Originally posted by giggschan999 at 2005-12-20 21:17:( V& G+ Y( E1 j
1呀....................~~~3 @) k) v/ v- m8 }$ C& C1 r3 z
靚好多/\/\
7 n" G: @, E. t$ O% x' i3 Y- t2 q* B, E( U
I can see it at 6:30 to 8:00 p.m. today作者: 機密 時間: 2005-12-20 10:30 PM
1啦梗係作者: 阿感 時間: 2005-12-20 11:10 PM
1.太普通 * D) l7 u, |4 k* Y- A2.中文字部份幾好,有娛樂雜誌o既感覺作者: Jk 時間: 2005-12-21 05:21 AM
1.:cool:作者: sherryliu 時間: 2005-12-21 07:05 AM
Number 1 is the best作者: 個人資 時間: 2005-12-21 10:09 AM
1.==作者: artta 時間: 2005-12-21 10:44 AM
For a designer point of view, the first one is too childish, I don;t mean that doesn't look nice, but seems doesn't match up with EF...2 ~% D! v8 h7 n8 F$ M& K% C
, o# u/ n" V2 p, [, Q. Z* s
Second one feel more make sense for EF, but personal saying, i think it is still not mature enough yet..." \5 Z7 M! v I( k" Z3 F
2 S1 v- a1 @3 g, j/ Q) Q9 G4 _" d% v; c7 { D
( Above are personal perspective)作者: kakeidevil 時間: 2005-12-23 03:34 PM
睇投票咪知囉~作者: YingTung 時間: 2005-12-23 05:07 PM
平心而論...兩個都麻麻地 9 W+ B0 l+ o. J J$ x$ t第一個的確太孩子氣..完全係中學生設計水平feel...' Z4 q4 ?) v% C P8 F9 |$ K* [3 w) f
第二個..設計技巧上高過第一個,做左o的Inner Grow~~但整體俾人感覺係怪..同埋唔靚.. ' B- u: C; [1 qsorry...