娛樂滿紛 26FUN - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: 論壇熱話第二回 - 碧咸是否真係"廢物" !? [打印本頁]

作者: aenco 時間: 2005-7-11 05:27 PM 標題: 論壇熱話第二回 - 碧咸是否真係"廢物" !?

請各位問心投票

碧咸0係我心目中 ...
雖然唔係一個偉大既球員
但係 , 碧咸0係我心目中係一個好既球員 !!

圖片附件: mu2.jpg (2005-7-11 05:27 PM, 15.5 KB) / 下載次數 2
http://26fun.com/bbs/attachment.php?aid=437472&k=ae9bac2a5a850e2f956a9bd18f2c3797&t=1732686511&sid=V8l5tE

作者: pyliu 時間: 2005-7-11 05:31 PM

Originally posted by aenco at 2005-7-11 09:27 AM:
請各位問心投票...

我支持你的觀點！
當然他不是球王的級數，但足球發展史上，他應有一個位置！

作者: YUEN_LOUIS 時間: 2005-7-11 05:32 PM

至少唔會阻住晒

作者: aenco 時間: 2005-7-11 05:34 PM

Originally posted by pyliu at 2005-7-11 05:31 PM:

我支持你的觀點！
當然他不是球王的級數，但足球發展史上，他應有一個位置！

多謝你0既支持

圖片附件: champions2.jpg (2005-7-11 05:34 PM, 33.2 KB) / 下載次數 8
http://26fun.com/bbs/attachment.php?aid=437482&k=7bbaadf8817a8d89c788d66b262e7598&t=1732686511&sid=V8l5tE

作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-7-11 05:44 PM

哇~體育版今期好紅呀碧咸~
佢當然唔會係球王級啦,但係我心目中係一個好既球員,有作為既球員,
唔會阻住球隊發展,反而會幫到手。

作者: aenco 時間: 2005-7-11 05:47 PM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-7-11 05:44 PM:
哇~體育版今期好紅呀碧咸~
佢當然唔會係球王級啦,但係我心目中係一個好既球員,有作為既球員,
唔會阻住球隊發展,反而會幫到手。

絶對同意

圖片附件: db99-1.jpg (2005-7-11 05:47 PM, 37.7 KB) / 下載次數 4
http://26fun.com/bbs/attachment.php?aid=437486&k=5a8a00b79856249a17d29ac36372ed8c&t=1732686511&sid=V8l5tE

作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-7-11 05:50 PM

Originally posted by aenco at 2005-7-11 05:47 PM:

絶對同意

講右中場既級數佢數一數二添,
但有時埋門果下真係差左d,有時皇馬佢有機門前射入都貼柱出界.....
希望皇馬用埋右邊啦@@"

作者: adamjacky123 時間: 2005-7-11 05:52 PM

again....beckham's topic.....
he's good,but so many people dislike him.....

p.s. most of the people dislike him are ugly...

作者: aenco 時間: 2005-7-11 05:55 PM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-7-11 05:50 PM:

講右中場既級數佢數一數二添,
但有時埋門果下真係差左d,有時皇馬佢有機門前射入都貼柱出界.....
希望皇馬用埋右邊啦@@"

講右中場既級數佢數一數二添 <==
你咁講一講 , 又會引起不少人眼紅同迴響

[ Last edited by aenco on 2005-7-11 at 05:56 PM ]

作者: aenco 時間: 2005-7-11 05:56 PM

Originally posted by adamjacky123 at 2005-7-11 05:52 PM:
again....beckham's topic.....
he's good,but so many people dislike him.....

p.s. most of the people dislike him are ugly...

haha ...
i can tell you i like him !! haha ~

作者: 艾力克 時間: 2005-7-11 05:57 PM

佢斬波同罰球幾好
但都有唔少人做倒

佢係一個好球員,但我覺得好似太出名喇~

作者: aenco 時間: 2005-7-11 05:59 PM

Originally posted by 樂壇渣Fit人 at 2005-7-11 05:56 PM:
如果我係sport板既常註會員
我一定會...

i know wt you mean ,
but i really want to know is that most of the ppl think he is 廢物 !!

