Kev

原帖由 c.ronaldooo 於 2009-6-11 09:09 PM 發表 唔好意思, 大家要插都係咁話, 迪維斯比我既感覺, 係好勤力, 技術都好, 但入球量真係差D, 個人認為佢既技術又未去25-30M呢個身價. 呢個亦係我問下既原因,佢地合拍既時候, 兩人既入球率唔高, 靠都係靠C朗爆發...  ...

i agree that tevez doesnt worth 30m. not even 25m. he might be suitable for spanish league yet not in the epl.
i would rather spend 15m for hunterlaar, or 2x for benzema..

Kev

原帖由 skyhookii 於 2009-6-11 06:44 PM 發表 I haven't watched a lot of Benzema, so I won't comment on that, but I believe Manchester United is ready for a huge bid on Franck Ribery. To be honest, their frontline of Rooney and Berbatov should be ...

in case you want to have a look on benzema, this is the video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XjvucMBlU_Q&feature=related

Kev

原帖由 jordi 於 2009-6-11 11:14 PM 發表 有無人諗過格拉沙用o麗 80M 還債呢 ?

no way, from the business point of view the loan shouldnt be repaid that early.
Man utd has the ability to generate profit they need for all the expenses including the huge amount of interest charged every month till 2049(as i rmb).
The reason to take such a huge debt is that they foresee the return to be earned is more than enough to cover the cost of the debt (interest expense).
That makes no point at all to repay half of the debt (80m) at this moment. They would rather spend this money on investment on assets (in this case buying players), to generate more future profit.
Also the huge gain from the selling of c.ron gave rise to a high level of tax to be paid at the end of this year. The huge interest charges could therefore offset a great proportion of  the profit that man utd earned.
If they simply repay 80m to settle half of their debt, the tax on the revenue gained from the sale of c ron would still be taxed and there would be less interest expense to offset the large amount of tax expense.