johnwu

Originally posted by happylion99 at 2005-6-15 04:49 AM:
# ^* _9 f) {4 ~8 D3 u$ n1 B
! |  B$ _8 s7 d+ b7 K( c1 Y3 Q) [' S
; c! j. Z3 h* i4 M" P* n" W" P+ z, Y除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打...

. P) f# R( `6 n3 i' Q

. R; a8 D" F  YThis is a crimial case, the goverment/tax payer pay for everything.8 ?) u: {% m8 I& e# q
Find out the fact before you speak lar....

johnwu

hello vivi, you beat me to it

johnwu

刑事罪:0 c) B) \9 P. E" C/ @( Q& t' P
告人個條友= your goverment  (not you)
2 N2 Y+ o# B# S4 \4 C1 ?% d
  D  F  F2 B) \# N7 N民事訴訟:
( P7 ~+ _" {% |& a! m# T告人個條友 =you

johnwu

Originally posted by vivienna at 2005-6-15 05:14 AM:
2 h. M8 e# `: q8 W9 _# \! E' K$ \7 r仲有再補充既就係律政處靜係會o係有足夠證據既情況下先會落CHARGE﹐唔係話告就告。

6 k4 c9 [9 u7 ?) L

) r' e( S# f8 p$ |+ JNot always... like this case..
7 h* j, D. g- C: ror SingTao newspaper case is 有足夠證據既情況下 but no charge

johnwu

Originally posted by timho1027 at 2005-6-15 05:19 AM:! \9 z" ]1 a& ~+ n) V! Q
我想聽大家自己的觀點% P9 o/ ~" a* P7 k3 ?( C6 u; M
如果你喜歡% M* D8 r9 z" ~1 {
您可以加入討論1 l9 u9 [4 V! e6 k& B, A" k
但如果某人認為那"人地講左啦~"
7 {, ?  t, T, B: {6 {) U已經代表自己的觀點6 K, o2 y/ s, Z
您沒有需要繼續吠
0 f2 }) ?/ O; U& W- HTHE END

5 ^8 }  W9 z; K3 o2 A! K' {" c, k5 a- @0 Z6 z; w
Be careful of your wording.... N8 O4 i/ g. W. K4 I