作者: 亨九利 時間: 2005-7-11 06:04 PM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-7-11 17:44:
哇~體育版今期好紅呀碧咸~
佢當然唔會係球王級啦,但係我心目中係一個好既球員,有作為既球員,
唔會阻住球隊發展,反而會幫到手。

beckham何只是好球員, 其"七旋斬"和"射罰球" 直頭有科學家開file研究......

作者: aenco 時間: 2005-7-11 06:06 PM

Originally posted by 亨九利 at 2005-7-11 06:04 PM:

beckham何只是好球員, 其"七旋斬"和"射罰球" 直頭有科學家開file研究......

真係 ?!

圖片附件: 194.jpg (2005-7-11 06:06 PM, 23.1 KB) / 下載次數 3
http://26fun.com/bbs/attachment.php?aid=437591&k=0a44af7aa386c5f679b50918aebecea0&t=1732686511&sid=V8l5tE

作者: 無聊的Gary 時間: 2005-7-11 06:07 PM

其實佢都唔係好差...你睇佢d free kick就知佢有天份

作者: 左輪仔 時間: 2005-7-11 06:10 PM

講真,我對碧咸都冇咩好感....我都覺得佢有d名過其實.......(個人睇法)

作者: aenco 時間: 2005-7-11 06:12 PM

Originally posted by 左輪仔 at 2005-7-11 06:10 PM:
講真,我對碧咸都冇咩好感....我都覺得佢有d名過其實.......(個人睇法)

多謝你 ~
絶對 welcome 個人睇法 ~

作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-7-11 06:20 PM

Originally posted by 樂壇渣Fit人 at 2005-7-11 05:56 PM:
如果我係sport板既常註會員
我一定會...

版友們喜歡開冇辦法= =",我地d版主根本唔會特別去開一個post討論某球員

[ Last edited by abc123aa on 2005-7-11 at 06:23 PM ]

作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-7-11 06:20 PM

Originally posted by 亨九利 at 2005-7-11 06:04 PM:

beckham何只是好球員, 其"七旋斬"和"射罰球" 直頭有科學家開file研究......

哇~潮爆喎

作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-7-11 06:21 PM

Originally posted by 艾力克 at 2005-7-11 05:57 PM:
佢斬波同罰球幾好
但都有唔少人做倒

佢係一個好球員,但我覺得好似太出名喇~

罰球專家大把,但係射式同射法個個都唔同

作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-7-11 06:21 PM

Originally posted by aenco at 2005-7-11 05:55 PM:

講右中場既級數佢數一數二添 <...

怕咩ja,講唔講都會有人眼紅嫁啦= ="

作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-7-11 06:22 PM

Originally posted by aenco at 2005-7-11 06:12 PM:

多謝你 ~
絶對 welcome 個人睇法 ~

當然~

作者: kakeidevil 時間: 2005-7-11 06:58 PM

碧咸係一個好球員
碧咸唔係廢物

碧咸既傳中同罰球幫皇馬同曼聯入左好多波...
以前o係曼聯打既時候你話佢唔勁咩??
雲佬一季入40幾球就知...
甚至英格蘭國家隊都要靠佢先可以入到02世界柸...
另一半係靠佢個樣...
碧咸係靚仔冇人否認...
佢拍一個廣告既人工有d人可能一世都揾唔到...
你睇下佢靠個樣揾幾多錢就知...
所以佢絕對唔係廢物...

仲有..版主叫你唔好以不同形式翻炒Topic呀...
我都覺得好悶...

作者: aenco 時間: 2005-7-11 07:00 PM

Originally posted by kakeidevil at 2005-7-11 06:58 PM:
碧咸係一個好...

okok ^^
作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-7-11 07:36 PM

Originally posted by kakeidevil at 2005-7-11 06:58 PM:
碧咸係一個好...
剛剛睇到呢個文章都嚇一跳
作者: slimshady 時間: 2005-7-11 07:54 PM

剩識斬中同罰球都證明左佢唔會係廢物啦

足球又唔係一個人踢曬,佢唔夾隊波都無計
作者: aenco 時間: 2005-7-11 08:02 PM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-7-11 07:36 PM:

