Board logo

標題: 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5] [打印本頁]
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 09:52 PM     標題: 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

我希望佢冇事!6 a1 H2 [' j8 d% P# Q: M& I
佢都係方便各網友啫!
; z5 ^0 g& S4 o; {/ P7 C  H之前我都有好多套戲響佢度download.
. K! {7 _; I$ `+ d告得入就俾班仆街開到先例!
7 k! z+ j: p$ }/ M我覺得bt係一個灰色地帶, 唔可能好definite話係侵權或犯法!9 ]3 a2 h; f& i" j
班友甘大回嚮甘狼都係感情因素居多!
3 K2 G2 d/ I: h7 z純個人意見! 冇意開戰!亦不打算回應!
: ]( t8 e$ O; d' ^* j7 [9 y6 ~9 Q) N7 w& E5 v
[ Last edited by 樂壇渣Fit人 on 2005-4-30 at 11:32 AM ]
作者: tony    時間: 2005-4-29 09:58 PM

冇事!
作者: Ricky00893    時間: 2005-4-29 10:02 PM

罰款 $ 5000
作者: dogson009    時間: 2005-4-29 10:03 PM

其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
作者: goonejp    時間: 2005-4-29 10:47 PM

法律已死,班友强姦法律 " q; _) |8 S; s+ u  O+ I8 i
http://jm.g.free.fr/smileys/Xsmileys/iconsex----dog.gif
( {6 a; `4 ?& }& Y$ Y# L
1 G# N  V9 v  l[ Last edited by goonejp on 2005-4-29 at 10:48 PM ]
作者: chickenboy    時間: 2005-4-29 11:03 PM

kill chicken scare monkey.....佢起碼都要守行為
作者: 692004    時間: 2005-4-29 11:09 PM

冇罪釋放
作者: bob64    時間: 2005-4-29 11:10 PM

打靶!!
作者: king_king    時間: 2005-4-29 11:14 PM

小弟覺得會冇事,但會好似m$,要公開道歉.
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-4-29 11:15 PM

最好就冇事,否則班所謂的"電影人"就有本地案例
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:16 PM

我覺得班友成日嘈話侵版權, 但我覺得佢哋自己做就冇問題!0 L4 [4 p' S3 \, s4 K) V
根本bt係灰色地域!我覺得即係未係犯法!甘邊有理由入佢罪?
  N9 s' z% f0 x# m, w1 W- _( m"老鼠愛大米"甘, 人人爭黎唱, 講真, 佢哋甘正義, 自動自覺交返版權費俾個原創者囉! 咪又係食個灰色地帶話國語版冇版權邊個鍾意就攞黎唱!
' L) l6 u6 D* ?- M1 ?講開又講!首歌根本唔好聽(我唔識欣賞啦!)啲詞直接係好, 但太老土了!啲人而家老土當冧歌!, c$ B5 h0 u9 ?% Y* k" y
香港人有啲真係好似中咗毒甘!!!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-29 11:18 PM

美國咁講版權法都吾敢告BT,香港海關想扮勁想做世界法治一哥,輸.....輸硬.(除非又請人大釋法)
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:26 PM

重有就係, 佢而家唔係只係針對"公開"既人, 連攞黎睇既人都想造佢哋!
! j# I5 ~3 W( }根本就荒天下之大謬!) H. ~( a) N' O+ \1 [4 ?
不知所謂!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:27 PM

重有就係, 佢而家唔係只係針對"公開"既人, 連攞黎睇既人都想造佢哋!
( U" E# ?( K/ o2 J+ P6 E$ E0 n, ^根本就荒天下之大謬!
3 w& f! I9 x5 U: P不知所謂!
作者: nkt1000    時間: 2005-4-29 11:36 PM

