Board logo

標題: 唔知梁奕侖還可以留在港台工作嗎? [打印本頁]

作者: rayyipas    時間: 2007-11-7 11:13 PM     標題: 唔知梁奕侖還可以留在港台工作嗎?

唔知梁奕侖還可以留在港台工作嗎?
作者: oz2    時間: 2007-11-7 11:17 PM

港台e排發生咩事呀?1 m. s$ w1 p0 U: _) ?% S
之前嗱嗱林貪污,而家又到梁奕侖; g0 Q4 \  ~! S0 V8 z
難怪曾特首話要封港台啦!
作者: foto188    時間: 2007-11-7 11:25 PM

Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-7 11:17 PM:
! w' I4 g, }% l$ i8 ?) W- c) `8 a& n7 y& U港台e排發生咩事呀?
# h4 I' d& x: k1 ?5 B" a6 t之前嗱嗱林貪污,而家又到梁奕侖. k1 }% C# N& `2 ]8 k5 J# f$ d
難怪曾特首話要封港台啦!
* c0 R, T# k5 w- I4 q. q" r( v( Q/ ]7 ~) A7 j  e
特首有講過要封港台嗎?
作者: oz2    時間: 2007-11-7 11:36 PM

Originally posted by foto188 at 2007-11-7 11:25 PM:* h  |3 N. `. h" e1 a, Q# F/ J

* l! j4 a  V5 q9 \0 D6 ]4 r2 P  J8 e* |& b2 a& w5 U
特首有講過要封港台嗎?
1 j, {- w2 X2 K% Y9 r' u' S( r7 E/ `/ D9 `$ \
之前特首講過考慮港台續牌問題
作者: foto188    時間: 2007-11-7 11:56 PM

Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-7 11:36 PM:
) R, ]# Z/ e# {  U$ J- ?
! q( S  J5 V2 g
1 m; U' z' ~9 o7 v6 j- H1 \9 ^之前特首講過考慮港台續牌問題
7 U$ s& t# Z6 o: ~, t( q$ p) f, B
. w  ?5 M, U: M3 b
=封港台?
作者: oz2    時間: 2007-11-8 12:06 AM

Originally posted by foto188 at 2007-11-7 11:56 PM:0 h# j2 r. w: H+ X: ^# o

+ b$ r4 R6 F8 F  J9 E+ E" K( b: d5 r# j8 H0 v5 w; ~
=封港台?
2 K6 a8 N. _+ `+ ?. A& k$ t; Q7 f如他唔續牌給港台,咪變相式封了港台囉(不過唔係直接封姐)
作者: foto188    時間: 2007-11-8 12:08 AM

Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-8 12:06 AM:
! y) e2 ?: s) ]- M/ y' }' n; U' L; ?
如他唔續牌給港台,咪變相式封了港台囉(不過唔係直接封姐)
. c% H9 S" Z$ T$ a, S5 V( Q: D- N5 L, y, j  W& s9 m' o  r) {  X
"如果"+ m& M- U& R: E

$ e" [% `% h: [4 f5 ^; ?9 i) dthey way you comment is no different from those irresponsible weekly magazines. you cannot make your assumption becomes the fact. that is not a fair statement.
作者: oz2    時間: 2007-11-8 12:44 AM

Originally posted by foto188 at 2007-11-8 12:08 AM:' f* S( c- N! Y5 x8 Y- O% R& H: J7 w

9 o4 g, {! F7 Y" b# r
0 ?9 n- r, F; e0 r$ B+ k- B"如果"* g' g3 `4 G, \4 n

5 q7 l9 @: Q" v$ i; Vthey way you comment is no different from those irresponsible weekly magazines. you cannot make your assumption becomes the fact. that is not a fair statement.
& p5 }. w6 U- U想不到一個吹水區變了時事評論區,還要一定100%正確的言論才能發言
. s0 U0 M. W* A9 j; k1 E本人英文欠佳,只能用中文回覆,請閣下見諒。: X( i' X8 ~  j  l( d' G

; E# |0 y) W, \$ |豈不聞[空穴來風,未必無因],之前[頭條新聞]事件徐四民已點名說此節目不當了,曾特首也評論過[十大中文金曲]是否繼續,而且政府在查核港台時也發現財政賬目有問題,加上近日港台員工貪污醜聞不斷,令人們會想政府會否要再次評審港台牌照問題呢?, \& B' g1 Z( G5 U, s1 @" j
5 |  _. }( X' r2 n/ G4 m& n
當然,以上只是個人的想法意見,並不代表任何人立場。+ ~% t; h3 v" c% C

# ~7 {* T8 e( |5 S; ~7 s[ Last edited by oz2 on 2007-11-8 at 12:46 AM ]




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0