剛剛睇到呢個文章都嚇一跳
y ??
作者: alan1984 時間: 2005-7-11 09:09 PM

我覺得碧咸0係罰球同角球方面係頗出色,但其他好似速度,腳法,頭鎚等等方面只係一般
作者: wer 時間: 2005-7-11 09:10 PM

碧咸是好球員
他的傳中和罰球是能幫助球隊
他絕對有力在職業足球上佔一席
但不靠樣子能否有今天的成就呢?
作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-7-11 09:20 PM

Originally posted by aenco at 2005-7-11 08:02 PM:

y ??
估唔到有人會員,仲要係aenco兄添^^"
作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-7-11 09:21 PM

Originally posted by wer at 2005-7-11 09:10 PM:
碧咸是好球員
他的傳中和罰球是能幫助球隊
他絕對有力在職業足球上佔一席
但不靠樣子能否有今天的成就呢?
靠樣係絕對冇可能有今日既成就
作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-7-11 09:22 PM

Originally posted by alan1984 at 2005-7-11 09:09 PM:
我覺得碧咸0係罰球同角球方面係頗出色,但其他好似速度,腳法,頭鎚等等方面只係一般
我諗以前既青年軍比較少會叫d中場練速度同腳法~依家果d通常都會咁練
作者: night 時間: 2005-7-11 09:23 PM

我投名過其實
作者: alan1984 時間: 2005-7-11 09:35 PM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-7-11 09:21 PM:

靠樣係絕對冇可能有今日既成就
我覺得有一半係
作者: wer 時間: 2005-7-11 09:35 PM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-7-11 21:21:

靠樣係絕對冇可能有今日既成就
如果碧咸如施丹有地中海,受歡迎程度..................................
作者: yinloveu 時間: 2005-7-11 10:09 PM

佢當然唔係廢物~ 雖則佢唔係話可以一個過好多個果D, 但佢有一定既作用,睇英格蘭國家隊就知
作者: pc20001103b 時間: 2005-7-11 10:32 PM

Originally posted by wer at 2005-7-11 21:35:

如果碧咸如施丹有地中海,受歡迎程度..................................
你咁講不如話碧咸有施丹既腳法,
咁就又靚仔踢得又瀟灑
&個人感受係d人批評碧咸不外乎都係速度,腳法唔夠好,唔應該有咁大既成就,
的確靚仔係幫佢唔少
但都唔應該話佢係廢,
小弟都曾話過佢廢,亦係因上述原因,
但明白左不能用碧咸同費高比較之後,
就唔再認為佢廢
作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-7-11 11:00 PM

Originally posted by alan1984 at 2005-7-11 09:35 PM:

我覺得有一半係
但都要有返兩度先得,如果佢唔係有七旋斬的話adidas點樣幫佢出boot???@@"
作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-7-11 11:00 PM

Originally posted by pc20001103b at 2005-7-11 10:32 PM:

你咁講不如話碧咸有施丹既腳法,
咁...
因為費高同碧咸係唔同類型既球員~根本比唔到@@"
作者: alan1984 時間: 2005-7-11 11:41 PM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-7-11 11:00 PM:

但都要有返兩度先得,如果佢唔係有七旋斬的話adidas點樣幫佢出boot???@@"
因為靠個樣囉...
我反問番你,如果佢只係得七旋斬adidas點樣幫佢出boot?(其中有一年英超,蘇蘭奴既傳中準繩度係高過碧咸,又唔見adidas搵佢)
點解足球員會0係娛樂版出現??
大家心平氣和討論,唔好勞氣:cool:
作者: 奶茶 時間: 2005-7-11 11:42 PM

廢就唔講得,只不過係殘左
作者: fffffa 時間: 2005-7-11 11:56 PM

Originally posted by pyliu at 2005-7-11 05:31 PM:

我支持你的觀點！
當然他不是球王的級數，但足球發展史上，他應有一個位置！
佢既技術雖然未到球王級,但佢既傳中同埋罰波技巧絕對係球王級,有人話佢係自柏天尼同薛高以後射罰波最勁既球員................未必個個都要係好扭既,佢淨係長傳同射罰波已經足以獨步球壇,我夠膽話全世界冇多過5個人呢2樣野會好得過佢..........
作者: MaxFigo 時間: 2005-7-12 12:00 AM

Originally posted by alan1984 at 2005-7-11 11:41 PM:

