Board logo

標題: 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5] [打印本頁]
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 09:52 PM     標題: 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

我希望佢冇事!: n  L- C  g; ^+ D+ n' x" Y
佢都係方便各網友啫!
1 q5 ~0 j' x! S! S1 f之前我都有好多套戲響佢度download.
: c4 F% ?0 N6 o. p告得入就俾班仆街開到先例!+ L/ f/ c; z& }, z8 r. M
我覺得bt係一個灰色地帶, 唔可能好definite話係侵權或犯法!
& L: m% n, l: m! l4 M: k班友甘大回嚮甘狼都係感情因素居多!+ `$ R# }( J" O( C, |
純個人意見! 冇意開戰!亦不打算回應!
2 E8 M7 z7 m  X3 |
% f9 _: g; x7 e6 U  j' M[ Last edited by 樂壇渣Fit人 on 2005-4-30 at 11:32 AM ]
作者: tony    時間: 2005-4-29 09:58 PM

冇事!
作者: Ricky00893    時間: 2005-4-29 10:02 PM

罰款 $ 5000
作者: dogson009    時間: 2005-4-29 10:03 PM

其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
作者: goonejp    時間: 2005-4-29 10:47 PM

法律已死,班友强姦法律
' Y/ V1 P( C0 s/ M2 g% P+ ghttp://jm.g.free.fr/smileys/Xsmileys/iconsex----dog.gif& h* V( w& d: W0 g/ C: b
7 Y$ e' E# Q. `  ?* r) L
[ Last edited by goonejp on 2005-4-29 at 10:48 PM ]
作者: chickenboy    時間: 2005-4-29 11:03 PM

kill chicken scare monkey.....佢起碼都要守行為
作者: 692004    時間: 2005-4-29 11:09 PM

冇罪釋放
作者: bob64    時間: 2005-4-29 11:10 PM

打靶!!
作者: king_king    時間: 2005-4-29 11:14 PM

小弟覺得會冇事,但會好似m$,要公開道歉.
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-4-29 11:15 PM

最好就冇事,否則班所謂的"電影人"就有本地案例
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:16 PM

我覺得班友成日嘈話侵版權, 但我覺得佢哋自己做就冇問題!
' S  P' |  O8 D8 c根本bt係灰色地域!我覺得即係未係犯法!甘邊有理由入佢罪?
2 T( a6 F- w9 l7 ?! m! S"老鼠愛大米"甘, 人人爭黎唱, 講真, 佢哋甘正義, 自動自覺交返版權費俾個原創者囉! 咪又係食個灰色地帶話國語版冇版權邊個鍾意就攞黎唱!8 ^4 C9 m- G/ t1 b' ^, H
講開又講!首歌根本唔好聽(我唔識欣賞啦!)啲詞直接係好, 但太老土了!啲人而家老土當冧歌!9 p+ a7 \  V$ k8 p6 A; T- Z
香港人有啲真係好似中咗毒甘!!!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-29 11:18 PM

美國咁講版權法都吾敢告BT,香港海關想扮勁想做世界法治一哥,輸.....輸硬.(除非又請人大釋法)
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:26 PM

重有就係, 佢而家唔係只係針對"公開"既人, 連攞黎睇既人都想造佢哋!" k; [) d2 ?1 K8 ^% p8 [( E
根本就荒天下之大謬!
9 w2 h5 F6 k7 X  _不知所謂!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:27 PM

重有就係, 佢而家唔係只係針對"公開"既人, 連攞黎睇既人都想造佢哋!
9 D! l7 i* t5 D$ o/ ~根本就荒天下之大謬!* Q& ^% s+ f2 Z& z. Q8 A: O3 _
不知所謂!
作者: nkt1000    時間: 2005-4-29 11:36 PM

