
Originally posted by artta at 2007-5-17 08:18 PM:
10 port
Originally posted by msv at 09:04 PM:
點解今時今日先會有投訴??: A( F8 L$ r1 F5 E
本野出左咁耐都冇既??1 Y2 L: U& q' v" h+ \
好唔明
Originally posted by 阿感 at 2007-5-17 09:16 PM:
8 J* K0 S7 A: b
公然與教會對抗有如拿屎上身8 x3 q) r/ O- F6 {- l) X* t
所以過去一直都冇人夠膽提出
現在有人帶頭發起提出* S! p8 _* a+ m
一直對聖經不滿o既人自然會群起支持
一呼百應
Originally posted by msv at 2007-5-17 09:04 PM:! Z+ t: y5 e# f' f* \
點解今時今日先會有投訴??3 L/ o8 e( y' e: H
本野出左咁耐都冇既??
好唔明
Originally posted by magic at 2007-5-17 09:30 PM:
+ |- R) k# D$ @- F; K
...唔係教徒不看..
...係教徒的..因己被洗腦..看了也不會出聲...明未...
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:# ^$ q9 L/ a' h2 t4 B% u1 {* K
% P* E8 k& }* b' r0 U, l9 R* O8 H
J7 Y) E- g, ^ N% q; e
同意紅字哥part. U Z' ~ b2 U# [3 S7 O; k5 S
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by shehboy2 at 2007-5-17 11:02 PM:# s7 c0 m+ A. v7 M
根本就係邊個疊友邊個話事, 是與非係無準則.
Originally posted by admin at 2007-5-18 12:07 AM:
* n) b) Y% O$ C6 g: y7 _
勝者為皇, 敗者為寇![]()
Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-18 02:27:- G- _; e T9 I" G: Q
嗯 ... 我覺得樓主好似有少少無謂 ......
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:
( E6 B% Q D0 [( s
同意紅字哥part
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by admin at 2007-5-18 12:07 AM:
勝者為皇, 敗者為寇![]()
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:
同意紅字哥part
' v5 K2 l' G6 U X
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by shehboy2 at 2007-5-17 11:02 PM:+ q* W9 G* z) B- |6 o* @ U
一千幾百人投訴? 是但一間教會都唔止...
Originally posted by magic at 11:46 AM:& T4 X8 \5 L: s$ u
: k: }. ~* t3 \% X6 w; s7 r
, u0 u( O# U9 s! t
一流的論點...[不過被洗左惱的人...
Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:' @4 j) Q7 N; n1 `
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41: {0 e# M6 s$ t9 {2 ]
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
~~~Originally posted by hubingandtvb at 2007-5-18 11:10 AM:
如果要達成樓主的期望,最好的辦法 請...
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 2007-5-18 08:41 PM:2 U9 k" n) S% k5 Y
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:
立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。: n7 s- v4 d; D( b) u4 o
咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係...
Originally posted by 阿感 at 2007-5-19 06:01 PM:
. B# a0 i: X+ w
那些教徒會說 神o既想法,人類不能夠理解
Originally posted by karenmoe at 2007-5-20 02:36 AM:+ k+ K' T' C6 u
投訴x經既目的唔係要令聖經變成不雅...
Originally posted by magic at 2007-5-19 11:46 AM:
一流的論點...[不過被洗左惱的人...
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-22 09:51 AM:
) p+ j( B; v1 v" t: `4 b' q: ]. \
5 u$ R+ v+ @# N3 m! y
多謝讚賞 haha
聖經係咪不...
Originally posted by vcrcan at 2007-5-23 01:40 AM:6 l, e- x1 _6 r! Q' r& _
大部分人都係雙重標準的,見怪不怪了
今次事件已令更多港人那些出位耶教組織的面目
| 歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0 |