娛樂滿紛 26FUN - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: 歐聯16強-波圖對阿仙奴 [打印本頁]

作者: 傷心帶笑者 時間: 2010-2-17 07:15 PM 標題: 歐聯16強-波圖對阿仙奴

阿仙奴名單無艾沙雲、桑治、艾蒙尼亞、加拿斯、伊度亞度
大劑!

作者: kuru 時間: 2010-2-18 12:00 AM

阿仙奴呢場和到都好好

作者: dcsh 時間: 2010-2-18 02:28 AM

arsenal always do better when they starting 11 can't play together

作者: smmen3 時間: 2010-2-18 07:41 PM

KEEPER KAI既~~

作者: 電梯男 時間: 2010-2-19 01:20 AM

有片睇

[youtube]crsB9_VPvEM[/youtube]

作者: %%% 時間: 2010-2-19 01:29 AM

好低能!!!!!!!!

作者: 自由神 時間: 2010-2-19 01:39 AM

好低能!!!!!!!!
%%% 發表於 2010-2-19 01:29 AM

個球證？
你睇番replay，佢係用腳點左一下先用手，就算回傳都無得吹
加上禁區入面既間接自由球可以快開？你不如俾個十二碼porto啦

不過無計，另一場又係，高路C offside成米有多，加上旁證同onside線並排
咁都合埋眼當合法
可見愈多人睇，獎金愈高既賽事，球證可以決定邊隊贏

作者: kuru 時間: 2010-2-19 02:44 AM

駛鬼踢咩, 收買球証咪得囉, 黑哨

作者: arthur8088 時間: 2010-2-19 06:43 AM

個球證？
你睇番replay，佢係用腳點左一下先用手，就算回傳都無得吹
加上禁區入面既間接自由球可以快開？你不如俾個十二碼porto啦

不過無計，另一場又係，高路C offside成米有多，加上旁證同onside線並排
咁都合 ...
自由神發表於 2010-2-19 01:39 AM

and also with a nice pick from the referee~~~the chief was the king yesterday~~

Ovreba, the chief ref in the Bayern match, besides the offside, he made some crazy controversial call as well..
like the Penalty kick, it was a recall after Gomez netted a goal~~luckily Robben nailed it, or else there would be more arguements!!

Hannsson and Ovreba are the ref of year candidate..completely have no idea how they are still on the list to June's World Cup 2010!!!!

作者: brightlee 時間: 2010-2-19 04:12 PM

and also with a nice pick from the referee~~~the chief was the king yesterday~~

Ovreba, the chief ref in the Bayern match, besides the offside, he made some crazy controversial call as well..
like ...
arthur8088 發表於 2010-2-19 08:43 AM

Ovreba.... I told others in here before.. he couldn't handle too much pressure.... so I am not surprised about he may have another poor performance.

However, I think that's a good call for Hansson. A good call and a good goal should be allowed. By the spirit of the Law of the game, they would encourage "attacking" football. If the referee, like Mr Hansson didn't call Porto players to wait for his whistle. A quick free kick should be allowed. I get no idea why Arsene Wenger blamed for the referee, Thierry Henry scored some goals like this when he was playing Arsenal.

作者: brightlee 時間: 2010-2-19 04:17 PM

本帖最後由 brightlee 於 2010-2-19 06:18 PM 編輯

Ovreba.... I told others in here before.. he couldn't handle too much pressure.... so I am not surprised about he may have another poor performance.

However, I think that's a good call for Hansson. ...
brightlee 發表於 2010-2-19 06:12 PM

This is the article from Graham Poll

Technically, there is nothing wrong with the goal, nor the actions ofthe referee Martin Hansson. There has clearly been a transgression oflaw with Sol Campbell's backpass and, once the referee has awarded thefree-kick, the rule is that advantage is immediately given back to theteam who have been wronged.

In the spirit of the law, it can be argued that the defending teamshould be given an opportunity to regroup before the kick is taken, butthat responsibility falls to the players.

