版主請注意, 本題原意並非為同一事件開新post討論, 而是想藉此評估一下照片流出情況, 因為流傳是否廣泛, 有多廣泛, 將直接影響案件的嚴重程度, 法庭應以此作為對被告判刑及量刑的考慮條件之一, 但目前並無人(包括警方及傳媒)留意這個問題. 8 y! d& `0 }# e: h& W% W. i, p1 S! q. f) d
版友如要討論事件請到其他post, 多謝認真投票. 7 B* q |5 o% `7 g9 r 7 W; B) i: }5 z& [+ y3 |樓主不鼓勵發佈,傳閱有問題圖片及一切違法行為.作者: ckyckk 時間: 2008-2-1 11:32 PM
完全沒看過 作者: malecoke 時間: 2008-2-2 12:43 AM
if u havent seen it ure missin out on a part of history man作者: lizard 時間: 2008-2-2 12:51 AM
抗議！ ( `5 M4 M) m) h( ]0 {/ h, e2 N1 V7 a9 s. v8 B$ W
只許 谷德超 商場 買 翻版鹹碟$ V4 n! q' E1 |: N
不准 香港人 網絡 睇 自拍淫照. T' ]! X. `1 ?% K- o- v$ K' R
6 w$ h ?7 T$ ^$ v, g" a0 y0 P; I% V強列 要求 香港警察 不要 選擇性 執法！( d. w7 ]; a4 x2 E3 V9 V
7 _ H, O( y# t- W8 F# @[ Last edited by lizard on 2008-2-2 at 12:57 AM ]作者: Edgar_Davids 時間: 2008-2-2 08:37 AM
What is the definition of "原圖" ? 2 R/ Q1 }# i3 P& V& w- Z/ Z
7 @) u- _. B1 |4 ]8 `; J5 @5 @4 V6 e$ t* l, o
I have watched only several "疑似" 相片, / M6 ?: _( {. J! Z7 p, P( x" Oand "I AM NOT SURE WHETHER THEY ARE REAL OR FRAUD".... I, g6 {0 Q0 A 8 C" I5 A: U0 r- EI can only say that "I believe they have been widely spreaded".....作者: garlicguy79 時間: 2008-2-2 09:09 AM
I did saw some but it seems quite true, anyway, if they really done something, they hv to bare the responsibility. 0 ^5 f& _# l7 |& c$ DOn the other hand, in fact the media have to play a important rules, before anything finalise, especially the truely of the photo, have to be verify by the specialst and after that, they wrote whatever they want. & Q8 N1 w( Y1 ]9 }Well, just my personal comments.2 U" C. m* h# q+ W5 {& C
2 R/ Q1 }# i3 P& V& w- Z/ Z
