johnwu

Originally posted by happylion99 at 2005-6-15 04:49 AM:3 q) Z5 d, K7 `8 i

4 m3 B% `, C2 L1 ?0 [9 e
: h; U# E4 N' X7 P% u除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打...

) t7 Y9 H+ {1 o5 x  D# p& w4 h3 q
) A) ~8 S6 s- ~5 b5 B% ^/ M4 o
This is a crimial case, the goverment/tax payer pay for everything.
' c; x. e- {8 g: }$ pFind out the fact before you speak lar....

johnwu

hello vivi, you beat me to it

johnwu

刑事罪:  p8 W/ t$ z* m, ^$ I
告人個條友= your goverment  (not you)- q, _8 M. q" k$ i0 ~1 S; ~4 E8 y

9 R* t0 X: T9 W# H' m3 i# {8 t民事訴訟:' B* y) _: l" k
告人個條友 =you

johnwu

Originally posted by vivienna at 2005-6-15 05:14 AM:5 x  t! Z' H" s9 i* E6 g; C/ K
仲有再補充既就係律政處靜係會o係有足夠證據既情況下先會落CHARGE﹐唔係話告就告。

# r9 X- s$ L" ]5 q$ Q

1 o! ~$ H( d3 H& e1 x7 ~Not always... like this case.. & H# a% a: _$ z! w
or SingTao newspaper case is 有足夠證據既情況下 but no charge

johnwu

Originally posted by timho1027 at 2005-6-15 05:19 AM:
4 Z* d: h; |4 y6 @9 f7 X! b8 h我想聽大家自己的觀點) {% a4 [' o. g- M7 y1 v
如果你喜歡
$ X* \+ q) ]- a# }! B5 P0 z9 K您可以加入討論
; Y7 @, H3 ]- J6 U8 x# D但如果某人認為那"人地講左啦~": b5 ]2 `: i6 C8 D0 L& M
已經代表自己的觀點
' j/ r+ S4 }9 Z+ c$ J您沒有需要繼續吠1 M+ U+ O8 |6 [3 k- Q4 S; g, i# _
THE END

/ v/ S# m1 Z. o; Z8 V$ E- h1 J5 d4 q
Be careful of your wording..." m! v- |4 V$ k5 t+ @! |* P