版主請注意, 本題原意並非為同一事件開新post討論, 而是想藉此評估一下照片流出情況, 因為流傳是否廣泛, 有多廣泛, 將直接影響案件的嚴重程度, 法庭應以此作為對被告判刑及量刑的考慮條件之一, 但目前並無人(包括警方及傳媒)留意這個問題. 5 u k+ N( E. b9 f5 I7 a+ H 2 @( C c: Y% C" Y; N/ t! k版友如要討論事件請到其他post, 多謝認真投票. * v1 h, n m0 V! U' H# y# r7 x! n/ A% z4 f9 ^ C, S4 v) v
樓主不鼓勵發佈,傳閱有問題圖片及一切違法行為.作者: ckyckk 時間: 2008-2-1 11:32 PM
完全沒看過 作者: malecoke 時間: 2008-2-2 12:43 AM
if u havent seen it ure missin out on a part of history man作者: lizard 時間: 2008-2-2 12:51 AM
抗議！" |* a. K; R, z. j8 _
+ E) K( a1 h. r ~1 x只許 谷德超 商場 買 翻版鹹碟& `0 ^& v$ l! t6 _% M
不准 香港人 網絡 睇 自拍淫照7 y: _' Y7 {6 N, f
2 J E% Z' h5 Y6 w1 G/ M" |" K強列 要求 香港警察 不要 選擇性 執法！1 e+ {- e% U9 T: l) @# Q# S- R2 g7 _
* x8 E& k* y! j: M7 y
[ Last edited by lizard on 2008-2-2 at 12:57 AM ]作者: Edgar_Davids 時間: 2008-2-2 08:37 AM
What is the definition of "原圖" ? * A) |) j, G5 R& e8 E& l. g4 W
7 f, S, v; S* z3 x) J. ^" @
! q2 u- z3 Y; F4 r }
I have watched only several "疑似" 相片, , {' L$ T2 W: C7 k, _and "I AM NOT SURE WHETHER THEY ARE REAL OR FRAUD"....' x. N' `) }: D9 L% M
r; B4 n/ j7 |0 s( { F' `( `0 FI can only say that "I believe they have been widely spreaded".....作者: garlicguy79 時間: 2008-2-2 09:09 AM
I did saw some but it seems quite true, anyway, if they really done something, they hv to bare the responsibility. 6 D w3 G) q3 C
On the other hand, in fact the media have to play a important rules, before anything finalise, especially the truely of the photo, have to be verify by the specialst and after that, they wrote whatever they want. # ^- B7 S: b% ^, gWell, just my personal comments.8 c1 ?- ` o8 J
( X* h! t! H o" t7 Z+ N
Hv a nice day.作者: alanfcw 時間: 2008-2-6 03:42 PM
完全沒看過~~~作者: 迪達拉姑 時間: 2008-2-9 01:45 AM
未呀..未看到入洞..咁算唔算看過原圖= =作者: loklok117 時間: 2008-2-9 03:31 AM
* A) |) j, G5 R& e8 E& l. g4 W
