if u havent seen it ure missin out on a part of history man作者: lizard 時間: 2008-2-2 12:51 AM
抗議！4 l' S) t1 V* \: }
, @3 F9 t1 o y7 {6 U# d. s
只許 谷德超 商場 買 翻版鹹碟 [3 B, x* f7 c4 S) i( _不准 香港人 網絡 睇 自拍淫照7 x& X9 M8 X4 {! y0 P1 h+ ~
' C& W7 A* C0 R$ K" J
強列 要求 香港警察 不要 選擇性 執法！ 5 i* [( ?( B2 g0 e 2 f$ W y; X1 s# v/ v/ m+ H[ Last edited by lizard on 2008-2-2 at 12:57 AM ]作者: Edgar_Davids 時間: 2008-2-2 08:37 AM
What is the definition of "原圖" ? + c: m- V! T0 d9 C" B# ^3 H1 K
! [& b. ]5 F0 M0 a; ]( s( J" d! K! W, C/ D" F: j0 L8 _1 G: N
I have watched only several "疑似" 相片, , y f- g. j! t7 S7 Mand "I AM NOT SURE WHETHER THEY ARE REAL OR FRAUD".... - }2 @& W l" T0 m" W K & I2 L3 n- Z& f/ _3 E; ~* CI can only say that "I believe they have been widely spreaded".....作者: garlicguy79 時間: 2008-2-2 09:09 AM
I did saw some but it seems quite true, anyway, if they really done something, they hv to bare the responsibility. - o, m, c W" e7 h7 b+ Y4 OOn the other hand, in fact the media have to play a important rules, before anything finalise, especially the truely of the photo, have to be verify by the specialst and after that, they wrote whatever they want. 8 P$ V6 C& b5 @Well, just my personal comments.8 P2 C5 h4 `8 A$ K
$ N& {1 L& C, `) |/ o
Hv a nice day.作者: alanfcw 時間: 2008-2-6 03:42 PM
完全沒看過~~~作者: 迪達拉姑 時間: 2008-2-9 01:45 AM
未呀..未看到入洞..咁算唔算看過原圖= =作者: loklok117 時間: 2008-2-9 03:31 AM
+ c: m- V! T0 d9 C" B# ^3 H1 K
