Board logo

標題: 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5] [打印本頁]
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 09:52 PM     標題: 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

我希望佢冇事!
8 W0 C2 `  A3 W7 J& L$ r佢都係方便各網友啫!
) X+ j0 R% |: J) H之前我都有好多套戲響佢度download.
7 E/ u) Y1 `7 q% ]) Z告得入就俾班仆街開到先例!
/ G1 A( `- f( E0 I3 K我覺得bt係一個灰色地帶, 唔可能好definite話係侵權或犯法!5 p, P# ~( V+ b
班友甘大回嚮甘狼都係感情因素居多!
( a/ N. k) D! y純個人意見! 冇意開戰!亦不打算回應!
7 z4 G: Z, g! ~$ N8 e: v. P; S
* O$ d" W/ D2 V$ t; t[ Last edited by 樂壇渣Fit人 on 2005-4-30 at 11:32 AM ]
作者: tony    時間: 2005-4-29 09:58 PM

冇事!
作者: Ricky00893    時間: 2005-4-29 10:02 PM

罰款 $ 5000
作者: dogson009    時間: 2005-4-29 10:03 PM

其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
作者: goonejp    時間: 2005-4-29 10:47 PM

法律已死,班友强姦法律
2 n1 w3 r* I5 U0 w2 m! C. w* F0 Jhttp://jm.g.free.fr/smileys/Xsmileys/iconsex----dog.gif
6 g" t- w/ ?7 n. x( o
  ~; F# l1 e/ i[ Last edited by goonejp on 2005-4-29 at 10:48 PM ]
作者: chickenboy    時間: 2005-4-29 11:03 PM

kill chicken scare monkey.....佢起碼都要守行為
作者: 692004    時間: 2005-4-29 11:09 PM

冇罪釋放
作者: bob64    時間: 2005-4-29 11:10 PM

打靶!!
作者: king_king    時間: 2005-4-29 11:14 PM

小弟覺得會冇事,但會好似m$,要公開道歉.
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-4-29 11:15 PM

最好就冇事,否則班所謂的"電影人"就有本地案例
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:16 PM

我覺得班友成日嘈話侵版權, 但我覺得佢哋自己做就冇問題!
- o: \* p: N5 G, R# e9 b8 X根本bt係灰色地域!我覺得即係未係犯法!甘邊有理由入佢罪?
4 I* ?( Q6 \1 n"老鼠愛大米"甘, 人人爭黎唱, 講真, 佢哋甘正義, 自動自覺交返版權費俾個原創者囉! 咪又係食個灰色地帶話國語版冇版權邊個鍾意就攞黎唱!  C2 h5 m; c' Y8 l& O( I
講開又講!首歌根本唔好聽(我唔識欣賞啦!)啲詞直接係好, 但太老土了!啲人而家老土當冧歌!
# ~3 x) ^: u/ i- j+ W2 \* Z香港人有啲真係好似中咗毒甘!!!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-29 11:18 PM

美國咁講版權法都吾敢告BT,香港海關想扮勁想做世界法治一哥,輸.....輸硬.(除非又請人大釋法)
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:26 PM

重有就係, 佢而家唔係只係針對"公開"既人, 連攞黎睇既人都想造佢哋!5 e3 B1 |: s9 e7 R+ Q) ?- u
根本就荒天下之大謬!+ v, m, [: s0 e  }5 ~. x* q
不知所謂!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:27 PM

重有就係, 佢而家唔係只係針對"公開"既人, 連攞黎睇既人都想造佢哋!
. |+ C* b' b* F/ G根本就荒天下之大謬!* I! V# [/ }8 k1 ?' f
不知所謂!
作者: nkt1000    時間: 2005-4-29 11:36 PM

