娛樂滿紛 26FUN - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: 車仔對熱刺嗰場波,米度值唔值得直接被紅牌趕出場? [打印本頁]

作者: 雷公 時間: 2005-8-29 07:21 PM 標題: 車仔對熱刺嗰場波,米度值唔值得直接被紅牌趕出場?

米度絕對唔值得直接被紅牌趕出場
睇慢鏡,佢其實係用前臂(唔係手睜)去推開車仔球員
佢係犯規,但一定不致於紅牌,又d球證連黃牌都未必比添
因為都係開賽初段,通常都會警告吓先
好難令我會唔相信球證有幫車仔之疑
講真,10人應戰真係全個形勢都唔同晒
大家打11個時都係拉成均勢,一打少個,車仔就係敢係後場猜
消耗熱刺10人架體力,
到下半場10人應戰架熱刺返樸所需要架體能都用得7788
我應為熱刺肯上訴,一定可以推番變黃牌
球證都應該受到處分,係一個嚴重架判決錯誤
唔知大家點睇?

作者: bestww 時間: 2005-8-29 07:26 PM

唔值la......
只不過球證望個角度問題ja..............
真係"登"熱刺唔抵,如果MIDO冇紅牌,熱刺真係有得打ga
車仔好似個冇乜態,可惜........

[ Last edited by bestww on 2005-8-29 at 07:31 PM ]

作者: alan1984 時間: 2005-8-29 07:36 PM

我覺得果球最多都只係黃牌...估唔到會紅牌
今屆英超球證已經有好多出錯,好似第一週,贊拿斯領紅後,球證出黎認錯,另外,查爾頓既高捷斯基都係同樣既情況

作者: stereo 時間: 2005-8-29 07:57 PM

你睇迪荷奴之後都無事,仲入埋波

如果米度真係有意既話,我諗迪荷奴唔爆江都昏迷la

見到各位力撑米度，我身為tot既球迷都好感動

作者: erik 時間: 2005-8-29 08:01 PM

It's must be yellow card not red !!
why the referee has show many card in this game ??
5 yellow 1 red !!
he can't do his job well , he make the game bore !!
I agree Spurs 上訴 !!

作者: blu_ray 時間: 2005-8-29 08:09 PM

又剷車, 唔悶咩

我記得早排先有人話利記俾對面既10人守死
而家車仔無俾人守死就投訴
之前Janas個紅牌夠唔抵
又唔嘈?

作者: wer 時間: 2005-8-29 08:14 PM

Originally posted by blu_ray at 2005-8-29 20:09:
又剷車, 唔悶咩

我記得早排先有人話利記俾對面既10人守死
而家車仔無俾人守死就投訴
之前Janas個紅牌夠唔抵
又唔嘈?

又一名車路士球迷

作者: erik 時間: 2005-8-29 08:20 PM

Originally posted by wer at 2005-8-29 08:14 PM:

又一名車路士球迷

Yes Yes Yes i think he is ~~
ha ha

作者: blu_ray 時間: 2005-8-29 08:22 PM

Originally posted by wer at 2005-8-29 08:14 PM:

又一名車路士球迷

有問題嫁?
呢度反車反到係車路士球迷會俾人ban嫁?

同埋quote人地句野suppose係要回人地個point

有時間回下我個point

作者: 雷公 時間: 2005-8-29 08:22 PM

Originally posted by wer at 2005-8-29 20:14:

又一名車路士球迷

Agree, 講野唔理智,明明講緊個張米度架紅牌,
但又走去講第2樣野

作者: wer 時間: 2005-8-29 08:24 PM

Originally posted by 雷公 at 2005-8-29 20:22:

Agree, 講野唔理智,明明講緊個張米度架紅牌,
但又走去講第2樣野

九唔'答'八的專家,blu_ray

作者: ken1 時間: 2005-8-29 08:25 PM

愈睇愈登tot唔抵..唉..咁就紅牌..
我唔係tot球迷都覺得唔抵
睇住佢地被人入波..唉～～
打得好好架本來

作者: blu_ray 時間: 2005-8-29 08:26 PM

Originally posted by 雷公 at 2005-8-29 08:22 PM:

Agree, 講野唔理智,明明講緊個張米度架紅牌,
但又走去講第2樣野

張米度係邊個黎嫁?

有邊句唔理智?
quote出黎睇下

同埋有樣既叫聯想舉例
係適合有腦既人類用

作者: wer 時間: 2005-8-29 08:28 PM

Originally posted by blu_ray at 2005-8-29 20:22:

有問題嫁?
呢度反車反到係車路士球迷會俾人ban嫁?

