if u havent seen it ure missin out on a part of history man作者: lizard 時間: 2008-2-2 12:51 AM
抗議！ 4 X- P6 s% u* g* N7 o( a+ X# B" s5 \0 L; d
只許 谷德超 商場 買 翻版鹹碟 ! h7 {: k" i0 n* z ^不准 香港人 網絡 睇 自拍淫照 ' h7 v% i5 |2 r: A3 I' O) ], y) x! v4 p9 {6 \0 O L, `1 a
強列 要求 香港警察 不要 選擇性 執法！8 D( X8 ]) A9 [7 v& e
0 y) ]' \4 ~9 a! r
[ Last edited by lizard on 2008-2-2 at 12:57 AM ]作者: Edgar_Davids 時間: 2008-2-2 08:37 AM
What is the definition of "原圖" ? " h* G/ C0 h" U' M8 G8 }
9 F: M2 a# Z; a. |1 R0 v
6 `5 V5 g. o5 @+ R3 S# V6 I
I have watched only several "疑似" 相片,: i4 g! y$ d/ O' X# X3 B0 k- F* L
and "I AM NOT SURE WHETHER THEY ARE REAL OR FRAUD".... 0 q* q2 U3 q) b% `* _, @5 Q$ u \2 c & M: |4 O2 a( f/ |I can only say that "I believe they have been widely spreaded".....作者: garlicguy79 時間: 2008-2-2 09:09 AM
I did saw some but it seems quite true, anyway, if they really done something, they hv to bare the responsibility. 4 D+ K( Q& l8 a; [% u: @) P. t
On the other hand, in fact the media have to play a important rules, before anything finalise, especially the truely of the photo, have to be verify by the specialst and after that, they wrote whatever they want. ' N; o3 X+ Z. N% m/ c7 Z1 ?Well, just my personal comments.; G, ~" H4 a0 P# x, d& Y
5 K, L2 ^2 D. l8 h1 IHv a nice day.作者: alanfcw 時間: 2008-2-6 03:42 PM
完全沒看過~~~作者: 迪達拉姑 時間: 2008-2-9 01:45 AM
未呀..未看到入洞..咁算唔算看過原圖= =作者: loklok117 時間: 2008-2-9 03:31 AM
我完全沒看過...$ ]( J* y1 f8 p T4 L
你信唔信ar?作者: 傲魂楓 時間: 2008-2-9 06:50 PM
" h* G/ C0 h" U' M8 G8 }
