if u havent seen it ure missin out on a part of history man作者: lizard 時間: 2008-2-2 12:51 AM
抗議！" \ }- u, G4 Q O' n
1 k* M5 J2 f' a0 `! J
只許 谷德超 商場 買 翻版鹹碟 + V; V8 I6 M. O _# U不准 香港人 網絡 睇 自拍淫照5 B2 M7 P% ^5 _" S3 A# I- Q
$ | z, v5 W6 F# b7 `
強列 要求 香港警察 不要 選擇性 執法！/ p! ~5 K. d" i' I: R) T$ L, D
# b* F1 L+ E+ i% C& U% ]4 G
[ Last edited by lizard on 2008-2-2 at 12:57 AM ]作者: Edgar_Davids 時間: 2008-2-2 08:37 AM
What is the definition of "原圖" ? % L4 u/ h5 k- h8 H + u8 O5 T$ l- }- O5 g, X 7 [" v* z% @8 O) T% ]' ~ eI have watched only several "疑似" 相片, 4 E( ^9 U7 Z9 k! C5 B) H# Xand "I AM NOT SURE WHETHER THEY ARE REAL OR FRAUD".... [) X. d3 P3 i P1 v
& v+ \ y7 K8 e( k
I can only say that "I believe they have been widely spreaded".....作者: garlicguy79 時間: 2008-2-2 09:09 AM
I did saw some but it seems quite true, anyway, if they really done something, they hv to bare the responsibility. & v& k' ^0 L) }' ]/ `$ ^: C x$ VOn the other hand, in fact the media have to play a important rules, before anything finalise, especially the truely of the photo, have to be verify by the specialst and after that, they wrote whatever they want./ t: H: o! j( d" z
Well, just my personal comments. 2 u3 y# t% m& y7 L% M2 G9 c 7 _9 B }( D1 b: r4 _Hv a nice day.作者: alanfcw 時間: 2008-2-6 03:42 PM
完全沒看過~~~作者: 迪達拉姑 時間: 2008-2-9 01:45 AM
未呀..未看到入洞..咁算唔算看過原圖= =作者: loklok117 時間: 2008-2-9 03:31 AM
