if u havent seen it ure missin out on a part of history man作者: lizard 時間: 2008-2-2 12:51 AM
抗議！ $ W9 A- u! i% D% v5 \5 b& {, h4 ?. `: [8 l
只許 谷德超 商場 買 翻版鹹碟 3 r/ n7 D/ g& ~不准 香港人 網絡 睇 自拍淫照 2 K& u% \- V" T0 k ; g0 M3 X6 x9 E0 g0 m2 P7 h強列 要求 香港警察 不要 選擇性 執法！ ! W: Y: P s7 J8 @6 K4 g, c8 m7 K & d% ]# ?, H/ U" @- n |) S' L9 q[ Last edited by lizard on 2008-2-2 at 12:57 AM ]作者: Edgar_Davids 時間: 2008-2-2 08:37 AM
What is the definition of "原圖" ? ; I) |8 @6 R6 A7 c- T+ U
$ }( `/ W5 P( }* }' U2 w ' h2 f7 |3 Y" l% Y8 v P( KI have watched only several "疑似" 相片, 7 H8 j% I6 d0 o# V* E$ u6 ~+ y+ A' jand "I AM NOT SURE WHETHER THEY ARE REAL OR FRAUD"....5 D$ k1 G5 O/ _
3 s1 o5 [4 z7 P( l( z6 i9 `: o. J
I can only say that "I believe they have been widely spreaded".....作者: garlicguy79 時間: 2008-2-2 09:09 AM
I did saw some but it seems quite true, anyway, if they really done something, they hv to bare the responsibility. 2 C/ f9 L/ {& \' x( T8 K' V( E
On the other hand, in fact the media have to play a important rules, before anything finalise, especially the truely of the photo, have to be verify by the specialst and after that, they wrote whatever they want.% k; k, I0 ~/ x* w' J1 M
Well, just my personal comments. & s5 B3 G" B* {/ ?' O3 w2 S( T( J/ }& \4 V6 |% {
Hv a nice day.作者: alanfcw 時間: 2008-2-6 03:42 PM
完全沒看過~~~作者: 迪達拉姑 時間: 2008-2-9 01:45 AM
未呀..未看到入洞..咁算唔算看過原圖= =作者: loklok117 時間: 2008-2-9 03:31 AM
; I) |8 @6 R6 A7 c- T+ U
