Board logo

標題: 西甲球證又一次針對碧咸 [打印本頁]

作者: bigfish    時間: 2005-10-24 04:51 AM     標題: 西甲球證又一次針對碧咸

人人都投訴, 淨係趕碧咸走, 擺明針對啦
又俾加維臣紅牌, 又唔俾多d 罰球佢射
十二碼又錯判
作者: ciger    時間: 2005-10-24 04:53 AM

Originally posted by bigfish at 2005-10-24 04:51:
人人都投訴, 淨係趕碧咸走, 擺明針對啦
又俾加維臣紅牌, 又唔俾多d 罰球佢射
十二碼又錯判
佢爆粗喎
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-10-24 04:53 AM

碧咸衰就衰在拍手.......
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-10-24 04:53 AM

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-10-24 04:53 AM:

佢爆粗喎
一定罰嫁喇,依家最大既問題係下場點踢........作客對貝迪斯= ="
作者: bigfish    時間: 2005-10-24 04:55 AM

全隊皇馬踢得最好係佢, 施丹都換走埋, 點踢呀
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-10-24 04:56 AM

Originally posted by bigfish at 2005-10-24 04:55 AM:
全隊皇馬踢得最好係佢, 施丹都換走埋, 點踢呀
問題係班人唔多願走,下半場一開波已經比人係自己既後場踢黎踢去,浪費左好多時間
作者: bigfish    時間: 2005-10-24 04:56 AM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-10-24 04:53 AM:
碧咸衰就衰在拍手.......
佢都係想激勵自己 jeh
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-10-24 04:57 AM

Originally posted by bigfish at 2005-10-24 04:56 AM:

佢都係想激勵自己 jeh
你咪搵藉口啦
作者: bigfish    時間: 2005-10-24 04:57 AM

碧咸今場有球左腳遠射差d入, 上半場又有球罰球
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-10-24 04:58 AM

Originally posted by bigfish at 2005-10-24 04:57 AM:
碧咸今場有球左腳遠射差d入
離龍門好遠喎???差d入???
作者: bigfish    時間: 2005-10-24 04:59 AM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-10-24 04:58 AM:

離龍門好遠喎???差d入???
sor...
i mean 球罰球
作者: ciger    時間: 2005-10-24 04:59 AM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-10-24 04:53:
碧咸衰就衰在拍手.......
不過佢唔係當面向球證拍手,你理得我自己拍唔拍手啫,好似朗尼咁明寸球證就話啫,走開拍手你又點肯定佢係寸球證
作者: bigfish    時間: 2005-10-24 05:00 AM

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-10-24 04:59 AM:

不過佢唔係當面向球證拍手,你理得我自己拍唔拍手啫,好似朗尼咁明寸球證就話啫,走開拍手你又點肯定佢係寸球證
係啦
我見有d o係球證耳仔度拍手, o個d 就柢罰
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-10-24 05:04 AM

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-10-24 04:59 AM:

不過佢唔係當面向球證拍手,你理得我自己拍唔拍手啫,好似朗尼咁明寸球證就話啫,走開拍手你又點肯定佢係寸球證
冇計喎,鬼叫你拍手.....球証唔會理你係為左d咩拍手.........
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-10-24 05:04 AM

Originally posted by bigfish at 2005-10-24 04:59 AM:

sor...
i mean 球罰球
上半場果球差少少就入,不過都唔中龍既.......
作者: ciger    時間: 2005-10-24 05:06 AM

Originally posted by bigfish at 2005-10-24 05:00:

係啦
我見有d o係球證耳仔度拍手, o個d 就柢罰
如果在球證面前拍手仲有野講就話比牌,但行開左自己拍手真係好難講,不過碧咸好似爆粗喎,如果爆粗又真係一定要趕出場,但純粹拍手就好難講
作者: funnygay    時間: 2005-10-24 05:09 AM

佢串串貢喎,串親個球證
係球場球證最大,邊個唔俾面都有權以不君子行為為理由趕佢走
好明顯睇到碧咸佢輸唔起,燥底先做呢d拍手呀,爆粗呀既行為啦
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-10-24 05:10 AM

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-10-24 05:06 AM:

