LMQ

即係叫d人掉哂d mp3機同md機佢! t; A7 {9 s1 L2 C- |5 C1 V7 I
因為dum親歌落去就係侵犯版權5 `& G9 l6 P: U# w" W* K
以後個個淨係聽disman搞掂~

LMQ

Originally posted by 167169 at 2005-5-31 10:28 AM:
8 k% J% F3 L  C3 S所以依家攪網上download mp3,如你比錢後download咪OK law/ X, b3 K: ~8 V

" ?6 E/ J% b5 w5 l, }/ h" m, u(其實一早就要攪,全世界都用mp3,但就冇合法渠道download)

7 M. U8 _% M, e# ?
但係係唔係大部份人都係咁做就係一個問題..

LMQ

Originally posted by yuripenny at 2005-5-31 06:44 PM:  Y* H" z  u* z1 ~* q- h* n
咁就好正啦...8 l% B* L, Z* ^4 G
咁直係話個個出街攞住...

& e* b9 y! J7 U所以我先唔明3 Y, W* B' [" q3 \- Y5 S
咁d公司仲出d mp3機黎做乜& C/ H/ p$ @0 T4 ^, o$ }
棧俾政府又係度話助長複製風氣..

LMQ

Originally posted by karenmoe at 2005-6-1 02:03 AM:6 ]% R- K! W9 Q2 Z0 ?
這是兩回事，8 {7 y- t% f! X( R# N
MP3製造商可以說MP3的用途是收錄自製音樂而不是有版權的音樂，7 i) T. H, J+ ?* K, U( T- D
正如菜刀和車子一樣，用家犯法是用家本身的責任，" ~& j# v9 V1 X5 ?" l8 n: Y) P
與商品和商家無關.0 N( F' P+ A5 e% M1 t6 e
雖然好明顯係推缷責任，不過又吹佢唔脹.......
5 W  i' X! c% m8 G" K+ q: X- u

. ]2 q, g' a, W* g! z6 fd公司全部都利字當頭
8 R7 |4 m/ f+ p佢真係睬你都傻啦..2 K- J! W6 s' C* ]9 J
唔推缷責任佢仲d咩野做..

LMQ

Originally posted by gunners at 2005-6-2 08:19 AM:
2 Q+ \5 L/ E. k: @8 L咁擁有mp3機都應屬違法.  :x

% K2 j0 v: R& y1 @+ w" R
我有兩部喎
; ~- a1 r. K# F% m2 \1 a. `8 S6 S4 p咁我咪double懲罰??