版主請注意, 本題原意並非為同一事件開新post討論, 而是想藉此評估一下照片流出情況, 因為流傳是否廣泛, 有多廣泛, 將直接影響案件的嚴重程度, 法庭應以此作為對被告判刑及量刑的考慮條件之一, 但目前並無人(包括警方及傳媒)留意這個問題. ; T. Y% ]. q) Y4 D m |" y& N n+ J- c& ^6 \版友如要討論事件請到其他post, 多謝認真投票. . U% \3 A m% X; o! O U9 N7 b4 i2 {, B7 j/ j$ M$ Y3 j. q
樓主不鼓勵發佈,傳閱有問題圖片及一切違法行為.作者: ckyckk 時間: 2008-2-1 11:32 PM
完全沒看過 作者: malecoke 時間: 2008-2-2 12:43 AM
if u havent seen it ure missin out on a part of history man作者: lizard 時間: 2008-2-2 12:51 AM
抗議！ 0 u. r4 B3 z% C" w/ \5 ~) e2 K9 t$ o1 j) O
只許 谷德超 商場 買 翻版鹹碟 3 W! R! q6 T4 v6 ?不准 香港人 網絡 睇 自拍淫照 ! [9 ~+ C, f6 V9 I0 k; x o t) c7 v7 p4 v5 b
強列 要求 香港警察 不要 選擇性 執法！ " S- o7 D& O0 g H, j0 n6 n; ]. p
[ Last edited by lizard on 2008-2-2 at 12:57 AM ]作者: Edgar_Davids 時間: 2008-2-2 08:37 AM
What is the definition of "原圖" ? % F5 N3 w1 l: M: c: e9 e
. m, A8 l; O- d! ?" r1 L S2 l) h
! A. G$ k' D4 X* D. aI have watched only several "疑似" 相片,5 |* U5 ?9 F& r% O
and "I AM NOT SURE WHETHER THEY ARE REAL OR FRAUD"....% x) y1 [1 j1 e/ { V
, v) M+ K! O$ Y3 }8 w# J
I can only say that "I believe they have been widely spreaded".....作者: garlicguy79 時間: 2008-2-2 09:09 AM
I did saw some but it seems quite true, anyway, if they really done something, they hv to bare the responsibility. 4 B) k/ o0 {* eOn the other hand, in fact the media have to play a important rules, before anything finalise, especially the truely of the photo, have to be verify by the specialst and after that, they wrote whatever they want. 9 o0 l* d* S3 q' O) z d# P7 J; zWell, just my personal comments. ) a1 F! M) a( k; E8 \( \; J! U. w' N3 @* L( d
Hv a nice day.作者: alanfcw 時間: 2008-2-6 03:42 PM
完全沒看過~~~作者: 迪達拉姑 時間: 2008-2-9 01:45 AM
未呀..未看到入洞..咁算唔算看過原圖= =作者: loklok117 時間: 2008-2-9 03:31 AM
% F5 N3 w1 l: M: c: e9 e