希望古惑天皇兄會冇事吧!!!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:47 PM

我希望佢冇事之餘,仲可以挫一挫班契弟既銳氣!
作者: 短毛    時間: 2005-4-29 11:48 PM

大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好似*講明*非牟利性*的侵犯版權也算是犯法.
* s$ ^- ~# I# t) G" \9 r, e: `
/ Q: t* H; d, @3 f! l8 D佢放種子俾人下載, 明顯地有動機讓其他人下載.( j1 t! ~+ c8 K6 {8 r: r, |9 D
8 {4 }* X) n3 l! m# u4 m, P7 l
現在好似有人做錯事(非法盜版)但好多人都覺得沒有大不了.9 I/ s; u. ^: `( v8 }: E2 `' s
5 K! I9 I6 m2 S* L; q( O/ ]8 z; h4 x
沒有意思偏幫那一方, 只希望大家可以討論一下.
8 b$ A+ F& B0 {1 W$ `6 |( ^2 R7 q5 P9 C+ l" X/ y4 p
還有報紙中提到一百萬人下載某一部戲, 損失幾億元, 那個記者一定沒有讀經濟的, 沒有成本下需求當然大. 叫人$60買張飛都無咁多人睇啦~
作者: lijinwei    時間: 2005-4-29 11:51 PM

想罰錢, 但因他失業, 身家不多
" H! E! R! P. P, X& z7 L要坐牢, 但政府財赤, 還要出錢養一個失業的人( h& ^% d2 _; W1 `9 K3 ^" G
罰少少錢, 守行為並留案底算了吧
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:58 PM

Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
% P! m" E0 i1 i$ b: ~% n大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
$ X. A) \* `3 {; P2 Xvcd鋪通常一有新返既碟就對住大街大行黎播!
0 ~* c+ j/ a) v' s1 s, D  v1 {然後啲人睇睇下入去買咗!: ~* t: l+ E3 @6 K7 T
既牟利又侵權!2 W; o( j- R) l
但亦大行其道.....1 B6 k7 L8 X& z
唉! 唔係話甘就唔代表bt係唔犯法定係點......1 s0 x! f  F' H& r
只係香港政府係多重標準!
% }- C# f4 T+ W" J, {同埋bt冇先例, 始終係灰色地帶!
0 }0 f7 t# {/ t; A& C6 Y; g難聽到嘔既老鼠愛大米國語版俾啲人大搖大擺攞黎唱到臭晒又冇事.....+ X9 @3 p7 W# r0 {2 }" ~% ]
所以話, 香港政府都係仆街黎! 鍾意點就點!正仆街!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-30 12:08 AM

無得告 la~~~全世界都冇先例又冇法証參考,香港e班2打6法官點識判,陳嘉上點都惡吾過哥倫比亞或Dream Work掛,e家個個都想睇香港點死.
作者: 史艷文2    時間: 2005-4-30 01:00 AM

雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)% b3 g( X3 `8 Q# ~! p  X9 ?' [  ?
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
作者: F.king    時間: 2005-4-30 07:08 AM

Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
* e1 A/ c: j1 ~9 j  A大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
( M+ }% I0 c9 nI agree you points that it could be illegal
( i6 z: u# S# ]2 ^but that is still a "gray area"! \, R& }6 ~3 X: p  Z
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
! O: b( t6 R0 [1 e, A6 O# }8 v9 m$ x4 }2 a( }$ |4 X8 N
anyway, I want to say that is
& A& n  r# @9 Q8 s7 Y$ C" S; B$ C" Jwho is supposed to be protected by laws8 T! X; d) L  J) Y4 A- {2 c# T
creators?
4 n% G7 P& t9 c. Wbut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market0 J8 X8 r' C7 K% _) v8 |8 V* K
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.' A) s3 P4 U2 P
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
* q" o$ \0 \1 a/ U; b) tWhy nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
作者: junob04    時間: 2005-4-30 08:41 AM

Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
9 G  `8 e: T/ c: a其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
$ J8 k5 x* n. B5 P( f; T* B8 a我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-30 09:58 AM

Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:3 i2 M! K  |: n2 Z8 S

2 ]' j5 F8 u% Z% w我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
' z. y/ n$ z4 }唔係喎!$ w- n- N( t; w3 C+ g/ m: Y, n2 m
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
4 y# G6 E. |8 f我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
& E2 s  p3 }- d7 F5 [7 i佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
4 \4 l; P) A- E9 J- C就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
作者: 大家樂1234    時間: 2005-4-30 12:27 PM