同埋quote人地句野suppose係要回人地個point
有時間回下我個point

好笑,你根本不是討論這個話題,
我唔使答你

作者: blu_ray 時間: 2005-8-29 08:28 PM

Originally posted by wer at 2005-8-29 08:24 PM:

九唔'答'八的專家,blu_ray

嘩, 阿仙奴的球迷好無禮貌
我踩親你條尾咩
見我新仔好恰呀

作者: blu_ray 時間: 2005-8-29 08:30 PM

Originally posted by wer at 2005-8-29 08:28 PM:

好笑,你根本不是討論這個話題,
我唔使答你

手高手底見真章了:cool:

作者: wer 時間: 2005-8-29 08:30 PM

Originally posted by blu_ray at 2005-8-29 20:28:

嘩, 阿仙奴的球迷好無禮貌
我踩親你條尾咩
見我新仔好恰呀

我講事實

作者: 雷公 時間: 2005-8-29 08:32 PM

算吧啦,講番張紅牌算啦

作者: blu_ray 時間: 2005-8-29 08:32 PM

Originally posted by wer at 2005-8-29 08:30 PM:

我講事實

你d回覆好少字, 無point, 唔好呃post

作者: wer 時間: 2005-8-29 08:34 PM

Originally posted by blu_ray at 2005-8-29 20:32:

你d回覆好少字, 無point, 唔好呃post

不合理的指控

作者: wer 時間: 2005-8-29 08:35 PM

Originally posted by 雷公 at 2005-8-29 20:32:
算吧啦,講番張紅牌算啦

希望有人可以

作者: blu_ray 時間: 2005-8-29 08:36 PM

Originally posted by 雷公 at 2005-8-29 08:32 PM:
算吧啦,講番張紅牌算啦

好
一人讓一步
見你打左咁多字, 我都唔想搞亂你呢個post
不過我回埋無point人一個回覆先

作者: abwong886 時間: 2005-8-29 08:36 PM

Originally posted by wer at 2005-8-29 08:34 PM:

不合理的指控

好似係邊道睇過這句野

作者: wer 時間: 2005-8-29 08:38 PM

Originally posted by blu_ray at 2005-8-29 20:36:

好
一人讓一步
見你打左咁多字, 我都唔想搞亂你呢個post
不過我回埋無point人一個回覆先

係就快d

作者: wer 時間: 2005-8-29 08:39 PM

Originally posted by 雷公 at 2005-8-29 20:32:
算吧啦,講番張紅牌算啦

我非常生氣,原本可以守和車仔

作者: blu_ray 時間: 2005-8-29 08:39 PM

Originally posted by wer at 2005-8-29 08:34 PM:

不合理的指控

你呃post 果d post唔洗我quote番曬出黎呀, 想做死我咩
成個sports版吹水版都係咁呃啦
唔係以為走得甩呀

作者: wer 時間: 2005-8-29 08:41 PM

Originally posted by blu_ray at 2005-8-29 20:39:

你呃post 果d post唔洗我quote番曬出黎呀, 想做死我咩
成個sports版吹水版都係咁呃啦
唔係以為走得甩呀

有就post出黎,咪系度嘈

作者: abwong886 時間: 2005-8-29 08:41 PM

Originally posted by blu_ray at 2005-8-29 08:39 PM:

你呃post 果d post唔洗我quote番曬出黎呀, 想做死我咩
成個sports版吹水版都係咁呃啦
唔係以為走得甩呀

乜你成日留意佢架

:cool:

作者: wer 時間: 2005-8-29 08:45 PM

Originally posted by abwong886 at 2005-8-29 20:41:

乜你成日留意佢架:cool:

錯LA強兄,他根本就沒證據,他吹水

作者: abwong886 時間: 2005-8-29 08:46 PM

Originally posted by wer at 2005-8-29 08:45 PM:

錯LA強兄,他根本就沒證據,他吹水

真係,如果佢有,你會點?

作者: wer 時間: 2005-8-29 08:47 PM

Originally posted by abwong886 at 2005-8-29 20:46:

真係,如果佢有,你會點?

有先算

作者: blu_ray 時間: 2005-8-29 08:49 PM

Originally posted by 雷公 at 2005-8-29 07:21 PM:
米度絕對唔值得...

呢單野相信球會可以上訴得藉
不過要罰個球證就無乜可能
球證錯誤一向係足球既一部份
之前都好多人講過
有時踢少個反而好d, 打反擊或者死守守和
有時會輸到貼地
一場波會發生咩事無人估到
所以無咩話邊隊抵唔抵
作為車仔迷我都唔想咁樣贏
不過足球就係咁
天時地利人和睇你有幾多

作者: abwong886 時間: 2005-8-29 08:56 PM

我都係車仔球迷,
只有車仔贏到就得,唔洗理佢點贏
加上車仔質素又好,
要扲三冠王,冇問題

作者: leeyanta 時間: 2005-8-29 08:57 PM

我係車迷都唔幫你.. blu_ray你的確係offtopic..
講番張牌.. 我都覺唔應該紅.. 而家搞到個個都認為係車仔收買左個裁判
我都覺車仔未有番上年既水準.. 呢幾場波都打得唔好..
熱刺如果唔係打少個我相信會難打好多.. 所以車仔要快d打番起ar

作者: brianchy 時間: 2005-8-29 08:58 PM

Originally posted by blu_ray at 2005-8-29 08:49 PM:

呢單野相信球會可以上訴得藉
不...

