if u havent seen it ure missin out on a part of history man作者: lizard 時間: 2008-2-2 12:51 AM
抗議！ / j# E4 _2 s0 Y, H9 e" p4 Z 1 G: k' W8 b$ J7 E7 `只許 谷德超 商場 買 翻版鹹碟 . R% ^+ I, n5 [1 o不准 香港人 網絡 睇 自拍淫照0 G8 V0 M& M' u3 {, M
3 f- _0 K& z7 ^強列 要求 香港警察 不要 選擇性 執法！/ m) B! |/ v( c: `/ y" r
8 v0 h+ M' x& H0 K& D8 n, ^0 u4 Z
[ Last edited by lizard on 2008-2-2 at 12:57 AM ]作者: Edgar_Davids 時間: 2008-2-2 08:37 AM
What is the definition of "原圖" ? $ h8 O3 J& c) K" H+ q% p, c" g4 j# Y4 `2 Q0 `/ ]% R9 K
6 @; E) B: e+ I. X" q5 ~0 P$ uI have watched only several "疑似" 相片,& i+ C- t/ W }" ]& K
and "I AM NOT SURE WHETHER THEY ARE REAL OR FRAUD".... 9 j$ W. Z6 _* | ( l6 t! e1 ]8 K5 O* vI can only say that "I believe they have been widely spreaded".....作者: garlicguy79 時間: 2008-2-2 09:09 AM
I did saw some but it seems quite true, anyway, if they really done something, they hv to bare the responsibility. + f& _# i3 E" D4 P0 pOn the other hand, in fact the media have to play a important rules, before anything finalise, especially the truely of the photo, have to be verify by the specialst and after that, they wrote whatever they want.$ \/ O- u4 |9 E3 h! m/ N5 |9 K V
Well, just my personal comments.9 E; K; e2 e* H& H8 G4 a
! f5 E2 K, h& E \
Hv a nice day.作者: alanfcw 時間: 2008-2-6 03:42 PM
完全沒看過~~~作者: 迪達拉姑 時間: 2008-2-9 01:45 AM
未呀..未看到入洞..咁算唔算看過原圖= =作者: loklok117 時間: 2008-2-9 03:31 AM
