版主請注意, 本題原意並非為同一事件開新post討論, 而是想藉此評估一下照片流出情況, 因為流傳是否廣泛, 有多廣泛, 將直接影響案件的嚴重程度, 法庭應以此作為對被告判刑及量刑的考慮條件之一, 但目前並無人(包括警方及傳媒)留意這個問題. ) p; ]. b! ~5 |7 Z" ]1 l: q8 X( @1 S( i( y+ L. o
版友如要討論事件請到其他post, 多謝認真投票. % v+ n: j+ O f% i* S2 A, x 8 N& l6 N5 n& y& P q$ |+ h* u% w樓主不鼓勵發佈,傳閱有問題圖片及一切違法行為.作者: ckyckk 時間: 2008-2-1 11:32 PM
完全沒看過 作者: malecoke 時間: 2008-2-2 12:43 AM
if u havent seen it ure missin out on a part of history man作者: lizard 時間: 2008-2-2 12:51 AM
抗議！ ) I; d$ T8 B& i' z' n- ]7 c7 e& ? ]* ~6 p5 _
只許 谷德超 商場 買 翻版鹹碟 7 M% f/ a+ o, g$ V1 X. [+ D$ _: ^不准 香港人 網絡 睇 自拍淫照 6 j) F. q3 Y8 Y1 J9 j7 e! b% o1 X+ u5 O5 G3 m% W+ [
強列 要求 香港警察 不要 選擇性 執法！ % M) R6 H: e( Y& B# l 4 \# K; C. o% h0 J2 N% i) {# K[ Last edited by lizard on 2008-2-2 at 12:57 AM ]作者: Edgar_Davids 時間: 2008-2-2 08:37 AM
What is the definition of "原圖" ? 0 K0 V9 L1 `* J6 R: r6 D9 U. L! b2 v0 u; q; c- L8 V& O' s0 g
, u1 ]1 Z4 R9 o6 h
I have watched only several "疑似" 相片,4 p5 G$ V+ ~9 x; v, I7 z
and "I AM NOT SURE WHETHER THEY ARE REAL OR FRAUD".... / l/ W2 R$ q% q, D- D # y& k+ F& d0 Z2 b# kI can only say that "I believe they have been widely spreaded".....作者: garlicguy79 時間: 2008-2-2 09:09 AM
I did saw some but it seems quite true, anyway, if they really done something, they hv to bare the responsibility. ! C8 I, U( o4 d# k# S; N- V6 z
On the other hand, in fact the media have to play a important rules, before anything finalise, especially the truely of the photo, have to be verify by the specialst and after that, they wrote whatever they want.: v+ w! M/ A5 `( a
Well, just my personal comments.% V0 ^7 F/ X0 V5 X" k
, F b% f" C4 FHv a nice day.作者: alanfcw 時間: 2008-2-6 03:42 PM
完全沒看過~~~作者: 迪達拉姑 時間: 2008-2-9 01:45 AM
未呀..未看到入洞..咁算唔算看過原圖= =作者: loklok117 時間: 2008-2-9 03:31 AM
