Board logo

標題: 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5] [打印本頁]
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 09:52 PM     標題: 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

我希望佢冇事!8 `  Q5 ^+ O$ L1 v( v( u& A+ N
佢都係方便各網友啫!
& K# Z  f- G$ g+ q( m之前我都有好多套戲響佢度download.$ b" v+ m+ d/ A
告得入就俾班仆街開到先例!
& i% e* [! S  {5 y5 ]我覺得bt係一個灰色地帶, 唔可能好definite話係侵權或犯法!
- l& l, D: {  z0 f2 v7 p( s; }班友甘大回嚮甘狼都係感情因素居多!+ B. |; l4 l% k+ w+ m4 a9 B. O
純個人意見! 冇意開戰!亦不打算回應!' V. E! y1 S( `9 F2 ^; c& X

% |' L* d$ A/ N6 x! w[ Last edited by 樂壇渣Fit人 on 2005-4-30 at 11:32 AM ]
作者: tony    時間: 2005-4-29 09:58 PM

冇事!
作者: Ricky00893    時間: 2005-4-29 10:02 PM

罰款 $ 5000
作者: dogson009    時間: 2005-4-29 10:03 PM

其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
作者: goonejp    時間: 2005-4-29 10:47 PM

法律已死,班友强姦法律
. O/ _: `1 F, phttp://jm.g.free.fr/smileys/Xsmileys/iconsex----dog.gif
& {2 J: |) m( D# [) t7 }% m+ t: d  q' ?
[ Last edited by goonejp on 2005-4-29 at 10:48 PM ]
作者: chickenboy    時間: 2005-4-29 11:03 PM

kill chicken scare monkey.....佢起碼都要守行為
作者: 692004    時間: 2005-4-29 11:09 PM

冇罪釋放
作者: bob64    時間: 2005-4-29 11:10 PM

打靶!!
作者: king_king    時間: 2005-4-29 11:14 PM

小弟覺得會冇事,但會好似m$,要公開道歉.
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-4-29 11:15 PM

最好就冇事,否則班所謂的"電影人"就有本地案例
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:16 PM

我覺得班友成日嘈話侵版權, 但我覺得佢哋自己做就冇問題!
/ b' g. S9 T- s$ `根本bt係灰色地域!我覺得即係未係犯法!甘邊有理由入佢罪?
2 K1 ^- W5 G& q; M6 t/ \"老鼠愛大米"甘, 人人爭黎唱, 講真, 佢哋甘正義, 自動自覺交返版權費俾個原創者囉! 咪又係食個灰色地帶話國語版冇版權邊個鍾意就攞黎唱!
3 q0 T( Y4 K$ D$ x講開又講!首歌根本唔好聽(我唔識欣賞啦!)啲詞直接係好, 但太老土了!啲人而家老土當冧歌!
# R, ~# P. V) w  v) ~香港人有啲真係好似中咗毒甘!!!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-29 11:18 PM

美國咁講版權法都吾敢告BT,香港海關想扮勁想做世界法治一哥,輸.....輸硬.(除非又請人大釋法)
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:26 PM

重有就係, 佢而家唔係只係針對"公開"既人, 連攞黎睇既人都想造佢哋!
# _  O" E+ V( L7 P. K根本就荒天下之大謬!
: ~7 w# C5 J. ^4 ~4 D不知所謂!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:27 PM

重有就係, 佢而家唔係只係針對"公開"既人, 連攞黎睇既人都想造佢哋!: _% ~+ g/ G4 `3 |
根本就荒天下之大謬!
4 S" Q( ~# z0 a+ o8 y不知所謂!
作者: nkt1000    時間: 2005-4-29 11:36 PM

