
Originally posted by artta at 2007-5-17 08:18 PM:5 {# O4 L3 o' [1 J" e* N9 i
10 port
Originally posted by msv at 09:04 PM:
點解今時今日先會有投訴??
本野出左咁耐都冇既??0 b. K( h+ K. ]9 p9 }) L4 v' `' n
好唔明
Originally posted by 阿感 at 2007-5-17 09:16 PM:7 |' T3 m5 f7 z/ ~! y) l
7 x9 h" K+ t) B, ?! s
公然與教會對抗有如拿屎上身- M' @) \0 u% S4 L' v, h
所以過去一直都冇人夠膽提出
現在有人帶頭發起提出6 U- L9 h! A5 k7 ]: n9 b0 p
一直對聖經不滿o既人自然會群起支持
一呼百應
Originally posted by msv at 2007-5-17 09:04 PM:
點解今時今日先會有投訴??
本野出左咁耐都冇既??! i! |$ d- M4 D" h8 u( n! ~0 G) q
好唔明
Originally posted by magic at 2007-5-17 09:30 PM:$ z# X! A" u1 p0 A( ~
...唔係教徒不看..
...係教徒的..因己被洗腦..看了也不會出聲...明未...
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:4 i; `" P" ]( z0 i7 j& O6 E( x
+ R- P- g5 p3 J2 \
同意紅字哥part' _2 c0 J4 }: e( I5 Z
) v2 N. k: x0 k, b! [' v
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by shehboy2 at 2007-5-17 11:02 PM:9 J( i Y' l. T& C2 Y
根本就係邊個疊友邊個話事, 是與非係無準則.
Originally posted by admin at 2007-5-18 12:07 AM:
勝者為皇, 敗者為寇![]()
Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-18 02:27:3 q$ W/ L+ T, g( t
嗯 ... 我覺得樓主好似有少少無謂 ......
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:
3 N; g, i l2 K& M% {5 y8 D
" u! A. _/ g& w) f. g! J
同意紅字哥part! |! [$ O+ u0 P6 }
, n$ T. I r$ h4 h# p9 f
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by admin at 2007-5-18 12:07 AM:( y( y- W) @: i
/ `* X# ?0 [+ i- f/ r
3 y9 i( s5 \! Q$ `5 \6 `. K
勝者為皇, 敗者為寇![]()
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-17 11:06 PM:
* A+ e( q& c- z, g
同意紅字哥part+ H& ~/ L0 k/ O3 D/ ~. M& \; U! N2 P
$ m1 ~5 D2 Y& d6 T% Z1 W+ }& E% ~
講真,有d教徙...
Originally posted by shehboy2 at 2007-5-17 11:02 PM:
一千幾百人投訴? 是但一間教會都唔止...
Originally posted by magic at 11:46 AM:
. H) _: p! R, k/ w' r% x; R
一流的論點...[不過被洗左惱的人...
Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
~~~Originally posted by hubingandtvb at 2007-5-18 11:10 AM:) C7 x: ? x: _8 m! V
如果要達成樓主的期望,最好的辦法 請...
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 2007-5-18 08:41 PM:
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:) K; Y* u0 j/ a# u
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)
Originally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:
立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。! ~3 {; |7 ]( Q7 ?& Z# n( y* L5 [ J, F
咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係...
Originally posted by 阿感 at 2007-5-19 06:01 PM:
5 |) W& K+ Q1 C- A. }
那些教徒會說 神o既想法,人類不能夠理解
Originally posted by karenmoe at 2007-5-20 02:36 AM:8 t1 P; t/ s" T. v; x
投訴x經既目的唔係要令聖經變成不雅...
Originally posted by magic at 2007-5-19 11:46 AM:+ ?$ E. V0 \* v0 a9 e1 Y5 r
! ?% K Q9 t/ \4 x. x
8 ]0 N4 Y! d8 {& Z6 v
一流的論點...[不過被洗左惱的人...
Originally posted by sakura310 at 2007-5-22 09:51 AM:* ?( b$ _/ ~3 C% s
多謝讚賞 haha
. q$ O- O0 y! C1 q5 `# F
聖經係咪不...
Originally posted by vcrcan at 2007-5-23 01:40 AM:9 D" a6 l+ X2 N2 p( ]. ?
大部分人都係雙重標準的,見怪不怪了
今次事件已令更多港人那些出位耶教組織的面目
| 歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0 |