Fabianski could have held on to the ball or thrown it away - as we seeso often - thus risking a yellow card but ensuring that Porto would notbe able to take a quick free-kick. As for the role of the Portoplayers, how many times did we see Thierry Henry take a quick free-kickduring his Arsenal days under Arsene Wenger?

Most memorably, in an FA Cup tie against Chelsea - and we didn't hearhis manager complaining then.It could perhaps be argued that Hansson'spositioning prevents Sol Campbell from making an attempt to get back,but that doesn't make the referee wrong.

West Ham and Chelsea fans will remember a similar situation involvingmyself in a Premier League match some years ago, when I was standingbetween the ball and West Ham's goal, and then stepped aside to allowJimmy Floyd Hasselbaink to take a quick free-kick, which flew pastDavid James into the net. Looking back at it, I admit that mypositioning could have been better but, in this case, Hansson hasn'tblocked the view of the Arsenal goalkeeper and, by, asking forFabianski to hand the ball back, cannot be accused of taking theGunners by surprise.

作者: brightlee 時間: 2010-2-19 04:19 PM

This is the article from Graham Poll

Technically, there is nothing wrong with the goal, nor the actions ofthe referee Martin Hansson. There has clearly been a transgression oflaw with Sol Campbel ...
brightlee 發表於 2010-2-19 06:17 PM

【明報專訊】阿仙奴被波圖的快開自由球攻陷，球證漢臣的判決惹來爭議。不過英國前資深球證普爾力撐同袍，表示基於利益歸攻方原則入球絕對合法；本地球證亦表示波圖有權快開自由球，毋須等待阿仙奴排人牆。

利益歸於攻方

普爾在報章專欄中解釋為何波圖入球合法﹕「首先阿仙奴回傳犯規沒有任何爭議，當球證判罰間接自由球後，根據球例原則，利益歸於犯規者的對手。當然阿仙奴有權要求在對手開罰球前重組防線，但這是球員本身的責任。儘管可能令他被罰黃牌，法比安斯基亦應抱覑皮球或把它拋走。」

一名不願公開身分的本地球證則謂，波圖獲判罰球後可以選擇直接開球。事實上要求對方排人牆、離球10碼是攻方的權利，攻方有權不行使。他表示：「除非球證指示要待人牆排好才准開球，否則快開罰球絕對合符球例。」

作者: arthur8088 時間: 2010-2-19 08:46 PM

This is the article from Graham Poll

Technically, there is nothing wrong with the goal, nor the actions ofthe referee Martin Hansson. There has clearly been a transgression oflaw with Sol Campbel ...
brightlee 發表於 2010-2-19 04:17 PM

Bright, i guess the main problem is not the rules, even there're heaps of controversial about it.....it is all the execution...it seems the chief from all around the world do not follow the rules !!! we seldom see this kind of problem in Big 4 leagues....the problem always appears in European matches as those ref come from lower standard league like Danish league or Swedish League...I'm not being racists, but that's the fact!!!!

i guess professional ref should be introduced asap, just like Video referee in Basketball, rugby~~and tennis~~~

作者: brightlee 時間: 2010-2-19 09:37 PM

本帖最後由 brightlee 於 2010-2-19 11:40 PM 編輯

Bright, i guess the main problem is not the rules, even there're heaps of controversial about it.....it is all the execution...it seems the chief from all around the world do not follow the rules !! ...
arthur8088 發表於 2010-2-19 10:46 PM

I know what you are trying to say.. that's why I think Overbo is not ready to referee as high level as Champions League. I still couldn't believe he'll be 1 of the referees in World Cup this year. But if you asked me about that decision from Mr. Hansson (Swedish referee), I think he made a great call. From referee point of views, he did absolutely right...

You know I support Arsenal, but this is 1 of the incidents I doubt about Arsene Wenger's comment. I think Arsene's comment is wrong this time

Yes, As similar as Graham Poll's article, Mr Hansson could be located in better position during free kick, but he hadn't blocked any view of Fabinski... then.. what's the point we could complain about it?