希望佢無事* Z+ Y3 v+ ~( T. A, g2 ?6 s: q6 `4 ^
一有先例以後就死嚕
作者: jason williams    時間: 2005-4-30 12:36 PM

honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!" `* d: x6 _! V! V& n
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
0 V8 s  W2 {  M5 {7 S  rif so bad, dun download la, right?
* ?4 I7 j( d! d; _' }; ]2 ji am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
4 G; T4 t% s5 |4 a" }) bbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
& d: f- \4 ?1 ]! S* E! S/ k1 x; K3 ano need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
4 E/ o( n% K1 z- Wso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society  i7 |8 h& i* I7 H: b# |( g& K1 e
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
8 i1 J$ `: j  Y% U& e* v0 jwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
2 i! T# |4 p: C: Bso, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
作者: coolyiceman    時間: 2005-4-30 12:45 PM

罰款,冇留案底!, v% M, |, u( Q; ~- e+ e/ E4 E. s
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~% u9 e  D7 J" D7 |0 V9 D3 \) O; H  h
政府想比下馬威0的人~~  s9 y) k3 F: {& ~! t
錢就一定罰
9 L3 t8 G: ]& z  \0 P未必要坐牢~~
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-30 01:31 PM

如果真係判佢有罪,/ Y% x. j& i# g# D' `9 t" s
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
0 E, m9 a: b3 V) g. {佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?" R6 ^+ ]- h! l: |
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-30 04:17 PM

最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
作者: @bcc@    時間: 2005-4-30 05:39 PM

冇事!!!!!:cool:
作者: 小虫    時間: 2005-4-30 06:05 PM

法官班報法令要幾個保鑣護送佢返屋企^_^
作者: 老鬼X    時間: 2005-5-1 01:54 PM

無奈！一定搞死佢　
作者: markmk    時間: 2005-5-3 04:29 AM

一定坐牢......殺雞警猴...仲要大字標題咁話俾bt友聽..
作者: 人人人人人    時間: 2005-5-3 06:09 PM

唉...試問有幾多人未用過BT??政府係都要搞呢D咁o既野, 多少都感到無奈
作者: ilovefuckingyou    時間: 2005-5-4 01:47 AM

告得入我切!!!
作者: bonzi1983    時間: 2005-5-4 05:40 AM

I think 古惑天皇 is immoral, but not illegal....so he is not guilty according to the law
作者: karenmoe    時間: 2005-5-5 01:14 AM

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-5-4 01:47 AM:! d! E9 j5 Z' a0 v: X9 U9 e
告得入我切!!!
0 m# a" h7 e7 T9 p) H我當初都估告唔入,
* Q' @% c) n- Y0 u6 G0 J. X2 T( S不過我老豆提醒我,政府咁多大狀,# T8 p( C: {( Z+ [% @; V3 V; n
真係告唔入就唔會告啦.....
作者: timho1027    時間: 2005-5-5 03:34 AM

海關做戲給美國電影業睇+ C' X$ p, @. k, r0 _6 C% V
我希望佢冇事
作者: wolfevil    時間: 2005-5-5 10:08 PM

會有罪, 不過冇圖利and第一次, 最大可能會守行為
作者: 阿細    時間: 2005-5-5 10:54 PM

Originally posted by EV4886 at 2005-4-29 11:18 PM:# L. H+ b6 Z# x4 P8 H
美國咁講版權法都吾敢告BT,香港海關想扮勁想做世界法治一哥,輸.....輸硬.(除非又請人大釋法)
6 e7 J. Y+ K* |- R9 R4 ]/ s1 C% [
因為美國人權大過天...所以唔敢告用bt d人ja...香港海關想扮勁...就唔見得係la..大家都用緊份內事...
作者: kwajc    時間: 2005-5-6 08:58 AM

香港海關想做一場大龍鳳俾電影業d人睇......講真香港有成幾廿萬人用bt download野....拉晒番去邊到有咁多錢養呢班人呀!!!



歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0