
Originally posted by Triangel at 2008-2-5 01:32 AM:' R8 R2 Y+ k+ W
$ x4 h3 t( W3 i% J1 W/ t+ b
oz2, Great Topic6 ]. H9 m& N: {, J; w9 V( v; w
我幫你張呢個主題: (1)Move 去吹水版? & (2) 轉做加分題好冇?
Originally posted by oz2 at 2008-2-5 01:33 AM:
+ y8 G9 I, A! _
那麼方案(2),ok?
7 Y4 a* l7 w) I% o" U5 \/ R7 IOriginally posted by Triangel at 2008-2-5 01:37 AM:$ @8 h0 f, P* a
: `) u6 B3 i" j5 X' Y! _
可以帶出討論氣氛并且有討點的,我都會加分
Ok?
6 u, z3 a; l, J7 {4 c


Originally posted by 勇勇 at 2008-2-5 01:59 AM:% ? {- b# A+ Q9 O) {4 ?
你係唔係有D搞亂左啊!
上面發表嘅文章[不好]AND[錯]係有連貫性架!- \+ ^5 r5 I# R+ |; ?% e
你嘅舉例根本就亂晒龍![]()
Originally posted by oz2 at 2008-2-5 02:11 AM:! U- q- c' h4 e. S- Z% a6 g: A6 t. S
+ Q' G8 `4 {% T& j9 \
可能我的例子未必是好好,而且每件事... ! I" b( y! s) w4 A! s) {6 F$ g
[棺材]多數人認為是[不好]的東西,但它不是一件[錯]的東西;6 i0 f/ o' f2 }. ? H+ U; V6 I
即使把[棺材]被放在一些不恰當地方,也是行為上的[錯],不是[棺材]的[錯]。4 h# G5 @+ ^3 m B8 ~% a

Originally posted by oz2 at 2008-2-5 02:11:
, _, G' `) N7 [; V( m. l4 k6 V8 p
可能我的例子未必是好好,而且每件事...
Originally posted by SWK at 2008-2-5 02:20 AM:; X3 H3 g4 A9 E+ X
你啲舉例好似有啲"格硬理" 咁唔係你既錯 只係你舉例得不好![]()

Originally posted by Triangel at 2008-2-5 02:27:
% y' w. O+ ~: N( ~: i) y
應該係:【格硬黎】, 唔係: [格硬理]![]()
Originally posted by SWK at 2008-2-5 02:20 AM:7 G$ H* J) ~% I1 E. D! F
* u: h! [- V" _- g5 T- U8 b
你啲舉例好似有啲"格硬理" 咁唔係你既錯 只係你舉例得不好![]()
Originally posted by oz2 at 2008-2-5 02:42 AM:
多謝你見意,也令到我又有另一見解:
( c: L3 I7 F: }8 F
不希望因為此帖而令到會員之間產生罵戰
...
Originally posted by Triangel at 2008-2-5 02:47 AM:. r0 B; z! N$ h, q( |' t
( A! M5 n! n0 j& |- b. L, q. R3 [3 V: r( G
放心,我相信 SWK姐姐唔係敢既意義, right?
Originally posted by s20021601 at 2008-2-5 09:10 AM:
我就覺得「不好」同「錯」呢個關係......
哈哈..講到連我自己都唔係幾明tim...
還望大家見諒
Originally posted by yeung hiu he at 2008-2-5 09:47 AM:. c7 v9 {- E1 B7 Y5 N
其實我覺得(不好) 同 (錯), 每次都連...
Originally posted by alanfcw at 2008-2-5 01:35 PM:
不好同錯 2樣野黎 我覺得% E' v; n( @1 }# |; z8 [8 Z( h
媽媽見我做得唔好既野未必打你,如做功課呀) V) B4 m1 p. G, a$ d
6 S9 _. U6 F1 y
但係錯既野佢一定會打你,如你同人打架
| 歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0 |