希望古惑天皇兄會冇事吧!!!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:47 PM

我希望佢冇事之餘,仲可以挫一挫班契弟既銳氣!
作者: 短毛    時間: 2005-4-29 11:48 PM

大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好似*講明*非牟利性*的侵犯版權也算是犯法.
7 L4 k- d; T8 U5 z6 P( y* W( R- r# ]7 P* y: s/ B
佢放種子俾人下載, 明顯地有動機讓其他人下載.
, X  O, I5 I8 V+ m  A
6 z5 f) F, J5 i1 x. I) p9 q* T現在好似有人做錯事(非法盜版)但好多人都覺得沒有大不了.
9 p) `  z# \) j/ J
; h# }* R7 q2 t2 R. p沒有意思偏幫那一方, 只希望大家可以討論一下.
+ [  |3 }) n9 r$ e% P5 D8 W% w: f" P" I, x* X
還有報紙中提到一百萬人下載某一部戲, 損失幾億元, 那個記者一定沒有讀經濟的, 沒有成本下需求當然大. 叫人$60買張飛都無咁多人睇啦~
作者: lijinwei    時間: 2005-4-29 11:51 PM

想罰錢, 但因他失業, 身家不多2 @- y* o  Y$ J  B# w0 s
要坐牢, 但政府財赤, 還要出錢養一個失業的人" n' Q8 K8 _+ y' F) V9 [" N
罰少少錢, 守行為並留案底算了吧
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-29 11:58 PM

Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:# d. ]& p- r- o- ]. D! w
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
! Z5 w$ o* `3 s' b) Avcd鋪通常一有新返既碟就對住大街大行黎播!   i5 f+ U, d- j! D2 R! ^6 [
然後啲人睇睇下入去買咗!
* B' N) B$ h( c  }& l' X4 r既牟利又侵權!
1 m$ s, c% P' f6 E# C$ f但亦大行其道.....
* o2 j/ l% q( w+ Z" X, C. ]唉! 唔係話甘就唔代表bt係唔犯法定係點......
) m8 E2 T8 E% p$ |: z- E7 B只係香港政府係多重標準!
) Q( h$ U! G$ ~1 n" r同埋bt冇先例, 始終係灰色地帶!
, }: K; t4 h" V& l  I難聽到嘔既老鼠愛大米國語版俾啲人大搖大擺攞黎唱到臭晒又冇事.....
  @4 u6 {. \. r; W所以話, 香港政府都係仆街黎! 鍾意點就點!正仆街!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-30 12:08 AM

無得告 la~~~全世界都冇先例又冇法証參考,香港e班2打6法官點識判,陳嘉上點都惡吾過哥倫比亞或Dream Work掛,e家個個都想睇香港點死.
作者: 史艷文2    時間: 2005-4-30 01:00 AM

雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)& S, t7 Z, |& @. X
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
作者: F.king    時間: 2005-4-30 07:08 AM

Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
8 t$ Y; i% k7 o8 i% p" |大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
7 o2 d# l! ]2 GI agree you points that it could be illegal
& n4 y6 W6 x- u, m) ^but that is still a "gray area"5 s) k0 p; [7 z. W* {$ R' z% P
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair1 g# }) K  }2 y1 P, I% L+ _

* K/ f; [# ~/ Wanyway, I want to say that is
( {& {) b9 g6 S' Z0 t; ewho is supposed to be protected by laws
. F) D6 \2 N* X- rcreators?# J( H- j2 w7 L- O: Z, p, h
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
* U( r# b4 g( u& I5 ]( ylet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
( U( N+ J* r! {. A$ B% n3 T* \when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
) t; _3 @, C9 T; A$ B: h" I* nWhy nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
作者: junob04    時間: 2005-4-30 08:41 AM

Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
' \; i( Y/ y) |, A% d' y其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
6 H8 z2 e- ^! B& I- E
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-30 09:58 AM

Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:0 R$ j- \4 ]& c8 D1 Z
4 J6 C( @: D2 C- }+ H; V- g. k
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
! t! p5 k  j% x
唔係喎!
; `3 A" v8 f* w" N2 k3 I  A$ \* o古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
  o- A+ C& _2 S我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
; s. x5 @, \, e: ^佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!* g/ [1 X7 m- O
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
作者: 大家樂1234    時間: 2005-4-30 12:27 PM