其中有一年英超,蘇蘭奴既傳中準繩度係高過碧咸,又唔見adidas搵佢...
曇花一現
不足為據 @@

至於點解佢會係娛樂版出現
你就要問返d娛樂版記者la = =
作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-7-12 12:03 AM

Originally posted by alan1984 at 2005-7-11 11:41 PM:

因為靠個樣囉...
我反問番你,如果...
蘇蘭奴如果唔係著adidas boot點幫佢出呢???
另外係aio版出現係因為d人唔知體育版可以貼圖加上佢名氣大,如果你話佢靠個樣多過佢d技術根本冇可能,
唔通好波既一定樣衰???咁舒夫真高呢???
作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-7-12 12:04 AM

Originally posted by MaxFigo at 2005-7-12 12:00 AM:

曇花一現
不足為據 @@

至於點解佢會係娛樂版出現
你就要問返d娛樂版記者la = =
沙比阿朗素夠比人話出波準啦,但係如果唔係經常做呢d野根本冇人會知= ="
作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-7-12 12:05 AM

Originally posted by fffffa at 2005-7-11 11:56 PM:

佢既技術雖然未到球王級,但佢既傳中...
如果個個都係扭得先叫做好球員就死嫁喇,遲d連埋d中堅同龍門都要識扭波先得
作者: ciger 時間: 2005-7-12 12:10 AM

呢個投票都幾難搞,一個英格蘭正選國腳係廢物,咁香港,澳門,法羅群島同英格蘭非國腳係咩
佢都算係一個好球員,但又真係名不副實,咁點投呀?
碧咸係一個要配合球隊戰術的球員,如果你想佢好似大細哨,施丹,費高等一個打唒扭轉局勢就冇可能,但如果有好隊友配合,佢嘅傳球準繩又真係幾有威脅
但佢今時今日咁出名就真係靠個樣,因為就算佢唔踢波,走去做MODEL都紅啦,只不過佢興趣係足球又踢得下先做球員啫,如果佢只得乙丙組水準,我諗佢一早唔踢波喇!
其實碧咸之所以比人覺得名不副實,係D傳媒為左討好球迷,胡亂吹捧佢啫,你睇球圈中人對佢嘅評價,跟本就唔係咁高,你有幾何見佢當選D乜乜足球先生,不過作為傳媒,佢咁受歡迎你敢唔敢踩佢吖

[ Last edited by ciger on 2005-7-12 at 12:16 AM ]
作者: MaxFigo 時間: 2005-7-12 12:11 AM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-7-12 12:05 AM:

如果個個都係扭得先叫做好球員就死嫁喇,遲d連埋d中堅同龍門都要識扭波先得
keeper都識扭波ge下場...
咪就係好似巴夫斯咁lo

所以扭咁多黎做乜  = =
交波la baby
作者: Gretzky 時間: 2005-7-12 12:16 AM

I think there is a 'Becks Complex" for football fans (and esp. here in EF). Football players are idols these days. Players are loved and hated for many years in sports and animosity towards a player is not uncommon. But the 'attention' of this player is unheard of in many ways....even if you hated Becks guts, you can't get him out of your football world....people have to voice out their feelings towards him so badly. Out of love or out of hatred, I don't think there's a player that has captured so much attention in the history of the game.

There are so many players that has a bigger 'overrated nametag' on his shoulder and yet no one talks about them at all.

Becks is a good sociology topic....it can even make a good thesis...
作者: alan1984 時間: 2005-7-12 12:18 AM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-7-12 12:03 AM:

蘇蘭奴如果唔係著adidas boot點幫佢出呢???
另外係aio版出現係因為d人唔知體育版可以貼圖加上佢名氣大,如果你話佢靠個樣多過佢d技術根本冇可能,
唔通好波既一定樣衰???咁舒夫真高呢???
佢唔係著開都得嫁,如果人地sponsor果個球員,果個球員先會著佢d boot...好似卡斯辛奴咁,佢以前都唔係著puma,都係人地sponsor佢先著姐
另外我從未講過好波就會係樣衰(請不要誤解),我只係講佢有咁既知名道,有一半係靠佢個樣姐
作者: alan1984 時間: 2005-7-12 12:21 AM