如果在球證面前拍手仲有野講就話比牌,但行開左自己拍手真係好難講,不過碧咸好似爆粗喎,如果爆粗又真係一定要趕出場,但純粹拍手就好難講
點解你知爆粗既???不過我見碧咸咁鬼誇張就知佢有d野........仲有個球証個樣變到好兇
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-10-24 05:10 AM

Originally posted by funnygay at 2005-10-24 05:09 AM:
佢串串貢喎,串親個球證
係球場球證最大,邊個唔俾面都有權以不君子行為為理由趕佢走
好明顯睇到碧咸佢輸唔起,燥底先做呢d拍手呀,爆粗呀既行為啦
輸唔起???皇馬年中輸n場喎,你話碧咸燥底唔順氣就啱啫
作者: funnygay    時間: 2005-10-24 05:11 AM

而加維臣個球真係茅魚喎,vicente過晒佢
佢仲要落腳,落腳唔緊要,仲要落得咁肉酸
抵俾紅牌啦
作者: ciger    時間: 2005-10-24 05:12 AM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-10-24 05:04:

冇計喎,鬼叫你拍手.....球証唔會理你係為左d咩拍手.........
咁就有問題,拍手本身唔係一個有問題嘅動作,球例又冇話唔比在場中拍手,朗尼被罰係因為佢好明顯係寸球證,但之前奧利華拉拍手更被直接罰紅牌,如1每次吹罰後球員拍手都要比黃牌(球例本身並冇規定),咁吹罰後投訴呢,用口同用手表達又有分別咩?
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-10-24 05:12 AM

Originally posted by funnygay at 2005-10-24 05:11 AM:
而加維臣個球真係茅魚喎,vicente過晒佢
佢仲要落腳,落腳唔緊要,仲要落得咁肉酸
抵俾紅牌啦
佢不嬲都係咁嫁啦........成場永遠出腳最恐怖果個就係加維臣.....
作者: funnygay    時間: 2005-10-24 05:13 AM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-10-24 05:10 AM:

輸唔起???皇馬年中輸n場喎,你話碧咸燥底唔順氣就啱啫
咁我收番輸唔起呢句囉
作者: ciger    時間: 2005-10-24 05:14 AM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-10-24 05:10:

點解你知爆粗既???不過我見碧咸咁鬼誇張就知佢有d野........仲有個球証個樣變到好兇
慢鏡睇口型係'f'音行頭,加埋過表情都應該係
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-10-24 05:14 AM

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-10-24 05:12 AM:

咁就有問題,拍手本身唔係一個有問題...
呢d明顯係球証之間冇明文規定既條例........之前樸茨茅夫個教練又係不滿球証拍手被請離場.......
拍手當然唔係一個問題,但球証點睇先係問題,如果球証覺得你拍手係寸佢既話佢可以比牌你
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-10-24 05:15 AM

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-10-24 05:14 AM:

慢鏡睇口型係'f'音行頭,加埋過表情都應該係
咦,又好似係喎....唔怪得覺得怪怪地啦
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-10-24 05:15 AM

Originally posted by funnygay at 2005-10-24 05:13 AM:


咁我收番輸唔起呢句囉
咁又唔洗咁嚴重.......
作者: funnygay    時間: 2005-10-24 05:16 AM

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-10-24 05:14 AM:

慢鏡睇口型係'f'音行頭,加埋過表情都應該係
yea,佢口型係講左fxxk嫁,呢d世界語言球證點會唔識
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-10-24 05:16 AM

Originally posted by funnygay at 2005-10-24 05:16 AM:


yea,佢口型係講左fxxk嫁,呢d世界語言球證點會唔識
世界語言
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-10-24 05:17 AM

下場週中作客對拉科,再下場作客對貝迪斯......
作者: ciger    時間: 2005-10-24 05:21 AM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-10-24 05:14:

呢d明顯係球証之間冇明文規定既條例...
其實自從朗尼事件之後,球證對拍手行為都執得好緊,但朗尼果下又點同一般拍手呀,而且好多球員被吹罰後都會投訴,甚至鬧球證,但都唔一定比牌,點解用手表達就一定要罰,而用口就有陣時可免,基本上用口寸你同用手寸你都係一樣啫,唔通真係精人出口笨人出手
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-10-24 05:23 AM

