
Originally posted by artta at 2007-5-17 08:18 PM:; g; v, M" e) F: o) n
10 port
Originally posted by msv at 09:04 PM:7 Z* [# T G( c
點解今時今日先會有投訴??
本野出左咁耐都冇既??
好唔明
Originally posted by 阿感 at 2007-5-17 09:16 PM:
: n {# n! W( C0 V+ O
公然與教會對抗有如拿屎上身- J' x1 k' Z( Z! H8 `
所以過去一直都冇人夠膽提出: h8 @- B( J8 h
現在有人帶頭發起提出3 }' X$ E; D$ f. Y3 a0 x
一直對聖經不滿o既人自然會群起支持
一呼百應
Originally posted by msv at 2007-5-17 09:04 PM:- G( f2 @+ ]* Z7 N' h% v4 d# F6 y
點解今時今日先會有投訴??7 ]" g% ?: r8 u# o& N: {
本野出左咁耐都冇既??, |% k# \7 {5 r) e" D
好唔明
Originally posted by magic at 2007-5-17 09:30 PM:
4 Y* A! Q/ J3 G3 m7 k6 y* n
...唔係教徒不看..
...係教徒的..因己被洗腦..看了也不會出聲...明未...
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:
" T+ _, _' ]/ S' b9 h! ~* G
同意紅字哥part0 p( M z: x4 r- }! P
; D7 U% o" z9 V$ o
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by shehboy2 at 2007-5-17 11:02 PM:
根本就係邊個疊友邊個話事, 是與非係無準則.
Originally posted by admin at 2007-5-18 12:07 AM:3 b. X. s2 L, Z" U1 s
% J+ E* {/ D+ _/ o
勝者為皇, 敗者為寇![]()
Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-18 02:27:& V4 n6 J% K' F U- x6 w8 Y* u9 j
嗯 ... 我覺得樓主好似有少少無謂 ......
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:
& n4 Z, p. e( r! O% H! S: @
K' |" h. u2 H- j% J
同意紅字哥part0 Y: I4 P2 {. E2 x ?
9 B, n0 n1 r3 n4 _
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by admin at 2007-5-18 12:07 AM:
D0 `0 n, j) z9 [# ~9 W5 x/ x) ^
; x, D& s3 T+ _- r0 a- F: q
勝者為皇, 敗者為寇![]()
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:
+ v% q4 O1 O. w4 k! {- ^- _8 S# h
, |/ S& G- b/ X
同意紅字哥part
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by shehboy2 at 2007-5-17 11:02 PM:
一千幾百人投訴? 是但一間教會都唔止...
Originally posted by magic at 11:46 AM:
8 J- Z& Z+ {1 A/ @- e& e, Z
一流的論點...[不過被洗左惱的人...
Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:' F! M) ^/ j" a' W1 d
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
~~~Originally posted by hubingandtvb at 2007-5-18 11:10 AM:& `1 {9 e7 B: o8 k$ P8 c+ T
如果要達成樓主的期望,最好的辦法 請...
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 2007-5-18 08:41 PM:( X- n& f& W5 L$ [. Q
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:$ m9 ~, o' `8 S8 z
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:
) g, ~! W9 P, Y% K7 k6 o
立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。
咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係...
Originally posted by 阿感 at 2007-5-19 06:01 PM:
4 }! _- X1 }8 o# @+ H$ \
那些教徒會說 神o既想法,人類不能夠理解
Originally posted by karenmoe at 2007-5-20 02:36 AM:
投訴x經既目的唔係要令聖經變成不雅...
Originally posted by magic at 2007-5-19 11:46 AM:) x A$ Y8 m6 v% v6 ?
! _1 i) G, ~+ p: ~9 O U! ~
一流的論點...[不過被洗左惱的人...
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-22 09:51 AM:
) J. D( ~' g1 h6 ^* y$ R
: |0 w! f, l1 X
多謝讚賞 haha
聖經係咪不...
Originally posted by vcrcan at 2007-5-23 01:40 AM:
大部分人都係雙重標準的,見怪不怪了
今次事件已令更多港人那些出位耶教組織的面目
| 歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0 |