Board logo

標題: 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5] [打印本頁]
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 09:52 PM     標題: 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

我希望佢冇事!
3 E9 y3 i* J5 ]. }2 r2 v! L" b佢都係方便各網友啫!4 k* D" S) h% Z
之前我都有好多套戲響佢度download.3 a; y$ A$ `( S5 y- D* T1 P
告得入就俾班仆街開到先例!* @$ T% ^8 }" n0 i& X
我覺得bt係一個灰色地帶, 唔可能好definite話係侵權或犯法!
. Y0 H% w9 i* l; m( H班友甘大回嚮甘狼都係感情因素居多!' U& {5 y8 h1 V. ~! q
純個人意見! 冇意開戰!亦不打算回應!  \- r; g! k) t" F  u. e
$ R. G+ b3 S) v! u. ~+ N) O- [
[ Last edited by 樂壇渣Fit人 on 2005-4-30 at 11:32 AM ]
作者: tony    時間: 2005-4-29 09:58 PM

冇事!
作者: Ricky00893    時間: 2005-4-29 10:02 PM

罰款 $ 5000
作者: dogson009    時間: 2005-4-29 10:03 PM

其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
作者: goonejp    時間: 2005-4-29 10:47 PM

法律已死,班友强姦法律
2 d0 f" a. i6 m& |% `http://jm.g.free.fr/smileys/Xsmileys/iconsex----dog.gif1 C# i) F& @0 R+ D  U4 H; a

7 }/ l0 L( {3 I% h5 Z[ Last edited by goonejp on 2005-4-29 at 10:48 PM ]
作者: chickenboy    時間: 2005-4-29 11:03 PM

kill chicken scare monkey.....佢起碼都要守行為
作者: 692004    時間: 2005-4-29 11:09 PM

冇罪釋放
作者: bob64    時間: 2005-4-29 11:10 PM

打靶!!
作者: king_king    時間: 2005-4-29 11:14 PM

小弟覺得會冇事,但會好似m$,要公開道歉.
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-4-29 11:15 PM

最好就冇事,否則班所謂的"電影人"就有本地案例
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:16 PM

我覺得班友成日嘈話侵版權, 但我覺得佢哋自己做就冇問題!
' T# V3 t" Y7 s根本bt係灰色地域!我覺得即係未係犯法!甘邊有理由入佢罪?) R" f  C% H) j  b
"老鼠愛大米"甘, 人人爭黎唱, 講真, 佢哋甘正義, 自動自覺交返版權費俾個原創者囉! 咪又係食個灰色地帶話國語版冇版權邊個鍾意就攞黎唱!6 i0 o# z& K- ~' @0 i) e
講開又講!首歌根本唔好聽(我唔識欣賞啦!)啲詞直接係好, 但太老土了!啲人而家老土當冧歌!
' s- w% h+ b4 k% g$ ]! m香港人有啲真係好似中咗毒甘!!!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-29 11:18 PM

美國咁講版權法都吾敢告BT,香港海關想扮勁想做世界法治一哥,輸.....輸硬.(除非又請人大釋法)
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:26 PM

重有就係, 佢而家唔係只係針對"公開"既人, 連攞黎睇既人都想造佢哋!6 ], Y  t! W* M4 J3 y2 Q
根本就荒天下之大謬!. U0 Z( s% m# S2 j& c4 U( W* o
不知所謂!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:27 PM

重有就係, 佢而家唔係只係針對"公開"既人, 連攞黎睇既人都想造佢哋!6 g7 p5 @. a$ J5 \) k# b
根本就荒天下之大謬!
* _6 f8 P7 n4 l, B' T不知所謂!
作者: nkt1000    時間: 2005-4-29 11:36 PM

希望古惑天皇兄會冇事吧!!!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:47 PM

我希望佢冇事之餘,仲可以挫一挫班契弟既銳氣!
作者: 短毛    時間: 2005-4-29 11:48 PM

大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好似*講明*非牟利性*的侵犯版權也算是犯法.* @7 C2 E8 x6 ^4 S8 S- a0 n; @

