版主請注意, 本題原意並非為同一事件開新post討論, 而是想藉此評估一下照片流出情況, 因為流傳是否廣泛, 有多廣泛, 將直接影響案件的嚴重程度, 法庭應以此作為對被告判刑及量刑的考慮條件之一, 但目前並無人(包括警方及傳媒)留意這個問題. * _1 \1 I: m0 B0 q# i4 O. K % O) r4 \+ Y% j: u+ t版友如要討論事件請到其他post, 多謝認真投票.% ]# H1 Z, Q+ Z. m6 k+ E
7 t6 J% ?' O6 t) y) C
樓主不鼓勵發佈,傳閱有問題圖片及一切違法行為.作者: ckyckk 時間: 2008-2-1 11:32 PM
完全沒看過 作者: malecoke 時間: 2008-2-2 12:43 AM
if u havent seen it ure missin out on a part of history man作者: lizard 時間: 2008-2-2 12:51 AM
抗議！0 T& h0 g% [3 S
, W' a; K. x# x# G. k1 i; R* Q2 w& F# }只許 谷德超 商場 買 翻版鹹碟 % t6 h6 k* K. I; E* D& z6 w" U. }不准 香港人 網絡 睇 自拍淫照( f6 p5 ?# F: \: _6 e8 z
& P# i- G* D' X( d
強列 要求 香港警察 不要 選擇性 執法！2 Z* p% Q" f$ |
- {, o+ B0 n2 z) F. U M
[ Last edited by lizard on 2008-2-2 at 12:57 AM ]作者: Edgar_Davids 時間: 2008-2-2 08:37 AM
What is the definition of "原圖" ? ) _" x1 B! ]3 Z
/ K. i& T+ a! T; I
* |1 x6 m8 W; b6 F% ^2 YI have watched only several "疑似" 相片, * y5 o1 I y+ H+ u1 b9 ?: uand "I AM NOT SURE WHETHER THEY ARE REAL OR FRAUD".... : \- f) ?4 ~6 }' u; \ b: c( i- j" r) H1 W - q8 h0 }$ d, w! lI can only say that "I believe they have been widely spreaded".....作者: garlicguy79 時間: 2008-2-2 09:09 AM
I did saw some but it seems quite true, anyway, if they really done something, they hv to bare the responsibility. . H* f0 o1 J8 g' E
On the other hand, in fact the media have to play a important rules, before anything finalise, especially the truely of the photo, have to be verify by the specialst and after that, they wrote whatever they want. ! p/ \6 ^# W/ }5 k- }Well, just my personal comments. $ J2 C w8 Z! Y1 W+ h. j# c2 @ 5 c/ s$ b" k* K1 f( FHv a nice day.作者: alanfcw 時間: 2008-2-6 03:42 PM
完全沒看過~~~作者: 迪達拉姑 時間: 2008-2-9 01:45 AM
未呀..未看到入洞..咁算唔算看過原圖= =作者: loklok117 時間: 2008-2-9 03:31 AM
) _" x1 B! ]3 Z