希望古惑天皇兄會冇事吧!!!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:47 PM

我希望佢冇事之餘,仲可以挫一挫班契弟既銳氣!
作者: 短毛    時間: 2005-4-29 11:48 PM

大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好似*講明*非牟利性*的侵犯版權也算是犯法.
2 b. Z4 r4 j' P4 q+ p! X* W
* M0 O2 k4 l, f7 h* ^6 m' u佢放種子俾人下載, 明顯地有動機讓其他人下載.
( N, }2 |8 F3 _# O3 t! ]* ~/ V3 D
( A0 R. }& B) V0 x' G+ x6 k0 a% i1 f現在好似有人做錯事(非法盜版)但好多人都覺得沒有大不了.
: Y! j1 _5 s  I- c* f; W  }: C$ G% Y
沒有意思偏幫那一方, 只希望大家可以討論一下." K0 y6 B9 Y5 b( S' O% n; U
+ Z  \  P! X' N  T
還有報紙中提到一百萬人下載某一部戲, 損失幾億元, 那個記者一定沒有讀經濟的, 沒有成本下需求當然大. 叫人$60買張飛都無咁多人睇啦~
作者: lijinwei    時間: 2005-4-29 11:51 PM

想罰錢, 但因他失業, 身家不多! v( i5 m9 J: G1 }: ]5 X2 D4 e: r: [
要坐牢, 但政府財赤, 還要出錢養一個失業的人
7 k- e/ I! U- s# x+ [罰少少錢, 守行為並留案底算了吧
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:58 PM

Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
2 x1 k" r! K5 a& c大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
# I( c; M& `9 q; [) k3 p& T( U0 k/ C
vcd鋪通常一有新返既碟就對住大街大行黎播! 1 a" E  D1 F4 ?8 i! [0 X
然後啲人睇睇下入去買咗!
0 w& q* g9 P& x) z. j$ X既牟利又侵權!0 }+ y8 t& e# S( `; @9 z3 ^
但亦大行其道....." a7 d; |$ e8 R( d1 o
唉! 唔係話甘就唔代表bt係唔犯法定係點......& g- P' L& R9 t
只係香港政府係多重標準!
2 f% b* Y( s+ i* ]同埋bt冇先例, 始終係灰色地帶!
. T% ?: S# G/ b* k! J& V, j* H! K) _難聽到嘔既老鼠愛大米國語版俾啲人大搖大擺攞黎唱到臭晒又冇事.....
- f& F! m$ c; {7 V  G4 N所以話, 香港政府都係仆街黎! 鍾意點就點!正仆街!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-30 12:08 AM

無得告 la~~~全世界都冇先例又冇法証參考,香港e班2打6法官點識判,陳嘉上點都惡吾過哥倫比亞或Dream Work掛,e家個個都想睇香港點死.
作者: 史艷文2    時間: 2005-4-30 01:00 AM

雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)7 R0 H- Z2 t. Y. ]. r0 J* R3 A
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
作者: F.king    時間: 2005-4-30 07:08 AM

Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
4 M+ [6 u8 {3 Q, \( {" i大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
) o1 D" @! ?# J/ B2 F* h& t& D
I agree you points that it could be illegal
( }1 q8 H+ f9 F& B0 \, B6 ^but that is still a "gray area"
) T$ x! D, q* u. p- Hwhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
! A. V2 k+ n+ u) C* [# f" V6 l8 q' r0 A5 T! m
anyway, I want to say that is6 l5 Q# I& y4 M. V
who is supposed to be protected by laws/ D" J( K! {+ [3 E
creators?4 u, A0 C# x8 V# F  L7 x
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market6 U; G; k) ]! ^  i% [$ |
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
5 L7 d" V5 u/ T( l, i' C3 z* ?9 S2 r4 J0 dwhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
. @2 m; `7 z0 q) @. J5 A' GWhy nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
作者: junob04    時間: 2005-4-30 08:41 AM

Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
5 F) K- {# ?1 E5 x" I其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
) P: i! }3 @  v4 e我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-30 09:58 AM

Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:5 b+ \8 H3 G8 P9 P3 u" O, e% [

