slwong3

動物是交給人去「看管」的﹗

.......isn't it radiculous....
Will your parents buy you a PS2 and not letting you to play once?  and they say playing PS2 is a sin....  what's the point of giving you the PS2 at the first place then....
totally radiculous....

I'm not saying human should eat all kinds of animals...but if the god really made the human and predicted that they might eat the animals....why did the god still put the human and the animals together?

the god should just separate the humans and animals so the "sin" (eating animals) would not even happen at all...

"第三﹕如你所說﹐人是天下萬物最後被造的﹐也就是說﹐造人之前知善惡樹就已經在地上了﹐這並不是試探人的陷阱啊﹗而神亦預先警告亞當及夏娃不要吃樹上的果子﹐怎麼能說亞當是不知情的呢﹖要知道將他人遺失的錢包據為己有也算是犯了偷竊罪啊﹐更不要說已事先知會了所有人不能拿那錢包吧﹗"

I'm not familiar with the Bible...but what's the purpose of 知善惡樹?
the above example is just like putting posion in the house and ask the children not to touch it
and saying it is the children's fault if they touch the posion and got killed....

slwong3

Originally posted by mememe at 2005-6-22 11:46 PM:
唔客觀0甘分析問題既錯誤恐怕傳道人會...

agree...
and the 傳道人 at here are not really 傳道人
they can't explain and answer our questions anyway

slwong3

Originally posted by smsboy at 2005-6-23 10:31 PM:
Justin又說"神的確是知道未來﹐...

人類選擇上的偏差由吃下善惡果開始，而情況根本是不可能逆轉，由此至終這都是人類的命運。
if this is really the case.....I'd rather choose not to believe in it...
at least this will make myself feel better

slwong3

二﹑若是因神並非全能而不能殺掉所有人﹐那麼挪亞時代就不可能有洪水滅世的事﹐這推論也不能成立。

although there are proofs that there was 洪水 before, it doesn't mean it was made by the god...