Board logo

標題: 唔知梁奕侖還可以留在港台工作嗎? [打印本頁]

作者: rayyipas    時間: 2007-11-7 11:13 PM     標題: 唔知梁奕侖還可以留在港台工作嗎?

唔知梁奕侖還可以留在港台工作嗎?
作者: oz2    時間: 2007-11-7 11:17 PM

港台e排發生咩事呀?$ y4 G6 z) C7 N& V5 u/ D* B
之前嗱嗱林貪污,而家又到梁奕侖. W. ^. q& r( v3 h3 ~  V5 K, p' q" Y
難怪曾特首話要封港台啦!
作者: foto188    時間: 2007-11-7 11:25 PM

Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-7 11:17 PM:
0 h7 l& w( R9 n- j3 ?/ J3 e港台e排發生咩事呀?" N% I7 \; w& G+ f, ?% b; Q2 J; ^
之前嗱嗱林貪污,而家又到梁奕侖2 a8 u1 d) Q( n
難怪曾特首話要封港台啦!
7 |1 s; T$ V; h, ]
  q1 f+ t2 _  a
特首有講過要封港台嗎?
作者: oz2    時間: 2007-11-7 11:36 PM

Originally posted by foto188 at 2007-11-7 11:25 PM:% ~- P. Y; h0 v! h
" \. ^5 k5 q0 r* {5 P$ k
2 V, h8 l* `2 i5 ]+ v% t, f% [
特首有講過要封港台嗎?
' }2 y) b5 s7 y0 B9 W5 T9 f

* B/ R# r  q- F之前特首講過考慮港台續牌問題
作者: foto188    時間: 2007-11-7 11:56 PM

Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-7 11:36 PM:
2 y- Z/ W0 K8 b+ N8 ^) [" v7 Q$ N
% D6 ]: ]9 j; Q; d7 d5 N% z* K& k8 E; i! `
之前特首講過考慮港台續牌問題
$ m7 m' F: G! `7 o8 t% l; g! d
; r; x5 |+ S. @) d3 e; I- H=封港台?
作者: oz2    時間: 2007-11-8 12:06 AM

Originally posted by foto188 at 2007-11-7 11:56 PM:# Z* U. }5 c' {# ^: _# Q
: u& _5 Y% r! X! P! J

  V$ C) W) a; \8 `* z; g=封港台?
# J' U4 u. r9 K3 X  d如他唔續牌給港台,咪變相式封了港台囉(不過唔係直接封姐)
作者: foto188    時間: 2007-11-8 12:08 AM

Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-8 12:06 AM:
' G- w% u  h5 f& @' A7 N
& C+ C+ r" T, ^+ S! O( Z如他唔續牌給港台,咪變相式封了港台囉(不過唔係直接封姐)
; R( r7 f% T, o4 B
8 P5 G; I( S& _* }4 L
"如果"0 a" Z0 b' d6 |5 P9 m

( `/ [. v4 S! mthey way you comment is no different from those irresponsible weekly magazines. you cannot make your assumption becomes the fact. that is not a fair statement.
作者: oz2    時間: 2007-11-8 12:44 AM

Originally posted by foto188 at 2007-11-8 12:08 AM:: K5 T3 ?6 E( h5 S( ^0 X5 [% q
1 O4 I6 M- R9 _- Q

! y' X1 d+ A1 M1 @5 O"如果"
/ R3 Z& c( r. h0 T
$ x, K; n4 n& G8 f4 E# ?$ d; ithey way you comment is no different from those irresponsible weekly magazines. you cannot make your assumption becomes the fact. that is not a fair statement.
8 m2 ]8 V  [  r, p/ `- J1 k
想不到一個吹水區變了時事評論區,還要一定100%正確的言論才能發言
4 ]5 c. n  e9 {( |5 Q# W本人英文欠佳,只能用中文回覆,請閣下見諒。
  M/ t  W  E) J, |9 ~
1 P9 D7 k+ [* k豈不聞[空穴來風,未必無因],之前[頭條新聞]事件徐四民已點名說此節目不當了,曾特首也評論過[十大中文金曲]是否繼續,而且政府在查核港台時也發現財政賬目有問題,加上近日港台員工貪污醜聞不斷,令人們會想政府會否要再次評審港台牌照問題呢?8 {6 A- U5 ~2 `

/ ]# t. @: F) j當然,以上只是個人的想法意見,並不代表任何人立場。; D9 E0 R4 z, O2 w$ K% e4 |. i& E1 w

* I) m% ?$ c8 K! B[ Last edited by oz2 on 2007-11-8 at 12:46 AM ]




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0