Board logo

標題: 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5] [打印本頁]
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 09:52 PM     標題: 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

我希望佢冇事!
6 s2 t& {) S: ?5 S佢都係方便各網友啫!7 Z/ y4 p' b4 d% d. @: s! ^
之前我都有好多套戲響佢度download.- U% F* f4 `" S
告得入就俾班仆街開到先例!0 |9 U4 h) R: Z1 L, ]4 u4 [1 V
我覺得bt係一個灰色地帶, 唔可能好definite話係侵權或犯法!) m9 s" F& e" {/ o! p' {3 |- T
班友甘大回嚮甘狼都係感情因素居多!/ f* D5 S' r0 Y! X
純個人意見! 冇意開戰!亦不打算回應!
1 o' }9 g2 x2 f9 f4 n# G% |6 o, z3 ]2 X4 y
[ Last edited by 樂壇渣Fit人 on 2005-4-30 at 11:32 AM ]
作者: tony    時間: 2005-4-29 09:58 PM

冇事!
作者: Ricky00893    時間: 2005-4-29 10:02 PM

罰款 $ 5000
作者: dogson009    時間: 2005-4-29 10:03 PM

其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
作者: goonejp    時間: 2005-4-29 10:47 PM

法律已死,班友强姦法律 , q1 f6 l) m$ V+ u8 Y# \) |
http://jm.g.free.fr/smileys/Xsmileys/iconsex----dog.gif
7 a, G* y+ r; X* N/ w* Y7 |' |3 Q( D: ]$ h* j: K' `# f2 z: D, o
[ Last edited by goonejp on 2005-4-29 at 10:48 PM ]
作者: chickenboy    時間: 2005-4-29 11:03 PM

kill chicken scare monkey.....佢起碼都要守行為
作者: 692004    時間: 2005-4-29 11:09 PM

冇罪釋放
作者: bob64    時間: 2005-4-29 11:10 PM

打靶!!
作者: king_king    時間: 2005-4-29 11:14 PM

小弟覺得會冇事,但會好似m$,要公開道歉.
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-4-29 11:15 PM

最好就冇事,否則班所謂的"電影人"就有本地案例
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:16 PM

我覺得班友成日嘈話侵版權, 但我覺得佢哋自己做就冇問題!
5 |$ y( g( S. W& `  E0 h* z根本bt係灰色地域!我覺得即係未係犯法!甘邊有理由入佢罪?
1 f* B& M$ C, ]2 l6 q! W"老鼠愛大米"甘, 人人爭黎唱, 講真, 佢哋甘正義, 自動自覺交返版權費俾個原創者囉! 咪又係食個灰色地帶話國語版冇版權邊個鍾意就攞黎唱!- c  W- L9 a( f% z0 p
講開又講!首歌根本唔好聽(我唔識欣賞啦!)啲詞直接係好, 但太老土了!啲人而家老土當冧歌!
3 ]9 j8 f+ ~! o( T: A; a7 a香港人有啲真係好似中咗毒甘!!!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-29 11:18 PM

美國咁講版權法都吾敢告BT,香港海關想扮勁想做世界法治一哥,輸.....輸硬.(除非又請人大釋法)
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:26 PM

重有就係, 佢而家唔係只係針對"公開"既人, 連攞黎睇既人都想造佢哋!
+ p' I$ U: _) H  B) R6 U% Z根本就荒天下之大謬!' d' ]. o5 I$ J% I
不知所謂!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:27 PM

重有就係, 佢而家唔係只係針對"公開"既人, 連攞黎睇既人都想造佢哋!
& n0 S% B. j  P( D9 o根本就荒天下之大謬!5 @! V. n3 q& _- w# |
不知所謂!
作者: nkt1000    時間: 2005-4-29 11:36 PM

希望古惑天皇兄會冇事吧!!!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:47 PM

我希望佢冇事之餘,仲可以挫一挫班契弟既銳氣!
作者: 短毛    時間: 2005-4-29 11:48 PM

大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好似*講明*非牟利性*的侵犯版權也算是犯法.
+ F! x6 C" M$ E* ]4 V- F& ~
& f. i7 g( R0 d/ r# {7 ?2 i佢放種子俾人下載, 明顯地有動機讓其他人下載.' F. _' T9 l! o* q

