版主請注意, 本題原意並非為同一事件開新post討論, 而是想藉此評估一下照片流出情況, 因為流傳是否廣泛, 有多廣泛, 將直接影響案件的嚴重程度, 法庭應以此作為對被告判刑及量刑的考慮條件之一, 但目前並無人(包括警方及傳媒)留意這個問題.1 R2 C! @& C' V4 i: G( n% c$ G# \. ?
% n' C1 r! a3 K8 b( R, }6 E4 F
版友如要討論事件請到其他post, 多謝認真投票. 2 m$ A8 l* }# v8 P , K" k: m G Q4 \9 X1 p: N. n& }樓主不鼓勵發佈,傳閱有問題圖片及一切違法行為.作者: ckyckk 時間: 2008-2-1 11:32 PM
完全沒看過 作者: malecoke 時間: 2008-2-2 12:43 AM
if u havent seen it ure missin out on a part of history man作者: lizard 時間: 2008-2-2 12:51 AM
抗議！3 M4 o% P0 q C3 y7 d$ h7 v4 X W; R
; R9 Z. v+ [" A只許 谷德超 商場 買 翻版鹹碟) \1 N$ K3 t" W( V7 v! \4 d
不准 香港人 網絡 睇 自拍淫照 ; T. _# M% ^. K9 r) A 6 c: u) e2 _3 ^' Y7 g8 g: q強列 要求 香港警察 不要 選擇性 執法！ - e5 @; d8 Z1 D8 k8 H4 l4 c1 D3 ~; l* n& p9 Z/ r) Y% J! T8 N8 C
[ Last edited by lizard on 2008-2-2 at 12:57 AM ]作者: Edgar_Davids 時間: 2008-2-2 08:37 AM
What is the definition of "原圖" ? " T" Q6 u z+ N+ n2 |. i O1 X; v+ R: z( U7 _1 \; V1 R
0 f7 c F3 e" G) H6 MI have watched only several "疑似" 相片, ( f+ _1 H1 ?' ]7 Q4 Kand "I AM NOT SURE WHETHER THEY ARE REAL OR FRAUD".... + N, G& Y5 q" W& b2 r 4 i0 g) }" v) B r. `I can only say that "I believe they have been widely spreaded".....作者: garlicguy79 時間: 2008-2-2 09:09 AM
I did saw some but it seems quite true, anyway, if they really done something, they hv to bare the responsibility. % T, J+ F- _% @/ L7 ^' uOn the other hand, in fact the media have to play a important rules, before anything finalise, especially the truely of the photo, have to be verify by the specialst and after that, they wrote whatever they want.3 o: \+ K5 f7 i+ _- u% K1 f" d
Well, just my personal comments. 1 _: a( T. I+ P& G {9 b- ]# U& r1 {- {5 u1 h7 }9 G
Hv a nice day.作者: alanfcw 時間: 2008-2-6 03:42 PM
完全沒看過~~~作者: 迪達拉姑 時間: 2008-2-9 01:45 AM
未呀..未看到入洞..咁算唔算看過原圖= =作者: loklok117 時間: 2008-2-9 03:31 AM
