if u havent seen it ure missin out on a part of history man作者: lizard 時間: 2008-2-2 12:51 AM
抗議！ % L8 E% d: j/ _9 }. Y# x- U O) V7 G3 q# F
只許 谷德超 商場 買 翻版鹹碟! C+ f. s5 |8 I: k
不准 香港人 網絡 睇 自拍淫照 0 T" ^* R5 h+ m) V2 k M7 _9 \$ K+ X1 G8 ?
強列 要求 香港警察 不要 選擇性 執法！. m* V' {! A9 T
" n5 Z2 J3 j' V3 ?! ~) z
[ Last edited by lizard on 2008-2-2 at 12:57 AM ]作者: Edgar_Davids 時間: 2008-2-2 08:37 AM
What is the definition of "原圖" ? . @5 ~4 |1 e+ I+ h, } [( T' h7 A f, K* _2 _) L D5 a
% d0 h5 h, f* C8 xI have watched only several "疑似" 相片, * Y, l* \6 U* i* w' tand "I AM NOT SURE WHETHER THEY ARE REAL OR FRAUD".... 4 [& O0 B9 p1 D : @8 O. `$ B8 `0 A' s1 pI can only say that "I believe they have been widely spreaded".....作者: garlicguy79 時間: 2008-2-2 09:09 AM
I did saw some but it seems quite true, anyway, if they really done something, they hv to bare the responsibility. ' q3 C7 _7 S0 S8 }; Y% c- s4 z
On the other hand, in fact the media have to play a important rules, before anything finalise, especially the truely of the photo, have to be verify by the specialst and after that, they wrote whatever they want. " X5 Z3 p* \ T [4 Z, U- qWell, just my personal comments. {4 r- k( Y4 ~, w7 ]! |! m/ g2 J
+ e. c' t: a8 r* A3 z7 J) nHv a nice day.作者: alanfcw 時間: 2008-2-6 03:42 PM
完全沒看過~~~作者: 迪達拉姑 時間: 2008-2-9 01:45 AM
未呀..未看到入洞..咁算唔算看過原圖= =作者: loklok117 時間: 2008-2-9 03:31 AM
