johnwu

Originally posted by happylion99 at 2005-6-15 04:49 AM:
0 d0 R* v% B& V. \% {$ q' G$ K1 n5 J$ q" L3 h+ A

7 Q2 Z2 h8 D2 G3 {除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打...

7 u9 O1 k3 t9 \8 q( B, E! V; m% z- Y% g. f
This is a crimial case, the goverment/tax payer pay for everything.: x. p! K# }- f- t3 J% X7 p6 `
Find out the fact before you speak lar....

johnwu

hello vivi, you beat me to it

johnwu

刑事罪:
& k  q; T/ f5 c1 @3 T1 e9 O告人個條友= your goverment  (not you)' @+ i; q. i/ s& j5 J. }6 E
0 T! ~2 N& J/ j- A
民事訴訟:
4 d9 U! d! M( v* ]* F- @告人個條友 =you

johnwu

Originally posted by vivienna at 2005-6-15 05:14 AM:
- R0 D' f: z. n, ~# Z' l仲有再補充既就係律政處靜係會o係有足夠證據既情況下先會落CHARGE﹐唔係話告就告。

9 T* Q. h: X' W3 s$ l: K* o
5 `: C( U: O; M  R/ {) C) i( NNot always... like this case..
( [: B; a, u7 O1 m* ]5 Gor SingTao newspaper case is 有足夠證據既情況下 but no charge

johnwu

Originally posted by timho1027 at 2005-6-15 05:19 AM:4 T8 p" T* p( [* D) t/ ]
我想聽大家自己的觀點  J- Y& Q9 v% I5 ^4 n7 X: V
如果你喜歡
$ M3 G4 K* ]0 g+ g. m) S0 v您可以加入討論
# V* C4 Z* q, f5 b+ s但如果某人認為那"人地講左啦~"
) _7 P; V- G' B+ ~+ b已經代表自己的觀點
6 h- B, w0 E+ I0 F# p, i) t# f您沒有需要繼續吠7 h4 M' n: S( H% Y5 a2 a( E
THE END

: S) `( z) ?' O; M* X# J
: U- {1 w" a9 i+ t0 @' S$ a# A
Be careful of your wording...' ^6 H& j: e; ^0 _% a( ]+ U