if u havent seen it ure missin out on a part of history man作者: lizard 時間: 2008-2-2 12:51 AM
抗議！, `, d4 i4 T1 }) E
_- R6 ~' {" C) K3 _7 ?只許 谷德超 商場 買 翻版鹹碟 % G2 k0 j# y( C z不准 香港人 網絡 睇 自拍淫照 5 o4 B ^5 v$ u% g 9 y( T9 F, Y" y2 C' L4 @0 f H強列 要求 香港警察 不要 選擇性 執法！ 2 Q4 J2 X$ j# c0 ^; w9 W* s ; S; O0 g1 u, r5 c/ O[ Last edited by lizard on 2008-2-2 at 12:57 AM ]作者: Edgar_Davids 時間: 2008-2-2 08:37 AM
What is the definition of "原圖" ? $ `1 q- c! l' ]4 R, u & p8 V+ S5 R) ] ! x Z# X$ L$ dI have watched only several "疑似" 相片, ) x& W) N1 i; _( s4 F# Qand "I AM NOT SURE WHETHER THEY ARE REAL OR FRAUD".... 0 A4 d# O# ^/ H4 C8 O i! {' `6 w# {5 I& o4 w1 `8 H1 b
I can only say that "I believe they have been widely spreaded".....作者: garlicguy79 時間: 2008-2-2 09:09 AM
I did saw some but it seems quite true, anyway, if they really done something, they hv to bare the responsibility. ! V" `! j$ {% Y4 w
On the other hand, in fact the media have to play a important rules, before anything finalise, especially the truely of the photo, have to be verify by the specialst and after that, they wrote whatever they want. 2 e$ l0 ~* P# l) m0 x! mWell, just my personal comments., n, Q0 w; c m$ E
: e* Z% B* O- m# k
Hv a nice day.作者: alanfcw 時間: 2008-2-6 03:42 PM
完全沒看過~~~作者: 迪達拉姑 時間: 2008-2-9 01:45 AM
未呀..未看到入洞..咁算唔算看過原圖= =作者: loklok117 時間: 2008-2-9 03:31 AM
