Originally posted by artta at 2007-5-17 08:18 PM:
10 port
Originally posted by msv at 09:04 PM:$ ^7 ^+ {4 t, _+ \0 L0 P
點解今時今日先會有投訴??
本野出左咁耐都冇既??% H! @. L- ~ I3 S- l/ c& R1 `" |
好唔明
Originally posted by 阿感 at 2007-5-17 09:16 PM:
2 K" f T$ Q% M' |$ K/ a
公然與教會對抗有如拿屎上身5 g) H/ F# N+ a, }- I
所以過去一直都冇人夠膽提出9 N0 l0 F# i/ `* Q' H4 L; a
現在有人帶頭發起提出% J# _3 I9 `" k3 \) e! Q0 z+ a
一直對聖經不滿o既人自然會群起支持, f/ j4 h! ^9 A2 P+ k1 G
一呼百應
Originally posted by msv at 2007-5-17 09:04 PM:8 P2 p: I" x+ G/ L$ C4 C" F6 v
點解今時今日先會有投訴??
本野出左咁耐都冇既??
好唔明
Originally posted by magic at 2007-5-17 09:30 PM:0 n6 F7 v+ B- U8 @# M
...唔係教徒不看..+ V' T# g0 |0 M, m' h7 h8 I
...係教徒的..因己被洗腦..看了也不會出聲...明未...
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:
3 M7 _7 s, E5 U( m. M
) k& A0 M) z, _" _# u- o+ n
同意紅字哥part, y' H( W# O3 I! L: @; ^8 n7 q- P! K, n W
4 q& w5 f3 x) m6 f) z2 t
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by shehboy2 at 2007-5-17 11:02 PM:
根本就係邊個疊友邊個話事, 是與非係無準則.
Originally posted by admin at 2007-5-18 12:07 AM:
. ^8 `4 s4 p. r) k0 k6 M
; i$ b) N8 h# z
勝者為皇, 敗者為寇![]()
Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-18 02:27:! _, U9 o& K' P7 _- p7 R
嗯 ... 我覺得樓主好似有少少無謂 ......
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:5 k8 r/ c. @5 i5 D9 i t
6 D A/ ]8 Y, T* H* n4 m
同意紅字哥part
( a# ]0 b Z; T z
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by admin at 2007-5-18 12:07 AM:8 K: t. h1 g, q# X ^ R- o' g
2 w7 f2 `4 n4 h9 Y& H8 ?
勝者為皇, 敗者為寇![]()
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:0 W* O. ?8 J$ Y) N
同意紅字哥part/ v" Q/ I+ i: k
& C- I' E; g8 K2 n
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by shehboy2 at 2007-5-17 11:02 PM:0 I" t% F* I* M& x
一千幾百人投訴? 是但一間教會都唔止...
Originally posted by magic at 11:46 AM:
W1 A4 }% C6 R" W7 y; `$ s
( p: ?' n' i8 u- H5 N
一流的論點...[不過被洗左惱的人...
Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by hubingandtvb at 2007-5-18 11:10 AM:4 F' N* P1 o0 L0 {
如果要達成樓主的期望,最好的辦法 請...
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 2007-5-18 08:41 PM:
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:, _0 R& x" r! e" W) e0 D3 S
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:) R' C& `* A$ i% J
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:9 x) T8 q. e' ?- f, e
立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。
咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係...
Originally posted by 阿感 at 2007-5-19 06:01 PM:
; R( j- ^2 ?; h! b
那些教徒會說 神o既想法,人類不能夠理解
Originally posted by karenmoe at 2007-5-20 02:36 AM:, s9 K; r$ X& _" p% U
投訴x經既目的唔係要令聖經變成不雅...
Originally posted by magic at 2007-5-19 11:46 AM:
一流的論點...[不過被洗左惱的人...
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-22 09:51 AM:
$ f: r2 O2 M+ h; Y( J
多謝讚賞 haha
; p- V; ^& @3 `! {) g: \( f) e0 @. e
聖經係咪不...
Originally posted by vcrcan at 2007-5-23 01:40 AM:/ Y! f1 O& M% r) g$ g2 G4 `
大部分人都係雙重標準的,見怪不怪了9 o0 D2 T/ Z/ s% w' I
今次事件已令更多港人那些出位耶教組織的面目
歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0 |