希望佢無事
5 F: k0 K- n9 j4 [3 @3 O' w一有先例以後就死嚕
作者: jason williams    時間: 2005-4-30 12:36 PM

honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!& T; ]. M7 f& p6 G# w
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......! W: _( i. ?0 @8 T. r% o
if so bad, dun download la, right?
( u# c1 x8 }  t! L4 Z. xi am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^/ K: ~; [* p, W1 S" M( M
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct$ h) z3 ]. ?, W  {- L+ {
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la! i2 ]7 N, H3 l4 p; {) }% L7 n
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
. y% U" P# U6 K$ j* Tusing bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........( i; f, H0 U, E% W
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
1 }" z# n* K1 U4 @! W/ V- `/ gso, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
作者: coolyiceman    時間: 2005-4-30 12:45 PM

罰款,冇留案底!- t  A/ F! e6 g# o; p6 U$ ^
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
8 O0 Y1 A7 X( ?4 c3 D政府想比下馬威0的人~~1 D! K% [) R; C& E! B2 N% [) [9 L
錢就一定罰
: @+ q* _2 X8 d6 q" P未必要坐牢~~
作者: HansChan    時間: 2005-4-30 01:31 PM

如果真係判佢有罪,* {1 c# g5 q+ [) z/ Q1 o
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
5 g8 \1 e' x( z: b4 ^佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
  Y$ q3 M0 |: T到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
作者: EV4886    時間: 2005-4-30 04:17 PM

最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
作者: @bcc@    時間: 2005-4-30 05:39 PM

冇事!!!!!:cool:
作者: 小虫    時間: 2005-4-30 06:05 PM

法官班報法令要幾個保鑣護送佢返屋企^_^
作者: 老鬼X    時間: 2005-5-1 01:54 PM

無奈！一定搞死佢　
作者: markmk    時間: 2005-5-3 04:29 AM

一定坐牢......殺雞警猴...仲要大字標題咁話俾bt友聽..
作者: 人人人人人    時間: 2005-5-3 06:09 PM

唉...試問有幾多人未用過BT??政府係都要搞呢D咁o既野, 多少都感到無奈
作者: ilovefuckingyou    時間: 2005-5-4 01:47 AM

告得入我切!!!
作者: bonzi1983    時間: 2005-5-4 05:40 AM

I think 古惑天皇 is immoral, but not illegal....so he is not guilty according to the law
作者: karenmoe    時間: 2005-5-5 01:14 AM

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-5-4 01:47 AM:) B( ~. l, D) l  m+ j8 M1 ~5 ]
告得入我切!!!
( c% I2 \2 i  B) M: |$ H7 M& a
我當初都估告唔入," f  n& {0 F4 d* T
不過我老豆提醒我,政府咁多大狀,1 W0 A6 P" W2 t4 O% I( v$ E- _9 _
真係告唔入就唔會告啦.....
作者: timho1027    時間: 2005-5-5 03:34 AM

海關做戲給美國電影業睇
- [6 e- X1 V' K3 j0 b2 P我希望佢冇事
作者: wolfevil    時間: 2005-5-5 10:08 PM

會有罪, 不過冇圖利and第一次, 最大可能會守行為
作者: 阿細    時間: 2005-5-5 10:54 PM

Originally posted by EV4886 at 2005-4-29 11:18 PM:- {7 k4 }3 ^2 S5 z% R
美國咁講版權法都吾敢告BT,香港海關想扮勁想做世界法治一哥,輸.....輸硬.(除非又請人大釋法)
3 O  c2 J3 w# g3 G0 g
因為美國人權大過天...所以唔敢告用bt d人ja...香港海關想扮勁...就唔見得係la..大家都用緊份內事...
作者: kwajc    時間: 2005-5-6 08:58 AM

香港海關想做一場大龍鳳俾電影業d人睇......講真香港有成幾廿萬人用bt download野....拉晒番去邊到有咁多錢養呢班人呀!!!



歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0