
Originally posted by Triangel at 2008-2-5 01:32 AM:8 F! w/ _1 B$ Y, i$ x% d8 j
" U6 X. q( }- M3 W) N7 o8 l
oz2, Great Topic3 P! _1 m" q. D$ ?+ H1 M( U" s
我幫你張呢個主題: (1)Move 去吹水版? & (2) 轉做加分題好冇?
Originally posted by oz2 at 2008-2-5 01:33 AM:
那麼方案(2),ok?
8 s5 k# k0 |/ w1 @# c! w1 Y1 wOriginally posted by Triangel at 2008-2-5 01:37 AM:
d2 [/ h7 s$ u5 N" L) j) D X
可以帶出討論氣氛并且有討點的,我都會加分
Ok?
0 g% `8 }9 \9 n% i' w! E
+ O; X, J( g8 }- @+ v( X1 ^

Originally posted by 勇勇 at 2008-2-5 01:59 AM:
你係唔係有D搞亂左啊!
上面發表嘅文章[不好]AND[錯]係有連貫性架!5 y2 ? n, s# A* f; `) \5 X
你嘅舉例根本就亂晒龍![]()
Originally posted by oz2 at 2008-2-5 02:11 AM:
. ?( o; \/ E* N# X9 X% q* D" y
可能我的例子未必是好好,而且每件事... ( }4 [3 n* ?, {7 g) I4 o2 T1 a
[棺材]多數人認為是[不好]的東西,但它不是一件[錯]的東西;
即使把[棺材]被放在一些不恰當地方,也是行為上的[錯],不是[棺材]的[錯]。1 g j. @( C9 C G& m! I/ W0 d

Originally posted by oz2 at 2008-2-5 02:11:' L- B) D' C( g5 a: K+ |+ L: Z8 u
) J1 {' V; @1 m
可能我的例子未必是好好,而且每件事...
Originally posted by SWK at 2008-2-5 02:20 AM:, G" n: R3 y7 P( d* x: t
, ~0 a4 n% z/ j T+ V( X/ ^
你啲舉例好似有啲"格硬理" 咁唔係你既錯 只係你舉例得不好![]()

Originally posted by Triangel at 2008-2-5 02:27:( o8 C- @0 T' V
0 d. |% J1 {) ^. v" e
應該係:【格硬黎】, 唔係: [格硬理]![]()
Originally posted by SWK at 2008-2-5 02:20 AM:
! ^# k+ y( x! G
你啲舉例好似有啲"格硬理" 咁唔係你既錯 只係你舉例得不好![]()
Originally posted by oz2 at 2008-2-5 02:42 AM:
多謝你見意,也令到我又有另一見解:# A/ w" `2 {/ P
' ~+ R0 k- @5 G, G
不希望因為此帖而令到會員之間產生罵戰
...
Originally posted by Triangel at 2008-2-5 02:47 AM:
" \4 X1 K+ _( [! K8 ?4 E8 X
放心,我相信 SWK姐姐唔係敢既意義, right?
Originally posted by s20021601 at 2008-2-5 09:10 AM:
我就覺得「不好」同「錯」呢個關係......
哈哈..講到連我自己都唔係幾明tim.... S: E V. f8 r. Q ?$ I, q
還望大家見諒
Originally posted by yeung hiu he at 2008-2-5 09:47 AM:
其實我覺得(不好) 同 (錯), 每次都連...
Originally posted by alanfcw at 2008-2-5 01:35 PM:# D+ x" d' b" K: ], Y# S" x0 h. _* X
不好同錯 2樣野黎 我覺得
媽媽見我做得唔好既野未必打你,如做功課呀+ U% W: K) O/ f% M6 g
但係錯既野佢一定會打你,如你同人打架
| 歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0 |