版主請注意, 本題原意並非為同一事件開新post討論, 而是想藉此評估一下照片流出情況, 因為流傳是否廣泛, 有多廣泛, 將直接影響案件的嚴重程度, 法庭應以此作為對被告判刑及量刑的考慮條件之一, 但目前並無人(包括警方及傳媒)留意這個問題. & U1 T' H8 c2 v) o$ H8 s y6 _6 Y8 E6 [/ w* ~( w0 O
版友如要討論事件請到其他post, 多謝認真投票. H' f; b R' m2 W& p4 j& W5 O* z. f4 B
樓主不鼓勵發佈,傳閱有問題圖片及一切違法行為.作者: ckyckk 時間: 2008-2-1 11:32 PM
完全沒看過 作者: malecoke 時間: 2008-2-2 12:43 AM
if u havent seen it ure missin out on a part of history man作者: lizard 時間: 2008-2-2 12:51 AM
抗議！ ( N# l' D( V; W" B) j. G8 J" A t$ Z @" U6 S$ O
只許 谷德超 商場 買 翻版鹹碟 $ }( C7 \# ?- b8 o不准 香港人 網絡 睇 自拍淫照 * o6 b R9 Q3 P( J9 B" \/ T 1 \% ^0 Z/ n v( S5 p( v強列 要求 香港警察 不要 選擇性 執法！, n# J# S$ a8 n! o; s/ a
+ |: ~9 w' _) [& ^: S[ Last edited by lizard on 2008-2-2 at 12:57 AM ]作者: Edgar_Davids 時間: 2008-2-2 08:37 AM
What is the definition of "原圖" ? - p! L8 l& {. N7 S) R4 @
7 A0 a2 ^, R/ G, j+ E2 F7 z
4 r. h. u F6 l; U- U* y' G
I have watched only several "疑似" 相片,) P6 j+ S5 M4 s0 F# C
and "I AM NOT SURE WHETHER THEY ARE REAL OR FRAUD"....+ d, |. z" Z, a' b. n* J5 N# ~3 b5 X
3 u" [/ `4 p: A: V
I can only say that "I believe they have been widely spreaded".....作者: garlicguy79 時間: 2008-2-2 09:09 AM
I did saw some but it seems quite true, anyway, if they really done something, they hv to bare the responsibility. # Y! A/ n- H9 V5 e) m, Q/ x
On the other hand, in fact the media have to play a important rules, before anything finalise, especially the truely of the photo, have to be verify by the specialst and after that, they wrote whatever they want. / F$ ^* \$ c" ?' d) U; tWell, just my personal comments.3 Q# q P8 v7 o. Y; D
5 j4 r$ Z+ C- Z7 M, I5 D
Hv a nice day.作者: alanfcw 時間: 2008-2-6 03:42 PM
完全沒看過~~~作者: 迪達拉姑 時間: 2008-2-9 01:45 AM
未呀..未看到入洞..咁算唔算看過原圖= =作者: loklok117 時間: 2008-2-9 03:31 AM
- p! L8 l& {. N7 S) R4 @
