if u havent seen it ure missin out on a part of history man作者: lizard 時間: 2008-2-2 12:51 AM
抗議！ - _1 \0 l8 w- D4 m8 G% o" c# K7 C: k8 Z
只許 谷德超 商場 買 翻版鹹碟 5 w# ~* B l5 l8 i; K1 n不准 香港人 網絡 睇 自拍淫照 5 p1 X' {* R* |7 _ $ H F, v, ~) H+ K. z" z強列 要求 香港警察 不要 選擇性 執法！3 H2 b3 H) `- d: S5 U7 N6 j
3 n! F2 {8 @5 J
[ Last edited by lizard on 2008-2-2 at 12:57 AM ]作者: Edgar_Davids 時間: 2008-2-2 08:37 AM
What is the definition of "原圖" ? ! a& K) ]7 Q) S+ h4 \ 1 t! H7 q; c# u5 k+ C9 m6 k* v2 u+ Q" B6 ?; j
I have watched only several "疑似" 相片,8 r( @( V4 i* u; h
and "I AM NOT SURE WHETHER THEY ARE REAL OR FRAUD".... ' j1 W$ S0 _- ]6 g5 h# t6 ]3 o8 d6 E; N: `: V" N+ l/ t( q
I can only say that "I believe they have been widely spreaded".....作者: garlicguy79 時間: 2008-2-2 09:09 AM
I did saw some but it seems quite true, anyway, if they really done something, they hv to bare the responsibility. p8 M) }3 K; _( Q3 x4 \; }- WOn the other hand, in fact the media have to play a important rules, before anything finalise, especially the truely of the photo, have to be verify by the specialst and after that, they wrote whatever they want.) Y& L* ^& v) b6 T, K
Well, just my personal comments. 4 } B# _9 @7 z; M7 o ]. X9 y7 _+ \
Hv a nice day.作者: alanfcw 時間: 2008-2-6 03:42 PM
完全沒看過~~~作者: 迪達拉姑 時間: 2008-2-9 01:45 AM
未呀..未看到入洞..咁算唔算看過原圖= =作者: loklok117 時間: 2008-2-9 03:31 AM
