Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-7 11:17 PM:
3 t8 L/ @6 _. K2 j, o' G0 W港台ｅ排發生咩事呀?6 F$ p/ R, \1 }. {/ R
之前嗱嗱林貪污,而家又到梁奕侖
6 b" o3 I6 {. u" D8 d: W) L難怪曾特首話要封港台啦!

Originally posted by foto188 at 2007-11-7 11:25 PM:
4 h& E3 t2 r  e9 d. k9 M& c, H9 K; d

. q7 W* g1 _; F  e+ E) p4 \特首有講過要封港台嗎？

Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-7 11:36 PM:% v  k- f' p9 `7 c! s& p8 R
( R9 G0 P0 |6 G! G& ~9 S9 ?1 `
) K2 P, }( Q; s
之前特首講過考慮港台續牌問題

Originally posted by foto188 at 2007-11-7 11:56 PM:% ?4 S( [) V6 C

' i5 O) [8 L& }) d. A
' B" i7 r5 j& e=封港台?

Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-8 12:06 AM:) P. q- Z. b' f+ O% }

5 z3 U' t0 k8 `如他唔續牌給港台,咪變相式封了港台囉(不過唔係直接封姐)

Originally posted by foto188 at 2007-11-8 12:08 AM:
2 N% a# j, e& s) u% P2 Z1 g9 ~4 T- O# |5 s' o
8 j4 w7 J  |7 o% |
"如果"3 D$ i6 X- a2 S1 A& p
% E! X( v" H% [: B9 b2 z# F
they way you comment is no different from those irresponsible weekly magazines. you cannot make your assumption becomes the fact. that is not a fair statement.