娛樂滿紛 26FUN - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: 比盧普斯披露布朗施暴行為 03年榜眼遭老帥摧殘 [打印本頁]

作者: shaqkobe 時間: 2005-9-4 01:50 AM 標題: 比盧普斯披露布朗施暴行為 03年榜眼遭老帥摧殘

　　長久以來在人們印象中拉里-布朗一直扮演著“恩師”的角色，不過當這位老帥遠走紐約後，他手下的徒弟可絲毫不再給他任何面子，而首當其沖的便是“得意門徒”昌西-比盧普斯。香港時間9月3日《奧克蘭新聞報》消息，比盧普斯在接受媒體採訪時大肆譴責了布朗對於2003年榜眼秀達科-米利西奇所釆用的“暴行”。

　　比盧普斯坦言在過去的兩個賽季中布朗在對待米利西奇時過於刻薄，甚至嚴重的擊垮了這位潛質球員的信心，“拉里實在對他太狠了。”比盧普斯說：“他把那孩子的自信心傷害的太嚴重，對於他來說要想恢復自信已經很難，或許新上任的辛特斯會令情況有所改觀，總之拉里做的太過份，甚至有可能使他永遠都無法翻身。”

　　執教活塞時布朗經常會當著媒體的面公然指責米利西奇的表現，並且在給予他上場時間時也顯得十分“吝嗇”，布朗常稱這位7尺1寸的中鋒根本無法在隊中立足並且在比賽態度上也有問題。對於米利西奇來說上賽季簡直就是艱熬，除了坐爛板凳外，一直不被主帥看好也令他大傷腦筋，盡管之後米利西奇、布朗以及杜馬斯開了一次小會略微緩和了些緊張的氣氛，但比盧普斯認為米利西奇仍然受布朗指責的影響而一蹶不振。

　　“他說的太過火了。”比盧普斯說：“這孩子有著難以置信的才華，他在場上幾乎無所不能，在季後賽中我們都充滿著歡樂和微笑，但無論在比賽還是訓練中，我都從未看到達科笑過，這就有問題了。”

　　那麼如今布朗的離去是否意味著米利西奇的機會到來了？誰都不敢肯定，杜馬斯表示他將是新賽季隊中第四號內線球員，這也就暗示著米利西奇將緊挨著本-華萊士、拉西德-華萊士以及麥克泰斯之後成為隊中內線的第四號選擇，但或許連這位活塞主席都忽略了一點，他們在數周前剛簽下老將戴亞-戴維斯，而其目的就是對抗日益強盛的熱火，因此活塞是絕對不會花3百萬簽一位只孜袞凳的球員，由此可見下賽季米利西奇的上場時間根本沒有得到保證，而唯一的出路就是靠他自己打出昔日榜眼秀的身價，而活塞拒絕了老鷹用哈林頓交換他的提議也足以證明了球隊對他仍存希望。(喜歡)

作者: night 時間: 2005-9-4 01:54 AM

d名好難先譯得番........

作者: shaqkobe 時間: 2005-9-4 01:58 AM

Originally posted by night at 2005-9-4 01:54:
d名好難先譯得番........

唔係既。睇慣就無問題。

作者: shaqkobe 時間: 2005-9-4 01:59 AM

布朗雖然係好教練，不過同球員相處總係有問題。果時同AI又係咁，黎到活塞又係咁，去到力搏唔知會點呢？？同馬貝利不和？？好大機會。哈哈

作者: night 時間: 2005-9-4 02:05 AM

Originally posted by shaqkobe at 2005-9-4 01:58 AM:

唔係既。睇慣就無問題。

所以我都睇得明....:cool:

作者: night 時間: 2005-9-4 02:07 AM

Originally posted by shaqkobe at 2005-9-4 01:59 AM:
布朗雖然係好教練，不過同球員相處總係有問題。果時同AI又係咁，黎到活塞又係咁，去到力搏唔知會點呢？？同馬貝利不和？？好大機會。哈哈

跟住marbury就話:我係全NBA最佳既控球後衛,布朗教練????同我行開一二面啦

haha:cool:

作者: shaqkobe 時間: 2005-9-4 02:22 AM

Originally posted by night at 2005-9-4 02:07:

跟住marbury就話:我係全NBA最佳既控球後衛,布朗教練????同我行開一二面啦

haha:cool:

哈！正~

作者: shaqkobe 時間: 2005-9-4 02:23 AM

某程度上AI同Marbury都幾似，同布朗不和都真係唔出奇=.="

作者: night 時間: 2005-9-4 02:29 AM

Originally posted by shaqkobe at 2005-9-4 02:23 AM:
某程度上AI同Marbury都幾似，同布朗不和都真係唔出奇=.="

不過marbury比AI自大好多
可能會難相處d

作者: yan_dbof 時間: 2005-9-4 04:54 AM

In fact, I didn't know why Larry Brown did that to Darko Milicic while LeBorn James, Carmelo Anthony, and Dwyane Wade were becoming superstars. Even, Chris Bosh and Josh Howard stole spotlight sometimes.

作者: step025 時間: 2005-9-4 08:12 AM

Originally posted by yan_dbof at 2005-9-4 04:54 AM:
In fact, I didn't know why Larry Br...

when u see how he play in the game, u will know......

i was so LUCKY that i could watch him played for few mins once, he is a good player but playing not hard enuf, i mean he could always be a starter in any team but when u r talking about pistons, a team that major in defence, he could be a big hole of the team

i also think he already lost his confidence, there r two ways in front of him:

- learn how to become a defender in terms to stay in the team
- go to europe, or ABA to get back the confidence that needed for a game

else......throw him the garbage bin

作者: flashbone 時間: 2005-9-5 09:20 PM

hi everyone,

i believe this has something to do with the "old-school-coach-mindset", i.e. coaches from the early 80's (or coaches with a long history of basketball coaching) tend not to use rookies as their first or second team options. rather, they will bench these young guys for most of the time. one of the more obvious example is pat riley (if you could recall how he transformed the whole miami heat when he took over the team back in the early 90's. the hear's roster at that time was full of vets - tim hardaway, morning, mashburn, pj. brown etc).

the reason behind this "benching rookies" is simple, these "old school" coaches don't want to see their offence or defence ruined by rookies who just come to the league to experience professional basketball. they are paid by their employers to get instant impact (say, getting a 60-win season). instead of trying to play rookies and let them develop their game, these "old school" coaches simply stick to veterans who've been in this league long enough to know how to "play safe and win".

another explanation is that these coaches are trying to help the rookies to develope in the best possible way. early exposure to the pro game may sometimes be devastating, e.g. ed o'bannon who was a lottery draft pick by the nets, played for something like 2 seasons and gone! just look how many minutes kobe, garnett, dirk, petra played in the first few seasons. for yao, i'm pretty sure the rockets wanted to do the same. but for the economic benefits it was really stupid not to play yao when he first came in.

so, it's not so weird when the new season starts and larry brown benches rookies the knicks has got this year. ^_^

歡迎光臨娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs/)