; K8 {6 k4 h. a# n) g佢放種子俾人下載, 明顯地有動機讓其他人下載.- t; `, Q! I5 \& _$ j! s
# j: |( g5 s$ a3 J/ T& |
現在好似有人做錯事(非法盜版)但好多人都覺得沒有大不了.
3 A" ]. S! H) J9 S* H# o" q1 O/ ^: _+ v; J' o
沒有意思偏幫那一方, 只希望大家可以討論一下.1 H' d7 c& _5 L( D; J* l$ h: B

' ]& D+ t# a$ O+ ~' ~5 Z" i; x還有報紙中提到一百萬人下載某一部戲, 損失幾億元, 那個記者一定沒有讀經濟的, 沒有成本下需求當然大. 叫人$60買張飛都無咁多人睇啦~
作者: lijinwei    時間: 2005-4-29 11:51 PM

想罰錢, 但因他失業, 身家不多
! V, b  e! K0 W& _要坐牢, 但政府財赤, 還要出錢養一個失業的人! ]% y. N! V; b3 |  K
罰少少錢, 守行為並留案底算了吧
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:58 PM

Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
+ w' s' N' M* _% Z; s3 ^9 c大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
( J+ a$ r, \; ~4 A2 \
vcd鋪通常一有新返既碟就對住大街大行黎播!
( j  X! l. }8 \1 }, G! O4 E然後啲人睇睇下入去買咗!: B0 I( h3 A7 a# \6 i3 e  A! g# B
既牟利又侵權!
, P" Z! i7 z! D6 q但亦大行其道.....
# I0 h, z4 n3 x4 H# V6 W6 Z唉! 唔係話甘就唔代表bt係唔犯法定係點......4 b, j/ o9 z9 ?
只係香港政府係多重標準!
$ ^& ~4 w3 L2 s$ J( o; J) O0 k& j同埋bt冇先例, 始終係灰色地帶!
! {* k( Z" w5 y" ?7 f8 l難聽到嘔既老鼠愛大米國語版俾啲人大搖大擺攞黎唱到臭晒又冇事.....* B- M3 u# I/ J5 `6 `# G9 s; L
所以話, 香港政府都係仆街黎! 鍾意點就點!正仆街!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-30 12:08 AM

無得告 la~~~全世界都冇先例又冇法証參考,香港e班2打6法官點識判,陳嘉上點都惡吾過哥倫比亞或Dream Work掛,e家個個都想睇香港點死.
作者: 史艷文2    時間: 2005-4-30 01:00 AM

雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)7 G0 d2 E3 A) D8 a9 G- {- s* h
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
作者: F.king    時間: 2005-4-30 07:08 AM

Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:/ p; _* ?# B3 b8 b( L9 w
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
% P: Z3 z  V+ g+ O6 {- J0 u# q3 CI agree you points that it could be illegal
+ o+ W5 n! W" [but that is still a "gray area"
) V) N& C" \+ C1 p  X( u8 z$ p& R! ]whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair) J6 l4 U" R+ s4 t. i( C5 C; `- t
6 n+ y; Z: w6 F6 \4 y; p- y& X  ]$ ?
anyway, I want to say that is9 p* T$ B0 d7 D8 \, F$ J# w
who is supposed to be protected by laws
6 x4 n/ y6 Y( J3 b6 kcreators?% D) j2 P. k3 E3 G5 B3 X
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
, @" [' X; k& Y7 h* R2 mlet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
+ L- h* B0 j1 z" D# [when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
" k7 D& g9 c6 R- ?6 kWhy nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
作者: junob04    時間: 2005-4-30 08:41 AM

Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
# K1 {4 G8 y1 D% q1 _+ E. `其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
, y- \2 V9 }- G- v* |我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-30 09:58 AM

Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
  A, k$ F; {8 K+ L
: `. E: a/ ~9 V+ I$ [; G我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
% }2 h* s6 h- A! q& l
唔係喎!
4 d! I- w( p. b, E  s( D古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
( W: X$ l, N9 `" z  J我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
  V* b( ^& ~& O% O3 F佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
- J' b; f& v: F! {, J! ~% r" m. Q就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
作者: 大家樂1234    時間: 2005-4-30 12:27 PM

