if u havent seen it ure missin out on a part of history man作者: lizard 時間: 2008-2-2 12:51 AM
抗議！ h( v, F8 a+ ^& z Z 9 ]- }! ^5 F' S4 g) o f# s! m只許 谷德超 商場 買 翻版鹹碟! f- U. b% O- H$ h
不准 香港人 網絡 睇 自拍淫照 5 P- N( W6 j4 m7 l N- W: {/ e7 B4 ^; W6 }2 o( f
強列 要求 香港警察 不要 選擇性 執法！' F0 b; o x1 z8 t
2 [0 d( l# h2 `1 q- `4 U) b, }/ r[ Last edited by lizard on 2008-2-2 at 12:57 AM ]作者: Edgar_Davids 時間: 2008-2-2 08:37 AM
What is the definition of "原圖" ? ' k4 K$ k+ [) P; i% _
3 k) c8 E2 S* [( x( Q- X/ q" S+ B+ D; C) G" I, d1 {
I have watched only several "疑似" 相片,$ a$ }7 @3 f9 {# z
and "I AM NOT SURE WHETHER THEY ARE REAL OR FRAUD"....3 b6 C& s4 x! \% i
" D& m/ O- Z% K7 b0 jI can only say that "I believe they have been widely spreaded".....作者: garlicguy79 時間: 2008-2-2 09:09 AM
I did saw some but it seems quite true, anyway, if they really done something, they hv to bare the responsibility. L! b+ L, @# j( R, l; M
On the other hand, in fact the media have to play a important rules, before anything finalise, especially the truely of the photo, have to be verify by the specialst and after that, they wrote whatever they want." }7 i K! ?. g/ N% Z5 O
Well, just my personal comments. ( Z- H/ {) |! d6 u8 f+ U % L8 k! M' d& s' vHv a nice day.作者: alanfcw 時間: 2008-2-6 03:42 PM
完全沒看過~~~作者: 迪達拉姑 時間: 2008-2-9 01:45 AM
未呀..未看到入洞..咁算唔算看過原圖= =作者: loklok117 時間: 2008-2-9 03:31 AM
我完全沒看過... - O; R y; v4 H3 }9 m1 n. `& H9 J你信唔信ar?作者: 傲魂楓 時間: 2008-2-9 06:50 PM
' k4 K$ k+ [) P; i% _
