if u havent seen it ure missin out on a part of history man作者: lizard 時間: 2008-2-2 12:51 AM
抗議！! \0 l1 a" w+ s/ y& X' R0 Z2 b
) o1 ~% _+ ^& X
只許 谷德超 商場 買 翻版鹹碟' s3 f- t4 z2 n/ E
不准 香港人 網絡 睇 自拍淫照 G) N& d5 \: B' p
: w) b# F) D5 Y- K0 |強列 要求 香港警察 不要 選擇性 執法！ + y* I, K1 _- p# q$ \# K( B7 p' l& [$ @0 ]! N# U* V
[ Last edited by lizard on 2008-2-2 at 12:57 AM ]作者: Edgar_Davids 時間: 2008-2-2 08:37 AM
What is the definition of "原圖" ? 7 g/ v# y7 n: G$ b, p- \6 U: X6 {" p; w' e# c
1 D9 u. _2 s3 Z1 u
I have watched only several "疑似" 相片, - n; s+ f+ h7 o+ M# Y3 Vand "I AM NOT SURE WHETHER THEY ARE REAL OR FRAUD"....6 v% i# E. ?. j3 s
R; X' ^6 \+ X0 b6 w( O2 dI can only say that "I believe they have been widely spreaded".....作者: garlicguy79 時間: 2008-2-2 09:09 AM
I did saw some but it seems quite true, anyway, if they really done something, they hv to bare the responsibility. ' w+ t4 d' W" W* o
On the other hand, in fact the media have to play a important rules, before anything finalise, especially the truely of the photo, have to be verify by the specialst and after that, they wrote whatever they want. 9 O1 d4 {8 _' {0 b( F' Z0 IWell, just my personal comments.' Q6 P. ~' c$ V& x
( Y7 r- l+ K5 r( f
Hv a nice day.作者: alanfcw 時間: 2008-2-6 03:42 PM
完全沒看過~~~作者: 迪達拉姑 時間: 2008-2-9 01:45 AM
未呀..未看到入洞..咁算唔算看過原圖= =作者: loklok117 時間: 2008-2-9 03:31 AM
