Originally posted by artta at 2007-5-17 08:18 PM:0 J g L4 C6 f( y3 S' l0 Q5 n% E
10 port
Originally posted by msv at 09:04 PM:3 l7 L6 a% ~6 ^& R2 u4 g1 H) V
點解今時今日先會有投訴??8 _/ S3 n2 e- t4 p' q# c
本野出左咁耐都冇既??
好唔明
Originally posted by 阿感 at 2007-5-17 09:16 PM:
+ R$ E" g/ d2 g1 t
2 E: {5 y8 Q: A
公然與教會對抗有如拿屎上身
所以過去一直都冇人夠膽提出
現在有人帶頭發起提出. O7 t$ J" [) [
一直對聖經不滿o既人自然會群起支持
一呼百應
Originally posted by msv at 2007-5-17 09:04 PM:6 L2 V; C! ]* ]( C/ h; K$ O
點解今時今日先會有投訴??
本野出左咁耐都冇既??* |) w/ O0 d: t6 A2 f9 k \
好唔明
Originally posted by magic at 2007-5-17 09:30 PM:6 u& U# y' E0 `8 ?
6 \3 Q$ A- b( [ S0 Q
...唔係教徒不看..; a* {- |2 e* Q0 d
...係教徒的..因己被洗腦..看了也不會出聲...明未...
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:: I. J) J" E+ y
0 p" a8 X }+ r! S# ^' z8 x. R
同意紅字哥part
4 |8 C q7 k5 n" T, w$ L
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by shehboy2 at 2007-5-17 11:02 PM:
根本就係邊個疊友邊個話事, 是與非係無準則.
Originally posted by admin at 2007-5-18 12:07 AM:
勝者為皇, 敗者為寇
Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-18 02:27:( z4 m2 P4 I. W i
嗯 ... 我覺得樓主好似有少少無謂 ......
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:
4 B+ V0 u5 Q# Q9 e3 U
# P1 p5 Q2 }8 ^
同意紅字哥part/ p0 u+ q* V, H' E3 q
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by admin at 2007-5-18 12:07 AM:
" G4 I) b7 O% c. r g7 s0 @
" D/ ^" z6 t r( |
勝者為皇, 敗者為寇
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:
) U! L% \0 v+ K% Y* t
1 h3 {1 q+ d2 f! {' a
同意紅字哥part
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by shehboy2 at 2007-5-17 11:02 PM:8 f n" V1 c( f: u
一千幾百人投訴? 是但一間教會都唔止...
Originally posted by magic at 11:46 AM:$ e; R: y+ ^' a# F: D. _
2 E0 y* f. i3 P* ~& O+ {
9 e, E' i7 c- u% D3 v' c
一流的論點...[不過被洗左惱的人...
Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:/ Z' t3 z/ _) M6 W3 Q( B9 y
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:2 C; V1 T, }0 d3 K4 x' }' m6 a
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by hubingandtvb at 2007-5-18 11:10 AM:! ^. c0 L! G" y. _
如果要達成樓主的期望,最好的辦法 請...
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 2007-5-18 08:41 PM:
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:
5 F; U: X7 b) a$ e7 b2 Z
立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。" {; J2 W8 J6 E9 P
咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係...
Originally posted by 阿感 at 2007-5-19 06:01 PM:
& X5 a, _3 M$ F1 R& ~
+ }# T% k* R$ S! [: p: R, z, p
那些教徒會說 神o既想法,人類不能夠理解
Originally posted by karenmoe at 2007-5-20 02:36 AM:
投訴x經既目的唔係要令聖經變成不雅...
Originally posted by magic at 2007-5-19 11:46 AM:1 n2 i+ p6 f0 T) n5 \
6 M" H5 l0 s, @' `
/ [+ Q9 @( ?: A" e! X- y+ w* W
一流的論點...[不過被洗左惱的人...
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-22 09:51 AM:
8 i/ r' E! [) a% L% j
7 ^8 A6 h3 H: N! z) i9 P
多謝讚賞 haha6 w8 O4 ^ f% G% ` [$ L
8 ^4 ]* ^' m. U0 k; O7 `
聖經係咪不...
Originally posted by vcrcan at 2007-5-23 01:40 AM:) w" z2 [+ }5 _7 R; ]- b
大部分人都係雙重標準的,見怪不怪了
今次事件已令更多港人那些出位耶教組織的面目
歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0 |