foto188

Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-7 11:17 PM:
7 c+ Q  K4 M1 S$ V0 ]0 m港台ｅ排發生咩事呀?
9 T4 c1 I1 M  I6 ]2 x之前嗱嗱林貪污,而家又到梁奕侖
' O5 h! N# \. y- E2 i# p難怪曾特首話要封港台啦!

3 t4 Y/ v2 g8 `" c8 n8 D$ q
' A1 M6 v6 K( }3 y  B特首有講過要封港台嗎？

foto188

Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-7 11:36 PM:1 X' w& [2 x  h2 I9 o' {3 C
1 y2 s. F1 V# m  x
2 Z" T4 r- H. I+ X" [: v
之前特首講過考慮港台續牌問題

6 ^- j! @3 [; f+ Q: a& F; u+ L
6 D0 f& A/ E4 }9 z& D3 a9 j8 }
=封港台?

foto188

Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-8 12:06 AM:* b, B$ c1 ^7 r7 t2 y  l/ \

8 a( `1 U& G/ b' Z$ _& f/ u如他唔續牌給港台,咪變相式封了港台囉(不過唔係直接封姐)

1 t3 y4 K( M& ^/ |) K

& X8 R, q. i0 \; s8 v# P5 j( ?"如果": m, E) W9 |; }4 \0 k
1 I$ K! ~( d0 e
they way you comment is no different from those irresponsible weekly magazines. you cannot make your assumption becomes the fact. that is not a fair statement.