賽....
一向以來英超的執法都係較鬆,因英超普偏較粗野,如果用意甲既標準,我諗朗尼場場要紅牌都似。

英超人粗野得黎唔夠陰濕,唔似馬達拉斯呢d誇張打人球證都可以睇唔倒。

[ Last edited by Kian76 on 2006-8-5 at 11:55 PM ]
作者: bigfish    時間: 2006-8-6 12:04 AM

劉健基都話波圖球員七情上面, 搞到朗尼食紅牌
作者: 地力    時間: 2006-8-6 02:05 AM

如果停聯賽咁頭幾場前鋒好緊人用喎
作者: cfccfcc    時間: 2006-8-6 02:43 AM

反而係friendly先赶走你
費時比你搞到冇晒friendly的氣氛
作者: Lyon    時間: 2006-8-7 01:20 PM

世界盃踩人都唔應該紅牌啦, 何況呢d開爭咁小事, 俾黃牌都接受唔到啦.

支持朗尼, 以後繼續.
作者: iMacc    時間: 2006-8-7 02:37 PM

我真係唔覺朗尼有意~
就算係有意都唔係打肘~
係用隻手打到塊面~
我就覺得朗尼想"禁"人多d~
不過個勢去得太盡~
有d肉酸~
作者: iMacc    時間: 2006-8-7 02:38 PM

Originally posted by MaxFigo at 2006-8-5 15:08:
施丹都係3場啦,迪羅斯停4場tim....朗尼3場都合理
sorry~
想問吓你覺得朗尼嘅情況同迪羅斯,施丹一樣~?
作者: iMacc    時間: 2006-8-7 02:39 PM

Originally posted by fung0109 at 2006-8-5 16:30:
迪羅斯係世杯果下都係冇心嫁la,,,,睇...
迪羅斯無心.....
直頭升起哂個人之後駛出tony jaa絕招都無心~
作者: bigfish    時間: 2006-8-7 04:40 PM

Originally posted by Lyon at 2006-8-7 01:20 PM:
世界盃踩人都唔應該紅牌啦, 何況呢d開爭咁小事, 俾黃牌都接受唔到啦.

支持朗尼, 以後繼續.
o個下根本就冇意
作者: bigfish    時間: 2006-8-7 04:41 PM

Originally posted by iMacc at 2006-8-7 02:37 PM:
我真係唔覺朗尼有意~
就算係有意都唔係打肘~
係用隻手打到塊面~
我就覺得朗尼想"禁"人多d~
不過個勢去得太盡~
有d肉酸~
加上個波圖球員七情上面呢
作者: harvey22    時間: 2006-8-7 04:42 PM

well looks like rooney won't get ban afterall~
which is good!!! i read it on the papers yesterday!
作者: MaxFigo    時間: 2006-8-7 06:39 PM

Originally posted by iMacc at 2006-8-7 02:38 PM:

sorry~
想問吓你覺得朗尼嘅情況同迪羅斯,施丹一樣~?
sorry...可能係我講得唔清楚

施丹停3場係直接紅牌ge判罰,朗尼都係直接紅牌,所以停3場都合理

而迪羅斯又係開踭,朗尼個犯規無咁嚴重,已經比佢停少左場,所以都好合理
作者: nahmean    時間: 2006-8-8 01:49 AM

抵佢死啦
作者: bigfish    時間: 2006-8-8 01:54 AM

Originally posted by nahmean at 2006-8-8 01:49 AM:
抵佢死啦
你冇病呀?
作者: 王晶    時間: 2006-8-8 02:55 AM

Originally posted by bigfish at 2006-8-8 01:54 AM:

你冇病呀?
我相信你比較嚴重 唔洗咁怒氣既
你永遠係呢度既一哥
作者: 5m    時間: 2006-8-8 10:30 PM

其實應該係佢返到去要去個聽証會先決定,so果3場都未必要停
老孫前年又係熱身賽嚴重犯規red card出場,但又係咁cancel左

以上都係0係大陸睇波果陣個評述講既
作者: brightlee    時間: 2006-8-9 07:25 PM

Originally posted by 5m at 2006-8-9 00:30:
其實應該係佢返到去要去個聽証會先決...
Your info was ABSOULTELY WRONG

Sun was sent off in the last game for the perseason last season.
He got suspended in the first 3 game.

Then in the midseaon, he got sent off by Mr. Webb.
He got 4 matches suspension........
作者: 5m    時間: 2006-8-9 08:57 PM

Originally posted by brightlee at 2006-8-9 07:25 PM:


Your info was ABSOULTELY WRONG
...
actually,i dun know the commentator who said is true or fake

thank you for ur corrections

作者: iMacc    時間: 2006-8-10 12:06 PM

朗尼史高斯要停賽了~
不過由第3場先開始~
好似重衰過開鑼停~
因為會miss咗第4同5兩場大戰~

希望可以上訴得直啦~
作者: brightlee    時間: 2006-8-10 02:14 PM

Originally posted by 5m at 2006-8-9 22:57:


actually,i dun know the commentator who said is true or fake

thank you for ur corrections
no worries
作者: LMQ    時間: 2006-8-10 02:58 PM

睇左咁耐,大家都係爭波頂je
極其量你可以話朗尼隻手起"鋼"衰d je,你話朗尼有心傷人咩??
完全唔覺有咩蓄意成份
即紅我覺得有點兒那過

如果球證係因為之前朗尼既紀律問題而罰,咁樣就係個球證既錯
你理得人地之前打成點,而家問題係今次本身唔應該罰紅
作者: brightlee    時間: 2006-8-10 03:56 PM

Originally posted by LMQ at 2006-8-10 16:58:
睇左咁耐,大家都係爭波頂je
極其量你...
do you read the latest news?

The referee didn't think that's SIMPLE incident.

Both referee, linesmen and 4th offical wrote their reports and sent back to English FA......

so they thought this incident should be a bad one
作者: LMQ    時間: 2006-8-10 05:37 PM

Originally posted by brightlee at 2006-8-10 03:56 PM:

do you read the latest news?

T...
咁唔好理球證點睇喇
咁你覺得朗尼係咪蓄意傷人??
作者: brightlee    時間: 2006-8-10 05:51 PM

Originally posted by LMQ at 2006-8-10 19:37:

咁唔好理球證點睇喇
咁你覺得朗尼係咪蓄意傷人??
As I said the second time in here
That's a clear Red
no doubt about it.
I would send someone off if he has this incident on the field




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0