if u havent seen it ure missin out on a part of history man作者: lizard 時間: 2008-2-2 12:51 AM
抗議！ 7 o- D0 |; V% `+ B8 K! W; s % v3 _3 n1 _/ o; I只許 谷德超 商場 買 翻版鹹碟" g2 Q, m5 u+ ^' m" z8 v7 Y/ H
不准 香港人 網絡 睇 自拍淫照 ' Z6 H: U4 E/ i+ _! M3 |0 Q 9 ]% P; c* r$ Z# t3 y強列 要求 香港警察 不要 選擇性 執法！0 M' `. l4 O- Z
0 C+ o, t0 |9 V9 m4 `5 s- [3 W
[ Last edited by lizard on 2008-2-2 at 12:57 AM ]作者: Edgar_Davids 時間: 2008-2-2 08:37 AM
What is the definition of "原圖" ? ' h- Y4 z4 Z- u* h
/ ^* m9 n* l6 w+ J0 Y: C4 g- p9 ^' M$ d" g9 |( Q8 j
I have watched only several "疑似" 相片, ! Z7 e5 }, Z! Nand "I AM NOT SURE WHETHER THEY ARE REAL OR FRAUD"..... Y! U+ g; h5 `- O1 a5 g
5 r6 l% h' K% i% F F6 }* R7 U0 H" y/ QI can only say that "I believe they have been widely spreaded".....作者: garlicguy79 時間: 2008-2-2 09:09 AM
I did saw some but it seems quite true, anyway, if they really done something, they hv to bare the responsibility. ! }* L2 M& m+ A
On the other hand, in fact the media have to play a important rules, before anything finalise, especially the truely of the photo, have to be verify by the specialst and after that, they wrote whatever they want. 3 c; K- x; _3 B8 aWell, just my personal comments. 7 S. S/ u. ~& W$ t" G 5 ]9 P" ]& E: J& w; Z4 zHv a nice day.作者: alanfcw 時間: 2008-2-6 03:42 PM
完全沒看過~~~作者: 迪達拉姑 時間: 2008-2-9 01:45 AM
未呀..未看到入洞..咁算唔算看過原圖= =作者: loklok117 時間: 2008-2-9 03:31 AM
' h- Y4 z4 Z- u* h
