Originally posted by giggschan999 at 2005-12-20 21:17:4 x5 W v8 |7 i% m6 A- v" `( V F' b
1呀....................~~~5 _0 `) m' I5 g5 u# J, p
靚好多/\/\
4 | x/ ^: p4 B8 V3 g4 J. t2 S. z5 g) C 0 G! @1 s; w' {/ I/ L+ BI can see it at 6:30 to 8:00 p.m. today作者: 機密 時間: 2005-12-20 10:30 PM
1啦梗係作者: 阿感 時間: 2005-12-20 11:10 PM
1.太普通 : r5 j. }3 U" K3 O7 t2.中文字部份幾好,有娛樂雜誌o既感覺作者: Jk 時間: 2005-12-21 05:21 AM
1.:cool:作者: sherryliu 時間: 2005-12-21 07:05 AM
Number 1 is the best作者: 個人資 時間: 2005-12-21 10:09 AM
1.==作者: artta 時間: 2005-12-21 10:44 AM
For a designer point of view, the first one is too childish, I don;t mean that doesn't look nice, but seems doesn't match up with EF...8 M) m. W9 F8 ^9 Q7 S" [9 N2 o$ E
1 a& e3 Z, T5 F8 ?+ x! i1 e& C* @
Second one feel more make sense for EF, but personal saying, i think it is still not mature enough yet... $ P' ]& b& }- [/ |* b; v9 f2 L) N2 q1 \3 F6 b
, f1 E8 W) P! D" H2 z* I- Y
( Above are personal perspective)作者: kakeidevil 時間: 2005-12-23 03:34 PM
睇投票咪知囉~作者: YingTung 時間: 2005-12-23 05:07 PM
平心而論...兩個都麻麻地+ j% n+ }5 [1 o7 z) G. J
第一個的確太孩子氣..完全係中學生設計水平feel...3 O+ n; c# T9 @( ?0 Z0 N3 v
第二個..設計技巧上高過第一個,做左o的Inner Grow~~但整體俾人感覺係怪..同埋唔靚.. 6 Q& w% Y, p6 H5 @9 Ssorry...