if u havent seen it ure missin out on a part of history man作者: lizard 時間: 2008-2-2 12:51 AM
抗議！ 2 {$ Z- ^( t. s9 d! g 0 Y" b& k. q* C只許 谷德超 商場 買 翻版鹹碟 5 \7 y2 P6 E% F- b/ Y# a6 b不准 香港人 網絡 睇 自拍淫照# }9 S! S. X8 i; o- f
. J5 I7 L5 p0 W# t/ g" Q7 u1 w/ l, ?1 ]強列 要求 香港警察 不要 選擇性 執法！ 2 Y/ Y/ Y) k l* i' O, [! A2 {$ m! i( o 4 q, h# b6 t4 E; }: y( R d( q[ Last edited by lizard on 2008-2-2 at 12:57 AM ]作者: Edgar_Davids 時間: 2008-2-2 08:37 AM
What is the definition of "原圖" ? * ~" p3 [- c" m' Q' a
3 J( t; U5 {3 t
; X+ `. R8 P7 t( sI have watched only several "疑似" 相片,5 z- @; H. `! ]6 E- y- ?8 N
and "I AM NOT SURE WHETHER THEY ARE REAL OR FRAUD".... . p; A( k9 d* A* W7 x" e0 E$ X2 a# |* ]" f$ v0 O& i$ W
I can only say that "I believe they have been widely spreaded".....作者: garlicguy79 時間: 2008-2-2 09:09 AM
I did saw some but it seems quite true, anyway, if they really done something, they hv to bare the responsibility. : |+ B2 A" S3 KOn the other hand, in fact the media have to play a important rules, before anything finalise, especially the truely of the photo, have to be verify by the specialst and after that, they wrote whatever they want.; c- q n' y* U8 K; o1 d" y
Well, just my personal comments. A [3 A+ Z! v& t3 M( i$ h
: k& l3 O- j( [, x: M R. AHv a nice day.作者: alanfcw 時間: 2008-2-6 03:42 PM
完全沒看過~~~作者: 迪達拉姑 時間: 2008-2-9 01:45 AM
未呀..未看到入洞..咁算唔算看過原圖= =作者: loklok117 時間: 2008-2-9 03:31 AM
* ~" p3 [- c" m' Q' a
