版主請注意, 本題原意並非為同一事件開新post討論, 而是想藉此評估一下照片流出情況, 因為流傳是否廣泛, 有多廣泛, 將直接影響案件的嚴重程度, 法庭應以此作為對被告判刑及量刑的考慮條件之一, 但目前並無人(包括警方及傳媒)留意這個問題.6 u, N/ c4 h5 C ~; k# H8 R
) q6 u' Z- ?( W! H4 c" S# |' F
版友如要討論事件請到其他post, 多謝認真投票./ l7 ]7 x. ]. B' z0 r$ u
- ], _& {3 |# {8 x3 b3 I' {
樓主不鼓勵發佈,傳閱有問題圖片及一切違法行為.作者: ckyckk 時間: 2008-2-1 11:32 PM
完全沒看過 作者: malecoke 時間: 2008-2-2 12:43 AM
if u havent seen it ure missin out on a part of history man作者: lizard 時間: 2008-2-2 12:51 AM
抗議！0 `+ i! ~# s: R/ B
i! l+ b2 t+ s- t" V% A/ F只許 谷德超 商場 買 翻版鹹碟 , M# K# K( l% y7 y; {不准 香港人 網絡 睇 自拍淫照 ) M$ a6 s) g7 I. N$ a 1 G( `9 c5 x4 m t! {/ g5 R( y# V$ ]強列 要求 香港警察 不要 選擇性 執法！ $ ?" g8 }0 ?* g( `3 N 7 t3 v( N4 Y6 L( y[ Last edited by lizard on 2008-2-2 at 12:57 AM ]作者: Edgar_Davids 時間: 2008-2-2 08:37 AM
What is the definition of "原圖" ? ( X9 ^: M# b- h5 l/ b 6 s, g; g+ [- m# M: Q! T. V4 W8 q {$ A! i1 B
I have watched only several "疑似" 相片,: F% q" }9 X" L; L7 n
and "I AM NOT SURE WHETHER THEY ARE REAL OR FRAUD"....; a9 T$ u) D+ |& u: h$ G
1 t c# A. E& wI can only say that "I believe they have been widely spreaded".....作者: garlicguy79 時間: 2008-2-2 09:09 AM
I did saw some but it seems quite true, anyway, if they really done something, they hv to bare the responsibility. . U( Z I: [$ d0 aOn the other hand, in fact the media have to play a important rules, before anything finalise, especially the truely of the photo, have to be verify by the specialst and after that, they wrote whatever they want.2 C) z4 U- q3 w6 a, Z
Well, just my personal comments. 1 R# P3 e" O/ j/ P8 _, r3 u' ]3 O# E
Hv a nice day.作者: alanfcw 時間: 2008-2-6 03:42 PM
完全沒看過~~~作者: 迪達拉姑 時間: 2008-2-9 01:45 AM
未呀..未看到入洞..咁算唔算看過原圖= =作者: loklok117 時間: 2008-2-9 03:31 AM
我完全沒看過...* a% J9 |$ y, ?, [# L. _6 E
你信唔信ar?作者: 傲魂楓 時間: 2008-2-9 06:50 PM
