if u havent seen it ure missin out on a part of history man作者: lizard 時間: 2008-2-2 12:51 AM
抗議！1 P( @* [- s* f4 Z+ [- M
, s9 p% p* e+ ^7 o5 n) t, O- P只許 谷德超 商場 買 翻版鹹碟 & Y* o1 `) k, l$ y9 T不准 香港人 網絡 睇 自拍淫照 1 c7 g$ m6 F+ ~: |. b& x$ F3 H% b( n4 L+ y8 }+ A
強列 要求 香港警察 不要 選擇性 執法！5 D" q3 s! W2 Q7 B* o" N* s T) {
6 b+ |( q) A8 ?; w2 }- C+ C
[ Last edited by lizard on 2008-2-2 at 12:57 AM ]作者: Edgar_Davids 時間: 2008-2-2 08:37 AM
What is the definition of "原圖" ? - L7 H3 p2 ?" h7 I9 O) p8 V6 u
3 W9 ? ^. l$ L8 S: B ( _& |4 \% Q, L; JI have watched only several "疑似" 相片,9 {: I% |5 E% Q& A1 U+ ~
and "I AM NOT SURE WHETHER THEY ARE REAL OR FRAUD".... - l7 w" i1 n; d/ A; \5 ]7 ^ ' D n# J2 u6 o ~, u9 B. bI can only say that "I believe they have been widely spreaded".....作者: garlicguy79 時間: 2008-2-2 09:09 AM
I did saw some but it seems quite true, anyway, if they really done something, they hv to bare the responsibility. 0 r1 p" Q! q' U A5 t n
On the other hand, in fact the media have to play a important rules, before anything finalise, especially the truely of the photo, have to be verify by the specialst and after that, they wrote whatever they want. 5 F: X M0 y( p8 {Well, just my personal comments.8 ^$ ~3 ~3 V% K* g
( e- g; P M0 `/ Z
Hv a nice day.作者: alanfcw 時間: 2008-2-6 03:42 PM
完全沒看過~~~作者: 迪達拉姑 時間: 2008-2-9 01:45 AM
未呀..未看到入洞..咁算唔算看過原圖= =作者: loklok117 時間: 2008-2-9 03:31 AM
- L7 H3 p2 ?" h7 I9 O) p8 V6 u
