Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-7 11:17 PM:9 [- M7 b( ~- x
港台ｅ排發生咩事呀?
* z7 E# T$ h  P1 L% ?1 H5 N. L之前嗱嗱林貪污,而家又到梁奕侖
1 [/ V" L7 {" ^& |難怪曾特首話要封港台啦!

Originally posted by foto188 at 2007-11-7 11:25 PM:4 T4 ~* H1 C! }# C1 I$ ?2 `  R0 x
5 w7 Q+ I1 ^2 N& T

: B2 U: p' t: d* r( C6 J; l6 t0 m特首有講過要封港台嗎？

Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-7 11:36 PM:
1 x. I0 f% i) S  u% y
, x6 t7 ?$ f6 u) a
5 h8 t, _6 O( [& O1 E( m$ l之前特首講過考慮港台續牌問題

Originally posted by foto188 at 2007-11-7 11:56 PM:* R* e  t- E  Q: ~7 i* t

+ H5 Z' s$ Z. u' W' C/ C
) w" a- }  a6 i=封港台?

Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-8 12:06 AM:5 @+ R& e8 p3 _' C0 M

3 O% V7 L/ C, r7 W* u如他唔續牌給港台,咪變相式封了港台囉(不過唔係直接封姐)

Originally posted by foto188 at 2007-11-8 12:08 AM:1 c* O# v5 b. w2 n& `: s! {
  ]# g' M: \7 v+ J" b; }  ^
) O9 i9 c1 v: E8 X8 n$ K: ~" c
"如果"
5 y% ]7 L. t" I
# m! }$ h- P7 Y2 o: ?7 Sthey way you comment is no different from those irresponsible weekly magazines. you cannot make your assumption becomes the fact. that is not a fair statement.