) y& Y: e+ \7 i5 w( p我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
0 @. V3 q1 H$ a
唔係喎!0 Q% s4 e( `) p0 u: A
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
3 a: \+ A# q4 N7 @2 B我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!; p* _4 |9 e8 w% [- V6 B
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!2 x9 M+ A. t% [2 I, T8 Q/ p* v
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
作者: 大家樂1234    時間: 2005-4-30 12:27 PM

希望佢無事
1 h# D$ I: T3 h: j) F( P$ B" f一有先例以後就死嚕
作者: jason williams    時間: 2005-4-30 12:36 PM

honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!0 d% C0 o' N4 }. b
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
  o$ f7 Q' ]& i8 Tif so bad, dun download la, right?* [$ N" D/ X* ?/ j, e' P$ z7 D
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^- ?; H% A- e3 T( T. ]- B9 r
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct! _3 |7 e3 Z% M$ N$ H( O$ A
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
% R2 w. f& J1 [so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society2 l- f# h9 p4 l" [) L' M
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........2 H0 r/ }2 e2 `& U1 G7 O( ?0 v
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!) v! V7 ~- S; D3 @4 _) F
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
作者: coolyiceman    時間: 2005-4-30 12:45 PM

罰款,冇留案底!; l5 m' C, h% X2 u7 L
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
) _( o; |! X+ \1 B4 a- w) Z5 m2 z政府想比下馬威0的人~~1 a! O7 S2 `- z9 {8 q4 ^& k! `
錢就一定罰
7 W) \) [$ s. f未必要坐牢~~
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-30 01:31 PM

如果真係判佢有罪,6 z! o' W+ X# G
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
2 _# q3 w) M, O5 L! N  q佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
1 i+ X" m- p- s7 q到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-30 04:17 PM

最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
作者: @bcc@    時間: 2005-4-30 05:39 PM

冇事!!!!!:cool:
作者: 小虫    時間: 2005-4-30 06:05 PM

法官班報法令要幾個保鑣護送佢返屋企^_^
作者: 老鬼X    時間: 2005-5-1 01:54 PM

無奈！一定搞死佢　
作者: markmk    時間: 2005-5-3 04:29 AM

一定坐牢......殺雞警猴...仲要大字標題咁話俾bt友聽..
作者: 人人人人人    時間: 2005-5-3 06:09 PM

唉...試問有幾多人未用過BT??政府係都要搞呢D咁o既野, 多少都感到無奈
作者: ilovefuckingyou    時間: 2005-5-4 01:47 AM

告得入我切!!!
作者: bonzi1983    時間: 2005-5-4 05:40 AM

I think 古惑天皇 is immoral, but not illegal....so he is not guilty according to the law
作者: karenmoe    時間: 2005-5-5 01:14 AM

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-5-4 01:47 AM:: \  x7 c3 ~: m4 ?) A, j
告得入我切!!!
+ b/ V0 O) Z8 U8 v; i: `
我當初都估告唔入,  k& U$ j4 e: a
不過我老豆提醒我,政府咁多大狀,
0 m% Z2 x3 }1 Y. S! z' o- C真係告唔入就唔會告啦.....
作者: timho1027    時間: 2005-5-5 03:34 AM

海關做戲給美國電影業睇$ M" F+ F$ Z5 V/ D
我希望佢冇事
作者: wolfevil    時間: 2005-5-5 10:08 PM

會有罪, 不過冇圖利and第一次, 最大可能會守行為
作者: 阿細    時間: 2005-5-5 10:54 PM

Originally posted by EV4886 at 2005-4-29 11:18 PM:6 D4 c5 m* }& z
美國咁講版權法都吾敢告BT,香港海關想扮勁想做世界法治一哥,輸.....輸硬.(除非又請人大釋法)
, t  F8 Q& @# A1 H# {
因為美國人權大過天...所以唔敢告用bt d人ja...香港海關想扮勁...就唔見得係la..大家都用緊份內事...
作者: kwajc    時間: 2005-5-6 08:58 AM

香港海關想做一場大龍鳳俾電影業d人睇......講真香港有成幾廿萬人用bt download野....拉晒番去邊到有咁多錢養呢班人呀!!!



歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0