話分兩頭...關鍵在於10人應戰嗰隊係主場定係作客,呢個係好大因素..
如果10人應戰嗰隊係主場,多數都唔會同你死守,點都想贏
所以唔會打死守龜縮架戰術,點都會攻,後防一定有空位,
11人嗰隊就有好明顯著數左好多
如果10人應戰嗰隊係作客,多數會同你死守,因為佢地會覺得10人應戰兼作客
攞1分都有交代,所以會打死守龜縮,敢主場打多個架返而唔著數,
人地打10-0-0戰術,係難入波d

作者: leeyanta 時間: 2005-8-29 08:59 PM

Originally posted by abwong886 at 2005-8-29 08:56 PM:
我都係車仔球迷,
只有車仔贏到就得,唔洗理佢點贏
加上車仔質素又好,
要扲三冠王,冇問題

你咁講就唔好.. 車仔本身質素高咁又點.. 只要無態就保持唔到王者既風範
大家鐘意車仔都係因為車仔既漂亮組織.. 今年就小左好多.. 希望黎緊車仔會打好d..
打番多d靚組織

作者: wer 時間: 2005-8-29 09:00 PM

Originally posted by abwong886 at 2005-8-29 20:56:
我都係車仔球迷,
只有車仔贏到就得,唔洗理佢點贏
加上車仔質素又好,
要扲三冠王,冇問題

收買都得?

作者: blu_ray 時間: 2005-8-29 09:00 PM

Originally posted by wer at 2005-8-29 08:47 PM:

有先算

http://www.26fun.com/bbs/viewthr ... hlight=&page=84 #4197

http://www.26fun.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=76212&fpage=1 #6

http://www.26fun.com/bbs/viewthr ... ghlight=&page=2 #89

http://www.26fun.com/bbs/viewthr ... light=&page=106 呢版無限咁多

仲要唔要?

作者: abwong886 時間: 2005-8-29 09:00 PM

Originally posted by wer at 2005-8-29 09:00 PM:

收買都得?

唔得

作者: wer 時間: 2005-8-29 09:04 PM

Originally posted by blu_ray at 2005-8-29 21:00:

[url]http://www.26fun.com/bbs/...

無理的指控

作者: abwong886 時間: 2005-8-29 09:06 PM

Originally posted by wer at 2005-8-29 09:04 PM:

無理的指控

這句野我好似聽你講個

作者: blu_ray 時間: 2005-8-29 09:06 PM

Originally posted by leeyanta at 2005-8-29 08:57 PM:
我係車迷都唔幫你.. blu_ray你的確係o...

老兄, 我都係發表下感想
咁sports版好多題目入面d人都offtopic嫁
咁又有排搞
唔好再搞喇大佬

作者: blu_ray 時間: 2005-8-29 09:09 PM

Originally posted by wer at 2005-8-29 09:04 PM:

無理的指控

算把啦
你黎黎去去都係呢句
我唔出聲喇
話左唔搞亂
當我錯
我唔想曬時間
我係新仔 + 車仔fan屎
雙重打擊
唔好意思大佬門
阿仙奴萬歲
我去番d車仔topic喇
bibi

[ Last edited by blu_ray on 2005-8-29 at 09:10 PM ]

作者: 雷公 時間: 2005-8-29 09:13 PM

米度...我鄧你慘...比個賴醒架球證玩殘
可能個球證住係西倫敦,係車仔迷
你唔好彩勒

圖片附件: b8rzmo.jpg (2005-8-29 09:13 PM, 37.6 KB) / 下載次數 29
http://26fun.com/bbs/attachment.php?aid=540010&k=34ed94ba99d922144df1e50b5b0c354c&t=1727530219&sid=izAd7T

圖片附件: b8rzfs.jpg (2005-8-29 09:13 PM, 26.5 KB) / 下載次數 26
http://26fun.com/bbs/attachment.php?aid=540011&k=d003c22b5283a33da29e35ee84c761a6&t=1727530219&sid=izAd7T

作者: wer 時間: 2005-8-29 09:16 PM

Originally posted by blu_ray at 2005-8-29 21:09:

算把啦
你黎黎去去都係呢句
我...

