1呀....................~~~ , F5 S; j9 t L v% x" C! E靚好多/\/\作者: 151515 時間: 2005-12-20 09:23 PM
Originally posted by giggschan999 at 2005-12-20 21:17: 6 }* F, a7 j, R+ ]2 Z5 \( k1呀....................~~~ . F! Z7 G# j7 v靚好多/\/\
% N6 \- b q2 Y5 e" ^( M1 s0 w" G
! E% E7 r. G* L% J- h2 }I can see it at 6:30 to 8:00 p.m. today作者: 機密 時間: 2005-12-20 10:30 PM
1啦梗係作者: 阿感 時間: 2005-12-20 11:10 PM
1.太普通 ' ]" F3 h" F1 f- N/ @1 P# }2.中文字部份幾好,有娛樂雜誌o既感覺作者: Jk 時間: 2005-12-21 05:21 AM
1.:cool:作者: sherryliu 時間: 2005-12-21 07:05 AM
Number 1 is the best作者: 個人資 時間: 2005-12-21 10:09 AM
1.==作者: artta 時間: 2005-12-21 10:44 AM
For a designer point of view, the first one is too childish, I don;t mean that doesn't look nice, but seems doesn't match up with EF... / P2 f1 H! T5 e8 j( ^) ^ " Q) d( R% ~; Z9 xSecond one feel more make sense for EF, but personal saying, i think it is still not mature enough yet... $ c( A3 V5 B; n+ L; P6 i) [6 z1 s K
) m9 F9 `. I- U; s0 F1 |
( Above are personal perspective)作者: kakeidevil 時間: 2005-12-23 03:34 PM
睇投票咪知囉~作者: YingTung 時間: 2005-12-23 05:07 PM
平心而論...兩個都麻麻地 9 Z; Y# r, Y$ N& w第一個的確太孩子氣..完全係中學生設計水平feel.... `( j1 w. o' r8 Y0 X
第二個..設計技巧上高過第一個,做左o的Inner Grow~~但整體俾人感覺係怪..同埋唔靚..% @ i$ k. u+ n' v* `
sorry...