
Originally posted by artta at 2007-5-17 08:18 PM:/ b5 c& t6 I, r* {8 t9 R; L
10 port
Originally posted by msv at 09:04 PM:, O4 k. b2 A. ^, Y4 G; R0 T ]
點解今時今日先會有投訴??
本野出左咁耐都冇既??3 Y p5 l' d7 \
好唔明
Originally posted by 阿感 at 2007-5-17 09:16 PM:# I- G/ \$ }7 K6 ?
8 \; O2 M/ G2 p- M" X a
公然與教會對抗有如拿屎上身! y, Y2 x$ `' [) \; g% ]
所以過去一直都冇人夠膽提出
現在有人帶頭發起提出/ x, Y4 g2 n% Y$ a) z" N6 d
一直對聖經不滿o既人自然會群起支持8 s* r1 ?1 K, A& |+ O: q0 d' K9 u8 g# D
一呼百應
Originally posted by msv at 2007-5-17 09:04 PM:
點解今時今日先會有投訴??
本野出左咁耐都冇既??. ~# m/ p: X* P. m" v- H8 J
好唔明
Originally posted by magic at 2007-5-17 09:30 PM:
7 Y, S* o7 ^/ S) x- T) f
...唔係教徒不看..: @. |0 b/ b1 q' I3 _9 \
...係教徒的..因己被洗腦..看了也不會出聲...明未...
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:
; t N' |! ?4 F, l8 E
同意紅字哥part* @; g( f: l9 O3 F E
Z: ?9 K( E3 w( i% i/ j
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by shehboy2 at 2007-5-17 11:02 PM:" u" f: w' k1 n
根本就係邊個疊友邊個話事, 是與非係無準則.
Originally posted by admin at 2007-5-18 12:07 AM:
勝者為皇, 敗者為寇![]()
Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-18 02:27:
嗯 ... 我覺得樓主好似有少少無謂 ......
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:7 x" M/ K& z' ?. D0 r X& ^
5 H9 ^) G: @/ O5 }
同意紅字哥part! R2 x7 ?) e; L$ M7 o
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by admin at 2007-5-18 12:07 AM:$ S* `. b; W; F/ P8 c* f
' v9 d1 Q- ~' ^# H& M9 Z
8 Q5 |: d4 ]7 K' i) R' N1 X
勝者為皇, 敗者為寇![]()
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:1 [) s m) K4 N# M# s$ i# `
/ m1 Y: }5 Q8 W7 B# O4 n# r
同意紅字哥part
: l: N% I8 k. F# M+ q
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by shehboy2 at 2007-5-17 11:02 PM:4 h, k$ f- C: i* O/ \. S
一千幾百人投訴? 是但一間教會都唔止...
Originally posted by magic at 11:46 AM:! l6 S! k: B/ \6 s
7 }( ?" G4 K k/ e q% x
一流的論點...[不過被洗左惱的人...
Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
~~~Originally posted by hubingandtvb at 2007-5-18 11:10 AM:8 Y6 ?6 [ g+ N9 _- N% b
如果要達成樓主的期望,最好的辦法 請...
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 2007-5-18 08:41 PM:
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:+ r; `" {6 T$ a
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:
立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。
咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係...
Originally posted by 阿感 at 2007-5-19 06:01 PM:
' q* N1 {( H2 m5 R( l! h0 n4 s' h7 c
那些教徒會說 神o既想法,人類不能夠理解
Originally posted by karenmoe at 2007-5-20 02:36 AM:" k/ t4 D6 E) K3 n. w! K' N. L% y
投訴x經既目的唔係要令聖經變成不雅...
Originally posted by magic at 2007-5-19 11:46 AM:, t- G) U1 V( E) ?
2 d, J9 O5 V% d! M' ^2 ^4 X/ t
* J% |5 H7 Q+ T5 O. `# ~6 ~
一流的論點...[不過被洗左惱的人...
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-22 09:51 AM:
多謝讚賞 haha
5 N i& F; D7 E5 k+ Q) C
聖經係咪不...
Originally posted by vcrcan at 2007-5-23 01:40 AM:/ h2 v- \" f, J0 [/ x
大部分人都係雙重標準的,見怪不怪了
今次事件已令更多港人那些出位耶教組織的面目
| 歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0 |