
Originally posted by playbr2 at 2007-6-2 17:57: Y; B# ^2 x; _9 }* H
玩法:要搵出兇手/原因/殺人動機.........
Originally posted by QuiGonJinn at 2007-6-2 09:37 PM:
; K" e+ ~# g3 ?. X
Q門Playbr2氏,請問..................依家邊個死咗???????????

(新人除外)Originally posted by playbr2 at 2007-6-3 00:01:4 ^3 F0 e* c2 b4 {
% c/ V& o8 J* f5 `9 q- p; M
玩左咁耐.....乜仲有人會咁白痴睇ed野(新人除外)
Originally posted by 12d3 at 2007-6-3 11:44:
421王赫白都有嫌疑...因為"全身上下只用浴巾包了起來", 浴巾包的地方沒有被捜.
, L9 ~& s8 F7 ]2 lOriginally posted by head at 2007-6-3 12:01 PM:$ ~# e5 o$ T' Q4 I) I
$ [' _- _) c! |5 @
$ s& c! O y9 g( {
咁樣 洪...
Originally posted by kaichun88 at 2007-6-3 12:25 PM:
照你咁講,豈不是要將三人解剖...![]()
Originally posted by 勇勇 at 2007-6-3 04:28 PM:
我其實有一個問題?
點樣先可以攞晒15分啊??3 J( Q% t% H) L% q4 d: ]
好似part3咁......!我同個答案一無一樣(我解釋得比個正確答案仲清楚)都唔可以加15分???
Originally posted by 安心 at 2007-6-3 17:23:
想問呀~~芯片即係咩??
幾大到??
Originally posted by playbr2 at 2007-6-3 16:37:+ w7 d8 K6 J; i
@.@ 一無一樣 !?! ......你指原版答案吓馬![]()


真係唔係好明
Originally posted by 勇勇 at 2007-6-3 06:36 PM:7 g" i8 F* C7 X) N4 Q; }
) a7 w5 ~ _0 n; a
我同原版答案有咩野分別喎真係唔係好明
2 ~2 C1 Y) ]+ D+ A7 B
我最係有個會員居然加分多個我+13分
$ @; q2 o1 _+ c2 p' t/ v1 p1 s
[ Last edited by 勇勇 on 2007-6-3 at 06:41 PM ]
Originally posted by 勇勇 at 2007-6-3 06:36 PM:- P' g* x8 J P- G
我同原版答案有咩野分別喎真係唔係好明
4 a4 q5 i2 e( v# a
我最係有個會員居然加分多個我+13分
1 U$ R5 f+ ?/ m+ C `2 q1 b: Z
[ Last edited by 勇勇 on 2007-6-3 at 06:41 PM ]
Originally posted by kaichun88 at 2007-6-3 21:07:
我都冇用,又唔係我評分,係
都
評分嗰個
![]()
Originally posted by playbr2 at 2007-6-3 20:50:- w# d# X2 `: s2 H/ ?
2 L' K* u" z" W# [5 w
原版答案過於簡單 , 而且缺乏很多...


9 X3 F* Y- M1 l. g7 ?% Q


Originally posted by kaichun88 at 2007-6-3 09:07 PM:0 O6 M! m# v9 r. f, f3 |: t
我都冇用,又唔係我評分,係
都
評分嗰個
![]()
Originally posted by 勇勇 at 2007-6-3 09:26 PM:
明白晒
咁下次我打多d字啦![]()
Originally posted by playbr2 at 2007-6-3 21:40:- g- Y) t. E2 _6 u5 @+ R$ t1 }/ A
吾關打字多少既問題 , S310 兄都打左好多字 , 但都係攞10分......
我個答案都吾係好多字 , 但你有冇留意我既內容...有d咩與別不同的合理觀点



) b) b, k, }5 {* L" [* g+ u: }

(雖然我知道自己經已答對了)Originally posted by 勇勇 at 2007-6-3 09:46 PM:4 b2 r1 T% E2 j4 Y# o* B* h, |
即係88講出佢另類觀點(雖然唔岩...
Originally posted by 勇勇 at 2007-6-3 09:46 PM:
即係88講出佢另類觀點(雖然唔岩...
Originally posted by playbr2 at 2007-6-2 09:32 PM:
從方位而言 , 艾佛利能見到 希瓦克。阿萊的背面 , 只有兩個可能 , a. 是 阿萊跟著兩個警察去追強盜時 , 艾佛利也跟從阿萊其後 , 但這時應該還沒駁火 , 就算一路逃跑一路駁火 , 阿萊都不可能背面中槍 . b. 是強盜伏擊兩個跑在最前的警察, 之後阿萊逃避強盜追殺時 , 給強盜射中背面 , 如果艾佛利是一直跟從阿萊其後 , 他應該知道阿萊不是強盜 , 他亦不該見到''正在反方向''逃走的阿萊背面中槍與否 , 除非艾佛利處身於強盜的位置 , 艾佛利有可能就是那強盜了
Originally posted by kaichun88 at 2007-6-3 22:26:* g; _$ R5 R- N: D
' I4 Z* C C6 G5 Z( c6 X5 U
其實只要合理,即使與標準答案有出入...







Originally posted by 勇勇 at 2007-6-4 01:29 PM:& ?( o6 D9 d( H, `
哦.........原來係咁
88我個post唔係寸你啊,驚你吾會啊,你唔好啊
![]()
Originally posted by kaichun88 at 2007-6-4 17:49:
冇嘢![]()



Originally posted by playbr2 at 2007-6-11 08:26 PM:
playbr2 答案[/c...
Originally posted by AL力克 at 2007-6-11 09:20 PM:
6 j7 w' ? ~( h
http://www.26fun.com/bbs/viewthr ... light=&page=2966 a0 G$ t% j: h
8 @* X/ r4 s. Y/ q7 A
#8869
| 歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0 |