if u havent seen it ure missin out on a part of history man作者: lizard 時間: 2008-2-2 12:51 AM
抗議！ " f# m( }2 G+ G" d. G. f* W. S( A, p! l7 Y0 v% i. N7 `5 z
只許 谷德超 商場 買 翻版鹹碟% l% }6 ?$ o" L0 j
不准 香港人 網絡 睇 自拍淫照( e |5 h7 I5 N
3 v% J+ [ G: ^& v1 Y' W& ^強列 要求 香港警察 不要 選擇性 執法！ ' v$ z9 l1 n: y$ }" h# i! D$ X 0 ?; ]: b. j# |' o { v[ Last edited by lizard on 2008-2-2 at 12:57 AM ]作者: Edgar_Davids 時間: 2008-2-2 08:37 AM
What is the definition of "原圖" ? 4 _3 F; \ Z# i& d( d2 }
, G( Z8 B. }: ^% ~. ~( h " j* u% Q$ n, x: a% vI have watched only several "疑似" 相片,& ?" s% e" C% V) x3 X6 ]' A- e! z
and "I AM NOT SURE WHETHER THEY ARE REAL OR FRAUD".... 0 i; k6 j) |5 V6 {1 a; a& p; r% ^' e! W6 t' ]& V0 {$ J
I can only say that "I believe they have been widely spreaded".....作者: garlicguy79 時間: 2008-2-2 09:09 AM
I did saw some but it seems quite true, anyway, if they really done something, they hv to bare the responsibility. % L" ]# c, ], rOn the other hand, in fact the media have to play a important rules, before anything finalise, especially the truely of the photo, have to be verify by the specialst and after that, they wrote whatever they want.' S) J% o2 M6 X3 `8 k) R/ e
Well, just my personal comments.! O1 A5 ^5 o ]
7 h& U2 b' g& F F: a8 d; l' zHv a nice day.作者: alanfcw 時間: 2008-2-6 03:42 PM
完全沒看過~~~作者: 迪達拉姑 時間: 2008-2-9 01:45 AM
未呀..未看到入洞..咁算唔算看過原圖= =作者: loklok117 時間: 2008-2-9 03:31 AM
4 _3 F; \ Z# i& d( d2 }