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-7-12 12:10 AM:
其實碧咸之所以比人覺得名不副實,係D傳媒為左討好球迷,胡亂吹捧佢啫,你睇球圈中人對佢嘅評價,跟本就唔係咁高,你有幾何見佢當選D乜乜足球先生,不過作為傳媒,佢咁受歡迎你敢唔敢踩佢吖
係呀...同意,所以成日見好多forum有類似既topic,最後都會變成罵戰...
作者: night 時間: 2005-7-12 12:32 AM

佢老婆唔多唔少有影響
作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-7-12 01:23 AM

Originally posted by alan1984 at 2005-7-12 12:18 AM:

佢唔係著開都得嫁,如果人地sponsor...
如果係簽左約的話通常唔會轉,另外仲要睇埋球隊用咩贊助商,都會有影響的~
作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-7-12 01:23 AM

Originally posted by night at 2005-7-12 12:32 AM:
佢老婆唔多唔少有影響
佢老婆都幾黑人憎下@@"
作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-7-12 01:24 AM

Originally posted by alan1984 at 2005-7-12 12:21 AM:

係呀...同意,所以成日見好多forum有類似既topic,最後都會變成罵戰...
我未見過呢d文章,可能我少去d壇既體育版= ="
作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-7-12 01:25 AM

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-7-12 12:10 AM:
呢個投票都幾難搞,一個英格蘭正選國腳...
我覺得就算傳媒過份吹捧都要睇下事實囉,如果係事實既講出黎一定有人認同,唔係事實既就唔好講喇~
作者: ciger 時間: 2005-7-12 01:26 AM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-7-12 01:23:

佢老婆都幾黑人憎下@@"
佢老婆黑人憎下係碧咸d fans憎啫,人地係樂壇都唔知幾紅
作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-7-12 01:29 AM

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-7-12 01:26 AM:

佢老婆黑人憎下係碧咸d fans憎啫,人地係樂壇都唔知幾紅
之前有d投票話最憎咩人,碧咸嫂好似有上榜喎@_@"
我不嬲都唔鍾意佢,未結婚之前都係= ="
作者: ciger 時間: 2005-7-12 01:41 AM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-7-12 01:29:

之前有d投票話最憎咩人,碧咸嫂好似有上榜喎@_@"
我不嬲都唔鍾意佢,未結婚之前都係= ="
如果大部份人憎佢,少部份人鍾意佢,佢點紅吖,你唔見B嫂紅
作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-7-12 01:48 AM

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-7-12 01:41 AM:

如果大部份人憎佢,少部份人鍾意佢,佢點紅吖,你唔見B嫂紅
我唔知佢係樂壇有幾紅(都係幾年前既事啦),總之我聽到好多人話唔鍾意佢~

[ Last edited by abc123aa on 2005-7-12 at 01:51 AM ]
作者: ciger 時間: 2005-7-12 01:57 AM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-7-12 01:25:

我覺得就算傳媒過份吹捧都要睇下事實囉,如果係事實既講出黎一定有人認同,唔係事實既就唔好講喇~
唔知你有冇係電視聽到D人攞同施丹,大細哨相提並論,我就聽唔少喇,如果講技術(包括盤,傳,射,球賽閱讀能力同創造力),碧咸同施丹,大細哨真係有段距離,其實唔止碧咸,扥迪亦都經常被傳媒過份吹捧,不過碧咸情況更多
依家唔係話碧咸屎波(如果咁講亦屬過份偏激)只不過講技術碧咸只屬國家隊級,絕不能列入名人堂
作者: ciger 時間: 2005-7-12 02:00 AM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-7-12 01:48:

我唔知佢係樂壇有幾紅(都係幾年前既事啦),總之我聽到好多人話唔鍾意佢~

[ Last edited by abc123aa on 2005-7-12 at 01:51 AM ]
你話TWINS係香港紅唔紅吖,如果辣妹你都話唔紅,我諗你已經有偏見
作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-7-12 02:01 AM

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-7-12 01:57 AM:

唔知你有冇係電視聽到D人攞同施丹,...
碧咸點解施丹佢地比呀,根本冇得打,又唔同類型,又唔同打法~
我就冇聽過人地搵呢3個同碧咸比,因為根本冇得比,以上3位乃球王級,碧咸只算是傳中球入面既"球王"。
作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-7-12 02:02 AM

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-7-12 02:00 AM:

