if u havent seen it ure missin out on a part of history man作者: lizard 時間: 2008-2-2 12:51 AM
抗議！ # m5 Q% ^3 }& w9 x$ ]* T- B: e. q8 r4 B
只許 谷德超 商場 買 翻版鹹碟 t7 H) e1 T, X1 ^
不准 香港人 網絡 睇 自拍淫照 8 c0 a7 F& K! l3 O. g+ X $ t) U/ g1 M( E7 w( D; |5 z, M強列 要求 香港警察 不要 選擇性 執法！" q, }& {7 U* S( Y i9 E7 D3 [1 O
' Z) B( W [! L6 e[ Last edited by lizard on 2008-2-2 at 12:57 AM ]作者: Edgar_Davids 時間: 2008-2-2 08:37 AM
What is the definition of "原圖" ? 6 E$ _0 K1 [; v( b3 Z% J" u% R 7 b( O6 A6 s% S/ o( d' Q$ l# o4 Q' D3 u. G$ c. j* }* ]9 _
I have watched only several "疑似" 相片,8 L- b$ {( F4 [4 p5 f; k- s
and "I AM NOT SURE WHETHER THEY ARE REAL OR FRAUD".... ; K, { H0 x! t6 x% W ) x/ E- b# d" v% \I can only say that "I believe they have been widely spreaded".....作者: garlicguy79 時間: 2008-2-2 09:09 AM
I did saw some but it seems quite true, anyway, if they really done something, they hv to bare the responsibility. * |4 Y' }8 O# \0 I* }On the other hand, in fact the media have to play a important rules, before anything finalise, especially the truely of the photo, have to be verify by the specialst and after that, they wrote whatever they want. 7 B$ x1 ~2 ~+ R cWell, just my personal comments. 9 C2 @+ `5 [/ h9 H& E# U9 E! J3 ^' n2 l3 a, ]8 f& p& K. q5 z V' _. n
Hv a nice day.作者: alanfcw 時間: 2008-2-6 03:42 PM
完全沒看過~~~作者: 迪達拉姑 時間: 2008-2-9 01:45 AM
未呀..未看到入洞..咁算唔算看過原圖= =作者: loklok117 時間: 2008-2-9 03:31 AM
我完全沒看過...( V$ p) d. e+ c7 z
你信唔信ar?作者: 傲魂楓 時間: 2008-2-9 06:50 PM