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-10-24 05:21 AM:

其實自從朗尼事件之後,球證對拍手行...
精人出口笨人出手<~梗係啦
朗尼果下當然抵罰,但奧利華拉果下同碧咸果下差唔多,都唔係完全對住球証黎拍既,但球証既諗法可能同球員本身有出入,始終球証係比較敏感,因為用口講係正常,但用手比較唔正常,所以最主要都係睇球証點諗既啫
作者: cream    時間: 2005-10-24 06:35 AM

say foul language to referee, ironically applauding referee
deserve to be sent off.

not 針對 at all.
Didn't he saw what happened to Rooney?
Maybe he should have an IQ test.

ohoh..or maybe he is so clever that he wanna get himself sent off
so he can take a rest for next week..
didn't he delibereately get a yellow card in an england match
to get suspended?

[ Last edited by cream on 2005-10-24 at 06:43 AM ]
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-10-24 07:34 AM

Originally posted by cream at 2005-10-24 06:35 AM:
not 針對 at all.
Didn't he saw what happened to Rooney?
Maybe he should have an IQ test.
當然唔係針對啦,係樓主自己覺得針對啫
碧咸當然知道朗尼上次拍手紅牌出場啦,我諗佢都係一時衝動拍手啫,以當時咁既情況黎睇.........
事後冷靜過後當然會覺得佢不智,但係果一刻有冇人會敢寫包單自己唔會咁做先???
作者: nkt1000    時間: 2005-10-24 07:56 AM

碧咸今次唔係咁成熟
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-10-24 07:59 AM

Originally posted by nkt1000 at 2005-10-24 07:56 AM:
碧咸今次唔係咁成熟
係呀,今場踢得好差呀班球員.......成班都唔願郁咁.......
唔知點解下半場初段至中段碧咸經常出現係左閘同中場中呢兩個位.....到尾段先返右路,真係唔知盧森保高搞咩
作者: szetoafk    時間: 2005-10-24 10:18 AM

依家唔可以 "潤" 球証嫁
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-10-24 10:21 AM

Originally posted by szetoafk at 2005-10-24 10:18 AM:
依家唔可以 "潤" 球証嫁
梗係啦,都唔明點解d人要咁做......
作者: bigfish    時間: 2005-10-24 02:30 PM

講燥底, 我話古迪仲燥啦, 個波出左界仲要推人出廣告版外
作者: 馬蘭奴    時間: 2005-10-24 09:54 PM

無恥球証,專登針對萬人迷!
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-10-24 11:23 PM

Originally posted by bigfish at 2005-10-24 02:30 PM:
講燥底, 我話古迪仲燥啦, 個波出左界仲要推人出廣告版外
古迪不嬲都係咁,但係碧咸都係燥嫁啦
作者: 清揚    時間: 2005-10-24 11:27 PM

Originally posted by szetoafk at 2005-10-24 10:18:
依家唔可以 "潤" 球証嫁
球証=球塲的差佬
你出街試下"潤"D差佬ㄚ
執法者比你"潤"完唔做D野出黎威信何在先?
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-10-24 11:33 PM

Originally posted by 清揚 at 2005-10-24 11:27 PM:

球証=球塲的差佬
你出街試下"潤"D差佬ㄚ
執法者比你"潤"完唔做D野出黎威信何在先?
對~對住差佬拍手佢有權拉你返差館問話
作者: 清揚    時間: 2005-10-24 11:33 PM

Originally posted by 馬蘭奴 at 2005-10-24 21:54:
無恥球証,專登針對萬人迷!
點解全個球場咁多球員系要針對一個人先?
球証偏幫某一隊場場波都有架喇,但皇馬咁多人,系要針對萬人迷架咩,又唔見針對施丹,魯耳?
就昨晚場波好似針對施丹,魯耳既效果好過針對萬人迷喎~
作者: nkt1000    時間: 2005-10-24 11:34 PM

潤球証結果只有一個食牌
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-10-24 11:35 PM

Originally posted by 清揚 at 2005-10-24 11:33 PM:

點解全個球場咁多球員系要針對一個...
係樓主同埋你回佢果個人覺得啫
作者: 清揚    時間: 2005-10-24 11:35 PM

Originally posted by nkt1000 at 2005-10-24 23:34:
潤球証結果只有一個食牌
錯~輕則食牌
     重則出場
作者: 清揚    時間: 2005-10-24 11:37 PM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-10-24 23:35:

係樓主同埋你回佢果個人覺得啫
SO我在修正他們的想法~
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-10-24 11:37 PM

Originally posted by 清揚 at 2005-10-24 11:37 PM:

SO我在修正他們的想法~
good
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-10-24 11:38 PM

Originally posted by 清揚 at 2005-10-24 11:35 PM:

錯~輕則食牌
     重則出場
這就是朗尼,奧利華拉,樸茨茅夫個教練,碧咸被趕離場的原因
作者: 清揚    時間: 2005-10-24 11:41 PM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-10-24 23:37:

good
此乃經驗之談,我以前打校隊正是成日挑戰球證而被罰~
以前我都覺球證玩我針對我,後來某D原因才知我咁做是超蠢的~
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-10-24 11:43 PM

哈哈哈,以前踢學界遇到個球証冇啦啦對住我笑.......
作者: 清揚    時間: 2005-10-24 11:45 PM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-10-24 23:43:
哈哈哈,以前踢學界遇到個球証冇啦啦對住我笑.......
嘩~GAY 佬ar~~~
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-10-24 11:46 PM

Originally posted by 清揚 at 2005-10-24 11:45 PM:

嘩~GAY 佬ar~~~
哈哈,唔會啩
作者: 清揚    時間: 2005-10-24 11:48 PM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-10-24 23:43:
哈哈哈,以前踢學界遇到個球証冇啦啦對住我笑.......
我以前踢學界試過後上全力一擊"散"中個球証,之後球証怒瞪我幾秒~~:cool:
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-10-24 11:48 PM

Originally posted by 清揚 at 2005-10-24 11:48 PM:

我以前踢學界試過後上全力一擊"散"中個球証,之後球証怒瞪我幾秒~~:cool:

作者: 清揚    時間: 2005-10-24 11:49 PM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-10-24 23:46:

哈哈,唔會啩
冇話gay佬唔比做球証架~
作者: 清揚    時間: 2005-10-24 11:52 PM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-10-24 23:48:

咪當我流架,我左右開弓,砰砰聲架,彈跳力強,頭鎚重(唔準),但冇速度腳法low~
作者: 清揚    時間: 2005-10-24 11:53 PM

sleep ,88~
作者: shaqkobe    時間: 2005-10-24 11:55 PM

Originally posted by 清揚 at 2005-10-24 23:48:

我以前踢學界試過後上全力一擊"散"中個球証,之後球証怒瞪我幾秒~~:cool:
哈哈。佢又唔可以俾牌,真係吹你唔漲喎。
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-10-25 12:05 AM

Originally posted by 清揚 at 2005-10-24 11:52 PM:

咪當我流架,我左右開弓,砰砰聲架,彈跳力強,頭鎚重(唔準),但冇速度腳法low~
我都係左右開弓,不過有腳法,速度一般,彈跳力唔強,頭鎚一般:cool:
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-10-25 12:06 AM

Originally posted by shaqkobe at 2005-10-24 11:55 PM:

哈哈。佢又唔可以俾牌,真係吹你唔漲喎。
係呀,唯有怒啤
作者: ciger    時間: 2005-10-25 12:55 AM

Originally posted by shaqkobe at 2005-10-24 23:55:

哈哈。佢又唔可以俾牌,真係吹你唔漲喎。
佢冇風度啫,做得球證就預左有機會比人省,人地有冇心咁大個人分唔到咩,如果更因為咁而針對果個球員就真係冇資格做球證,基本上連成年人都唔配做
作者: 艾奧羅斯    時間: 2005-10-25 01:37 AM

個日場波冇睇....第一個黃牌唔知佢點解拎啦..
慨然拎左就算啦,重係球證面前拍手掌...呢點咪傻仔囉!
前車可鑑...朗尼/奧尼華啦..啱啱先做完的咁野比人趕出場!
好學唔學!
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-10-25 02:00 AM

