if u havent seen it ure missin out on a part of history man作者: lizard 時間: 2008-2-2 12:51 AM
抗議！ - D# Y7 D3 q" }, K& i, T8 U4 S; ^9 u! x8 e) o' G# W9 c- c
只許 谷德超 商場 買 翻版鹹碟 , H% p- U9 S( d+ d不准 香港人 網絡 睇 自拍淫照 / x y# J& o; _7 _( x& k5 k/ A1 c3 x' V3 s" w, i0 q, _' a
強列 要求 香港警察 不要 選擇性 執法！( c/ ]* E' M4 u
* }, l. }# O9 N3 ?7 G, G5 Q
[ Last edited by lizard on 2008-2-2 at 12:57 AM ]作者: Edgar_Davids 時間: 2008-2-2 08:37 AM
What is the definition of "原圖" ? 6 n$ I, m6 U5 B2 B0 D7 b / z0 {) H: h: p2 c# A; J: K6 S) r3 q, i5 b7 A
I have watched only several "疑似" 相片,8 e( A! F$ ?/ R, s* Z% l
and "I AM NOT SURE WHETHER THEY ARE REAL OR FRAUD".... 5 V2 q7 k, U- ]" n6 P* w2 [5 v' p7 ^5 M" W. [2 ~
I can only say that "I believe they have been widely spreaded".....作者: garlicguy79 時間: 2008-2-2 09:09 AM
I did saw some but it seems quite true, anyway, if they really done something, they hv to bare the responsibility. ( p8 d4 h3 [. sOn the other hand, in fact the media have to play a important rules, before anything finalise, especially the truely of the photo, have to be verify by the specialst and after that, they wrote whatever they want. 0 W+ _3 k( P; Q7 pWell, just my personal comments. " o- t7 R, B, P5 V1 s) j" q" U4 Y& s W
Hv a nice day.作者: alanfcw 時間: 2008-2-6 03:42 PM
完全沒看過~~~作者: 迪達拉姑 時間: 2008-2-9 01:45 AM
未呀..未看到入洞..咁算唔算看過原圖= =作者: loklok117 時間: 2008-2-9 03:31 AM
我完全沒看過...4 E, w8 W1 Z6 c% [$ S
你信唔信ar?作者: 傲魂楓 時間: 2008-2-9 06:50 PM