我好人,所以我盡量唔同你嘈

作者: 迷途小羔羊 時間: 2005-8-29 09:26 PM

果個球證應該行出黎道歉，主動認錯，先至係男人囉！

作者: cthim83 時間: 2005-8-29 09:34 PM

以波論波，米度最多食張黃牌，個動作又唔係粗暴嗰隻
我都覺得熱刺同車仔可以拉成均勢架，可惜俾球証整禍咗

作者: brightlee 時間: 2005-8-29 09:54 PM

1) Wai, first of all, I am really upset about this non-respectful arguing
seems PERSONAL ATTACK...

2) If you BLAME referee, you should try to be a referee in big games?
DO U KNOW HOW MUCH PRESSURE IT IS?

Non-sense!!!!!

Even though I think that's not a red in my point of view.

作者: 雷公 時間: 2005-8-29 10:03 PM

Originally posted by brightlee at 2005-8-29 21:54:
1) Wai, first of all, I am really u...

我唔同意
Pressure係睇嗰個人夠唔夠斤兩架ja
有人有壓力,有人就一d緊張都無
無得賴壓力好大,而判斷錯誤,係英超做球證,你有壓力所以你判斷有不足
咪即係代表你未夠班做英超球證囉,落番英冠去舒吓壓先啦,緊張先生..:cool:

作者: au212001 時間: 2005-8-29 10:09 PM

Originally posted by 雷公 at 2005-8-29 09:13 PM:
米度...我鄧你慘...比個賴醒架球證玩殘
可能個球證住係西倫敦,係車仔迷
你唔好彩勒

我極之同意...個球證賴醒咁沖埋去,,好似逅人還$$咁

(講笑)
之後俾佐張red card..我同米度反應一樣,,
張開佐個口......

..呆晒..希望下次吾好咁賴醒啦~~~

作者: cthim83 時間: 2005-8-29 10:32 PM

我記得新聞好似有講過
"英超今季會於賽後加緊返查錄影片段，以維護比賽嘅公平競技原則"
原意係加強檢控球員，以免有漏網之魚，不過依家都大派用場，可以用嚟加強檢控球証 :p

作者: 迷途小羔羊 時間: 2005-8-29 11:31 PM

Originally posted by brightlee at 2005-8-29 09:54 PM:
1) Wai, first of all, I am really u...

對不起，我也不能同意你所說
我絕對承認，做大賽球證好有壓力
但壓力是導致出錯的原因而已，而不是否認出錯的擋箭牌！

第一輪阿仙奴對紐卡素的比賽中，球證比完賽後，翻看影帶發現俾贊拿斯紅牌是過份了，主動改翻做黃牌！呢d咪就叫負責任既男人囉，俾錯牌係要認架。

作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-8-29 11:41 PM

絕對唔值~

作者: mokbobby 時間: 2005-8-29 11:44 PM

我都有睇果場波
我覺得只係一d好少的犯規動作
鬆起上黎甚至可以唔吹
絕對唔值~~~

作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-8-29 11:45 PM

Originally posted by mokbobby at 2005-8-29 11:44 PM:
我都有睇果場波
我覺得只係一d好少的...

同意

作者: Dicksonheng 時間: 2005-8-30 12:36 AM

單係睇番紅牌一定唔值
黃牌差唔多
但由於佢隻手並唔係按住, 而係打落去
因此我認為吹罰難免

作者: 1990511 時間: 2005-8-30 03:16 PM

Originally posted by bestww at 2005-8-29 07:26 PM:
唔值la......
只不過球證望個角度問...

完全同意

作者: brightlee 時間: 2005-8-31 10:28 PM

This is the offical answer from Football Assoication today............

The Football Association have rejected Tottenham striker Mido's claim for wrongful dismissal and will force the Egyptian to serve a three-match ban.

The FA disciplinary commission dismissed Spurs' appeal against the red card Mido received in the 2-0 defeat by Chelsea on Saturday for serious foul play.

Mido has also been charged with improper conduct relating to the same incident.

The charge relates to his reaction and his failure to leave the field of play promptly.

He has until 6pm tomorrow to respond to the charge. The case will be heard by a disciplinary commission on September 9.

作者: brightlee 時間: 2005-8-31 10:32 PM

This is the offical answer from Football Assoication today............

The Football Association have rejected Tottenham striker Mido's claim for wrongful dismissal and will force the Egyptian to serve a three-match ban.

The FA disciplinary commission dismissed Spurs' appeal against the red card Mido received in the 2-0 defeat by Chelsea on Saturday for serious foul play.

Mido has also been charged with improper conduct relating to the same incident.

The charge relates to his reaction and his failure to leave the field of play promptly.

He has until 6pm tomorrow to respond to the charge. The case will be heard by a disciplinary commission on September 9.

作者: jordi 時間: 2005-9-1 12:30 AM

算罷 , 唔同角度睇野有唔同架嗎 !
可能 , 球證見到米度昇龍拳條龍呢 !
希望熱剌唔好就咁沉左 ~

歡迎光臨娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs/)