. y( B) C4 K3 p4 Q8 e版友如要討論事件請到其他post, 多謝認真投票. 3 @7 T x7 C' r8 m# X( H ^: T6 e, X+ Y& |+ l
樓主不鼓勵發佈,傳閱有問題圖片及一切違法行為.作者: ckyckk 時間: 2008-2-1 11:32 PM
完全沒看過 作者: malecoke 時間: 2008-2-2 12:43 AM
if u havent seen it ure missin out on a part of history man作者: lizard 時間: 2008-2-2 12:51 AM
抗議！ / D& ]$ V9 ?9 p7 j9 p; k 3 Y$ Y- L# v8 C; G9 A1 |: U只許 谷德超 商場 買 翻版鹹碟) p4 h- R: h4 p" h, W( c
不准 香港人 網絡 睇 自拍淫照% u8 s% v5 H: v0 B/ e, s, g6 k# P$ s
7 M! K/ G5 }: @9 x/ i, r
強列 要求 香港警察 不要 選擇性 執法！ ( @! h% v+ v- H5 W; H/ G4 n! T! J6 v" ]- r
[ Last edited by lizard on 2008-2-2 at 12:57 AM ]作者: Edgar_Davids 時間: 2008-2-2 08:37 AM
What is the definition of "原圖" ? % @$ P- n, N9 a, ?3 ?! _4 I$ Z" m/ `
9 p u* M! @6 D0 j, h : K9 k6 M w: wI have watched only several "疑似" 相片, - Y! g0 Z% K7 x& A, U+ Aand "I AM NOT SURE WHETHER THEY ARE REAL OR FRAUD"...." w& L" O$ ?# w% b
4 Z8 X( d6 z, I6 UI can only say that "I believe they have been widely spreaded".....作者: garlicguy79 時間: 2008-2-2 09:09 AM
I did saw some but it seems quite true, anyway, if they really done something, they hv to bare the responsibility. ' s2 |; s* U% `* u$ Z, T# m
On the other hand, in fact the media have to play a important rules, before anything finalise, especially the truely of the photo, have to be verify by the specialst and after that, they wrote whatever they want. K+ F5 Q" R! d* O% K D$ P
Well, just my personal comments.- |8 d* q- v K2 N
0 {8 u2 w+ U) }8 o. q* c3 u
Hv a nice day.作者: alanfcw 時間: 2008-2-6 03:42 PM
完全沒看過~~~作者: 迪達拉姑 時間: 2008-2-9 01:45 AM
未呀..未看到入洞..咁算唔算看過原圖= =作者: loklok117 時間: 2008-2-9 03:31 AM
我完全沒看過...4 d& M! e. M$ `, e" d7 |# o
你信唔信ar?作者: 傲魂楓 時間: 2008-2-9 06:50 PM
% @$ P- n, N9 a, ?3 ?! _4 I$ Z" m/ `