希望佢無事
/ C# \* a/ e+ G- N/ B一有先例以後就死嚕
作者: jason williams    時間: 2005-4-30 12:36 PM

honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!* N' r% ]8 C5 F( t" @# }
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......+ |5 F* v) p: D: @. Z  `( J# a( V
if so bad, dun download la, right?
% t) X9 t) M8 O2 I6 {i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
4 R( Y, R; Y2 C$ |5 mbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
! w8 {, S' B7 Rno need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la0 n1 R* ~- ?* F# h, [
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society2 d+ K# o0 _. |! @8 g; K( I
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
5 L, z. b- d( {2 Y" swhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!7 j" S; Z' h  a
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
作者: coolyiceman    時間: 2005-4-30 12:45 PM

罰款,冇留案底!
9 R* _. u7 s' q' X) G& ~佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
3 T5 x% S$ J& u. J2 ~+ w政府想比下馬威0的人~~
6 f2 N1 }' `3 R- j+ G, T錢就一定罰
1 b% o5 H& ]/ o* Y未必要坐牢~~
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-30 01:31 PM

如果真係判佢有罪,9 R7 k8 Y5 V, k/ x1 @7 B
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
2 i( ]" M% W$ f' B* M3 R/ `7 p" f佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?  \" _2 e$ \; L) R- E6 q, B* y
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-30 04:17 PM

最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
作者: @bcc@    時間: 2005-4-30 05:39 PM

冇事!!!!!:cool:
作者: 小虫    時間: 2005-4-30 06:05 PM

法官班報法令要幾個保鑣護送佢返屋企^_^
作者: 老鬼X    時間: 2005-5-1 01:54 PM

無奈！一定搞死佢　
作者: markmk    時間: 2005-5-3 04:29 AM

一定坐牢......殺雞警猴...仲要大字標題咁話俾bt友聽..
作者: 人人人人人    時間: 2005-5-3 06:09 PM

唉...試問有幾多人未用過BT??政府係都要搞呢D咁o既野, 多少都感到無奈
作者: ilovefuckingyou    時間: 2005-5-4 01:47 AM

告得入我切!!!
作者: bonzi1983    時間: 2005-5-4 05:40 AM

I think 古惑天皇 is immoral, but not illegal....so he is not guilty according to the law
作者: karenmoe    時間: 2005-5-5 01:14 AM

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-5-4 01:47 AM:& U) t' C2 |- H4 l6 J
告得入我切!!!
" [' O! q  {+ `4 u4 k  N
我當初都估告唔入,
+ N5 Q: M  c4 O" `$ K3 N不過我老豆提醒我,政府咁多大狀,
0 m9 H' ~3 [, X, Y真係告唔入就唔會告啦.....
作者: timho1027    時間: 2005-5-5 03:34 AM

海關做戲給美國電影業睇
0 Q( C5 z, e* K; \/ Y0 @我希望佢冇事
作者: wolfevil    時間: 2005-5-5 10:08 PM

會有罪, 不過冇圖利and第一次, 最大可能會守行為
作者: 阿細    時間: 2005-5-5 10:54 PM

Originally posted by EV4886 at 2005-4-29 11:18 PM:
' l2 g+ M/ b$ j  a9 S美國咁講版權法都吾敢告BT,香港海關想扮勁想做世界法治一哥,輸.....輸硬.(除非又請人大釋法)
8 {9 S) D) y* K7 y3 s6 {1 @5 R
因為美國人權大過天...所以唔敢告用bt d人ja...香港海關想扮勁...就唔見得係la..大家都用緊份內事...
作者: kwajc    時間: 2005-5-6 08:58 AM

香港海關想做一場大龍鳳俾電影業d人睇......講真香港有成幾廿萬人用bt download野....拉晒番去邊到有咁多錢養呢班人呀!!!



歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0