希望古惑天皇兄會冇事吧!!!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:47 PM

我希望佢冇事之餘,仲可以挫一挫班契弟既銳氣!
作者: 短毛    時間: 2005-4-29 11:48 PM

大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好似*講明*非牟利性*的侵犯版權也算是犯法.
+ E  G( [- S+ e, e0 c% J
+ n9 }5 `) |) E$ R" C佢放種子俾人下載, 明顯地有動機讓其他人下載.
8 v0 e( [6 Z; ?4 e! u# ]
. b$ A+ X  E1 Q4 g' }現在好似有人做錯事(非法盜版)但好多人都覺得沒有大不了.
, [8 G: x% O. V* X6 P/ }0 ~1 T# @
沒有意思偏幫那一方, 只希望大家可以討論一下.% `1 O) ^1 @" i0 f( T/ j
( S: s, K$ \: G/ R1 G
還有報紙中提到一百萬人下載某一部戲, 損失幾億元, 那個記者一定沒有讀經濟的, 沒有成本下需求當然大. 叫人$60買張飛都無咁多人睇啦~
作者: lijinwei    時間: 2005-4-29 11:51 PM

想罰錢, 但因他失業, 身家不多6 O( a6 j& I8 c
要坐牢, 但政府財赤, 還要出錢養一個失業的人
) Z9 Q% ?. v: ]; n$ Y; e罰少少錢, 守行為並留案底算了吧
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:58 PM

Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
5 d% L9 Z$ P- Y大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
" m$ v: ]3 {9 s3 Ovcd鋪通常一有新返既碟就對住大街大行黎播!
8 `$ E, {: L$ [$ @1 a然後啲人睇睇下入去買咗!
# O7 N$ e( p8 C4 D8 _既牟利又侵權!
9 O" V5 @$ B: q6 _6 Z( l8 m但亦大行其道.....
# v! U7 A* L: w" c- \9 H唉! 唔係話甘就唔代表bt係唔犯法定係點......5 Y$ f" r4 u/ N/ |
只係香港政府係多重標準!; S. C/ Z* p: L9 A* V
同埋bt冇先例, 始終係灰色地帶!
4 I9 p& Z' o0 p: f& R難聽到嘔既老鼠愛大米國語版俾啲人大搖大擺攞黎唱到臭晒又冇事.....( W* d3 n( e$ X& G
所以話, 香港政府都係仆街黎! 鍾意點就點!正仆街!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-30 12:08 AM

無得告 la~~~全世界都冇先例又冇法証參考,香港e班2打6法官點識判,陳嘉上點都惡吾過哥倫比亞或Dream Work掛,e家個個都想睇香港點死.
作者: 史艷文2    時間: 2005-4-30 01:00 AM

雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大), V; r/ q: X3 o% q" u
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
作者: F.king    時間: 2005-4-30 07:08 AM

Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:( B9 K( O) ~+ l" c9 t
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
* w5 Y; F: c  ]- q5 gI agree you points that it could be illegal
( J8 P% N' P* l3 R% x+ O4 Wbut that is still a "gray area"- S/ s5 \& g* @4 @2 F
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
% x7 S( ]% x: ?2 ^" _; N  @5 S: f& w' O& p
anyway, I want to say that is7 ^8 k4 w! c# l" E
who is supposed to be protected by laws6 F% p1 S. _' U$ K7 p& W
creators?5 [* w8 ~, p! f0 l% N3 G' u$ k
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
7 q; b1 ?# I5 n6 Ilet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.- K2 U* P5 Z6 K8 M
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those" N/ I' z( Z0 [. c
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
作者: junob04    時間: 2005-4-30 08:41 AM

Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
3 Y* C* z5 g- S# d* N其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
2 S0 C9 R1 a- W: g" Z# Q
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-30 09:58 AM

Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
! m2 l0 g/ M$ v6 j# O  L% o
* |9 }: c/ ?# D我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
: _) N/ e& ]& n0 ], I0 [9 r/ `5 r+ t% @唔係喎!
# {" n' x4 R. E! _) A/ F6 t6 E古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!6 k. {. @8 |2 R  Y8 m  }
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
* M1 ^8 E3 i$ E$ t+ d佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
1 L" X* @& D; p1 P; g就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
作者: 大家樂1234    時間: 2005-4-30 12:27 PM

