Originally posted by giggschan999 at 2005-12-20 21:17: G+ @" B# D7 w
1呀....................~~~3 }) j& l) O) T3 o* _2 U
靚好多/\/\
, j, {2 s( W7 M& b% ?# q- L( m
1 F6 z* c7 g+ l' J
I can see it at 6:30 to 8:00 p.m. today作者: 機密 時間: 2005-12-20 10:30 PM
1啦梗係作者: 阿感 時間: 2005-12-20 11:10 PM
1.太普通 ! l/ z% N8 S+ X* v- W; Q3 N1 ~% z* p( p2.中文字部份幾好,有娛樂雜誌o既感覺作者: Jk 時間: 2005-12-21 05:21 AM
1.:cool:作者: sherryliu 時間: 2005-12-21 07:05 AM
Number 1 is the best作者: 個人資 時間: 2005-12-21 10:09 AM
1.==作者: artta 時間: 2005-12-21 10:44 AM
For a designer point of view, the first one is too childish, I don;t mean that doesn't look nice, but seems doesn't match up with EF...6 v( Q# N' H& N o/ c t
( `4 X4 a3 r% P. J0 H# ESecond one feel more make sense for EF, but personal saying, i think it is still not mature enough yet...3 ^9 p( r' g0 S/ E* x# w M
. c' I8 c" k+ j/ p6 o J! c
, a' |+ z& U' A* p/ _7 O
( Above are personal perspective)作者: kakeidevil 時間: 2005-12-23 03:34 PM
睇投票咪知囉~作者: YingTung 時間: 2005-12-23 05:07 PM
平心而論...兩個都麻麻地 G. p+ a! _+ e第一個的確太孩子氣..完全係中學生設計水平feel.../ q1 N: R" d+ N E
第二個..設計技巧上高過第一個,做左o的Inner Grow~~但整體俾人感覺係怪..同埋唔靚.. 1 K1 T) F6 j$ s+ I! C& isorry...