<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN» 吹水版 » 【每日一篇好文區】 » Is no coal necessarily good?
返回列表 回復 發帖
It is true that coal is the major source to generate electricity and the importance of coal cannot be changed in the foreseeable future. However, I still think the electric company should take the first step of shifting the domination of coal to some other renewable energy sources as you stated. If I push your points further, it is not just simply environmental issue. It will affect your health and lead to cancer (as you could imagined, those dust particles from burning coal). I will think this is more like a long term investment and obviously a certain price must be paid to achieve such goal. For example, we now have hybrid car and developing hydrogen cell car so we do not need to use gasoline as the only option for energy source. Why do we do that? The manufacturing and reseraching  cost is obviously a lot higher than using the regular car. The reason is quite obvious, which I believe kind of parallel to  this topic. To conclude, I think we must move forward for a better environment. How quickly do we move and how do we balance the problems you stated? These questions we can filter-004ed later on after the electric company is willing to take an active role on protecting the environement.

[ 本帖最後由 smallsnow 於 2008-10-15 10:43 AM 編輯 ]
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN» 吹水版 » 【每日一篇好文區】 » Is no coal necessarily good?

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。