希望佢無事
% H$ _5 y5 m% O5 h; E! `- @) V一有先例以後就死嚕
作者: jason williams    時間: 2005-4-30 12:36 PM

honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!5 J! p3 \  }6 B% _/ G- L: l
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
( g3 f0 \! A2 t( V; Bif so bad, dun download la, right?
3 C" _) X3 G  B4 D1 ei am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
& f6 b2 d8 Z) x1 b5 K6 @5 s2 sbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
5 Z; u7 B8 k% W, u0 sno need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la  o0 l* a4 n9 r1 Z8 ^. ]
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society4 n& E8 V# Z6 m9 Q
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema........." p0 Z2 ]1 w) p& W; G) Z
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!8 R6 E+ W$ j$ u9 i) B8 Y& C  |; T
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
作者: coolyiceman    時間: 2005-4-30 12:45 PM

罰款,冇留案底!
' a) u* R# R4 c! T9 ~佢又唔係殺人放火~~~* j9 u& q/ F+ |* T( c! ]! x7 A& Q
政府想比下馬威0的人~~
1 G" c: u9 a3 i! [錢就一定罰
2 @4 f  l# i4 a1 y. X未必要坐牢~~
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-30 01:31 PM

如果真係判佢有罪,
" {) t9 t0 F6 F# S, w7 j4 u唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
! ~. H5 @. u. Z' f- E7 C+ \& T佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?# S+ z! g& M$ j- |6 E( ]6 O8 q
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-30 04:17 PM

最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
作者: @bcc@    時間: 2005-4-30 05:39 PM

冇事!!!!!:cool:
作者: 小虫    時間: 2005-4-30 06:05 PM

法官班報法令要幾個保鑣護送佢返屋企^_^
作者: 老鬼X    時間: 2005-5-1 01:54 PM

無奈！一定搞死佢　
作者: markmk    時間: 2005-5-3 04:29 AM

一定坐牢......殺雞警猴...仲要大字標題咁話俾bt友聽..
作者: 人人人人人    時間: 2005-5-3 06:09 PM

唉...試問有幾多人未用過BT??政府係都要搞呢D咁o既野, 多少都感到無奈
作者: ilovefuckingyou    時間: 2005-5-4 01:47 AM

告得入我切!!!
作者: bonzi1983    時間: 2005-5-4 05:40 AM

I think 古惑天皇 is immoral, but not illegal....so he is not guilty according to the law
作者: karenmoe    時間: 2005-5-5 01:14 AM

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-5-4 01:47 AM:
0 j+ O, [) f- L) J' Z. U4 s# w告得入我切!!!
% d9 T0 B: o8 \! y9 r6 X我當初都估告唔入,
7 T! m6 x( `% A/ F" U- q不過我老豆提醒我,政府咁多大狀,
% E' W( X8 w: i' i真係告唔入就唔會告啦.....
作者: timho1027    時間: 2005-5-5 03:34 AM

海關做戲給美國電影業睇
, n. I0 Q# z7 D, x# w- m! s我希望佢冇事
作者: wolfevil    時間: 2005-5-5 10:08 PM

會有罪, 不過冇圖利and第一次, 最大可能會守行為
作者: 阿細    時間: 2005-5-5 10:54 PM

Originally posted by EV4886 at 2005-4-29 11:18 PM:
* N8 `" I2 Q5 h+ K5 V" F! c2 K美國咁講版權法都吾敢告BT,香港海關想扮勁想做世界法治一哥,輸.....輸硬.(除非又請人大釋法)
1 m# {  G- m. [1 p: s# h/ d因為美國人權大過天...所以唔敢告用bt d人ja...香港海關想扮勁...就唔見得係la..大家都用緊份內事...
作者: kwajc    時間: 2005-5-6 08:58 AM

香港海關想做一場大龍鳳俾電影業d人睇......講真香港有成幾廿萬人用bt download野....拉晒番去邊到有咁多錢養呢班人呀!!!



歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0