Please remember it..... Thierry Henry scored few goals about similar situation........

作者: brightlee 時間: 2010-2-19 09:55 PM

I know what you are trying to say.. that's why I think Overbo is not ready to referee as high level as Champions League. I still couldn't believe he'll be 1 of the referees in World Cup this year. B ...
brightlee 發表於 2010-2-19 11:37 PM

from latest news, Overbo is not in the shortlists of World Cup this year...
thanks Lord.....

作者: kc7800_80k 時間: 2010-2-20 12:18 AM

【明報專訊】阿仙奴被波圖的快開自由球攻陷，球證漢臣的判決惹來爭議。不過英國前資深球證普爾力撐同袍，表示基於利益歸攻方原則入球絕對合法；本地球證亦表示波圖有權快開自由球，毋須等待阿仙奴排人牆。

利益歸 ...
brightlee 發表於 2010-2-19 04:19 PM

本身法比安斯基唔夠經驗，有經驗的話就唔會咁快交個波出去，點都等人牆差唔多搞掂先交波

作者: fcukyoukelly 時間: 2010-2-21 12:06 PM

呢個球証真係好有問題

另外法比安斯基當然唔掂啦

作者: 艾官 時間: 2010-2-21 02:20 PM

第二球都仲話同佢技術無關~但輸第一球真係...咁都得既~??

作者: kit132 時間: 2010-2-21 07:57 PM

呢場個球證一定係黑哨
擋住人都有

作者: brightlee 時間: 2010-2-21 08:41 PM

呢場個球證一定係黑哨
擋住人都有
kit132 發表於 2010-2-21 09:57 PM

How can you prove he's brided?! Give me some real evidant please!~

Do you know what's meaning of the Law of the game?

If not, that means your world is really small, thinking about corruption, gambling all in your head.

When You are disrepecting soccer, then why do you watch soccer?? why don't you just gambling all time?

作者: HansChan 時間: 2010-2-21 10:44 PM

How can you prove he's brided?! Give me some real evidant please!~

Do you know what's meaning of the Law of the game?

If not, that means your world is really small, thinking about corruption, gamb ...
brightlee 發表於 2010-2-21 08:41 PM

算罷啦!!
講乜鬼野球例吖!!
講真,間接自由球可以放低即開,大家明!!
但講真,如果甘樣係話"鼓勵"進攻(我意思唔係話所有位置既間接自由球,我係特別指如阿記哩球甘)
不如話係"處決"回傳嗰一方!!
十次同類形事件,我估真冇一次會出現哩一球甘樣!
禁區呀大佬,球例!!
足球活動下下都話鼓吹"體育精神","公平"...你搬死既球例出黎,就話乜都岩!
再講,個球證當時亦阻住老蘇..."公平"??係球證係死物嘛,你甘實公平格!
要話個籠唔夠經驗的話,不如話佢俾人set snooker!!佢當時如果hold住個波唔俾返出,
球證一樣可以俾黃牌佢.....又係球例嘛!!
個球證根本覺得自己好有型...
從來見所謂既快開罰球,都被侵犯一方响地自己攞返個波放低即開,
今次個球證型到...好似人哋打籃球甘"彈"個波俾波圖球員!!
我唔會話波圖球員奸,因比賽隊隊或多或少都會"摶大霧"...
我只會話個球證賤,個球證廢!!

作者: wyman05 時間: 2010-2-21 11:35 PM

21# HansChan
非常同意大大的講法,希望此球証不要再左歐聯出現

作者: kit132 時間: 2010-2-22 01:43 PM

21# HansChan
非常同意大大的講法,希望此球証不要再左歐聯出現
wyman05 發表於 2010-2-21 11:35 PM

個球證係咪之前車仔對巴塞果個?

歡迎光臨娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs/)