Originally posted by 王晶 at 2006-12-16 11:50 PM:
人口多拎金牌點解係理所當然
君不見...
Originally posted by bigfish at 2006-12-16 11:54 PM:
點解要同印度比唔同香港比?
香港人口只有中國二百分之一, 按比例香港平均體壇水準係高過中國喎
Originally posted by bigfish at 2006-12-16 11:54 PM:
點解要同印度比唔同香港比?
Originally posted by bigfish at 2006-12-16 23:54:
點解要同印度比唔同香港比?
香港人口只有中國二百分之一, 按比例香港平均體壇水準係高過中國喎
Originally posted by r0211272 at 2006-12-17 00:12:
I thinks we should use points but not number of gold
eg 1 gold = 3 points
1 silver= 2 points
.
.
.
.
this will be more fair
Originally posted by bigfish at 2006-12-16 11:44 PM:
中國人口咁多, 拎咁多面金牌係理所當...
Originally posted by 王晶 at 2006-12-16 11:50 PM:
人口多拎金牌點解係理所當然
君不見...
Originally posted by sonyguy at 2006-12-17 08:52 AM:
1)首先想講...在亞洲...
中國的而且...
Originally posted by bigfish at 11:54 PM:
點解要同印度比唔同香港比?
香港人口只有中國二百分之一, 按比例香港平均體壇水準係高過中國喎
Originally posted by anttiniemi2000 at 2006-12-17 05:41 PM:
i think population size has no linkage with the achievements in sports. for example, china has lots of people, but she can't even send out 11 good players to play soccer.
Originally posted by sonyguy at 2006-12-17 08:52 AM:
1)首先想講...在亞洲...
中國的而且...
Originally posted by bigfish at 2006-12-17 17:58:
中國金牌數目點數一數二?
你當俄羅斯, 美國唔存在咩?
Originally posted by feuosma at 06:56 PM:
2004年夏季奧林匹克運動會獎牌榜 ...
Originally posted by 阿感 at 2006-12-17 08:49 PM:
原來日本,韓國的成績比英國還要好
Originally posted by feuosma at 2006-12-17 06:56 PM:
2004年夏季奧林匹克運動會獎牌榜 ...
Originally posted by bigfish at 2006-12-18 04:00 PM:
該會員係話近幾屆, 咁就唔止一屆啦
同埋數一數二, 點解冇一屆第一, 只有一屆第二?
Originally posted by bigfish at 2006-12-18 16:00:
該會員係話近幾屆, 咁就唔止一屆啦
同埋數一數二, 點解冇一屆第一, 只有一屆第二?
Originally posted by sonyguy at 2006-12-21 03:57 PM:
<數一數二>...只係解作<好好>咁解...唔一定要第一或第二先得...
即係例如話香港聯賽入場觀眾得小貓三四隻...
<小貓三四隻>...只係解作<好少>...唔係真係得三個或四個觀眾
歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0 |