版主請注意, 本題原意並非為同一事件開新post討論, 而是想藉此評估一下照片流出情況, 因為流傳是否廣泛, 有多廣泛, 將直接影響案件的嚴重程度, 法庭應以此作為對被告判刑及量刑的考慮條件之一, 但目前並無人(包括警方及傳媒)留意這個問題. 0 z; u& ?6 W% l( h6 x: e- h. W7 e( H+ u0 H
版友如要討論事件請到其他post, 多謝認真投票. 8 o. I, O' i/ j6 V2 H* v ; M% {& t7 o. q% g9 K- R+ C樓主不鼓勵發佈,傳閱有問題圖片及一切違法行為.作者: ckyckk 時間: 2008-2-1 11:32 PM
完全沒看過 作者: malecoke 時間: 2008-2-2 12:43 AM
if u havent seen it ure missin out on a part of history man作者: lizard 時間: 2008-2-2 12:51 AM
抗議！& M! l) u+ W5 a9 A. d1 U
4 T4 K1 s8 N% K9 e只許 谷德超 商場 買 翻版鹹碟 " \& V4 v4 Z- C, P不准 香港人 網絡 睇 自拍淫照4 W L# h( a' L- A
1 X# s& j4 G* j# H2 Z強列 要求 香港警察 不要 選擇性 執法！ ' U8 k/ _; @. O$ L9 ?+ L5 w: A! e9 S7 f3 G, I
[ Last edited by lizard on 2008-2-2 at 12:57 AM ]作者: Edgar_Davids 時間: 2008-2-2 08:37 AM
What is the definition of "原圖" ? ' \: o4 e; d1 O6 ^- S& w' y8 `
# u4 @7 X, Z1 W5 R6 R! T4 f$ S* K# m U- F p" `
I have watched only several "疑似" 相片, 7 @9 R( E; E& xand "I AM NOT SURE WHETHER THEY ARE REAL OR FRAUD"..../ r& a) T3 S9 R
; v. I/ G$ H$ a. C/ S! M+ g
I can only say that "I believe they have been widely spreaded".....作者: garlicguy79 時間: 2008-2-2 09:09 AM
I did saw some but it seems quite true, anyway, if they really done something, they hv to bare the responsibility. % w# z- u. q4 ^6 X) I# [
On the other hand, in fact the media have to play a important rules, before anything finalise, especially the truely of the photo, have to be verify by the specialst and after that, they wrote whatever they want. / u1 t$ Q2 }# dWell, just my personal comments. 6 h7 c' v; K2 D% S7 X # H# q5 e3 S& a' ], T+ {. F0 C& L' rHv a nice day.作者: alanfcw 時間: 2008-2-6 03:42 PM
完全沒看過~~~作者: 迪達拉姑 時間: 2008-2-9 01:45 AM
未呀..未看到入洞..咁算唔算看過原圖= =作者: loklok117 時間: 2008-2-9 03:31 AM
' \: o4 e; d1 O6 ^- S& w' y8 `