你話TWINS係香港紅唔紅吖,如果辣妹你都話唔紅,我諗你已經有偏見
twins係依家當紅,
但碧咸嫂你認為依家仲紅咩....佢隊組合冇唱好耐囉啵好似,就算碧咸嫂紅都唔係依家紅啦~
作者: ciger 時間: 2005-7-12 02:07 AM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-7-12 02:02:

twins係依家當紅,
但碧咸嫂你認為依家仲紅咩....佢隊組合冇唱好耐囉啵好似,就算碧咸嫂紅都唔係依家紅啦~
咁碧咸唔係今年先出名,佢幾年前辣妹當紅時已經同佢拍拖,結婚,生仔啦,咁人地話因為佢老婆出名令佢都出名又點會唔啱呢
作者: michael86 時間: 2005-7-12 02:09 AM

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-7-12 02:07 AM:

咁碧咸唔係今年先出名,佢幾年前辣妹當紅時已經同佢拍拖,結婚,生仔啦,咁人地話因為佢老婆出名令佢都出名又點會唔啱呢
碧咸出名係源自佢既一個50碼笠射
當時佢未同辣妹一齊
作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-7-12 02:09 AM

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-7-12 02:07 AM:

咁碧咸唔係今年先出名,佢幾年前辣妹當紅時已經同佢拍拖,結婚,生仔啦,咁人地話因為佢老婆出名令佢都出名又點會唔啱呢
有人話唔岩咩= ="
作者: ciger 時間: 2005-7-12 02:15 AM

或者我理解錯悟啦,黑人憎嘅老婆=你會受歡迎
作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-7-12 02:18 AM

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-7-12 02:15 AM:
或者我理解錯悟啦,黑人憎嘅老婆=你會受歡迎
大家都好似唔明大家講咩咁
作者: ciger 時間: 2005-7-12 02:25 AM

之前我地講緊碧咸出名,有人提出同佢老婆出名都有關,跟住你話佢老婆都幾黑人憎,基於愛屋及烏嘅道理,佢老婆黑人憎令人覺得會對碧咸有負面影響,所以假定你反對佢老婆出名令碧咸出名
作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-7-12 02:26 AM

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-7-12 02:25 AM:
之前我地講緊碧咸出名,有人提出同佢老...
幾時反對過???
作者: amigofans 時間: 2005-7-12 02:32 AM

點解成日問呢個問題??

識波之人就知....[color=Red]佢係好波既!!!!!

吾識波之人....只會講....佢球場以外既野,仲會講佢係廢之類既說話!

馬勒當拿,加斯居尼私生活同對足球既態度都好"不知所謂"
但佢地都好好波!!

無奈碧咸都有少少係呢一種!!
作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-7-12 02:38 AM

佢好唔好波我唔知,但係佢唔會係一個冇用既球員
作者: amigofans 時間: 2005-7-12 02:49 AM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-7-12 02:38 AM:
佢好唔好波我唔知,但係佢唔會係一個冇用既球員
如果咁都吾算好波,咁大概好波既只有....

次偉,小志強,仲有winning入面d電腦公仔....
話佢廢果d番去打機同睇足球小將啦,果d o岩你地多d!
作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-7-12 02:50 AM

Originally posted by ---fans at 2005-7-12 02:49 AM:

如果咁都吾算好波,咁大概好波既只有....

次偉,小志強,仲有winning入面d電腦公仔....
話佢廢果d番去打機同睇足球小將啦,果d o岩你地多d!
因為好波既定義唔係個個一樣,所以我唔敢講
作者: ciger 時間: 2005-7-12 02:52 AM

好唔好波係相對嘅,李健和同我比就好波,同施丹比就屎波
作者: amigofans 時間: 2005-7-12 03:01 AM

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-7-12 02:52 AM:
好唔好波係相對嘅,李健和同我比就好波,同施丹比就屎波
咁而家梗係講係世界頂級水平啦!
吾通同屋村5人場水準比咩.....

講野又吾洗保守都咁.......
作者: ciger 時間: 2005-7-12 03:06 AM

Originally posted by ---fans at 2005-7-12 03:01:

咁而家梗係講係世界頂級水平啦!
吾通同屋村5人場水準比咩.....