# R( S) N! J4 z4 ~. R現在好似有人做錯事(非法盜版)但好多人都覺得沒有大不了.
. U/ j! U; d$ T8 K4 K' ^  M% k* u. [4 a
沒有意思偏幫那一方, 只希望大家可以討論一下.
9 M% ]) W- C% g8 g0 Z* h6 j3 @4 R8 W6 K# i7 f0 ~5 b1 ~
還有報紙中提到一百萬人下載某一部戲, 損失幾億元, 那個記者一定沒有讀經濟的, 沒有成本下需求當然大. 叫人$60買張飛都無咁多人睇啦~
作者: lijinwei    時間: 2005-4-29 11:51 PM

想罰錢, 但因他失業, 身家不多
4 y1 X! D) f+ ~! f8 I! J: H! g要坐牢, 但政府財赤, 還要出錢養一個失業的人
0 |7 i7 A6 @2 S. t5 O+ K罰少少錢, 守行為並留案底算了吧
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:58 PM

Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:1 e2 l/ _. [! v4 t/ {" z$ r" u, r" P
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
% u7 S$ G+ N& K3 _4 o7 w2 j
vcd鋪通常一有新返既碟就對住大街大行黎播! 2 i8 `% i# u: j: w- w2 @; \
然後啲人睇睇下入去買咗!7 x4 M. P8 `, T* F, }- R
既牟利又侵權!3 I/ W- W$ y3 r% Q# Q% G, g9 K
但亦大行其道.....
) V* N& O7 h; E( X. T& y唉! 唔係話甘就唔代表bt係唔犯法定係點......* x* Q$ z4 Q2 Z7 G/ b+ h
只係香港政府係多重標準!
3 s0 N0 D4 g- P& O9 e: T. G9 S同埋bt冇先例, 始終係灰色地帶!, d3 k1 f. M7 U8 z
難聽到嘔既老鼠愛大米國語版俾啲人大搖大擺攞黎唱到臭晒又冇事.....
  I% b- |, _9 S" I1 L- V所以話, 香港政府都係仆街黎! 鍾意點就點!正仆街!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-30 12:08 AM

無得告 la~~~全世界都冇先例又冇法証參考,香港e班2打6法官點識判,陳嘉上點都惡吾過哥倫比亞或Dream Work掛,e家個個都想睇香港點死.
作者: 史艷文2    時間: 2005-4-30 01:00 AM

雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
8 ?4 n" J9 i+ h但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
作者: F.king    時間: 2005-4-30 07:08 AM

Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:* X* n3 t0 X# c% L- K0 Z
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
6 y# E# W) Q. \8 N. PI agree you points that it could be illegal) |" k+ |& y$ O5 u. D2 P& c
but that is still a "gray area"' t% d+ O1 W9 ?" A- p9 v. D
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
! {7 u% f. U5 Z0 t! D
1 s( [2 M) K+ M8 H6 A1 hanyway, I want to say that is" w% [6 X0 g2 q2 ?9 v* j/ I
who is supposed to be protected by laws
/ B- ~* m- X6 u8 J/ Gcreators?
9 C" v3 H4 U  Q3 Zbut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market# C9 \9 {- u0 s, \
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.0 L  c1 Z- e# |: u
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those, W! w! v* m' g  @+ K$ @
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
作者: junob04    時間: 2005-4-30 08:41 AM

Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:) ?- m* L' \) O" l4 }* h0 N
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
  j" b# r- t& b我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-30 09:58 AM

Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:7 e! s. h/ Y/ x/ P8 w8 g8 z* h

1 \# J  K3 \3 _1 I2 z) g; D5 l- v% r我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
) }6 G& X; i: W/ T. S6 h, ]0 T唔係喎!
- S' r  c$ W- }4 b, m) l6 o! x8 q( x古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!# t  e' ~3 O. C7 {1 o+ Y
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
6 Z9 v3 @) F+ Q9 a佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
3 v* E/ `4 Q; Q- R  x9 i就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
作者: 大家樂1234    時間: 2005-4-30 12:27 PM

