<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 您地會唔會考慮「同居」? [積極回應者+]
返回列表 回復 發帖
for a couple:
$ x: S1 h# k. u& S- ^: C9 ^
8 a8 Z7 v0 E/ Q* nfor my view, i agree concubinage b4 getting married
8 N0 h+ Y- z) y9 d- K0 Vbecause u can know much more about her/his daily life and comportment(also for them to know these about u), living together, nothing can be suppressed so easily7 W, t+ v, @) X
so that u can know much more about she/he is suitable for u or not
& T$ j6 |8 O1 J9 D4 Qavoiding divorse which will come out much more serious and trouble problems!!!+ t5 `% A, E2 r' ~: L, P9 {
- S. }7 M  F  v( k0 p/ a# K
after comparing with the moral and rational analysis, i think actuality is much more important!!!
$ x5 t5 p/ ~* m3 i' m  ^
, t! r9 E7 s7 A1 Mhowever for fds, i think no, i have tried to live with a guy at hall
  r+ g1 _5 t8 Q3 pliving together with fds really a trouble, because must need to stand for other bad point) @4 {: n7 S1 f- h" `
easily getting worse for yr relationship. C7 p0 b* \; e& G8 z# _
3 Z: L5 ?; Z; [/ x/ ^
[ Last edited by jason williams on 2005-5-27 at 11:14 PM ]
jason
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 您地會唔會考慮「同居」? [積極回應者+]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。