cyhk

Originally posted by hkcitywong at 2005-3-25 07:38 PM:
. i, U2 |0 ^* s5 c2 F& G' J) C- r呢d咪民健聯羅
6 m/ z" ]& G& Z: r) \0 E
, |6 e2 A. K: S  h0 R+ {& l. Lhttp://www.chisin.net/mov01462.mpg

$ {9 |% S$ r$ ~4 a6 k! z7 a" y  B" B. `9 d8 W/ D9 S
3 N% A' j- m& N4 h5 S5 G' d& \
admin
$ E0 X9 @  R, ]& z管理員  $ ^5 |5 B  ]* t/ u) a
8 l# q0 T* [. E( p% |% ~
+10! f7 x+ y+ ]" A( _  j
6 C, H: J1 F2 U- D; ~

7 f. g5 |  d( P, i7 h2 |請看此貼:
3 J2 p/ b: L9 k& \" ^http://www.26fun.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=29862&fpage=1; c) T4 \; |  P) w/ E/ E5 u2 q; S
: y' n6 K! W" J' P- P3 x
quote:FKGU
* b; b, c/ w- G) H# W根本就唔係民建聯D人.......8 @% P- [* E$ H0 D- v0 O
大家將2號侯選人ge名去yahoo查就知係邊個~~~~! B7 B$ O1 ~+ s% H% f6 @$ `. w

7 @: a- M& ?) N  B7 Z- v) o  k* N" e8 m
唔鍾意民健聯係一件事, 但不等於可以故意發放虛假資料7 {' Q* {, J, G
管理員還獎賞有關網友, 處理是否恰當及公道呢?( \+ R5 f) \% [8 j1 Y7 }9 w
難怪近期經常有人批評現在的賞罸制度純粹係版主的喜惡,而非客觀標準

cyhk

Originally posted by hkcitywong at 2005-3-29 12:04 AM:
  E' K+ a1 L% |9 L- b% W
+ ]' Z% p5 F0 }" T: @: O% E7 J+ \; E  W1 l& V: W# X' c

& b0 l: S% e4 f' `% q- E
3 M( L+ n; ~5 j: {+ O% ci admit i wrongly insult in 民健聯 this time and i don't have any preference on this party. I just want to say that how comes you say i am deliberately do this? pls mind your statement.

6 T1 T0 p! |. O- u7 V) }; c

3 q  I  `6 ?+ w; B# ]' a+ u  t- O9 D
' C5 _2 j! U9 v2 q) v6 L, w+ R' k近期有網友包括我對版主的加/減分決定是有質疑, 並感覺可能有人搏加分會用d出位言論才有此說法, 有關說法對大大造成之不安, 我亦深感遺憾, 因大大既非故意, 所以希望不要介意

cyhk

http://hk.news.yahoo.com/050320/12/1ak8z.html
2 ]' Q- a( p* x$ r* c; N3 _" a+ M& u+ \$ L! a/ S9 p& z" U) p+ O  g3 r

! Y2 y* C- y5 w2 E* ^" @: M根本就唔係民建聯D人.......+ E9 n8 b; M! u$ n8 P
大家將2號侯選人ge名去yahoo查就知係邊個~~~~