我覺得碧咸係特登,但係點解佢要咁做就唔知~
作者: bigfish    時間: 2005-10-25 02:12 AM

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-10-25 02:00 AM:
我覺得碧咸係特登,但係點解佢要咁做就唔知~
碧咸其實好冷靜架
上次佢特登拎黃牌停賽之後, 記者問佢:「做乜咁愚蠢犯規, 你下場對阿塞拜疆要停賽喎」
碧咸就答佢:「其實我係故意咁做架,我本身有傷,下場o既對手實力唔強,停賽之後又唔需要再顧忌拎黃牌。好多人以為足球員係好蠢,但我偏偏就有呢d 小聰明。」
所以你地如果以為佢魯莾,就大錯特錯 la
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-10-25 02:26 AM

果下明顯睇到佢唔冷靜啦,因為個犯規都唔關佢事既,係魯爾被球証吹罰之嘛.........
作者: ciger    時間: 2005-10-25 02:37 AM

Originally posted by bigfish at 2005-10-25 02:12:

碧咸其實好冷靜架
上次佢特登拎黃...
傍門左道好多人都識,不過踢波要有體育精神,做人就要有品,特登犯規係為比賽勝負都情有可原,但為洗底就並非君子所為,佢事後都比人鬧到仆街
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-10-25 03:19 AM

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-10-25 02:37 AM:

傍門左道好多人都識,不過踢波要有體育精神,做人就要有品,特登犯規係為比賽勝負都情有可原,但為洗底就並非君子所為,佢事後都比人鬧到仆街
警告

[ Last edited by abc123aa on 2005-10-25 at 05:30 AM ]
作者: bigfish    時間: 2005-10-25 05:41 AM

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-10-25 02:37 AM:

傍門左道好多人都識,不過踢波要有體育精神,做人就要有品,特登犯規係為比賽勝負都情有可原,但為洗底就並非君子所為,佢事後都比人鬧到仆街
作為職業球員, 梗會有球迷不滿架啦
人地鬧還人地o既事, 碧咸自己可以以清白之身踢埋餘下賽事就最幫到球隊, 否則一個唔覺意對波蘭, 威爾斯或者奧地利停賽累球隊失分就得不償失啦, 佢仲可以最佳狀態為俾錢請佢o既皇馬踢好波添
作者: 馬蘭奴    時間: 2005-10-25 08:17 PM

講到球品與體育精神。細哨都算好喇掛?
作者: ciger    時間: 2005-10-25 08:40 PM

Originally posted by 馬蘭奴 at 2005-10-25 20:17:
講到球品與體育精神。細哨都算好喇掛?
如果只計球場內,大哨仲好,佢經常比人踢但有幾何見佢發火
作者: abcde1918    時間: 2005-10-25 08:41 PM

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-10-25 08:40 PM:

如果只計球場內,大哨仲好,佢經常比人踢但有幾何見佢發火

作者: shaqkobe    時間: 2005-10-25 08:45 PM

Originally posted by 馬蘭奴 at 2005-10-25 20:17:
講到球品與體育精神。細哨都算好喇掛?
我覺得謝拉特最好,真係未見過佢發火。。
作者: bigfish    時間: 2005-10-25 08:50 PM

Originally posted by shaqkobe at 2005-10-25 08:45 PM:

我覺得謝拉特最好,真係未見過佢發火。。
佢d 攔截有時幾過火, 相對於碧咸, 佢真係冇咁聰明
作者: 清揚    時間: 2005-10-25 08:57 PM

Originally posted by shaqkobe at 2005-10-25 20:45:

我覺得謝拉特最好,真係未見過佢發火。。
施丹,尼維特最好脾4~
作者: abc123aa    時間: 2005-10-26 12:06 AM

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-10-25 08:40 PM:

如果只計球場內,大哨仲好,佢經常比人踢但有幾何見佢發火
同意,細哨有時都會發脾氣,施丹都係,你一旦激嬲施丹佢一定會發火,上年對維拉利爾就係一個例子啦,尼維特就剷人果下最恐怖
作者: iknow    時間: 2005-10-26 06:42 PM

碧咸得罪國際足協...




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://26fun.com/bbs/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0