講野又吾洗保守都咁.......
如果講世界級水平,碧咸就真係一線尾到二線頭,同埋佢罰球係勁,但係D生波遠射好似同D罰球唔成正比
作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-7-12 03:08 AM

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-7-12 03:06 AM:

如果講世界級水平,碧咸就真係一線尾到二線頭,同埋佢罰球係勁,但係D生波遠射好似同D罰球唔成正比
點樣唔成正比@@"
作者: ciger 時間: 2005-7-12 03:13 AM

佢罰球入球率都相當高,但生波遠射真係唔多,你射得出靚罰球就梗有一定射術,但點解生波遠射唔係咁多,仲少過林柏特,C朗拿度同卡卡等
作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-7-12 03:38 AM

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-7-12 03:13 AM:
佢罰球入球率都相當高,但生波遠射真係唔多,你射得出靚罰球就梗有一定射術,但點解生波遠射唔係咁多,仲少過林柏特,C朗拿度同卡卡等
係曼聯因為佢好似比較少返中間,就算有佢都唔會射,
去到皇馬更加冇得射,我諗係佢新黎驚比教練話,又可能係教練冇叫佢咁做,佢去到皇馬之後係射入過一球遠射,鵝眉月頂射入,仲有一次皇馬輸緊波佢先怒笠龍門,但岩岩高出@@"
作者: ciger 時間: 2005-7-12 03:42 AM

照道理射術好嘅球員教練冇理由唔叫佢起腳,我就覺得係佢擺脫後衛能力唔高,製造唔到空位起腳
作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-7-12 03:47 AM

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-7-12 03:42 AM:
照道理射術好嘅球員教練冇理由唔叫佢起腳,我就覺得係佢擺脫後衛能力唔高,製造唔到空位起腳
係囉~我都唔明= ="
唔關事,有時佢有位都唔會射嫁,寧願比返施丹或其他隊友都唔會射,我都唔知點解~~"
作者: ciger 時間: 2005-7-12 03:53 AM

你係電視覺得佢有位(因為平面關係),但佢係場中可能見到後衛只要一申腳,就攔到個波,如果有腳法嘅球員通常會用假動作令對方失位,碧咸就係差這一點
作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-7-12 03:58 AM

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-7-12 03:53 AM:
你係電視覺得佢有位(因為平面關係),但佢係場中可能見到後衛只要一申腳,就攔到個波,如果有腳法嘅球員通常會用假動作令對方失位,碧咸就係差這一點
講真,就算真係好空佢都好少會攻,或許真係好似你咁講,其實佢後面有人上緊去攔佢
最難忘果次就係對維拉利爾,全場打得非常生,有得攻就攻,要守就守~完全發揮到身價
作者: ciger 時間: 2005-7-12 04:02 AM

一場半場就梗有,不過有射術但擺脫唔到後衛就好難幫球隊絕處逢生,人地唔會咁輕易係禁區外犯規比你擺定黎射
作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-7-12 04:19 AM

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-7-12 04:02 AM:
一場半場就梗有,不過有射術但擺脫唔到後衛就好難幫球隊絕處逢生,人地唔會咁輕易係禁區外犯規比你擺定黎射
冇計,鬼叫唔比佢係右路出波咩~加上有時d人真係鍾意係禁區外犯你喎@@"
作者: step025 時間: 2005-7-12 04:50 AM

佢係好球員
簡單d黎講, d人唔掋得佢唔係最好波但係最出名啫
佢絕對有地位立足,樣討好(特別對女仔),美妙嘅罰球同傳中
但係佢嘅實力大概值10m-12m, 但係成交嗰陣係20+m, 個堆錢就証明咗依家嘅佢一本係實力一半係個名

當時咸嫂係非常出名,世界性嗰隻...佢地兩個稱得上世紀中最識互相利用嘅夫妻
作者: wer 時間: 2005-7-12 07:27 PM

Originally posted by pc20001103b at 2005-7-11 22:32:

你咁講不如話碧咸有施丹既腳法,
咁...
我最想聽到你說
的確靚仔幫佢唔少
碧咸唔係廢,但不靠樣可唔可以賺咁多錢
作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-7-12 07:44 PM

Originally posted by wer at 2005-7-12 07:27 PM:

我最想聽到你說

碧咸唔係廢,但不靠樣可唔可以賺咁多錢
賺錢果方面樣當然幫到好多,但如果話佢廢係冇可能的~
作者: shaqkobe 時間: 2005-7-13 02:43 PM

ab仔！我仲以為有人搞事。哈哈~
作者: raymond302 時間: 2005-7-13 05:10 PM

I dun think he is a trash. Although he doesn't have fast running and great crossing skill, he has a good passing skill and free kick skill. But now i think his level go downwards. Maybe because he is getting old. Anyway he is not a trash
作者: 一樓一 時間: 2005-7-13 05:40 PM

Originally posted by raymond302 at 2005-7-13 05:10 PM:
I dun think he is a trash. Although...
big 咸最佳o既時間, 係曼魚都係o係中埸10至20碼活動o者.  落底線出球o既係加利仔!
big 只係校炮同射罰球醒!  o個時咸d 罰球同12 碼好少唔入o既!

後來雲佬去左曼魚,  廢sir 連12 碼都俾埋雲佬射! big 咸表現已經冇咁好!
去到皇馬, 都唔係打佢最佳位置,  表現就梗係 ............. 不與置評啦!

不過,  以射12 碼o既水平黎量度 big 咸o既表現,  以前係必入,  所以, 佢老人家(唔係以年紀計)而家最多只有全盛時 6~7成!
作者: Dicksonheng 時間: 2005-7-13 05:44 PM

起碼在閱讀球賽方面
好過費高幾千倍
否則佢個仇人盧森保高竟然都會重用佢
而棄費高

因為碧咸的傳送,企位及體能真的相當出色
作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-7-13 06:02 PM

Originally posted by shaqkobe at 2005-7-13 02:43 PM:
ab仔！我仲以為有人搞事。哈哈~
哈哈,如果有人搞事一早鎖左文啦
作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-7-13 06:03 PM

Originally posted by Dicksonheng at 2005-7-13 05:44 PM:
起碼在閱讀球賽方面
好過費高幾千倍
否則佢個仇人盧森保高竟然都會重用佢
而棄費高

因為碧咸的傳送,企位及體能真的相當出色
乜有仇既咩= ="
作者: 一樓一 時間: 2005-7-13 06:22 PM

Originally posted by Dicksonheng at 2005-7-13 05:44 PM:
起碼在閱讀球賽方面
好過費高幾千倍
否則佢個仇人盧森保高竟然都會重用佢
而棄費高

因為碧咸的傳送,企位及體能真的相當出色
記憶中,  big 咸係曼魚時代, 係好少受傷同唔出得埸o既,  係鐵人一名(反而個乜q隊長-堅尼,  成日都話受傷)!  少受傷唔多唔少都代表一球員 fit 唔 fit.  唔 fit 就掂一掂都散!  不過,  過左皇馬之後,  就好多次因為受傷唔出得!

其實, 盧森保高如果真係想 big 咸打好 d,  個陣就要變o下 (big 咸打番右邊),  都咁鬼大(老),  攪乜鬼野轉踢法呀!
作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-7-13 06:29 PM

Originally posted by 一樓一 at 2005-7-13 06:22 PM:

記憶中,  big 咸係曼魚時代, 係好...
我都想盧森保高比返碧咸打右邊可以進攻><"
作者: ciger 時間: 2005-7-13 09:09 PM

講真吖,碧咸係皇馬嘅問題係死症,冇得搞,之前係其他標題中都講過,碧咸善長傳中,但朗拿度頭搥唔掂,就算比佢打右邊出到波但前鋒入唔到又有咩用,換前鋒就碧咸打法,人地施丹同朗拿度善於打小組,冇理由換兩個球皇級球員去就一個球星,根本唔係誰人唔掂嘅問題,係打法唔夾嘅問題,正如華朗踢曼聯一樣,但碧咸商業價值實在太高,賣走佢又唔願意
作者: Dicksonheng 時間: 2005-7-13 09:25 PM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-7-13 06:03 PM:

乜有仇既咩= ="
巴西傳媒好耐之前有報導出去
在盧生去皇馬之前
話碧咸只係名過其實, 實唔會畀佢打正選云云
但佢最終食言,
令到d巴西傳媒o哂嘴...

歡迎光臨娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0