希望佢無事
# U9 f) j1 R' r+ m一有先例以後就死嚕
作者: jason williams    時間: 2005-4-30 12:36 PM

honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
% L. x7 x, ~7 vdun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
- |6 Y& x2 z4 w7 B6 r1 |if so bad, dun download la, right?+ I5 T2 \. K$ v
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
  |. t/ B" R# D% A% A( h5 d. w* tbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct. p' y+ d) i2 q
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
/ o% S/ l& M6 I: ~  g% dso what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society5 R6 f  u1 y: I, |
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
6 X; R6 I$ d2 F5 R+ Rwhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
1 j7 v& }/ a3 B& J+ |so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
作者: coolyiceman    時間: 2005-4-30 12:45 PM

罰款,冇留案底!: F- d, O: q6 V: F! q4 c/ N) ?) ^
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~0 {; ^# |/ f- [2 H( U' a
政府想比下馬威0的人~~
  F) W( e/ K2 m, C3 l& @( f7 ^0 k錢就一定罰- b8 {, ^3 @% v' f  n4 U% x
未必要坐牢~~
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-30 01:31 PM

如果真係判佢有罪,1 W5 a- N' y+ _' g8 P
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
. A) V& }6 f/ ~( k. o佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
. ^8 P- p. s/ O& j! L2 f6 q到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-30 04:17 PM

最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
作者: @bcc@    時間: 2005-4-30 05:39 PM

冇事!!!!!:cool:
作者: 小虫    時間: 2005-4-30 06:05 PM

法官班報法令要幾個保鑣護送佢返屋企^_^
作者: 老鬼X    時間: 2005-5-1 01:54 PM

無奈！一定搞死佢　
作者: markmk    時間: 2005-5-3 04:29 AM

一定坐牢......殺雞警猴...仲要大字標題咁話俾bt友聽..
作者: 人人人人人    時間: 2005-5-3 06:09 PM

唉...試問有幾多人未用過BT??政府係都要搞呢D咁o既野, 多少都感到無奈
作者: ilovefuckingyou    時間: 2005-5-4 01:47 AM

告得入我切!!!
作者: bonzi1983    時間: 2005-5-4 05:40 AM

I think 古惑天皇 is immoral, but not illegal....so he is not guilty according to the law
作者: karenmoe    時間: 2005-5-5 01:14 AM

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-5-4 01:47 AM:) ], c( T; _) y$ v
告得入我切!!!
7 K% R" d! d! L) _4 r) c9 A5 h我當初都估告唔入,
+ g- B, d0 P( c, m$ _) t( N不過我老豆提醒我,政府咁多大狀,9 \9 t- o: m8 d* ]' x9 q; B
真係告唔入就唔會告啦.....
作者: timho1027    時間: 2005-5-5 03:34 AM

海關做戲給美國電影業睇; w0 G1 f: d9 d7 A5 @; C- F, c
我希望佢冇事
作者: wolfevil    時間: 2005-5-5 10:08 PM

會有罪, 不過冇圖利and第一次, 最大可能會守行為
作者: 阿細    時間: 2005-5-5 10:54 PM

Originally posted by EV4886 at 2005-4-29 11:18 PM:( F& j4 K1 E; d8 o: r$ T5 ^
美國咁講版權法都吾敢告BT,香港海關想扮勁想做世界法治一哥,輸.....輸硬.(除非又請人大釋法)
/ m& C' _; ]* Y% ?' H因為美國人權大過天...所以唔敢告用bt d人ja...香港海關想扮勁...就唔見得係la..大家都用緊份內事...
作者: kwajc    時間: 2005-5-6 08:58 AM

香港海關想做一場大龍鳳俾電影業d人睇......講真香港有成幾廿萬人用bt download野....拉晒番去邊到有咁多錢養呢班人呀!!!



歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0