if u havent seen it ure missin out on a part of history man作者: lizard 時間: 2008-2-2 12:51 AM
抗議！8 `5 t% ]# n, F2 _) C, w
0 x) A0 \9 @, e, q' O% S c9 L
只許 谷德超 商場 買 翻版鹹碟 + y) W6 i2 L) Z+ w8 ?不准 香港人 網絡 睇 自拍淫照! f) g. J* g% U1 T+ \
3 q; w" Z9 I7 r5 n4 \1 [0 j強列 要求 香港警察 不要 選擇性 執法！ ( L( W+ m2 ? j( J) _% Z3 |' F 9 Q% L1 ]& C. j8 [[ Last edited by lizard on 2008-2-2 at 12:57 AM ]作者: Edgar_Davids 時間: 2008-2-2 08:37 AM
What is the definition of "原圖" ? 7 V$ o6 @8 o/ K+ u& p( t8 F2 f4 E; L+ [. F/ V2 d8 ]0 s' `
7 C: o M1 K* f* iI have watched only several "疑似" 相片, % g9 @) L% E: d* h& Yand "I AM NOT SURE WHETHER THEY ARE REAL OR FRAUD"....1 \+ O# o/ u2 ]7 e' h% U/ C9 r4 j
$ d+ N9 L* k; D( u
I can only say that "I believe they have been widely spreaded".....作者: garlicguy79 時間: 2008-2-2 09:09 AM
I did saw some but it seems quite true, anyway, if they really done something, they hv to bare the responsibility. 3 q& j2 U+ M' h+ ?: k/ A
On the other hand, in fact the media have to play a important rules, before anything finalise, especially the truely of the photo, have to be verify by the specialst and after that, they wrote whatever they want.9 i0 K# y) M% y% J1 r* {- ]
Well, just my personal comments.1 x5 ]; @) [0 ]( i9 F9 i
% N8 k- u) g" q) L3 q: F3 I
Hv a nice day.作者: alanfcw 時間: 2008-2-6 03:42 PM
完全沒看過~~~作者: 迪達拉姑 時間: 2008-2-9 01:45 AM
未呀..未看到入洞..咁算唔算看過原圖= =作者: loklok117 時間: 2008-2-9 03:31 AM
