cyhk

Originally posted by hkcitywong at 2005-3-25 07:38 PM:! T/ i4 \% R" G; g. h- ~
呢d咪民健聯羅
' E7 G# t# H: N- `
5 T% E* l& k* W$ _9 _8 N& phttp://www.chisin.net/mov01462.mpg

- l! a& ^  i$ [0 R; l+ `/ K2 y5 J: @) Q% G( h0 s

+ _1 ^9 n3 j: b! g4 Uadmin
, l% m6 F* p) L8 `2 U; \- E管理員  
, Z4 V5 I, c: T, E' S4 w; \/ k# Y( m' c9 ^
+10
: G7 Z, j: f- @- K* K5 V5 j 9 l: v" `# f8 v+ q7 \. K. r
/ P2 }$ g7 v. N3 }8 ^) q
請看此貼:
! ?0 N: r0 }1 M( y& U. `$ `" r# _+ A8 ?http://www.26fun.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=29862&fpage=1
9 ~! ~& H1 N7 V8 v0 J( q+ @$ W" b  w' n7 e: N$ R: [
quote:FKGU' c9 W) s# O3 [  W" w3 [
根本就唔係民建聯D人.......% F3 k/ }1 n* g
大家將2號侯選人ge名去yahoo查就知係邊個~~~~, [5 q8 h  }! H; E( J9 p6 P
( t, @  _6 C7 F$ h+ O
( h$ z$ a" g+ E6 T# o$ g
唔鍾意民健聯係一件事, 但不等於可以故意發放虛假資料
7 ^; p: n( F0 L: q4 f管理員還獎賞有關網友, 處理是否恰當及公道呢?2 A. D3 l7 H" l; ?5 r
難怪近期經常有人批評現在的賞罸制度純粹係版主的喜惡,而非客觀標準

cyhk

Originally posted by hkcitywong at 2005-3-29 12:04 AM:
8 X7 g) ]3 I. ~1 S0 }1 w1 i
% C, G$ `( A: {: {# p6 j) U; @$ ]% t

- E) i! H; O0 G) h9 x
+ |; u) h, l0 w/ g- r: I8 qi admit i wrongly insult in 民健聯 this time and i don't have any preference on this party. I just want to say that how comes you say i am deliberately do this? pls mind your statement.

" Y) a+ \3 T, z' |

, q4 v. m* {* F- n9 O$ |0 Q9 j/ z0 G! E5 s7 O. m$ H1 b# h  }9 B
近期有網友包括我對版主的加/減分決定是有質疑, 並感覺可能有人搏加分會用d出位言論才有此說法, 有關說法對大大造成之不安, 我亦深感遺憾, 因大大既非故意, 所以希望不要介意

cyhk

http://hk.news.yahoo.com/050320/12/1ak8z.html
; e0 u, t! D; b7 l, S. V0 F# ~9 ~7 A) w( x. g* Z

" q8 i, _) V3 i" w7 U根本就唔係民建聯D人.......
" ~8 H6 F! h! \  z& m; c大家將2號侯選人ge名去yahoo查就知係邊個~~~~